The LISK Files: Rex Heuermann And The 20/20 Special

On December 11th 2010, authorities searching for Shannan Gilbert stumbled upon a gruesome scene: The remains of a woman who was bound and wrapped in burlap. Her name was Melissa Barthelmy. Three days later they made another horrific discovery: Three more women who were bound and found in burlap. Those women were:Maureen Brainard-Barnes: Disappeared in 2007.Melissa Barthelemy: Disappeared in 2009.Amber Lynn Costello: Disappeared in 2010.Megan Waterman: Disappeared in 2010.In this episode, we take a look at the investigation throughout the years and how the victims and their families seem to be on the cusp of holding Rex Heuermann, the man the government says is responsible, to justice.to contact me:[email protected]:On This Day: Three Victims Found On Gilgo Beach (longislandpress.com)

Rex Heuermann has been cleared as a suspect in the Murders of the Atlantic City Four. This comes after his arrest sparked theories that Heuermann could also be responsible for what happened in AC. Rodney Harrison, the top cop in Suffolk county, has now come out however, and thrown cold water directly on those theories with his announcement.In this episode, we take a look at the new information and see what the police in AC are saying about the investigation into who killed the AC 4 will go from here.(commercial at 7:43)to contact me:[email protected]:Gilgo Beach suspect not connected to Atl. City case: cops (nypost.com)

A multiple serial killer theory suggests the possibility that more than one individual is responsible for a series of murders that share certain patterns or characteristics. In cases where multiple victims have been killed in a similar manner, by the same means, or within a specific time frame, investigators might entertain the idea that more than one person is involved. This theory can emerge when there are variations in the victims' profiles, crime scenes, or methods of killing that suggest the work of different individuals.Key points of a multiple serial killer theory:Distinct Patterns: Instead of attributing all the murders to a single perpetrator, this theory posits that there could be multiple killers operating independently or collaboratively.Diverse Victimology: Different victims with varying characteristics, such as age, gender, socio-economic background, and lifestyle, might be linked to the same series of murders.Varying Methods: The murders may have been committed using different techniques or weapons, indicating the involvement of more than one person with different preferences or modus operandi.Geographic Variation: The locations of the crimes might be dispersed across a wide area, making it unlikely for a single individual to cover such ground, leading to the speculation of multiple perpetrators.Copycat Killings: In some instances, a well-publicized series of murders might inspire other individuals to commit similar crimes, thereby creating confusion as to whether a single or multiple killers are responsible.Complex Investigations: If law enforcement agencies entertain the multiple serial killer theory, investigations become more complex as they need to simultaneously track and analyze the activities of potentially different individuals.In this episode we explore the possiblity that there might be more than one killer responsible for the remains that have been found in and around Gilgo beach.(commercial at 15:37)to contact me:[email protected]:Gilgo suspect Rex Heuermann's full body count may never be known & his Google searches point to two killers, expert says | The US Sun (the-sun.com)

Ever since the arrest of Rex Heuermann, we have been finding out more and more about the man that the authorities say is the Long Island serial killer. Heuermann ,an unassuming architect from Long Island was nabbed after an extensive operation that included the collection of pizza crust and hours of surveillance which eventually led to the bombshell arrest.In this episode, we take a look at the 20/20 special that aired on Friday September 8th, and some of the new revelations that were revealed in it.(commercial at 11:45)to contact me:[email protected]:'The Long Island Serial Killer': How cell phones and a pizza box led to a suspect in 3 cases - ABC News (go.com)

Many critics inside and outside Parliament argue that Starmer showed poor political judgment by appointing Mandelson as UK Ambassador to the US despite known associations with Jeffrey Epstein. Leaked emails revealed Mandelson had defended or supported Epstein after his 2008 conviction, and expressed views questioning that conviction. Although some of these connections had long been reported, additional content and its extent were only fully disclosed after Mandelson’s appointment. Opponents say Starmer should have immediately known that such red flags made the appointment untenable. The delay in reacting — first defending Mandelson, then firing him once the media published further revelations — has amplified the accusations of weak oversight and lack of risk assessment.Within the Labour Party, there’s growing frustration over what many see as Starmer’s misreading of both optics and substance. Backbenchers and senior MPs have called for full transparency about the vetting process: what he was told, when, and by whom. Opposing parties are demanding apologies to Epstein’s victims, and some suggest that if Starmer cannot adequately account for these failures, his position could become unsustainable — especially if the controversy damages Labour’s standing in upcoming local elections. The controversy feeds into a broader narrative among critics that Starmer has repeatedly made questionable appointments, and lacks decisiveness and political sharpness when warning signs emerge.to contact me:[email protected]:Keir Starmer breaks silence over Mandelson sacking: ‘Had I known then what I know now, I’d have never appointed him’ | The Independent

The House Oversight Committee has received hundreds of pages of new material from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following congressional subpoenas. These include Epstein’s will, the infamous 2008 non-prosecution agreement, entries from his longtime address book, and a heavily redacted “birthday book” that Ghislaine Maxwell compiled for Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003. The book contained messages, photos, and drawings from associates, sparking scrutiny because of one note signed “Donald” alongside a crude sketch, which Democrats say points to Donald Trump. Trump has flatly denied it, calling the note fake and politically motivated.The estate said it redacted names and identifying details of minors and private individuals to protect victims. It also emphasized it does not possess a so-called “client list” of people involved in Epstein’s sex-trafficking crimes, despite years of speculation. The handover reflects growing congressional pressure, led by Rep. James Comer and the House Oversight Committee, to uncover what Epstein’s records reveal about his finances, associates, and possible political connections.to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein estate turns over more documents to House committee

The Epstein scandal continues to resurface through new waves of headlines, each one pulling different corners of power back into the spotlight. Donald Trump has filed a $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, accusing it of maliciously tying him to Epstein through disputed documents and reporting. At the same time, Melania Trump secured a rare retraction and apology from The Daily Beast after it published claims—based on Michael Wolff’s commentary—that she was introduced to Donald through Epstein’s world. Both stories underscore how volatile and litigious the Epstein narrative remains, especially when it brushes against the Trump family.Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, Congressman James Comer has vowed to release any Department of Justice or Epstein estate documents tied to Prince Andrew, promising the American public full transparency. The files are said to include correspondence, travel logs, and testimonies that could reignite scrutiny of Andrew’s dealings with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace, which has spent years shielding Andrew from the worst fallout, is bracing for renewed scandal, while survivor advocates welcome the promise of sunlight after decades of secrecy. The potential publication of these files signals that the Epstein story remains unfinished and still capable of shaking global institutions.to contact me:[email protected]

Jeffrey Epstein’s operation cannot be understood through the lens of a traditional sex trafficking ring. Unlike figures such as Heidi Fleiss, Epstein wasn’t in it for monetary gain or running a transactional enterprise. His network operated on two levels: the first was driven by his personal compulsions, where he targeted vulnerable high school girls in Palm Beach and New York to satisfy his own deviance. The second level was more strategic—trafficked women, often brought in by Ghislaine Maxwell or Jean-Luc Brunel, were used as leverage, positioned before powerful men in Epstein’s properties to entangle them in compromise and silence.This dual structure transformed his crimes into something far more insidious than prostitution or trafficking-for-profit. Epstein weaponized abuse itself, turning victims not only into prey but into tools of influence. The men who participated weren’t mere clients—they became co-conspirators, drawn into a system where their indulgence bound them to Epstein’s web of secrecy and power. In this sense, Epstein’s empire was less about sex as commerce and more about sex as control, creating a machinery of corruption that blurred every line between victim, perpetrator, and accomplice.to contact me:[email protected]

Republicans in Congress are intensifying pressure to fully expose the government’s files on Jeffrey Epstein, with some now privately conceding that it is only a matter of time before legislation compels Attorney General Pam Bondi to release everything the DOJ holds. Lawmakers have already pushed through partial disclosures — including Epstein’s “birthday book,” financial records, and his controversial non-prosecution agreement — but many argue these piecemeal releases fall short of true transparency. Behind closed doors, Republicans increasingly acknowledge that a complete unsealing is inevitable, even if it risks implicating powerful names and institutions.At the same time, Donald Trump has been trying to contain the fallout, publicly resisting demands from MAGA activists and members of his own party to make all Epstein materials public. For weeks he has dismissed the issue as a distraction, but GOP lawmakers admit privately that Trump is losing that argument. The pressure from inside his own ranks reflects not only the enduring political toxicity of Epstein’s network, but also the calculation that continued stonewalling may damage the party more than full disclosure would.to contact me:[email protected]:GOP momentum grows to fore release of Jeffrey Epstein files

Sarah Ransome alleged that Jeffrey Epstein kept or claimed to keep sex tapes involving powerful men such as Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Richard Branson, and Donald Trump. In emails and exhibits later unsealed in court, she claimed that recordings existed of sexual acts on Epstein’s properties, and that these tapes were used for leverage or blackmail. She suggested she either had access to some of this material or believed it existed, and pointed out that people in Epstein’s orbit lived in fear that such videos could surface.to contact me:[email protected]