Finding Manuland podcast

Podcast | India’s gods before India

0:00
58:52
Spol 15 sekunder tilbage
Spol 15 sekunder frem

The gods before the Veda

So, we go to the crossroads, in the middle of the second millennium before the common era. The great power of upper Mesopotamia was a kingdom called Mitanni. The M-N- is in Mitanni. Its people spoke Hurrian, a tongue that is, as the handbooks put it, “neither Indo-European nor Semitic.”

But the Mitanni kingdom was ruled, and this is the thing, by an Indo-Aryan aristocracy. Indo-Aryan here means, in effect, Indo-European. The Oxford Companion to World Mythology says it without fuss: the Mitanni Hurrians “were themselves ruled by an Indo-Aryan aristocracy with some allegiance to Indian deities.”

This is 1400 BCE. The Rigveda was properly systematised around 1200 BCE. It was not written down for centuries after that, and was carried in song and prayer. So from the Mitanni we have a treaty of around 1400 BCE. The earliest writing from India comes centuries later. The best guess we have is that the Indo-Europeans reached the Indian subcontinent around 1200 or 1300 BCE. So the Mitanni Hurrians left written artefacts, which I have seen with my own eyes in the museum in Istanbul, a hundred or two hundred years before the first Indo-Europeans reached India.

Parity of esteem

The Oxford Companion calls the gods named in that treaty Indian gods. Yet our evidence that these gods are Indian comes from a later period.

People sometimes tell me I am being anachronistic when I call Proto-Indo-European ancient Ukrainian. The Yamna, the community from which all living Indo-European languages come, lived six thousand years ago in Mykhailivka, in what is today Ukraine. Linguists call the language they spoke Proto-Indo-European. I say we can now carry the proper name back: ancient Ukrainian. We do that for ancient Greek and ancient Indian. People say, that is anachronistic, you cannot do that.

Well, here is the Oxford Companion to World Mythology doing it. It carries a category back onto deities we know the Mitanni worshipped, because they swore oaths on their names, centuries before India became India.

So it is legitimate to carry a name back this way. It may be anachronistic. I will not quibble with the Oxford Companion when it calls these Indian deities. But I will explain, as I just have, what it is doing. It is an anachronism. It calls these gods Indian centuries before India existed, before the first Indo-Europeans reached India and set up their culture there.

Some Indo-Europeans may have reached India earlier. But we know from the genetic evidence, in a 2019 paper in Science, that a group associated with the Painted Grey Ware culture brought steppe ancestry into the aristocracy there. They became the Brahmins, who systematised the Rigveda and finally wrote it down. We have written evidence of these gods’ names from the Mitanni long before any of that, long before India became India.

So parity of esteem demands this. If the Oxford Companion to World Mythology may call those gods Indian centuries before they became Indian, when we have this treaty from before then, then strictly we should call the Indian deities Mitanni deities. That would be ridiculous, because they truly caught fire in India. They gave their name to India: the N-D-, the Indra in India.

We will come back in future episodes to that N-D- sound, the reversal of the D-N- in the Don, the Donets, the Dnipro, the Dnister and the Danube. By the rule of first attestation in writing we could even call these Indian gods Hurrian gods. Of course we do not. Like Timothy Snyder, we have learnt that many lines of evidence besides writing help us understand our past, our identities, the origins of our language and culture, and why we say what we say today.

So we will not call them Hurrian. But parity of esteem demands this much. If you may do it for Indian deities, then at the very least we may use the name ancient Ukraine for Proto-Indo-European. That is all I ask there. I leave aside, modestly and humbly, the fact that all of these emanations, Indian, Irish, Celtic, Germanic, and the Mitanni gods themselves, come from the steppe, from this Yamna community. So a fortiori, we should be allowed to speak of ancient Ukraine.

That is a theme that runs through Finding Manuland. The objection usually comes from people whose mental models have not yet caught up with the latest archaeogenetics, linguistics and history. They have no mental model of Ukraine, because they have not listened to Finding Manuland.

I had no mental model of Ukraine either, until by accident I came across that Yamna burial mound in Dnipro, removed by property developers in May 2021. I tell the story in my first Finding Manuland episode. So I blame nobody for not knowing. I myself knew nothing of Ukraine and all of this until around my fiftieth year. I am doing my best to bring it into our awareness.

So when I use the term ancient Ukraine, I am not just trying to provoke you, or to provoke thought. I am giving the parity of esteem that great cultures owe to others who have achieved statehood.

Chariots off the steppe

The Mitanni war-nobility, the chariot-fighting caste named in the treaties as the maryannu, drove the same light spoked chariot the steppe had made. I have seen those treaties with my own eyes. The M-N- is in maryannu too, though that may be a coincidence.

I am calling this a crossroads, but it also radiates out like a wheel, from Van down to Mardin and along to Urfa. The wheel is a metaphor I use in Finding Manuland. It is also a central metaphor in all Indo-European languages. It became solid in the chariots and carts found on the steppe. I have seen those carts with my own eyes in the Dnipro museum, and in the photographs of the Sintashta community in today’s Kazakhstan, from whom the Iranian, the Indian and the Mitanni deities would have come.

So we have the one road I have spoken about, from the lower Volga through the Areni-1 cave in Armenia and across to Arslantepe. I have visited there too and we will go again. The museum in Malatya should reopen soon after the earthquake, and I really want to go back. That road becomes the Hittites.

The other road runs from Mykhailivka, in Kherson Oblast, on the Dnipro. I will use the World Labs model to help us picture it. It goes from there up to the Sintashta community. In the Sintashta graves, the setting out of horses’ heads and the remains of the funeral feast match the account in the Rigveda exactly.

The Sintashta date from about 2000 to 1900 BCE. So they took around two thousand years to go from ancient Ukraine to there. It then took them several centuries more to reach the Indian subcontinent, where the songs of the Rigveda describe exactly the rites we have physical evidence for at Sintashta. Centuries after that, the Rigveda was first written down. In the Sintashta graves we have actual chariots, so we know the chariot was there. Among the Hurrian-speaking Mitanni we have accounts of chariots. The maryannu, their chariot-fighting caste, drove the same light spoked chariots the steppe and the Sintashta had made, and we have the archaeological evidence for them.

Their kings, their rex, their raja, bore Indo-Aryan names. Their gods were the gods of the Rigveda. So they were Indo-European.

The treaty

We know this because of a treaty. Around the middle of the fourteenth century BCE the Hittite king Šuppiluliuma made a pact with Šattiwaza of Mitanni.

Remember that the Hittites came by the road from the Volga, through the Areni-1 cave in Armenia and Arslantepe. They brought the Indo-European languages that became Anatolian, all of which died out. Hittite was the language of Tarmana, whose contract to buy a slave, from around 1900 BCE, I saw in the Ankara museum. I also visited the site of his house at Kültepe, near the modern city of Kayseri.



Get full access to Power of Mana at www.powerofmana.net/subscribe

Flere episoder fra "Finding Manuland"