New Department of Education Rule Makes Accreditors Prove Degrees Are Worth The Cost

The job hasn't changed, but the degree required to get it has. Over the past three decades, one profession after another has raised its educational entry price: a bachelor's became a master's...a master's became a doctorate...a short training course became a year of mandatory classes.These new requirements are adding years of tuition and borrowing for careers that pay roughly what they paid before the new requirements were added. The labor market simply doesn't pay more because you got more education.Economists call it degree inflation, and the most surprising part isn't the cost. It's who decides "what's required". In many licensed fields, the degree you must "buy" isn't set by Congress or your state legislature. It's set by private organizations most Americans have never heard of: accrediting agencies.And because of how the higher education system is wired, a single change by one of these groups can raise the required degree standards for an entire profession in all 50 states at once, with no election, no hearing in your statehouse, and no vote by anyone you can vote out.That system is now squarely in Washington's crosshairs. The Department of Education's negotiated rulemaking committee reached consensus on May 21, 2026, on new regulations that would put a stop to this practice. The Department had named "credential inflation" as an explicit target when it launched the committee in January.To understand why that matters for your family's college costs, you first have to understand a system that almost nobody outside higher education knows exists.

A new federal lawsuit is trying to answer a question more than 1.5 million student loan borrowers have been asking: did the Department of Education actually cancel the loans it publicly promised to forgive?The Project on Predatory Student Lending (PPSL) sued the Department (PDF File) on July 1, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, after the agency sat on fifteen Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests (some for more than two and a half years) seeking records on how it carried out its announced group discharges.The College Investor team has previously filed similar FOIA requests for borrower defense data, the latest with a response in 2023, which took roughly 14 months to process.

Student loan borrowers who applied for the SAVE plan but were never officially enrolled are now receiving denial letters from their loan servicers. These are borrowers who submitted an application for SAVE or an old application selecting the option "Lowest Repayment Plan", but their applications were never actually processed. These borrowers had been in administrative forbearance while waiting for an outcome to their application.Borrowers have 90 days to submit a new income-driven repayment (IDR) application or their SAVE forbearance ends and payments resume on their old plan.Hundreds of thousands of borrowers submitted IDR applications requesting SAVE and have been sitting in a administrative forbearance (some for well over two years) waiting for an answer. That answer has now arrived: denied.Unlike borrowers officially enrolled in SAVE, who get auto-enrolled in the Standard or Tiered Standard plan if they miss their 90-day deadline, applicants who miss the deadline get kicked back to their previous repayment plan, or the Standard plan if they weren't enrolled in a plan before (such as new borrowers leaving college). For many, that could mean a payment far higher than what they expected under an income-driven plan.

A pair of Democratic bills introduced in May would eliminate one of the oldest restrictions in federal student loan policy: the rule that blocks teachers from counting the same years of teaching service toward both Teacher Loan Forgiveness (TLF) and Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF).The Teacher Debt Relief Act (H.R.8815), introduced May 14, 2026 by Rep. Jahana Hayes (D-CT) and endorsed by the National Education Association, would end the prohibition that forces teachers to choose one program or the other for a given service period. Hayes calls it a technical correction, but for teachers, it could shave years off the path to full forgiveness.Here's what to know about the drive to end the double-dipping provision of PSLF and TLF.

Formal 90-day notices began going out to more than 7 million SAVE borrowers on July 1, arriving in waves. Borrowers who don't choose a new repayment plan by their deadline (roughly September 30 for the first group) will be placed on the Standard plan automatically.In response, a common refrain has emerged in comment sections and forums: "I refuse to switch until I'm notified I have to. That way, if any new court action benefits SAVE borrowers, it will still apply to me because I'm technically still registered under SAVE."It makes it sound like waiting in the SAVE forbearance could be a smart move. But when you walk through every scenario that could actually unfold (the pending lawsuit, a forbearance extension, and the even longer-shot wildcards) the strategy delivers almost nothing different that switching wouldn't also deliver, while the costs of waiting increase every month.The simple truth is that waiting only preserves your no-payment forbearance. Your loan balance is growing, you're not making progress towards forgiveness, and the longer you wait, the more likely you are to have even higher payments in the future.Here's what to know about each scenario and how it could impact you as a SAVE borrower thinking about waiting it out.

For most borrowers after July 1, 2026, consolidating federal student loans no longer offers a real upside — and it can quietly erase progress you've already earned towards loan forgiveness. The one situation where it still helps is getting out of default.Consolidation used to be a helpful tool for many borrowers. It turned old FFEL loans into Direct Loans, unlocked income-driven repayment and Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF), and let borrowers capture the one-time IDR account adjustment. Those windows have closed. The adjustment is over, FFEL cleanup deadlines have passed, and the menu of repayment plans is shrinking — so the cost-benefit math has flipped for most people.There is no real requirement for any borrower to consolidate their loans at this point in time, and except for defaulted student loan borrowers, doing so may be more harmful than helpful.

The U.S. Department of Education announced a final rule that will, for the first time, strip federal student loan eligibility from college and career programs whose graduates fail to out-earn workers who never enrolled.The Student Tuition and Transparency System (STATS) and Earnings Accountability rule applies a single standard across every sector of higher education, from public universities to for-profit certificate schools, regardless of an institution's tax status or the credential it awards.The premise is simple: undergraduate programs must demonstrate that their graduates earn more than working adults who hold only a high school diploma. Graduate programs must show their completers earn more than typical bachelor's degree holders. A program that can't clear that bar for two of three years will lose the ability to enroll students who borrow federal loans. That doesn't mean it has to shut down - but the government is not going to continue to lend to students who end up having a bad financial outcome."If a program cannot show that it leaves its graduates financially better off than if they had never enrolled, it should not be underwritten by federal taxpayers," said Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent. He pointed to "rising rates of default and delinquency in the $1.7 trillion federal student loan portfolio" as the backdrop for the new framework.The rule is the third and final rulemaking package authorized by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Trump signed on July 4, 2025. It also folds the new earnings standard into the Department's existing Financial Value Transparency and Gainful Employment regulations, replacing what officials described as nearly two decades of regulatory back-and-forth with one test that reaches almost every program and sector.

The biggest overhaul of federal student loans in a generation just took effect. Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, borrowers who take out federal loans on or after July 1, 2026 face fewer repayment options, hard borrowing caps, and slightly higher interest rates.While many of these changes apply to new loans going forward, some borrowers do have choices to make. For example, borrowers in the SAVE forbearance will have to start making decisions to change repayment plans. It's important to remember that current borrowers keep their existing fixed interest rates and access to legacy plans like IBR — but anyone borrowing for the coming school year is entering a very different system.

Home / News / ED Expands Professional Degree List to 29 Programs After Court StayED Expands Professional Degree List to 29 Programs After Court StayUpdated: June 30, 2026 By Robert Farrington | < 1 Min Read Leave a Comment (Edit)Many or all of the products featured here may be from our partners who compensate us. This doesn't influence our evaluations or reviews. Our opinions are our own. Investing information is for educational purposes only. Learn more here. The Department of Education has temporarily widened the types of degree programs that qualify for the higher professional-student loan limits, adding fields like physician assistant, physical therapy, occupational therapy, audiology, and several advanced nursing degrees while the agency's narrower rule is paused in court.In Electronic Announcement GENERAL-26-42, posted June 29, ED published an updated list of Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) codes that schools must treat as professional degree programs for federal loan limit purposes. The list now covers 29 six-digit CIP codes, well beyond the 11 fields ED originally named in its Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) final rule.The change is a direct response to a court order. On June 24, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia preliminarily stayed part of ED's professional degree definition just days before the rule's July 1 effective date.

A federal judge has thrown out the Department of Education's controversial new Public Service Loan Forgiveness rule, ruling it unlawful one day before it was scheduled to take effect.In a 68-page decision issued June 30, 2026, U.S. District Judge Myong J. Joun of the District of Massachusetts (PDF File) held that the rule was "contrary to law," exceeded the Department's statutory authority, was "arbitrary and capricious," and violated the First Amendment.His order vacated the rule entirely.There's another case in the District of Columbia that's also about this same rule, still waiting on a ruling as of writing.