Diddy Requests a Stay In The Lawsuit Filed Against Him By Thalia Graves (6/17/25)

In this letter addressed to Judge Subramanian, the Government responds to the defense's renewed objections to the removal of Juror #6 in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs. The prosecution firmly denies the defense’s repeated claims that its efforts to remove the juror were racially motivated, calling the accusation “baseless.” It emphasizes that the juror was dismissed due to multiple inconsistencies in his statements during voir dire and subsequent questioning—specifically regarding basic biographical details like his residence. The Government asserts that it merely flagged the issue of candor to the Court, which independently concluded removal was warranted after its own review of the record.The Government further notes that nothing in the defense’s latest letter undermines the Court’s rationale for the juror’s dismissal. While stating it does not oppose further inquiry into a separate juror mentioned in the defense letter, the Government criticizes the rest of the submission as a barrage of unfounded personal attacks on the prosecution team. It asks the Court to both disregard and formally rebuke those portions of the defense’s letter as inappropriate and irrelevant to the matter at hand.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.405.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Juror #6—a 41‑year‑old Black man—was dismissed on June 16, 2025, by Judge Arun Subramanian after it emerged that he had provided conflicting information about his residence. During jury selection, he stated he lived in the Bronx, but later told court staff he had moved to New Jersey—making him potentially ineligible for the Manhattan federal jury. The judge cited serious concerns over his candor and credibility, noting that these inconsistencies might suggest he “shaded answers to get on, and stay on” the jury.Combs’s defense objected to the removal, arguing that dismissing one of only two Black men on the panel—and replacing him with a white male alternate—would compromise racial diversity and prejudice Combs. But Judge Subramanian emphasized that the decision was based solely on honesty and eligibility, stating that allowing the juror to remain “would be improper” if race were the motive. He noted the need to uphold the integrity of the process and maintain trust in juror credibility.to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy trial faces jury issues as experts question no sequestration | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

After the lunch break on Monday, June 16, 2025, testimony resumed with U.S. Special Agent DeLeassa Penland, who continued detailing travel records and communications tied to alleged “freak‑off” encounters. Specifically, she walked the jury through flight itineraries showing that a male escort—identified as Jules Theodore—flew from Los Angeles to New York in December 2009. These arrangements were allegedly made by Sean Combs and paid for using his American Express card registered to Bad Boy Entertainment. The jury also heard text messages between Combs and Jules coordinating the travel and stay at the London Hotel, underlining the prosecution’s argument about the orchestration of these encounters.Following that, the focus shifted to financial documentation: the prosecution introduced credit card statements and travel logs tying Combs’s business entity to payments for escorts and hotel bookings. These materials were presented to support the trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges—showing evidence of Combs arranging and funding travel and accommodations for escorts. Court then adjourned for the day, with the testimony set to continue the next dayto contact me:[email protected]:June 16, 2025 - Day 24 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case Graves v. Combs et al., 24-cv-07201, attorneys for Sean Combs—joined by co-defendant Joseph Sherman—have submitted a formal request to Judge Torres seeking a stay of the proceedings. The defendants argue that two pending appeals currently before the Second Circuit—Parker v. Alexander (No. 25-487) and Doe v. Black (No. 25-564)—will be determinative of the central legal issues raised in their motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 52-57). They maintain that the outcomes of these appellate cases are likely to directly impact the viability of the claims brought against them.The defense is asking that this matter be paused until thirty days after the Second Circuit renders decisions in both cited appeals. They note that such a stay would be consistent with the approach taken by the Court in a related matter, English v. Combs et al., 24 Civ. 05090, where Judge Torres granted a similar stay pending resolution of the same appellate questions. The request is presented as a measure of judicial efficiency and fairness, with the goal of avoiding potentially unnecessary litigation should the Second Circuit rulings render some or all of the current claims invalid.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628776.67.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes from MTV’s Making the Band 2 and a member of Da Band, filed a $60 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, battery, psychological abuse, and professional sabotage. Rivers claims that Combs subjected her to degrading treatment throughout her time on the reality series and beyond, including groping her without consent, making sexually explicit comments, and mocking her bulimia. She further alleges that Combs controlled contestants' food, sleep, and movement, orchestrated humiliating stunts like the infamous "cheesecake walk," and forced her into uncompensated labor under exploitative conditions. According to the complaint, Rivers was made to sleep in exposed, unsafe quarters with male co-stars and denied basic dignity and protection.The lawsuit names more than two dozen other parties, including executives at Bad Boy, Universal Music Group, MTV, and even Combs's mother, asserting that they either enabled or failed to intervene in the abuse. Rivers accuses Combs of deliberately dismantling Da Band to assert dominance and retain control of her earnings, effectively sabotaging her career. She asserts that this behavior was not isolated but part of a systemic pattern of exploitation and intimidation that targeted young, vulnerable performers. Combs’s legal team has dismissed the suit as meritless and opportunistic, noting it was filed just before the deadline under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act. The case joins a growing list of lawsuits and criminal investigations currently surrounding Combs.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes from MTV’s Making the Band 2 and a member of Da Band, filed a $60 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, battery, psychological abuse, and professional sabotage. Rivers claims that Combs subjected her to degrading treatment throughout her time on the reality series and beyond, including groping her without consent, making sexually explicit comments, and mocking her bulimia. She further alleges that Combs controlled contestants' food, sleep, and movement, orchestrated humiliating stunts like the infamous "cheesecake walk," and forced her into uncompensated labor under exploitative conditions. According to the complaint, Rivers was made to sleep in exposed, unsafe quarters with male co-stars and denied basic dignity and protection.The lawsuit names more than two dozen other parties, including executives at Bad Boy, Universal Music Group, MTV, and even Combs's mother, asserting that they either enabled or failed to intervene in the abuse. Rivers accuses Combs of deliberately dismantling Da Band to assert dominance and retain control of her earnings, effectively sabotaging her career. She asserts that this behavior was not isolated but part of a systemic pattern of exploitation and intimidation that targeted young, vulnerable performers. Combs’s legal team has dismissed the suit as meritless and opportunistic, noting it was filed just before the deadline under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act. The case joins a growing list of lawsuits and criminal investigations currently surrounding Combs.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ashton Kutcher has a long-standing friendship with Sean "Diddy" Combs, which has recently come under scrutiny. In a resurfaced 2019 interview on Hot Ones, Kutcher awkwardly dodged questions about what went on at Diddy’s infamous "White Parties," where many celebrities gathered. When asked for details, Kutcher laughed it off, saying, "I’ve got a lot I can’t tell," and added that he was "cycling through" memories but refrained from sharing specifics. This refusal to discuss the parties, paired with his cryptic remarks, has sparked renewed interest following Diddy's recent legal troubles.Kutcher described their relationship as "bizarre," explaining that it started when Diddy became a fan of Punk’d. Over time, they became friends, hanging out regularly, including attending parties and even running the New York Marathon together. Despite the public's curiosity about what happened at these parties, Kutcher has remained silent on specifics, emphasizing that he won't reveal any of the more scandalous details​.(commercial at 7:24)to contact me:[email protected]:Ashton Kutcher refuses to discuss Sean 'Diddy' Combs' parties in resurfaced interview (pagesix.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Whenever one of these famous people finds themselves in hot water, their go to narrative is something like this:  "I've realized that I have done some things that are bad, but now I'm getting help.  I've found God and I'm in therapy."    Diddy is no exception.    In his latest attempt to try and change the narrative, he released a ridiculous apology video where he does everything but apologize to his victims.    In this episode, we take a look at that apology and at the story overall and see where things currently stand now that the video has hit the public sphere.(commercial at 10:34)to contact me:[email protected]:Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs apologizes in a statement for assaulting Cassie Ventura | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A forthcoming Peacock documentary titled "Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy" delves into serious allegations against music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs, currently incarcerated on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering. The 90-minute film, premiering January 14, features interviews with individuals from Combs' inner circle—such as former bodyguards, childhood friends, and associates—who provide disturbing accounts of his alleged misconduct. One anonymous source claims that rooms illuminated in red signified sexual activities, often involving underage girls. Additionally, testimonies suggest that women were coerced or threatened into participating in these encounters.Combs' legal troubles have intensified since his arrest on September 16, 2024. He faces multiple civil lawsuits alleging sexual assault, with some plaintiffs accusing him of drugging and assaulting them. His legal team has vehemently denied these accusations, labeling them as false and defamatory. The documentary aims to shed light on these serious allegations, challenging viewers to reconsider their perceptions of the influential music figure.(commercial at 8:16)to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy responds to upcoming Peacock documentary featuring members of his inner circle | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Kaya Jones, a former member of the Pussycat Dolls, has made several claims regarding Sean "Diddy" Combs and his associates:Pressure to Engage in Sexual Activities: Jones has shared that during her time with the Pussycat Dolls, she felt pressured to engage in sexual relationships with powerful figures in the music industry, including those linked to Combs.Abuse by Combs' Inner Circle: In interviews, she recounted uncomfortable encounters with individuals connected to Combs, suggesting that the environment around him was part of a larger pattern of industry misconduct.Industry-Wide Exploitation: Jones has emphasized that the issues surrounding Combs reflect a broader culture of abuse in the entertainment world. She believes that the recent lawsuits against Combs could lead to meaningful change and accountability in the industry.Her comments add to the ongoing conversation about Combs' alleged misconduct and underscore the systemic nature of exploitation within the music business.   In this episode, we take a look at what she had to say.(commercial at 7:35)to contact me:[email protected]:Pussycat Dolls star Kaya Jones says the powerful men on Diddy list are the same 'suits' who abused her | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.