True Crime Rewind: Moscow Police And The Reddit Sleuths

An aviation whistleblower is an individual within the aviation industry who brings forth information regarding illegal, unethical, or unsafe practices or issues within their organization or the industry as a whole. These individuals may be current or former employees, contractors, or other stakeholders with insider knowledge of the operations, policies, or practices within airlines, aircraft manufacturers, regulatory agencies, or related entities.Aviation whistleblowers play a crucial role in promoting safety, transparency, and accountability within the aviation sector. They may expose various concerns such as safety violations, maintenance issues, regulatory non-compliance, security breaches, environmental hazards, financial improprieties, discrimination, or other misconduct.Whistleblowers often face significant risks and challenges when speaking out, including potential retaliation, loss of employment, legal consequences, damage to their reputation, and personal hardships. However, their disclosures can lead to positive changes, such as regulatory reforms, improved safety protocols, corrective actions, accountability for wrongdoing, and ultimately, enhanced safety for passengers, crew members, and the public.To protect whistleblowers and encourage reporting, some jurisdictions have enacted whistleblower protection laws that shield individuals from retaliation and provide avenues for reporting concerns confidentially or anonymously. Additionally, various organizations, advocacy groups, and legal resources may offer support and assistance to aviation whistleblowers.Overall, aviation whistleblowers serve as critical watchdogs, helping to identify and address issues that could jeopardize the safety, integrity, and trust within the aviation industry, ultimately contributing to the improvement and sustainability of air travel worldwide.John Barnett worked for Boeing for 32 years as a quality control supervisor and in 2017, he had enough of the nonsense that he says was going on at the company, so he became a whistleblower.   Not only that, but the regulators who investigated Boeing, backed up his findings.   This past week Mr. Barnett gave his testimony under oath and was scheduled to finish that testimony a couple of days later.   That would never happen as authorities found Mr. Barnett in his hotel parking lot, dead from what they say was a self inflicted gunshot wound.So, what really happened to Mr. Barnett and is there something more behind the curtain?   Let's dive in and try to find some clarity.   (commercial at 14:12)to contact me:[email protected]:Boeing whistleblower John Barnett is found dead in his truck outside a South Carolina hotel just days after testifying in lawsuit against the aviation giant | Daily Mail Online

From the archives: 12-13-22In the newest press release we heard from the investigators that conspiracy theories and speculation online is making their investigation harder and that the only official source of information is the information posted or provided by the investigators themselves.Meanwhile, the investigators are still imploring the public to provide them with any tips or information that could help them break the case.(commercial at 10:57)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/idaho-college-murders-crime-scene-reddit-b2244342.html

Katie Ferguson was on a trip across the country with her ex boyfriend and her two children. She has not been seen since. Her ex boyfriend has been arrested on unrelated charges, but the authorities investigating the situation say that all signs point back to Adam Aviles, the ex boyfriend in question.However, they have not charged him with anything besides being a felon in posession of ammunition. Aviles remains in jail on the charges.Jason Jolkowski, a 19-year-old from Omaha, Nebraska, disappeared on June 13, 2001, while walking to meet a coworker for a ride to work. Despite extensive investigations by the police and relentless advocacy by his family, no leads or evidence have surfaced to explain his disappearance. His mother, Kelly Jolkowski, founded Project Jason, a non-profit that supports families of missing persons, and pushed for legislative changes, resulting in the passage of “Jason's Law” in Nebraska. Numerous theories have been proposed, including abduction, medical emergency, or trafficking, but none have been substantiated. The family continues to fight for answers, utilizing new forensic technologies, private investigators, and public outreach efforts, keeping Jason's story alive and advocating for other missing persons. Jason's disappearance remains a haunting mystery, but his family's unbreakable determination to find him and bring awareness to others in similar situations endures.to contact me:[email protected]:Missing Wyoming mom case eerily similar to Gabby Petito story (foxnews.com)

In the case Anna Kane v. Sean Combs (Case No. 1:23-cv-10628-JGLC), the plaintiff, Anna Kane, alleges that Sean Combs, alongside other defendants, engaged in acts of sexual misconduct against her in 2003. Kane claims she was approached and coerced into traveling to New York, where she was allegedly drugged and assaulted by Combs and others at a recording studio owned by Bad Boy Entertainment. The complaint outlines claims of emotional trauma and seeks significant damages for the alleged acts, describing them as part of a broader pattern of misconduct within Combs' professional and personal sphere.In response, Combs has categorically denied the allegations in his formal answer to the amended complaint, maintaining that the claims are baseless and lack factual support. His legal team argues that the lawsuit is not only unfounded but also potentially time-barred under applicable statutes of limitations. The defense has filed motions to dismiss the case, asserting that the complaint fails to meet the required legal standards to proceed. Both parties continue to submit filings as the case advances, with Combs demanding a jury trial to resolve the matter.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.611545.82.0.pdf

In the case Anna Kane v. Sean Combs (Case No. 1:23-cv-10628-JGLC), the plaintiff, Anna Kane, alleges that Sean Combs, alongside other defendants, engaged in acts of sexual misconduct against her in 2003. Kane claims she was approached and coerced into traveling to New York, where she was allegedly drugged and assaulted by Combs and others at a recording studio owned by Bad Boy Entertainment. The complaint outlines claims of emotional trauma and seeks significant damages for the alleged acts, describing them as part of a broader pattern of misconduct within Combs' professional and personal sphere.In response, Combs has categorically denied the allegations in his formal answer to the amended complaint, maintaining that the claims are baseless and lack factual support. His legal team argues that the lawsuit is not only unfounded but also potentially time-barred under applicable statutes of limitations. The defense has filed motions to dismiss the case, asserting that the complaint fails to meet the required legal standards to proceed. Both parties continue to submit filings as the case advances, with Combs demanding a jury trial to resolve the matter.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.611545.82.0.pdf

The Los Angeles wildfires have caused unprecedented devastation, with the Palisades Fire becoming the most destructive in the city's history. As of January 12, 2025, the fires have claimed at least 16 lives, destroyed over 12,000 structures, and forced approximately 153,000 residents to evacuate. High winds, reaching up to 100 mph, have exacerbated the situation, grounding firefighting aircraft and spreading the flames unpredictably. Affluent neighborhoods, including Brentwood and Bel Air, home to numerous celebrities, are under threat, with evacuation orders in place. The economic impact is estimated between $135 and $150 billion.In response to the escalating crisis, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) has taken over the investigation into the origin of the Palisades Fire. This decision follows concerns about potential causes, including arson and power grid faults, as reported by local authorities. The ATF's involvement aims to provide a thorough and impartial examination to determine the fire's cause and prevent future occurrences. Meanwhile, firefighting efforts continue, with over 1,400 firefighters, including volunteers and teams from neighboring states, battling the blazes amid challenging conditions.to contact me:[email protected]:Los Angeles wildfires: Crews report progress but wind warnings remain through Wednesday | CNNHow did the L.A. fires start? Here’s what we know so far

Cecile De Jongh has filed a motion in the court of the USVI attempting to get the lawsuit that has been brought against her by multiple survivors as part of the USVI lawsuit tossed out.   Her defense?  Well, the same old story, and it all begins and ends with secretive deals and payouts structured specifically keep things quiet.    In this episode, we take a look at what Cecile De Jongh had to say in her newest filing and where the survivors might go from here when it comes to a response.   (commercial 9:04)to contact me:[email protected]:Cecile de Jongh Files Motion to Dismiss N.Y. Suit Alleging Collusion with Epstein | St. Thomas Source (stthomassource.com)

In the defamation lawsuit Giuffre v. Maxwell (Case No. 1:15-cv-07433), Virginia Giuffre, formerly known as Virginia Roberts, submitted a Second Amended Supplemental Response and Objections to Ghislaine Maxwell's First Set of Discovery Requests. In this document, Giuffre addresses Maxwell's interrogatories and requests for production of documents, while raising several objections. She contends that many of Maxwell's discovery requests are overly broad, unduly burdensome, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Giuffre also asserts that certain requests violate local civil rules and federal procedural rules, particularly regarding the permissible number of interrogatories and the scope of discovery.Additionally, Giuffre raises concerns about the invasion of her privacy and the potential harassment stemming from Maxwell's discovery demands. She emphasizes that some requests seek information protected by attorney-client privilege or other applicable privileges. Giuffre also notes that certain information sought by Maxwell is already in the defendant's possession or can be obtained through less burdensome means. Throughout her response, Giuffre maintains her objections while providing answers and producing documents where appropriate, aiming to balance compliance with discovery obligations against protecting her rights and interests as a victim of alleged sexual trafficking.to contact me: [email protected]  

In the defamation lawsuit Giuffre v. Maxwell (Case No. 1:15-cv-07433), Virginia Giuffre, formerly known as Virginia Roberts, submitted a Second Amended Supplemental Response and Objections to Ghislaine Maxwell's First Set of Discovery Requests. In this document, Giuffre addresses Maxwell's interrogatories and requests for production of documents, while raising several objections. She contends that many of Maxwell's discovery requests are overly broad, unduly burdensome, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Giuffre also asserts that certain requests violate local civil rules and federal procedural rules, particularly regarding the permissible number of interrogatories and the scope of discovery.Additionally, Giuffre raises concerns about the invasion of her privacy and the potential harassment stemming from Maxwell's discovery demands. She emphasizes that some requests seek information protected by attorney-client privilege or other applicable privileges. Giuffre also notes that certain information sought by Maxwell is already in the defendant's possession or can be obtained through less burdensome means. Throughout her response, Giuffre maintains her objections while providing answers and producing documents where appropriate, aiming to balance compliance with discovery obligations against protecting her rights and interests as a victim of alleged sexual trafficking.

The foray into the court documents continues in this episode, as we take a look at the Idaho Credit Union warrant for all four of the victims.(commercial at 9:53)to contact me:[email protected]:022823+Order+to+Seal+and+Redact+-+Idaho+Central+Credit+Union.pdf (amazonaws.com)