
Retrospective Coding Gone Wrong Documentation, HCCs & False Claims Act
A diagnosis can be accurate—and still fail to support a claim if the documentation underneath it doesn't meet applicable requirements.
In this episode, Alicia Scott examines retrospective HCC coding through the lens of a major settlement involving allegations about medical-record amendments and risk adjustment data.
The discussion focuses on documentation provenance, amendment requirements, provider involvement, add-only reviews, audit trails, HCC models, and workflow design.
You'll learn:
- The Identify–Attribute–Preserve test
- EHR amendment and audit-trail considerations
- Why provider sign-off isn't the whole analysis
- Risks of add-only retrospective reviews
- HCC model/date-of-service considerations
- Audit extrapolation concepts
- Five project-design questions
- What to do when you identify a concern
This episode is from the CCO Podcast #1751 webinar.
Watch the full video here: https://youtu.be/OQPXZ6miyw0
Flere episoder fra "CCO.us Podcast | Medical Coding, Billing, Auditing & Risk Adjustment"



Gå ikke glip af nogen episoder af “CCO.us Podcast | Medical Coding, Billing, Auditing & Risk Adjustment” - abonnér på podcasten med gratisapp GetPodcast.








