Listen As Lori Vallow Asks Chad Daybell To Talk To The Ghost Of Her Brother, Why Her 'Plan' Isn't Working Out

Buster Murdaugh, son of convicted murderer and fraudster Alex Murdaugh, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Netflix, Warner Bros. Discovery, and several other parties. The suit, lodged in the Court of Common Pleas in Hampton County, South Carolina, claims that the documentaries "Murdaugh Murders: A Southern Scandal," "Murdaugh Murders: A Deadly Dynasty," and "Low Country: The Murdaugh Dynasty" wrongfully implicated him in the 2015 death of 19-year-old Stephen Smith. The lawsuit, filed last Friday, also names Gannett, the publisher of the Hampton County Guardian, the newspaper’s editor, Michael Dewitt, Jr., and the production companies behind the documentaries. Murdaugh argues that the defendants defamed him by subtly or explicitly suggesting his involvement in Smith's death. Buster Murdaugh, who testified at his father’s trial regarding the shock of his mother, Margaret “Maggie” Murdaugh, and younger brother, Paul Murdaugh, being shot in June 2021, categorically denied any involvement in Stephen Smith’s death. "I have tried my best to ignore the vicious rumors about my involvement in Stephen Smith’s tragic death that continue to be published in the media as I grieve over the brutal murders of my mother and brother," Buster stated in 2023. Smith, an openly gay teenager and former classmate of Murdaugh, was found dead from a blow to the forehead, which an independent autopsy confirmed was likely from a hit-and-run. Despite these findings, Murdaugh claims the documentaries falsely portrayed him as Smith’s murderer. The lawsuit highlights a particular 10-minute segment from one series that alluded to Murdaugh as the killer. Murdaugh's complaint describes the documentaries as containing false statements that suggest he murdered Smith with a baseball bat in an anti-gay hate crime. It also disputes any romantic relationship between Murdaugh and Smith. "These statements are untrue in their entirety," the complaint reads. Eric Bland, the attorney for Stephen Smith’s family, criticized the lawsuit, predicting it would backfire. Bland noted that the powerful entities named in the suit would likely fight vigorously and might unearth further details damaging to Murdaugh. "Buster will have to answer questions in a multi-day deposition from every single defendant," Bland said, emphasizing the extensive questioning Murdaugh would face regarding his relationship with Smith and knowledge of his death. Bland also pointed out that Buster’s name appeared multiple times in the investigative file released by the South Carolina Highway Patrol in 2021. Buster Murdaugh seeks to clear his name of what he calls "baseless," "false," and "defamatory" accusations while offering condolences to Smith’s family. The outcome of this high-profile legal battle remains to be seen. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to a special episode of "The Trial of Karen Read," where today, we find ourselves inside the courtroom of the case against Karen Read. As we set the stage, let's briefly summarize the case that has gripped the public's attention.    Karen Read is facing charges related to the death of John O'Keefe, whose unexpected passing under mysterious circumstances led to intense police scrutiny. The case hinges on a combination of forensic evidence, alleged motives, and Karen's own statements to the police. Prosecutors argue that Karen had both the means and opportunity to commit the crime, citing contentious relationships and financial disputes as possible motives. The defense counters that the evidence is circumstantial and that Karen's connection to John's death is being misconstrued.    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to a special episode of "The Trial of Karen Read," where today, we find ourselves inside the courtroom of the case against Karen Read. As we set the stage, let's briefly summarize the case that has gripped the public's attention.    Karen Read is facing charges related to the death of John O'Keefe, whose unexpected passing under mysterious circumstances led to intense police scrutiny. The case hinges on a combination of forensic evidence, alleged motives, and Karen's own statements to the police. Prosecutors argue that Karen had both the means and opportunity to commit the crime, citing contentious relationships and financial disputes as possible motives. The defense counters that the evidence is circumstantial and that Karen's connection to John's death is being misconstrued.    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to a special episode of "The Trial of Karen Read," where today, we find ourselves inside the courtroom of the case against Karen Read. As we set the stage, let's briefly summarize the case that has gripped the public's attention.    Karen Read is facing charges related to the death of John O'Keefe, whose unexpected passing under mysterious circumstances led to intense police scrutiny. The case hinges on a combination of forensic evidence, alleged motives, and Karen's own statements to the police. Prosecutors argue that Karen had both the means and opportunity to commit the crime, citing contentious relationships and financial disputes as possible motives. The defense counters that the evidence is circumstantial and that Karen's connection to John's death is being misconstrued.    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, discusses the troubling case against Rex Heuermann, the alleged Long Island serial killer. The conversation delves into accusations made by attorney John Ray about Heuermann’s daughter, Victoria Heuermann, suggesting a possible connection to her father's dark tendencies. Dreeke introduces the concept of "lifestyle leakage," where a person's behaviors and interests can influence those around them, particularly their children. He draws parallels to the infamous BTK killer, noting the differences in how such behaviors might manifest within a family. The episode also examines the psychological and environmental factors at play, questioning whether Victoria’s macabre interests and artwork are mere coincidence or indicative of a deeper influence. The discussion highlights the complexity of the investigation, emphasizing the need to follow all leads while recognizing the potential impact of familial relationships on criminal behavior. - Discussion of the accusations against Rex Heuermann, the alleged Long Island serial killer. - Attorney John Ray's claims about Heuermann's daughter, Victoria Heuermann, and her potential connection to her father's dark tendencies. - Introduction of the concept of "lifestyle leakage," where a person's behaviors influence those around them. - Comparison to BTK killer, focusing on how familial relationships can affect behavior and interests. - Examination of Victoria Heuermann's macabre interests and artwork as potential evidence. - Analysis of the psychological and environmental factors at play in the Heuermann household. - Emphasis on the importance of following all investigative leads and understanding the familial influence on criminal behavior. ### Hashtags #RexHeuermann #VictoriaHeuermann #JohnRay #LongIslandSerialKiller #RobinDreeke #TonyBrueski #LifestyleLeakage Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," defense attorney Bob Motta provides his insights on the ongoing trial of Karen Read. Motta criticizes the prosecution's handling of the case, especially the performance of their expert witness, Trooper Paul, whose testimony he found highly unconvincing. Motta argues that the prosecution has failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove intent for second-degree murder, primarily relying on a weak tail light theory. He suggests that the manslaughter charge might survive, but doubts a conviction on the murder charge. Motta also highlights the lack of solid evidence from the medical examiner, who did not definitively state that John O'Keefe's injuries were caused by a vehicle. Overall, Motta believes the prosecution's case is flawed and unlikely to result in a conviction. - Defense attorney Bob Motta critiques the prosecution's case in Karen Read's trial. - Prosecution's expert witness, Trooper Paul, gave unconvincing testimony. - Prosecution has failed to prove intent for second-degree murder. - The case largely hinges on a weak tail light theory. - The manslaughter charge might survive, but a murder conviction is unlikely. - The medical examiner did not definitively state that O'Keefe's injuries were caused by     a vehicle. - Motta believes the prosecution's case is flawed and unlikely to result in a conviction. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #Trial #DefenseDiaries #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #Investigation Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott delves into the murder case of John O'Keefe, focusing on the recent court developments and Karen Read's involvement. The jury was exposed to various voicemails left by Read, depicting a night filled with anger and confusion. Scott emphasizes that while these voicemails portray an emotionally charged Read, they do not indicate a consciousness of guilt or awareness of O'Keefe's actual condition at the time. Scott asserts that the relationship between Read and O'Keefe was troubled but not uncommon for a couple on the brink of separation. The voicemails suggest Read believed O'Keefe was still alive, which contradicts the behavior of someone covering up a murder. Furthermore, Dr. Renee Stonebridge's testimony about O'Keefe's injuries reveals ambiguity in determining whether the injuries were caused by a fall or a vehicle strike. The episode concludes with a reflection on the potential outcomes of the case, suggesting that a not-guilty verdict might bring some semblance of peace to the community and serve as a reminder for law enforcement to maintain integrity. - Karen Read's voicemails revealed anger and confusion but did not imply consciousness of guilt. - Shavaun Scott described Read and O'Keefe's relationship as troubled but typical of separating couples. - The intensity and volume of Read's messages suggested emotional distress rather than an attempt to cover up a crime. - Dr. Renee Stonebridge testified that O'Keefe's injuries could be consistent with either a fall or a vehicle strike. - The jury faces difficulty with the ambiguous nature of the evidence presented. - A not-guilty verdict might bring some peace to the community and emphasize the importance of law enforcement integrity. - The case remains shrouded in uncertainty, highlighting the challenges of reaching a definitive conclusion. **Hashtags:** #HiddenKillersWithTonyBrueski #ShavaunScott #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #ReneeStonebridge #MurderCase #CourtTrial Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis discusses the challenges faced by both prosecution and defense in the Karen Read trial, particularly the frustrations surrounding conflicting expert testimonies. The conversation delves into the difficulties juries face when experts present opposing conclusions, making it hard to reach a cohesive judgment. Faddis highlights the importance of an expert's presentation and credibility, noting how poorly delivered testimonies, like that of Trooper Paul in the Reed trial, can create reasonable doubt. The discussion also touches on the relevance of alternative explanations, such as the suggestion of an animal attack on John O'Keefe, which Faddis argues is likely aimed at raising doubt rather than providing a definitive cause of death. Ultimately, the episode underscores the pivotal role of expert witnesses in shaping jury perceptions and the complex dynamics at play in high-profile legal battles. ### Main Points: - Eric Faddis discusses the frustrations of conflicting expert testimonies in the Karen Read trial. - The difficulties for juries to make a decision when experts provide opposing conclusions. - Importance of an expert's presentation and credibility. - Poorly delivered testimonies, like Trooper Paul’s, can create reasonable doubt. - Mention of alternative explanations, such as an animal attack, to raise doubt. - Defense's strategy often focuses on creating reasonable doubt rather than proving a specific cause. - High-profile cases amplify the need for well-prepared expert witnesses. ### Hashtags: #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #EricFaddis #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #ExpertWitness #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the ongoing trial of Karen Read, focusing on recent testimony and evidence presented by the prosecution. Coffindaffer highlights the significance of voicemails left by Karen after the incident, which reveal her emotional state and relationship dynamics with John O'Keefe. Despite making 53 calls, Coffindaffer argues that Karen's actions indicate she didn't believe O'Keefe was dead. The conversation also touches on Karen's admissions about possibly hitting O'Keefe, which have not been adequately presented to the jury. Coffindaffer criticizes the prosecution's handling of key evidence, including a lack of witness testimony and failure to present certain communications and video footage. The discussion underscores the complexities of the case, including the potential for Karen to be seen as a person who made a tragic mistake rather than a malicious criminal. ### Main Points - **Karen Read's Voicemails:** Reveal emotional state and relationship dynamics after the incident. - **Number of Calls:** 53 calls made by Karen, indicating she didn't think O'Keefe was dead. - **Karen's Admissions:** Text messages and interviews where Karen admits to possibly hitting O'Keefe. - **Prosecution's Handling:** Criticism of the prosecution for not presenting key evidence and witness testimonies. - **Key Evidence:** Failure to show jury Karen's admissions and relevant video footage. - **Complexity of the Case:** The distinction between a tragic mistake and malicious intent. - **Public Perception:** Discussion on Karen's character and the potential impact on the trial outcome. ### Hashtags #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #JenniferCoffindaffer #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #CourtCase Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a startling revelation, an explosive new book claims Bryan Kohberger, the suspect in the brutal murders of four Idaho college students, had a single target on the night of the crime. According to investigative journalist Howard Blum's forthcoming book, *When the Night Comes Falling: A Requiem for the Idaho Student Murders*, Kohberger intended to kill Madison Mogen specifically, dispelling notions of a random killing spree. Blum's book, set to be released on June 25, unveils significant details about the tragic night in November 2022 when Mogen, along with Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, lost their lives. “Officials believe Kohberger was after Mogen because he passed the rooms of two surviving roommates before starting the killing spree,” Blum explained in an interview with ABC News. “If he was just on a killing spree, it would have been natural, instinctive, to go to one of those doors. Instead, he goes up this narrow staircase and he turns directly into Maddie's room, and I think Maddie was his target.” Further compounding the tragedy, Blum reveals that Kohberger's family had harbored suspicions about him even before his arrest. Kohberger’s father, Michael, reportedly felt uneasy when he picked up his son from school after the murders. “[Michael] has been reading the headlines - he knows that four students were killed 12 miles from his son’s house. He knows what a troubled son he has,” Blum noted. The book also details an instance where one of Kohberger’s sisters approached their father to voice her suspicions. However, Michael chose to dismiss her concerns. “He can’t confront it,” Blum said about Michael's reaction at the time. On the night of the murders, the two surviving roommates, Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke, reportedly used their cellphones to communicate during and after the incident. Mortensen, 21, allegedly called out to her friends and roommates during the early morning hours of November 13 to quiet down. “Calm down, you’re being loud!” she reportedly yelled around 4 a.m., followed by, “I’m trying to sleep!” Mortensen later opened her door and saw Kohberger, whom she believed to be a partygoer, walking past her toward the back exit of the house. Law enforcement determined that the four students were killed between 4 and 4:25 a.m., but it took another eight hours before police were called to the off-campus residence. In December 2022, Kohberger was arrested in Pennsylvania at his parents' house and charged with the murders. Despite the mounting evidence, Kohberger has pled not guilty. His trial has yet to be scheduled, as prosecutors and defense attorneys continue to wrangle over the evidence and other data gathered throughout the investigation. A hearing on June 27 will discuss the schedule for the rest of the case, including dates for the trial and possible sentencing. In a significant development earlier this month, a judge allowed investigators working for Kohberger’s defense team to review sealed DNA records used to narrow the pool of potential suspects. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com