True Crime Rewind: A Local Legal Expert Weighs In On The Possibility Of A Firing Squad

We recently heard that a lawmaker in Idaho was attempting to have execution by firing squad reinstated due to the issues with aquiring the chemicals needed to carry out death by lethal injection.In this episode, we hear from a legal scholar from Gonzaga University who gives their opinion about the possiblity of the firing squad coming back to Idaho and what that would look like if it did.(commercial 7:07)to contact me:[email protected]:Local professor shares doubts over firing squads in Idaho | krem.com

Bryan Kohberger allegedly had at least one picture of one of the victims stored on his phone according to sources cultivated by People Magazine. In this episode, we hear from a former FBI agent who discusses the alleged pictures and what it could mean for the prosecution and for Bryan Kohberger moving forward.(commercial at 7:05)to contact me:[email protected]:Bryan Kohberger's Alleged Photos on Phone 'Highly Significant'—Ex-FBI Agent (newsweek.com)

In the case Doe v. Combs et al., No. 23-cv-10628 (JGLC), defendant Harve Pierre has filed an answer to the amended complaint, denying the allegations against him and asserting several affirmative defenses. Pierre contends that the claims are barred by statutes of limitations, lack of personal jurisdiction, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. He also argues that any actions taken were without malice or intent to harm, and that he did not engage in the alleged conduct. Pierre reserves the right to amend his defenses as the case progresses.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.611545.81.0.pdf

In December 2024, a woman identified as Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging that he sexually assaulted her during a charity basketball event at the City College of New York on December 28, 1991. According to the lawsuit, Doe and a friend attended the event, which was co-sponsored by Combs, then an emerging music producer. Upon arrival, they were escorted to a makeshift dressing room where Combs was present. Doe alleges that Combs offered her a drink, purportedly Coca-Cola, which caused her to feel disoriented after consumption. She claims that when she attempted to leave, Combs blocked her exit, proceeded to fondle her, and ultimately raped her. The assault allegedly ended when Combs was interrupted by a bodyguard informing him of a developing situation outside—a stampede that tragically resulted in nine fatalities.Combs' legal team has categorically denied the allegations, describing them as "facially ridiculous or demonstrably false." They assert that Combs has never engaged in sexual assault or sex trafficking and express confidence that the judicial process will exonerate him. This lawsuit adds to a series of legal challenges Combs has faced, including multiple allegations of sexual misconduct spanning several decades. As of December 2024, Combs is in federal custody, awaiting trial on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering, to which he has pleaded not guilty.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.633975.1.0_1.pdf

In the case of McKinney v. Combs (Case No. 1:24-cv-03931), the Combs defendants filed a reply memorandum supporting their motion to dismiss the amended complaint. They argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient legal basis and fail to meet the necessary standards for a viable claim. Specifically, the defendants contend that the complaint does not provide adequate factual details to substantiate the claims made against them, rendering the lawsuit legally insufficient.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims may be barred by statutes of limitations or other legal doctrines, further undermining the plaintiff's case. They highlight that the amended complaint includes vague and conclusory statements without specific evidence linking the defendants to the alleged misconduct. Based on these points, the defendants request that the court dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety(commercial at 9:21)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.38.0.pdf

In the case of McKinney v. Combs (Case No. 1:24-cv-03931), the Combs defendants filed a reply memorandum supporting their motion to dismiss the amended complaint. They argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient legal basis and fail to meet the necessary standards for a viable claim. Specifically, the defendants contend that the complaint does not provide adequate factual details to substantiate the claims made against them, rendering the lawsuit legally insufficient.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims may be barred by statutes of limitations or other legal doctrines, further undermining the plaintiff's case. They highlight that the amended complaint includes vague and conclusory statements without specific evidence linking the defendants to the alleged misconduct. Based on these points, the defendants request that the court dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety(commercial at 9:21)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.38.0.pdf

The United States' withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 resulted in the abandonment of billions of dollars' worth of military weapons, vehicles, and equipment, a consequence of poor planning and execution by U.S. leadership. Despite decades of investment, the rapid collapse of the Afghan government and security forces left advanced weaponry, including aircraft, firearms, and armored vehicles, in the hands of the Taliban. Critics argue this outcome was a glaring oversight, as the U.S. failed to adequately secure or destroy its assets prior to departure, effectively arming a militant group it spent two decades fighting. This mismanagement has drawn significant scrutiny, as it not only represents a massive financial loss to taxpayers but also poses long-term security risks, with some of the equipment potentially being used to bolster the Taliban’s control or even sold to adversarial states and terror organizations.Following the U.S. military's withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, a significant cache of advanced weaponry was left behind, including M4 carbine rifles and sophisticated night-vision devices. These arms have since been acquired by militant groups such as Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), enhancing their operational capabilities against the Pakistani military. The influx of these weapons has led to a notable increase in the lethality and frequency of attacks within Pakistan, posing substantial challenges to the nation's security forces.In addition to their use in Pakistan, these U.S.-origin weapons have surfaced in the Kashmir region. Security forces in Jammu and Kashmir have recovered American-made M4 rifles from militants during various encounters. The presence of such advanced weaponry in the hands of insurgents has raised serious concerns about regional security, indicating that these arms are being funneled through networks extending from Afghanistan into Kashmir. This development underscores the broader implications of unsecured military equipment left in conflict zones, as it exacerbates tensions and fuels ongoing conflicts in sensitive areas.to contact me:[email protected]

In the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Maxwell submitted a motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b) and (c), alleging that Giuffre failed to comply with court orders and disclosure requirements. Maxwell contended that Giuffre did not provide necessary information and documents pertinent to the case, thereby hindering Maxwell's ability to mount an effective defense. The motion sought remedies including the exclusion of certain evidence and the imposition of monetary sanctions against Giuffre for these purported violations.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1137.19.pdf (free.law)

In the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Maxwell submitted a motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b) and (c), alleging that Giuffre failed to comply with court orders and disclosure requirements. Maxwell contended that Giuffre did not provide necessary information and documents pertinent to the case, thereby hindering Maxwell's ability to mount an effective defense. The motion sought remedies including the exclusion of certain evidence and the imposition of monetary sanctions against Giuffre for these purported violations.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1137.19.pdf (free.law)

According to People magazine and sources that they have cultivated, Bryan Kohberger was following not only Madison and Kaylee on instagram, but he was also following Xana as well. Sources say none of xana, madison or kaylee followed him back.(commercial at 7:24)to contact me:[email protected]:Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger followed 3 female victims on Instagram before stabbings, report claims | Fox News