CCO.us Podcast | Medical Coding, Billing, Auditing & Risk Adjustment podcast

Retrospective Coding Gone Wrong Documentation, HCCs & False Claims Act

0:00
37:21
Spol 15 sekunder tilbage
Spol 15 sekunder frem

A diagnosis can be accurate—and still fail to support a claim if the documentation underneath it doesn't meet applicable requirements.

In this episode, Alicia Scott examines retrospective HCC coding through the lens of a major settlement involving allegations about medical-record amendments and risk adjustment data.

The discussion focuses on documentation provenance, amendment requirements, provider involvement, add-only reviews, audit trails, HCC models, and workflow design.

You'll learn:

  • The Identify–Attribute–Preserve test
  • EHR amendment and audit-trail considerations
  • Why provider sign-off isn't the whole analysis
  • Risks of add-only retrospective reviews
  • HCC model/date-of-service considerations
  • Audit extrapolation concepts
  • Five project-design questions
  • What to do when you identify a concern

This episode is from the CCO Podcast #1751 webinar.

Watch the full video here: https://youtu.be/OQPXZ6miyw0

Flere episoder fra "CCO.us Podcast | Medical Coding, Billing, Auditing & Risk Adjustment"