Here Comes Homan! Border Czar sent to Minnesota’s Civil‑War

1) Allegations about Rep. Ilhan Omar’s finances The Biden DOJ opened a 2024 investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar’s finances, campaign spending, and interactions with a foreign citizen, citing reporting from The New York Times. Donald Trump’s social posts asserting Omar went from “nothing” to “over $44M,” and shows Omar’s rebuttal on X calling it panic and conspiracy, saying years of probes found nothing. Cites Washington Free Beacon/Breitbart claims that Omar and her husband’s net worth grew to $6–$30M by end of 2024, a ~3,500% increase in one year, allegedly tied to her husband’s winery and venture capital firm. A winery purportedly not operating (closed tasting room/website, no phone), questioning how its value rose to ~$5M; the segment uses sarcasm to imply corruption. Rep. James Comer is planning to subpoena Omar’s husband regarding the couple’s wealth. 2) Minneapolis incident involving Alex Pretti Alex Pretti had a prior physical encounter with federal agents about a week before being shot and killed during a later confrontation; says CNN reported he suffered a broken rib from an earlier tackle during protests. States that Pretti was “known” to federal law enforcement and that he was armed during the fatal struggle, emphasizing that CBP’s use‑of‑force policy allows deadly force when there’s imminent danger. Argues mainstream media downplays the firearm detail and frames the narrative to elicit sympathy for Pretti rather than agents. 3) Defense of immigration enforcement & critique of “sanctuary” policies White House press‑room exchange noted a 2016 Washington Post headline and that President Barack Obama honored Tom Homan, countering critics who oppose Homan’s deployment to Minnesota. Includes a 2010 Obama quote asserting that indiscriminate legalization is unwise/unfair and that the U.S. must enforce border laws—used to argue Democrats once supported stronger enforcement. Features Tom Homan’s TV appearance listing arrests of non‑citizens with serious charges and contending that sanctuary policies endanger communities by forcing at‑large arrests rather than jail pickups. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Individual killed: Alex Pretti, age 37, was fatally shot by a Border Patrol/ICE agent during a physical confrontation at or near his home in Minneapolis. Prior confrontation with ICE: About one week before the fatal shooting, Preddy reportedly had a physical encounter with federal immigration agents while protesting an ICE action. During that earlier incident, agents allegedly tackled him, and Preddy later claimed he suffered a broken rib, saying he believed he might die at the time. Medical records reviewed by CNN reportedly showed he received treatment consistent with a broken rib. Context of earlier incident: Pretti intervened after seeing ICE agents chasing a family on foot, stopping his vehicle, shouting, and blowing a whistle in protest. Sources say he was tackled by multiple agents and restrained. Known to federal law enforcement: Pretti was already known to federal law enforcement prior to the fatal encounter. It remains unclear whether this knowledge came from the earlier protest or other encounters. Fatal encounter details: The final encounter occurred days later and ended with Pretti being shot and killed during a struggle. It is unclear whether the agents involved recognized him from prior incidents. Weapon involvement: CNN reportedly acknowledged that Pretti had a gun in his waistband during the fatal confrontation. Breitbart News also reported he was armed during the struggle, a fact the document claims media outlets under‑emphasized. Law enforcement justification: CBP use‑of‑force policy, stating deadly force is authorized when an agent reasonably believes there is an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. Emphasis is placed on the agent’s perception at the moment of the shooting, not retrospective analysis. Broader DHS context: DHS has warned of increased threats and harassment toward ICE officers, including physical interference during enforcement actions. DHS has acknowledged collecting information on individuals accused of obstructing enforcement but denies currently operating a formal database, despite public statements suggesting one may be created. Political and media criticism: The mainstream media is portraying Pretti primarily as a victim while downplaying: His prior confrontations with ICE, His alleged aggressiveness, The fact that he was armed. It frames his actions as part of broader anti‑ICE activism. Tom Homan and historical context: Tom Homan was praised and awarded under President Barack Obama. Obama‑era statements emphasizing enforcement, deportations, and border control to argue policy continuity across administrations. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Life in Cuba Before and After the Revolution At first, many Cubans—including Sonia’s family—believed Fidel Castro would bring hope and equality. Very quickly, Castro imposed strict control, destroyed economic freedom, and made the entire population equally poor. 2. The Reality of Communist Cuba Universal poverty: Everyone was paid the same and had almost nothing—food shortages, basic needs unmet. State surveillance: Every neighborhood had assigned informants who monitored households and reported any anti‑government sentiment. Restrictions on daily life: Cubans were barred from renting boats, traveling, or accessing certain services, even if they had citizenship elsewhere. 3. Persecution and Indoctrination Sonia witnessed the regime executing and imprisoning dissenters. Castro used propaganda to turn children against their families, encouraging them to report relatives critical of the government. Schools were forced to teach pro‑communist, pro‑Castro ideology. 4. Family Resistance Sonia’s mother (a teacher) was ordered to teach communist doctrine. Rather than comply, she pretended to have a mental breakdown so she could be removed from teaching, since quitting was illegal. Sonia herself resisted the regime and was repeatedly detained, imprisoned for days, and disappeared without her family knowing her whereabouts. 5. Life After Leaving Cuba Sonia left in 1962 but returned over the years with suitcases of medicine, food, clothing, and household essentials—items extremely scarce in Cuba. She often left behind even her own clothes because relatives in Cuba lacked basics like underwear and bedsheets. 6. The Illusion Presented to Foreign Visitors Tourists and foreign politicians were only shown “model” schools, hospitals, and neighborhoods. This created a false image of prosperity, hiding the suffering of everyday Cubans who lived in extreme poverty. 7. Misconceptions About Socialism and Communism The conversation highlights how younger Americans often romanticize socialism without understanding its authoritarian outcomes. It emphasizes that socialist regimes destroy incentive, suppress faith, and strip away basic freedoms. The leaders of these systems live in luxury while the people remain impoverished. 8. The Human Cost Sonia stresses that the worst suffering was the inability of families to secure food and basic necessities for their children. Many Cubans survive by drinking sugar water to feel full. Average income was described as around $30 per month, making survival nearly impossible. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Federal Investigation in Minnesota FBI Director Kash Patel states there is an ongoing federal investigation into: Attacks on ICE and federal law enforcement. Alleged “left‑wing extremist groups” coordinating violent actions in Minneapolis. Funding sources behind these groups. 2. Arrests and Criminal Activity Multiple recent arrests referenced: Individuals accused of attacking federal agents. People involved in destruction of government vehicles. A suspect who allegedly threatened federal agents’ families using leaked personal information. FBI claims continued progress and more arrests forthcoming. 3. Minnesota Shooting Incident DHS and HSI are leading the investigation. FBI is processing physical evidence such as the firearm and ballistics. Officials stress that bringing a loaded firearm to a protest is “not peaceful.” 4. Criticism of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz Strong criticism of statements by Gov. Walz urging residents to film ICE activity. Federal officials claim this rhetoric incites violence against law enforcement. 5. Trump Administration’s Response President Trump is: Sending Tom Homan to Minnesota to coordinate efforts. Demanding Minnesota turn over all criminal undocumented immigrants to federal authorities. Linking Minnesota unrest to alleged large‑scale welfare fraud investigations. Suggesting investigations into Congresswoman Ilhan Omar. 6. White House Briefing Outlining a federal plan for restoring law and order, including: Mandatory cooperation by Minnesota officials with ICE. Ending sanctuary policies. Deporting all criminal non‑citizens. 7. Political Tensions Over DHS Funding Senate Democrats reportedly threatening to: Vote down DHS appropriations. Possibly trigger a partial government shutdown. Demand restrictions on ICE funding. Senators like Warren, Schumer, and Murphy are cited as opposing ICE funding. 8. Projected Government Shutdown Commentary suggests: A shutdown is likely. It would center on DHS and ICE funding. Some departments are already funded, so the shutdown would be limited in scope. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Phone call between President Trump and Governor Walz President Donald Trump stated on Truth Social that Governor Tim Walz called him to discuss cooperation related to Minnesota. Trump said the call was “very good” and that they were “on a similar wavelength.” Trump said he would send Tom Homan (former ICE acting director) to work with Minnesota officials. 2. Immigration‑related demands from Trump Trump outlined several expectations for Minnesota leaders: Turn over all criminal undocumented immigrants currently held in state/local custody to federal immigration authorities. Cooperate with ICE by transferring all undocumented individuals arrested locally. Assist federal officers in locating and detaining undocumented immigrants with criminal histories or outstanding warrants. 3. Broader claims made by Trump Trump referenced: A $20+ billion welfare fraud investigation in Minnesota. Ongoing federal scrutiny of Rep. Ilhan Omar concerning her reported wealth. He linked these issues to unrest and protests occurring in Minnesota. 4. White House press secretary comments The press secretary emphasized the administration’s stance on: Ending “anarchy and chaos.” Prioritizing law and order. Urging Minnesota’s leaders to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. The administration also reiterated support for ending sanctuary policies nationwide. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Supreme Court Case Overview The Attorney General of West Virginia led a case to uphold a state law prohibiting biological males from competing in female sports. The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court after the ACLU sued West Virginia immediately following the law’s passage. The outcome is expected to have nationwide implications for similar laws in other states. 2. Core Arguments for the Law Safety & Fairness: Biological differences create unfair advantages and increase injury risks for female athletes. Privacy Concerns: Issues with shared locker rooms and potential sexual assaults were cited. Competitive Integrity: Advocates argue that sports teach discipline and resilience, which is undermined if competition is inherently unequal. 3. Title IX & Equal Protection Title IX was designed to protect women’s access to sports and education; the law uses “sex” as a basis for delineation. West Virginia argues its law supports Title IX by preserving opportunities for women. Equal Protection Clause: The state claims its approach is rational and fair, while the ACLU argues it discriminates against transgender individuals. 4. Broader Social & Ethical Concerns The document criticizes early gender transition for children, framing it as harmful and profit-driven. Raises moral questions about parental decisions, medical practices, and societal impact. Suggests the issue could be viewed historically as one of the most dangerous trends affecting children. 5. Cultural Commentary Highlights admiration for women’s sports for their style and integrity. Mentions prominent athletes like Riley Gaines and Martina Navratilova advocating for protecting women’s sports. Notes growing public support for restricting transgender participation in women’s sports. 6. Expected Impact A favorable ruling for West Virginia could validate similar laws in 27 other states. Could lead to lawsuits in states allowing transgender athletes in women’s sports. Decision anticipated by June or July; likely to set a major precedent. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Iran, U.S. Sanctions, and Regime Pressure Iran’s leadership blames the United States for internal economic hardship, citing sanctions as “inhumane” and portraying opposition to the Supreme Leader as an act of war. The commentary frames this messaging as state propaganda meant to deflect blame from Iran’s regime and suppress domestic protests. The U.S., under President Trump, is described as escalating a “maximum pressure” sanctions campaign, with a specific focus on: Targeting Iran’s oil revenue and shadow shipping fleet Sanctioning networks allegedly smuggling Iranian oil disguised as Iraqi exports Tracking and freezing Iranian leadership’s assets, including money moved abroad The piece claims sanctions are successfully weakening Iran’s economy, causing regime insiders to move money out of the country and increasing internal instability. Overall framing: U.S. economic pressure is portrayed as effective, justified, and supportive of the Iranian people, while Iran’s leadership is depicted as collapsing and desperate. 2. Minnesota, ICE, and Domestic Political Conflict The second half shifts to U.S. domestic politics, focusing on Minnesota state and Minneapolis city leadership. Claims that the Department of Justice is investigating the Minnesota governor and Minneapolis mayor for: Obstruction of federal law enforcement Misuse of taxpayer funds, with allegations that money ultimately reached foreign terrorist organizations The commentary contrasts current DOJ investigations with past cases involving Democrats, arguing this is legitimate law enforcement, not political intimidation. Strong criticism of Democratic officials for: Condemning or obstructing ICE operations Using inflammatory language toward ICE agents Supporting or encouraging the idea of abolishing or defunding ICE Violent clashes involving ICE agents in Minneapolis are cited to argue that: Local leaders are enabling lawlessness ICE arrests are targeting serious criminals, including violent offenders Overall framing: Federal enforcement is restoring “law and order,” while Democratic officials are portrayed as reckless, radical, and hostile to public safety. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

2. Minneapolis Situation & ICE Confrontations A. Escalating Conflict Recent fatal confrontations between civilians and ICE agents in Minneapolis. Two individuals (not known to be violent criminals) have been killed during encounters. Host urges toning down rhetoric from both political sides to prevent further escalation. B. Comparison Between Texas and Minnesota Texas sees far more ICE arrests but fewer violent confrontations. Reasons suggested: Texas law enforcement cooperates with ICE. Minnesota politicians (governor/mayor) allegedly encourage public confrontation with ICE. C. Violent Protest Structure Minneapolis protests are organized, funded, and oper­ated similarly to military groups. Reports mentioned: Surveillance operations against law enforcement Protesters allegedly sabotaging vehicles and physically attacking officers Autonomous‑zone style barricades forming in some areas 3. Responsibility & Advice Regarding Police Encounters Do not escalate encounters with law enforcement. Entering a protest with a firearm greatly increases danger for everyone involved. Legal principles discussed: Lethal force is justified if officers reasonably believe there is a threat. Officers cannot shoot fleeing suspects unless they pose serious immediate danger. 4. Media Narratives & Political Messaging A. Suburban Women as Target Audience Democrats viewed as shaping narratives (e.g., “ICE shoots mother of three,” “ICE detains 5‑year‑old”) to emotionally influence suburban voters. Hosts argue some widely publicized stories were misleading or false. B. Claims of Political Motives Democrats are using these incidents to distract from: A major Minnesota fraud scandal involving billions of dollars. Each new confrontation diverts media attention from that scandal. 5. Anticipated Government Shutdown A. Democrat Position Multiple Democratic leaders publicly oppose funding DHS/ICE at current levels. Statements from Senators (Schumer, Warren, Murphy) emphasize refusal to pass DHS funding bill without ICE restrictions. B. Hosts’ Conclusion They expect a government shutdown, driven by attempts to: Defund or weaken ICE Appeal to progressive voters Control political narrative ahead of elections Shutdown would affect agencies not yet funded (e.g., Defense, Labor, Education, HHS, HUD, DHS).   Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Democrats Are in a “Civil War” Over Abolishing ICE There is an internal Democratic debate on whether to openly support abolishing ICE or downplay it. Democratic officials are hostile toward ICE agents, including statements telling ICE to “get out” of cities. 2. ICE Arrests Highlighted Lists several individuals allegedly arrested in Minnesota, described as: Illegal immigrants Convicted or accused of violent crimes, including sexual offenses and domestic assault These individuals were freely moving in public before being detained by ICE. 3. Assertion That Democrats Are Protecting Criminal Illegal Immigrants Senator Schumer and other Democrats are accused of defending criminals by opposing ICE operations. Local Minnesota authorities have refused cooperation with ICE, releasing individuals instead of transferring them to federal custody. 4. Portrayal of ICE Critics as Misrepresenting Agents Democrats and progressive activists are deliberately “demonizing” ICE, calling agents “Gestapo” or oppressors. Activists are actually protecting dangerous criminals. 5. Incidents Involving Protests in Churches Protesters have entered churches targeting individuals believed to have ICE ties. Some Minnesota officials are portrayed as defending protesters and blaming ICE for tensions. 6. Media Criticism Mainstream media (CNN, CBS, etc.) distort ICE arrest statistics and narrative. Example included: disputed ICE statistic of “70% violent offenders” challenged by a news anchor and defended by DHS Secretary. 7. Allegations of Massive Fraud in Minnesota DHS Secretary Kristi Noem is cited claiming: Over 10,000 criminal illegal aliens arrested in Minneapolis. A $19 billion fraud probe is underway in the state (no details provided). Fraud is linked to cases like Feeding Our Future, involving federal child‑nutrition programs. 8. DOJ Investigating Minnesota Governor and Minneapolis Mayor DOJ is probing whether Minnesota officials obstructed federal immigration enforcement. Officials describe the investigation as intimidation; commentary rejects that and calls it necessary oversight. 9. Depiction of Democrats as Opposing Law Enforcement Defunding law enforcement Protecting criminal offenders Undermining federal authorities Trump administration leadership is restoring law and order. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

1. Democratic Politicians and Activists Some Democratic officials and activists are  calling for the abolition of ICE and even policing in general. Democratic leaders (senators, mayors, city council members) are accused of: Discouraging cooperation with ICE Downplaying or excusing protests that escalate into harassment or church disruptions Using rhetoric that dehumanizes ICE agents, comparing them to oppressive forces Specific figures are cited (e.g., Chris Van Hollen, Tina Smith, Stacey Abrams) as allegedly enabling or spreading anti‑ICE sentiment. 2. Focus on Minneapolis / St. Paul Events A church in Minnesota where protesters entered during a worship service, allegedly harassing congregants and targeting a pastor believed to have ICE connections. Failed to condemn the action Framed the protesters as peaceful or justified Contributed to a hostile environment toward ICE enforcement. 3. Don Lemon Allegations Don Lemon is accused of: Embedding with activist groups before the church incident Live‑streaming the protest inside the church Misrepresenting his role as that of a neutral journalist The U.S. DOJ warned him about violations related to disrupting religious services. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.