The Calls In The UK Grow Louder For Keir Starmer To Step Down From His Prime Minister Position (9/16/25)

In his opening statement, Patel described what he called the “original sin” of the Epstein investigation as being how Alex Acosta handled the case back in 2006. He criticized the limited search warrants used then and said they did not seize as much investigative material as they should have. Patel argued that significant portions of the case were restrained by the original non-prosecution agreement, which included provisions protecting some documents via court orders and limiting later prosecutorial or investigative access.Patel also addressed whether there is credible evidence that Epstein trafficked underage girls to other individuals (i.e. beyond himself). He said there is no credible information that such trafficking to third parties has been proven. He asserted that if he had seen such evidence, he would have pursued those charges. He emphasized that under his administration, the FBI is working to release all “credible information … legally able to do so,” while acknowledging legal limits.to contact me:[email protected]:Kash Patel claims no evidence Jeffrey Epstein trafficked girls to anyone but himself | Daily Mail Online

Courtney Wild and Haley Robson, two women who say they were abused by Jeffrey Epstein, filed a defamation lawsuit against journalist Julie K. Brown in 2022. They argue Brown’s book Perversion of Justice contained false claims that harmed their reputations. Wild says the book wrongly described her as having had intercourse with Epstein and being raped, allegations she denies. Robson, meanwhile, claims Brown portrayed her as complicit in Epstein’s operations after she refused to be interviewed for the book.According to the lawsuit, Brown’s reporting left both women branded in ways that distorted their roles in the Epstein saga, causing reputational damage and emotional distress. The plaintiffs allege that Brown pressured them and misrepresented facts for dramatic effect, leaving them to suffer fallout in their personal and professional lives. The case underscores the tensions between journalistic storytelling and survivor testimony in high-profile abuse investigations.Courtney Wild and Haley Robson, both survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, wrote powerful letters to top executives at JPMorgan—among them CEO Jamie Dimon—accusing the bank of enabling Epstein’s conduct by keeping him as a client for many years, despite knowing or having reason to know that there were serious abuse allegations. They ask JPMorgan to acknowledge that it benefited from the relationship (through transactions, accounts, etc.), to admit wrongdoing or mistakes, and to take steps to make amends—both to them and to other survivors. Wild and Robson frame their demand not just in moral terms but in legal and institutional accountability: that the bank should own up, not hide behind fine print or internal policies.They also stress that JPMorgan’s public statements and depositions (including Jamie Dimon’s) have downplayed or denied knowledge of Epstein’s abuse or minimized the bank’s role. In their letters, they challenge that narrative: they maintain that JPMorgan had ample warning of red flags and thus cannot claim complete ignorance. They call for transparency—release of internal documents, full cooperation, and concrete reforms—to ensure what happened with Epstein doesn’t happen again under the bank’s watch.to contact me:[email protected]

Prince Andrew came under scrutiny after documents revealed he told bankers to call Buckingham Palace when they questioned a £750,000 payment tied to him. The transaction raised compliance concerns, prompting officials to seek clarity on whether it was legitimate. Instead of offering a straightforward explanation, Andrew reportedly directed them to his Palace office, effectively leaning on his royal status to quell the inquiry.The payment’s origins and purpose stirred suspicions, especially given Andrew’s already controversial financial dealings and public scandals. The move highlighted how he allegedly relied on the prestige of the monarchy to shield himself from financial accountability, deepening concerns about his judgment and raising questions over whether he abused his royal position for personal protection.to contact me:[email protected]

Mark Epstein, brother of Jeffrey Epstein, has consistently expressed skepticism regarding the official account of his brother's death. He has questioned the swift conclusion by authorities that Jeffrey's death was a suicide, pointing to initial death certificates listing the cause as "pending" and highlighting irregularities in the investigation. Mark has referenced observations from forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden, who noted unusual fractures in Jeffrey's neck more consistent with homicidal strangulation than suicide. These concerns have led Mark to believe that the investigation into his brother's death was insufficient and that the possibility of foul play was prematurely dismissed. Additionally, Mark Epstein has criticized statements from officials, such as then-Attorney General William Barr, who labeled the death a suicide shortly after it occurred. He argues that despite acknowledged lapses in prison protocols and the presence of irregularities, attributing the death solely to bureaucratic failures is inadequate. Mark's persistent doubts have been fueled by the lack of comprehensive answers from the Department of Justice and other authorities, leaving him and the public with unresolved questions about the true circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death.to contact me:[email protected]

On December 11th 2010, authorities searching for Shannan Gilbert stumbled upon a gruesome scene: The remains of a woman who was bound and wrapped in burlap. Her name was Melissa Barthelmy. Three days later they made another horrific discovery: Three more women who were bound and found in burlap. Those women were:Maureen Brainard-Barnes: Disappeared in 2007.Melissa Barthelemy: Disappeared in 2009.Amber Lynn Costello: Disappeared in 2010.Megan Waterman: Disappeared in 2010.In this episode, we take a look at the investigation throughout the years and how the victims and their families seem to be on the cusp of holding Rex Heuermann, the man the government says is responsible, to justice.to contact me:[email protected]:On This Day: Three Victims Found On Gilgo Beach (longislandpress.com)

Rex Heuermann has been cleared as a suspect in the Murders of the Atlantic City Four. This comes after his arrest sparked theories that Heuermann could also be responsible for what happened in AC. Rodney Harrison, the top cop in Suffolk county, has now come out however, and thrown cold water directly on those theories with his announcement.In this episode, we take a look at the new information and see what the police in AC are saying about the investigation into who killed the AC 4 will go from here.(commercial at 7:43)to contact me:[email protected]:Gilgo Beach suspect not connected to Atl. City case: cops (nypost.com)

A multiple serial killer theory suggests the possibility that more than one individual is responsible for a series of murders that share certain patterns or characteristics. In cases where multiple victims have been killed in a similar manner, by the same means, or within a specific time frame, investigators might entertain the idea that more than one person is involved. This theory can emerge when there are variations in the victims' profiles, crime scenes, or methods of killing that suggest the work of different individuals.Key points of a multiple serial killer theory:Distinct Patterns: Instead of attributing all the murders to a single perpetrator, this theory posits that there could be multiple killers operating independently or collaboratively.Diverse Victimology: Different victims with varying characteristics, such as age, gender, socio-economic background, and lifestyle, might be linked to the same series of murders.Varying Methods: The murders may have been committed using different techniques or weapons, indicating the involvement of more than one person with different preferences or modus operandi.Geographic Variation: The locations of the crimes might be dispersed across a wide area, making it unlikely for a single individual to cover such ground, leading to the speculation of multiple perpetrators.Copycat Killings: In some instances, a well-publicized series of murders might inspire other individuals to commit similar crimes, thereby creating confusion as to whether a single or multiple killers are responsible.Complex Investigations: If law enforcement agencies entertain the multiple serial killer theory, investigations become more complex as they need to simultaneously track and analyze the activities of potentially different individuals.In this episode we explore the possiblity that there might be more than one killer responsible for the remains that have been found in and around Gilgo beach.(commercial at 15:37)to contact me:[email protected]:Gilgo suspect Rex Heuermann's full body count may never be known & his Google searches point to two killers, expert says | The US Sun (the-sun.com)

Ever since the arrest of Rex Heuermann, we have been finding out more and more about the man that the authorities say is the Long Island serial killer. Heuermann ,an unassuming architect from Long Island was nabbed after an extensive operation that included the collection of pizza crust and hours of surveillance which eventually led to the bombshell arrest.In this episode, we take a look at the 20/20 special that aired on Friday September 8th, and some of the new revelations that were revealed in it.(commercial at 11:45)to contact me:[email protected]:'The Long Island Serial Killer': How cell phones and a pizza box led to a suspect in 3 cases - ABC News (go.com)

Many critics inside and outside Parliament argue that Starmer showed poor political judgment by appointing Mandelson as UK Ambassador to the US despite known associations with Jeffrey Epstein. Leaked emails revealed Mandelson had defended or supported Epstein after his 2008 conviction, and expressed views questioning that conviction. Although some of these connections had long been reported, additional content and its extent were only fully disclosed after Mandelson’s appointment. Opponents say Starmer should have immediately known that such red flags made the appointment untenable. The delay in reacting — first defending Mandelson, then firing him once the media published further revelations — has amplified the accusations of weak oversight and lack of risk assessment.Within the Labour Party, there’s growing frustration over what many see as Starmer’s misreading of both optics and substance. Backbenchers and senior MPs have called for full transparency about the vetting process: what he was told, when, and by whom. Opposing parties are demanding apologies to Epstein’s victims, and some suggest that if Starmer cannot adequately account for these failures, his position could become unsustainable — especially if the controversy damages Labour’s standing in upcoming local elections. The controversy feeds into a broader narrative among critics that Starmer has repeatedly made questionable appointments, and lacks decisiveness and political sharpness when warning signs emerge.to contact me:[email protected]:Keir Starmer breaks silence over Mandelson sacking: ‘Had I known then what I know now, I’d have never appointed him’ | The Independent

The House Oversight Committee has received hundreds of pages of new material from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate following congressional subpoenas. These include Epstein’s will, the infamous 2008 non-prosecution agreement, entries from his longtime address book, and a heavily redacted “birthday book” that Ghislaine Maxwell compiled for Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003. The book contained messages, photos, and drawings from associates, sparking scrutiny because of one note signed “Donald” alongside a crude sketch, which Democrats say points to Donald Trump. Trump has flatly denied it, calling the note fake and politically motivated.The estate said it redacted names and identifying details of minors and private individuals to protect victims. It also emphasized it does not possess a so-called “client list” of people involved in Epstein’s sex-trafficking crimes, despite years of speculation. The handover reflects growing congressional pressure, led by Rep. James Comer and the House Oversight Committee, to uncover what Epstein’s records reveal about his finances, associates, and possible political connections.to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein estate turns over more documents to House committee