Tyrone Blackburn Requests Leave To Amend The Complaint Against Diddy (2/1/25)

Jamie Dimon, the head of the biggest bank in America, sat for a deposition on Friday over the allegations that his bank, JP Morgan Chase facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's behavior. While Jamie Dimon was sitting for the deposition however, JP Morgan was still on the attack as they continued their bombing run on the USVI for their complicity in Epstein's crimes.(commercial at 9:49)to contact me:[email protected]:JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon deposed in Jeffrey Epstein suit (cnbc.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiff Rodney Jones, represented by counsel, filed a Second Amended Complaint on March 25, 2024, in response to a Rule 11 letter dated March 4, 2024, within the 21-day safe harbor period. Due to a filing error in the heading, the Clerk issued a refiling notice on March 26, 2024. Plaintiff corrected and refiled the document on March 27, 2024.Despite this correction, the Clerk has since issued a notice stating that the Court must grant leave to amend. Plaintiff’s counsel contends that the amendment was timely and properly filed within the safe harbor window and seeks the Court’s clarification regarding the need for leave to amend in this instance.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The memorandum of law in reply to Plaintiffs’ opposition [ECF #148] supports Governor John de Jongh’s motion to dismiss, arguing that Plaintiffs fail to present legally sufficient claims against him. The reply reiterates that the allegations lack factual and legal merit, asserting that the claims do not meet the required legal standards to proceed. It emphasizes that the Plaintiffs' opposition does not adequately refute the defense’s arguments, particularly regarding sovereign immunity, statute of limitations, and failure to state a claim.Furthermore, the memorandum argues that Plaintiffs attempt to rely on conclusory statements rather than substantive evidence, making their claims insufficient for judicial consideration. It contends that even if the allegations were assumed to be true, they do not establish a valid legal basis for holding Governor de Jongh liable. The reply concludes by reinforcing that the motion to dismiss should be granted in its entirety, as the case against de Jongh lacks both jurisdictional and substantive grounds to move forward.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.159.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The memorandum of law in reply to Plaintiffs’ opposition [ECF #148] supports Governor John de Jongh’s motion to dismiss, arguing that Plaintiffs fail to present legally sufficient claims against him. The reply reiterates that the allegations lack factual and legal merit, asserting that the claims do not meet the required legal standards to proceed. It emphasizes that the Plaintiffs' opposition does not adequately refute the defense’s arguments, particularly regarding sovereign immunity, statute of limitations, and failure to state a claim.Furthermore, the memorandum argues that Plaintiffs attempt to rely on conclusory statements rather than substantive evidence, making their claims insufficient for judicial consideration. It contends that even if the allegations were assumed to be true, they do not establish a valid legal basis for holding Governor de Jongh liable. The reply concludes by reinforcing that the motion to dismiss should be granted in its entirety, as the case against de Jongh lacks both jurisdictional and substantive grounds to move forward.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.159.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiff Latroya Grayson, represented by her legal counsel, is respectfully requesting an extension of time to comply with the Court’s January 6, 2025 Order in the case Grayson v. Combs, et al. (Case No. 1:24-cv-09857-JAV). The request specifically seeks additional time to amend the Plaintiff's complaint, citing the need for an extension through and including February 21, 2025.This request is made with due regard for the Court’s timeline and procedural requirements, ensuring that Plaintiff has adequate opportunity to address the directives outlined in the Court’s order. The Plaintiff’s counsel seeks the Court's understanding and approval for the extension to ensure proper and thorough compliance.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.633985.7.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In October 2024, Ireland and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) signed an extradition treaty aimed at facilitating the transfer of individuals wanted for serious crimes, notably targeting members of the Kinahan cartel residing in Dubai. This agreement, formalized by Ireland's Justice Minister Helen McEntee and UAE's Minister Abdullah bin Sultan bin Awad al Nuaimi, represents a significant step in international cooperation against organized crime. The treaty's implementation is expected to expedite the extradition process, enabling Irish authorities to bring alleged criminals back to face justice.Recent developments indicate that authorities are intensifying efforts to dismantle the Kinahan cartel's operations. In October 2024, Ireland and the United Arab Emirates signed an extradition treaty aimed at facilitating the transfer of individuals wanted for serious crimes, notably targeting members of the Kinahan cartel residing in Dubai. Following this agreement, key cartel member Sean McGovern was arrested in Dubai, signaling increased enforcement actions under the new treaty. This move has heightened scrutiny on other senior figures, including Christy Kinahan Jr. and Daniel Kinahan, who have been residing in the UAE. The extradition treaty enhances the legal framework for Ireland to request their return to face charges related to their alleged involvement in organized crime. As international pressure mounts, the Kinahan cartel's operations and leadership structure are facing significant challenges, potentially leading to further arrests and extraditions.to contact me:[email protected]:Leaders of feared Kinahan drugs cartel face being deported from the UAE to Ireland to face murder, drug-smuggling and firearms charges | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In July 2024, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a co-founder of the Sinaloa Cartel, was apprehended by U.S. authorities in El Paso, Texas. Zambada contends that he was ambushed and forcibly taken to the United States against his will. According to his attorney, Frank Pérez, Joaquín Guzmán López, son of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, orchestrated the abduction. Zambada alleges that Guzmán López, accompanied by six armed men in military attire, ambushed him near Culiacán, Mexico. They allegedly restrained him, placed a bag over his head, and transported him to an airstrip, where he was flown to El Paso and handed over to U.S. authorities. Zambada maintains that he neither surrendered nor negotiated any terms with the U.S. government. Vicente Zambada Niebla, El Mayo's son, has a complex relationship with the U.S. government. Extradited to the United States in 2010, he pleaded guilty to drug trafficking charges in 2013. As part of his plea agreement, Zambada Niebla cooperated extensively with U.S. authorities, providing valuable intelligence on the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His cooperation was considered significant, leading to a reduced sentence of 15 years in prison, which was notably lenient given the severity of his charges. This collaboration has been instrumental in U.S. efforts to combat drug trafficking and dismantle cartel networks. to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Héctor Melesio Cuén Ojeda and Rubén Rocha Moya, both prominent political figures in Sinaloa, Mexico, have a longstanding rivalry rooted in their tenures as rectors of the Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa (UAS) and subsequent political endeavors. Cuén, who served as UAS rector from 2005 to 2009, later founded the Sinaloense Party (PAS) and became a significant political force in the state. Rocha, rector from 1993 to 1997, ascended to the governorship of Sinaloa in 2021. Their relationship, once collaborative, deteriorated over time, leading to public disputes and political confrontations. This animosity culminated in July 2024 when Cuén was murdered, an event that coincided with the arrest of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a leader of the Sinaloa Cartel. Initially, Cuén's death was reported as a robbery attempt; however, subsequent revelations, including claims by Zambada, suggested a more complex scenario involving political rivalries and cartel dynamics.The arrest of "El Mayo" Zambada has been mired in controversy, with Zambada alleging he was ambushed and kidnapped by Joaquín Guzmán López, son of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, and subsequently handed over to U.S. authorities. In a letter made public by his attorney, Zambada claimed that the ambush occurred during a meeting intended to mediate the dispute between Governor Rocha and Cuén. He alleged that during this orchestrated encounter, he was seized and transported to the United States against his will. These assertions have intensified scrutiny of the political feud between Rocha and Cuén, suggesting potential intersections between political conflicts and cartel activities in Sinaloa. The intertwining of these events underscores the complex and often opaque relationships between political figures and organized crime in the region.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In September 2024, Thalia Graves filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, accusing him and his former head of security, Joseph Sherman, of raping her in the summer of 2001. The lawsuit claims that Graves, then 25, was lured to a meeting at Combs' Bad Boy Records studio, where she was allegedly drugged, bound, and raped by both men. The lawsuit also alleges that the assault was recorded on video without her consent, and that the footage was later distributed as pornography.Graves has spoken publicly about the severe emotional trauma she has suffered since the alleged incident, including PTSD, flashbacks, and suicidal thoughts. The lawsuit, filed under the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as the removal of all copies of the video.This lawsuit is one of several against Combs, who was recently arrested on separate federal charges related to sex trafficking and racketeering. He has pleaded not guilty to those charges and remains jailed without bail.source:Sean "Diddy" Combs accused of rape, recording alleged attack in newly filed lawsuit - CBS Los Angeles (cbsnews.com)In the second segment...Joseph Sherman, Sean "Diddy" Combs' former head of security, has strongly denied the allegations made by Thalia Graves in her recent lawsuit. Graves accuses both Combs and Sherman of drugging, raping, and recording her without her consent in 2001 at Combs' Bad Boy Records studio. Sherman maintains that the claims are entirely fabricated, and his defense highlights that Graves allegedly contacted him multiple times following the incident, which he suggests undermines the credibility of her accusations.Sherman, aligning with Combs' legal stance, contends that the lawsuit is part of a broader attempt to bring false charges against them, given the current legal pressures Combs is facing. Both men are expected to contest Graves' claims vigorously in court, seeking to prove their innocence. The case against them, however, has garnered significant attention, particularly given Combs' other legal issues, including charges related to sex trafficking and racketeering​.source:Debauched life of Diddy bodyguard 'Big Joe' revealed in unearthed photos that show him partying with naked women and megastars | Daily Mail OnlineJoseph Sherman, formerly a bodyguard for Sean "Diddy" Combs, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Thalia Graves and her attorney, Gloria Allred. This legal action follows Graves' allegations that, in 2001, both Combs and Sherman drugged, bound, and raped her at a Bad Boy Entertainment recording studio, recording the assault and distributing it as pornography.In his lawsuit, Sherman asserts that he ceased working for Combs in 1999 and has never met Graves, labeling her claims as "utterly and entirely false." He contends that Graves contacted him in November 2023, seeking his cooperation as a witness against Combs in exchange for excluding him from legal proceedings. Sherman includes alleged messages from Graves in his lawsuit to support this claim.Sherman argues that the accusations have caused significant harm to his reputation and livelihood. His lawsuit includes counts of defamation, emotional distress, negligence, and abuse of process against Graves, Allred, and other associated parties.This countersuit emerges amid a series of legal challenges facing Combs, who was arrested in September 2024 on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering. Graves' lawsuit is among nearly 30 filed against Combs and his associates, with Sherman's countersuit being the first from a defendant in these cases.to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy's ex-bodyguard sues rape accuser for defamationBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The United States Virgin Islands has set themselves up as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and they've capitalized on that to the tune of a 105 million dollars. They have even taken it a step further and have sued JP Morgan for enabling Jeffrey Epstein. However, that move could come back to bite them as the USVI and their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein is anything but spotty.In this episode, we take a look at Jeffrey Epstein's special bank that was white gloved through the system in the USVI and who profited from it's operation.(commercial at 14:00)to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein's mystery bank got millions from his estate (chicagotribune.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.