You see success stories about brands that have leveraged incrementality testing to transform their business. While these are inspiring, they conceal an inescapable reality of executing a high-impact incrementality testing program: Sometimes, test results will bum you out. In our latest episode of Open Haus Playbook, Haus Measurement Strategists Dean Gordon and Ike Armstrong sit down to talk about that difficult moment when you get a test result that “punches you in the chin.” First, they outline ways to frame that poor test result in a way that's productive — not just to your marketing org, but also to the finance team and the C-suite. Then they lay out their playbook for next steps after a less-than-stellar result. They’ll share some tactical testing ideas that can build upon this baseline result and turn it from a disappointment to the start of improved media performance.In this episode:Intros, and defining “bad" results (1:22)The different types of disappointing test results (4:37)Reframing a “bad” test result (7:42)How do you communicate disappointing test results to finance? (13:04)Planning next steps after a bad test result (15:30)Strategy #1: The 1-2-1 approach (21:05)Strategy #2: The Firehose Approach (30:50)
About Haus:
Haus is the causal marketing measurement platform built for performance-driven brands and enterprises. From GeoLift incrementality testing to Causal MMM, Haus helps marketing and finance leaders understand what's actually driving growth — so they can make smarter business decisions.
🔗 Learn more about Haus: https://www.haus.io
📅 Book a demo: https://www.haus.io/demo
💡Follow Haus on LinkedIn: / haus-analytics
Flere episoder fra "Open Haus"



Gå ikke glip af nogen episoder af “Open Haus” - abonnér på podcasten med gratisapp GetPodcast.








