Prince Andrew Has Once Again Found Himself Irradiated In Epstein Related Fallout

In 2009, Vicente "Mayito" Zambada Niebla, son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, was indicted by the U.S. government on charges of trafficking vast quantities of cocaine and heroin into the United States. As a high-ranking member of the Sinaloa Cartel, he was accused of coordinating drug shipments from Central and South America to Mexico, and subsequently into the U.S., utilizing various methods such as private aircraft, submarines, and speedboats. Following his arrest in Mexico City in March 2009, Zambada was extradited to the U.S. in February 2010 to face these charges.In April 2013, Zambada pleaded guilty to the charges and agreed to cooperate with U.S. authorities. His cooperation included providing testimony against key cartel figures, notably Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán. As part of his plea agreement, Zambada acknowledged his role in coordinating the smuggling of multi-ton quantities of narcotics and agreed to forfeit assets totaling $1.37 billion. In May 2019, he was sentenced to 15 years in prison, with the court considering his substantial assistance to prosecutors. Due to his cooperation, Zambada was released in 2021 after serving part of his sentence.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew is finding himself pulled right back into the Epstein conversation now that Judge Preska has announced her decision to unmask the rest of the John and Jane Does from the once sealed documents. In this episode, we take a dive into the Joe Exotic of the Windsor family's newest Epstein related problem and what it could mean moving forward.(commercial at 9:11)to contact me:[email protected]:Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew's friendship with Jeffrey Epstein has been a source of controversy and scrutiny. Here's a summary of their relationship:Initial Connection: Prince Andrew, Duke of York, first met Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, in the late 1990s through mutual social connections. Their initial introduction was reportedly facilitated by Ghislaine Maxwell, a close associate of Epstein.Social Ties: Over the years, Prince Andrew and Epstein developed a social relationship. They were often seen together at various social events and parties, both in the United States and the United Kingdom. Prince Andrew stayed at Epstein's properties, including his mansion in New York City and his private island in the Caribbean.Controversial Allegations: The friendship between Prince Andrew and Epstein came under intense scrutiny due to Epstein's arrest and subsequent conviction on charges related to sex trafficking of minors. Epstein was accused of sexually exploiting young women and girls, some of whom claimed to have been trafficked while still underage.Denials and Legal Actions: Prince Andrew faced allegations of sexual misconduct with one of Epstein's accusers, Virginia Giuffre (formerly Virginia Roberts), who claimed she was forced to have sexual encounters with Prince Andrew when she was a minor. Prince Andrew vehemently denied these allegations and stated that he had no knowledge of Epstein's illegal activities.Legal Fallout: In August 2019, Prince Andrew faced public backlash and stepped back from his royal duties in the wake of the controversy surrounding his association with Epstein. He expressed a willingness to cooperate with law enforcement in the United States but faced challenges in arranging an interview with investigators.Ongoing Investigation: The legal saga involving Prince Andrew and his ties to Epstein continued beyond the knowledge cutoff date in September 2021. The FBI sought to interview him, and discussions about potential settlements or legal resolutions were ongoing.In this episode we hear from another witness who has some very, very disturbing things to say about the Joe Exotic of the Windsor family and about his alleged behavior while cavorting with his BFF Jeffrey Epstein.(commercial at 9:20)to contact me:[email protected]:Epstein victim: My friend was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew (nypost.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Bill Richardson is a prominent American politician who served in various government positions and is known for his extensive experience in both national and international affairs. Born on November 15, 1947, in Pasadena, California, Richardson has had a long and successful career in public service.Richardson's political journey began in the 1970s when he worked as a staff member for several Democratic politicians.He gained recognition as a skilled strategist and negotiator, leading to his appointment as Deputy Chief of Staff in the White House during the Clinton administration. In this role, he played a crucial role in domestic and international policymaking.Richardson's first major government position was as the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations from 1997 to 1998. During his tenure, he focused on human rights issues and advocated for diplomatic solutions to global conflicts.Richardson made two unsuccessful bids for the Democratic nomination for the U.S. presidency in 2008 and 2012. Despite his energetic campaigns, he was unable to secure the nomination but remained an influential figure within the Democratic Party.In this episode we head back to 2019 and take a look at his attempts to distance himself from Epstein and his sudden onset of dementia whenever Epstein or Zorro ranch is brought up. (commercial at 11:21)to contact me:[email protected]:Richardson recalls a single visit to Epstein ranch - Albuquerque Journal (abqjournal.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Former Epstein guard, Tova Noel, who was charged with forging records in the wake of Jeffrey Epstein's death at the lock up has been sued by a new co-worker who alleges that Noel bullied her and physically abused her after several altercations at work. The woman who brought the complaint against Noel has been fired, while Noel is still currently with the compnay. Noel avoided charges by the federal government after she cut a sweetheart deal with the feds after being accused of shopping and sleeping as well as faking her records while Jeffrey Epstein allegedly killed himself 15 feet away. And in a final bit of irony, the cameras at the medical office where Noel allegedly assaulted her co worker? They weren't working either.(commercial at 7:16)to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein prison guard who was 'snoozing and online shopping' when millionaire pedophile committed suicide in his cell is sued for assault by female colleague at new NYC job | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 24-cv-12647, United States District Judge Judith E. Levy issued an opinion and order granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss the case. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient grounds for their claims, leading to the dismissal of the case in favor of the defendant. Additionally, the court denied the plaintiff’s motion for permission to file an interlocutory appeal, indicating that the appeal did not meet the criteria for such a request at this stage of the proceedings.The court also addressed the defendant's motion for sanctions, ultimately denying it. While the dismissal of the case resolved the central legal issues, the court determined that sanctions were not warranted under the circumstances. The rulings collectively ended the litigation in favor of the defendant without imposing additional penalties or restrictions on the plaintiff.to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - Cardello-Smith Opinion and Order Final.docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 24-cv-12647, United States District Judge Judith E. Levy issued an opinion and order granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss the case. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish sufficient grounds for their claims, leading to the dismissal of the case in favor of the defendant. Additionally, the court denied the plaintiff’s motion for permission to file an interlocutory appeal, indicating that the appeal did not meet the criteria for such a request at this stage of the proceedings.The court also addressed the defendant's motion for sanctions, ultimately denying it. While the dismissal of the case resolved the central legal issues, the court determined that sanctions were not warranted under the circumstances. The rulings collectively ended the litigation in favor of the defendant without imposing additional penalties or restrictions on the plaintiff.to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - Cardello-Smith Opinion and Order Final.docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On the evening of January 29, 2025, an American Airlines regional jet operating as Flight 5342 collided mid-air with a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Washington, D.C. The aircraft, en route from Kansas, was carrying 60 passengers and four crew members. The collision occurred around 9:00 PM local time, resulting in both aircraft crashing into the frigid waters of the Potomac River. Emergency response teams were promptly dispatched to the scene.Initial reports indicate that there are no survivors among the 64 individuals on board the passenger jet. The exact number of personnel aboard the Black Hawk helicopter has not been confirmed, but it is feared that all occupants perished in the accident. The collision led to the grounding of all flights at Reagan National Airport as authorities initiated search and recovery operations. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has launched an investigation to determine the cause of the collision, with a focus on air traffic control communications and potential mechanical failures.(commercial at 8:42)to contact me:[email protected]:What we know about the American Airlines plane and Army helicopter crash over D.C.'s Potomac River - CBS NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On January 17, 2025, members of the Sinaloa Cartel executed a heist on a BNSF cargo train traveling north of Phoenix, Arizona. The cartel members reportedly severed the train's air brakes, forcing it to stop near Perrin, Arizona. They then offloaded approximately $202,500 worth of Nike merchandise from the train into a waiting box truck. Authorities were alerted after BNSF employees discovered the severed air hose and noticed suspicious activity nearby. Subsequent investigations led to the arrest of eleven individuals connected to the theft, nine of whom were in the United States illegally and six identified as natives of Sinaloa.This incident is part of a broader trend of cargo train robberies attributed to Mexican cartels. Over the past two years, such thefts have been on the rise, with cartels targeting trains carrying valuable goods like electronics, tools, and footwear. Their methods often involve sabotaging train systems, such as cutting air hoses or tampering with signal boxes, to halt the trains and facilitate the theft. The stolen merchandise is typically sold through online platforms or to cooperative retailers. Law enforcement agencies are intensifying efforts to combat this growing threat to supply chain security.to contact me:[email protected]:Sinaloa Cartel's cargo train Nike shoe heist latest in criminal trend: experts | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Jane Doe et al. v. Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands et al., 23-cv-10301, Cecile de Jongh's legal counsel has requested an informal conference to discuss staying depositions. This request is made pursuant to Local Rule 37.2 and Rule 5 of the Court's Individual Practices. The proposed stay would delay depositions until 30 days after the Court rules on the pending motions to dismiss. The argument emphasizes the importance of resolving these motions first to prevent unnecessary or premature discovery efforts.Ms. de Jongh's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 122) raises issues that mirror a previous case, Bensky v. Indyke, in which the Court granted a motion to dismiss. In that case, the Court ruled that certain claims lacked sufficient legal basis, and the defense argues this precedent strongly supports their position in the current matter. Given the similarity of legal questions and the Court’s prior ruling, the request highlights the prudence of staying depositions to ensure judicial efficiency and avoid unnecessary burdens on the parties involved.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.