The Lori Vallow Trial Vault: Multiple Experts Give Testimony During Day 3 (3/19/25)

The men or women who sit at the head of criminal organizations function much in the same way that a CEO would for a big business and most of these men or women who are running cartels would have just as much success running a legit business as they do an illicit one. In this episode, we dive in and see how things shake out. (commercial at 8:10)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/criminals-like-el-chapo-embody-the-underground-equivalent-of-successful-execs-author/ar-AAZUSYU?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=c9923af5cbd749acea92e50ad97b5dfa

​In the case identified as CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan Kohberger has filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained from the execution of a Pennsylvania search warrant at 119 Lamsden Drive, Albrightsville, PA, as well as statements he made during that operation. Kohberger's defense argues that the search warrant was invalid due to alleged reckless or intentional omissions of material facts in the supporting affidavit. They contend that these omissions led to a lack of probable cause, rendering the search unconstitutional. Additionally, the defense asserts that law enforcement's failure to properly "knock and announce" their presence violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights, and that any statements he made during the search should be suppressed as they were obtained without a Miranda warningIn response, the State maintains that the search was conducted under a valid warrant issued by a Pennsylvania court, based on substantial probable cause. They argue that the affidavit supporting the warrant was sufficient and did not omit any material information that would invalidate the warrant. The State also contends that the "knock and announce" procedure was appropriately followed, and that Kohberger's statements during the search were either spontaneous or made after he was informed of his rights, thereby complying with legal requirements. Consequently, the State requests that the court deny Kohberger's motion to suppress the evidence obtained from the search at 119 Lamsden Drive and his subsequent statements.to contact me:[email protected]:111424-REDACTED-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-Lamsden-Statements.pdf

​In the case identified as CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan Kohberger has filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained from the execution of a Pennsylvania search warrant at 119 Lamsden Drive, Albrightsville, PA, as well as statements he made during that operation. Kohberger's defense argues that the search warrant was invalid due to alleged reckless or intentional omissions of material facts in the supporting affidavit. They contend that these omissions led to a lack of probable cause, rendering the search unconstitutional. Additionally, the defense asserts that law enforcement's failure to properly "knock and announce" their presence violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights, and that any statements he made during the search should be suppressed as they were obtained without a Miranda warningIn response, the State maintains that the search was conducted under a valid warrant issued by a Pennsylvania court, based on substantial probable cause. They argue that the affidavit supporting the warrant was sufficient and did not omit any material information that would invalidate the warrant. The State also contends that the "knock and announce" procedure was appropriately followed, and that Kohberger's statements during the search were either spontaneous or made after he was informed of his rights, thereby complying with legal requirements. Consequently, the State requests that the court deny Kohberger's motion to suppress the evidence obtained from the search at 119 Lamsden Drive and his subsequent statements.to contact me:[email protected]:111424-REDACTED-Motion-Supress-Memorandum-Support-Lamsden-Statements.pdf

​On the fourth day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, key testimony was provided by Melanie Gibb, a close friend of Vallow. Gibb detailed Vallow's escalating involvement with Chad Daybell and their shared apocalyptic beliefs, which included concepts of "light" and "dark" spirits and the notion of individuals becoming "zombies" when possessed by evil entities. Gibb recounted that Vallow believed her children, JJ Vallow and Tylee Ryan, along with her husband Charles Vallow, had become "dark" or possessed, leading to justifications for extreme actions against them.Gibb also testified about a recorded phone conversation she had with Vallow and Daybell in November 2019, during which she confronted them about JJ's whereabouts. In this call, Vallow claimed JJ was safe and happy, but Gibb expressed concerns about their beliefs and actions. This testimony provided insight into the defendants' mindset and the justifications they allegedly used for their actions, highlighting the influence of their shared religious beliefs on the events leading up to the children's disappearances.to contact me:[email protected]

The powerful and sad testimony of Detective Hermosillo has set the tone for the prosecution and right out of the gate, was devastating to the defense and Lori Vallow. With emotions in the courtroom ranging from crying to blazing hot anger, there was not a single person who wasn't moved by what they saw and heard. That includes the jurors.​On the third day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the prosecution presented further evidence and witness testimonies to build their case against her. Fremont County Lieutenant Joe Powell testified about the investigation into the death of Tammy Daybell, Chad Daybell's first wife, whose demise was initially deemed natural but later considered suspicious. Lt. Powell discussed the decision to exhume Tammy's body for further examination, highlighting that her prior good health raised questions about the circumstances of her death.Additionally, FBI Tactical Specialist Nicole Heideman took the stand to explain the process of phone attribution, which involves determining the primary users of specific phone numbers. She revealed that Chad Daybell had multiple phone numbers during the relevant period, with three being of particular interest to the investigation. Similarly, Lori Vallow and her brother, Alex Cox, each had several phone numbers, with three associated with each being focal points in the case. This testimony aimed to establish communication patterns among the defendants, potentially linking them to the alleged crimes.to contact me:[email protected]

In this episode we take a look at the Kaylee Goncalves Reddit warrant.(commercial at 9:19)to contact me:[email protected]:030723+Order+to+Seal++Redact+-+Redditcom.pdf (amazonaws.com)

Bryan Kohberger and his "I was out for a gander at the stars" routine isn't sitting well with the Goncalves family and they had no  problem calling it absurd and a delay.In this episode, we hear from the Goncalves family in the wake of the alibi claimed by Bryan Kohberger and what we might expect as the process continues to grind forward.An alibi in a criminal trial is a defense strategy where the accused presents evidence to show that they were somewhere else at the time the crime was committed, thereby making it impossible for them to have committed the crime. It's essentially a form of proof of innocence by demonstrating that the accused couldn't have been at the scene of the crime.Corroborating an alibi using digital evidence involves gathering electronic records or data that can confirm the accused's presence elsewhere. Here's how it can be done:Surveillance footage: If there are surveillance cameras in the area where the accused claims to have been at the time of the crime, the footage can be reviewed to verify their presence.Cell phone records: Mobile phone records can show the location of the accused at the time of the crime, either through cell tower pings or GPS data if enabled. This can be corroborated with witness testimonies or other evidence.Social media or online activity: Posts, check-ins, or messages on social media platforms or other online services can provide a digital footprint of the accused's whereabouts. However, these can sometimes be manipulated, so additional evidence may be needed to corroborate them.Credit card transactions: Credit card transactions or ATM withdrawals can provide evidence of the accused's whereabouts if they made purchases or withdrew money around the time of the crime.Email or electronic communication: Emails, text messages, or other forms of electronic communication can provide timestamps that establish the accused's location or activities at a particular time.Digital photos or videos: If the accused or someone else took photos or videos at the time in question, these can serve as evidence of their presence elsewhere.(commercial at 9:17)to contact me:[email protected]:Family of Idaho murders victim Kaylee Goncalves bite back at Bryan Kohberger's 'moon and stargazing' alibi, saying 'if it had weight, it would have been submitted months ago' | Daily Mail Online

Bryan Kohberger keeps to himself and doesn't talk to anyone in the lock up that he is currently in. According to sources, he is constantly watching the news about the murders in moscow and when he's not doing that, he's sitting down with a pastor exploring his new found faith in god.From the archives: 3-20-23We also get a look at how much money it cost Pennsylvania to fly Bryan Kohberger from Pennsylvania to Idaho after Kohberger was extradited.(commercial at 6:26)to contact me:[email protected]:Bryan Kohberger's Secluded Life Inside Jail: Reports (newsweek.com)source:How much did it cost to fly Bryan Kohberger across the country? | ktvb.com

Bryan Kohberger and his defense team plan on calling two different DNA specialists as witnesses at a hearing scheduled for later on this week in Moscow.   The issue at hand?   The states handling of the IGG information and how they collected that information.   According to the defense, there were many issues with the process and because of those issues, they don't believe it should be introduced at trial.    In our second article, we check in on Diddy's latest problems and this time it's hitting him in the pocket book as his Sean John eyeglass frames have been pulled from stock at Americas Best contacts and eyeglasses.    Let's dive in!(commercial at 8:47)to contact me:[email protected]:DNA experts will testify in Kohberger hearing this week | University-of-idaho-murders | kxly.comsource:Diddy's Sean John Frames Pulled From America's Best Contacts and Eyeglasses (tmz.com)

Plaintiff John Doe, represented by Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, files this complaint against Defendant Sean Combs. The allegations are based on personal knowledge and information. Plaintiff asserts claims against Combs, detailing specific grievances and legal grounds for action. The complaint outlines the nature of the alleged wrongdoing, including factual and legal bases for holding Combs accountable.This lawsuit seeks relief for the harm allegedly caused by Combs, requesting appropriate legal remedies. The complaint establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting evidence, and sets forth claims that Plaintiff intends to prove in court. Through this action, Plaintiff seeks justice and compensation for the alleged misconduct by Defendant.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.637615.1.0.pdf