A Look Back: Jeffrey Epstein's Last Will And Testament (Part 2)

An amended declaration of support to dismiss a complaint is a legal document filed with a court to request the dismissal of a complaint, which is a formal written document that sets out the allegations and legal claims of one party against another. Here's a detailed summary of the components and purpose of such a document:Introduction: The document typically begins with an introduction that identifies the parties involved in the case, the court where the case is being heard, and the case number.Background: This section provides a brief overview of the case, including the events leading up to the filing of the complaint and any previous actions taken by the parties involved.Reasons for Amendment: The document explains why the declaration of support is being amended. This could be due to new information or evidence that has come to light since the original declaration was filed, or it could be to correct errors or omissions in the original document.Legal Basis for Dismissal: The document sets out the legal grounds on which the complaint should be dismissed. This could include arguments that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the complaint, or that the complaint is barred by the statute of limitations.Supporting Evidence: The amended declaration may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, witness statements, or documentary evidence to support the arguments for dismissal.Conclusion: The document concludes with a summary of the reasons why the complaint should be dismissed and a request that the court grant the dismissal.Signature and Verification: The amended declaration is typically signed by the party or their attorney, and may include a verification stating that the statements made in the document are true and accurate to the best of the signer's knowledge.Overall, an amended declaration of support to dismiss a complaint serves as a formal request to the court to dismiss the complaint against the party filing the document, providing legal arguments and evidence to support the request for dismissal.In this episode, we begin taking a look at the second declaration of support to dismiss claims filed by Donald Zakarin.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.42.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

An amended declaration of support to dismiss a complaint is a legal document filed with a court to request the dismissal of a complaint, which is a formal written document that sets out the allegations and legal claims of one party against another. Here's a detailed summary of the components and purpose of such a document:Introduction: The document typically begins with an introduction that identifies the parties involved in the case, the court where the case is being heard, and the case number.Background: This section provides a brief overview of the case, including the events leading up to the filing of the complaint and any previous actions taken by the parties involved.Reasons for Amendment: The document explains why the declaration of support is being amended. This could be due to new information or evidence that has come to light since the original declaration was filed, or it could be to correct errors or omissions in the original document.Legal Basis for Dismissal: The document sets out the legal grounds on which the complaint should be dismissed. This could include arguments that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the complaint, or that the complaint is barred by the statute of limitations.Supporting Evidence: The amended declaration may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, witness statements, or documentary evidence to support the arguments for dismissal.Conclusion: The document concludes with a summary of the reasons why the complaint should be dismissed and a request that the court grant the dismissal.Signature and Verification: The amended declaration is typically signed by the party or their attorney, and may include a verification stating that the statements made in the document are true and accurate to the best of the signer's knowledge.Overall, an amended declaration of support to dismiss a complaint serves as a formal request to the court to dismiss the complaint against the party filing the document, providing legal arguments and evidence to support the request for dismissal.In this episode, we begin taking a look at the second declaration of support to dismiss claims filed by Donald Zakarin.(commercial at 7:21)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.42.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Massachusetts Rule of Criminal Procedure 17 (Mass. R. Crim. P. 17) outlines the procedures for subpoenas in criminal cases within the Massachusetts court system. Here's a detailed summary of its key provisions:Authority and Purpose: Rule 17 derives its authority from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and is designed to facilitate the production of evidence and the summoning of witnesses in criminal proceedings.Issuance of Subpoenas: The rule allows for the issuance of subpoenas by the clerk of the court, a notary public, or any attorney authorized to practice law in Massachusetts. Subpoenas may be issued for the attendance of witnesses or the production of documents or other tangible evidence.Form and Content: Subpoenas must be issued in writing and must command the person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony, or to produce specified documents or tangible things, at a specified time and place.Service of Subpoenas: Subpoenas may be served by any person who is not a party to the case and who is at least 18 years old. Service may be made by delivering a copy of the subpoena to the person named in it, or by leaving a copy at their residence with a person of suitable age and discretion.Witness Fees and Mileage: Witnesses who comply with a subpoena are entitled to receive witness fees and mileage reimbursement as provided by law.Protection of Persons Subject to Subpoenas: Persons subject to subpoenas may seek protection from undue burden or harassment by filing a motion with the court. The court may quash or modify a subpoena if it is unreasonable or oppressive.Contempt for Failure to Obey Subpoena: Failure to obey a subpoena without reasonable excuse may result in a finding of contempt by the court. Contempt may be punished by fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions.Service of Subpoenas Outside the Commonwealth: The rule provides procedures for the service of subpoenas outside the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.Service of Subpoenas on Behalf of the Commonwealth: When the Commonwealth is the party seeking evidence or witnesses, subpoenas may be issued and served by any attorney authorized to represent the Commonwealth.Notice to Parties: The rule requires that notice of the issuance of a subpoena must be given to all parties in the case.Overall, Mass. R. Crim. P. 17 is designed to ensure the efficient and fair gathering of evidence and witness testimony in criminal cases, while also providing protections for individuals subject to subpoenas. It establishes clear procedures for the issuance, service, and enforcement of subpoenas within the Massachusetts court system.In this episode, we get a look at the order denying the Mass R. Crim. P. 17 request made by Karen Read.(commercial at 7:36)To contact me:[email protected]:PDF.COMMONWEALTH - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   (commercial at 7:04)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   (commercial at 10:54)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

When the Taliban came back into power, there were several pundits who tried to tell us that this new version of the Taliban was the reformed version. This, of course was nothing but a bunch of nonsense and the way the Taliban has conducted themselves since, is all you need to know that the new Taliban is no different than the old.(commercial at 13:27)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/4/6/are-the-taliban-returning-to-their-harshest-rulingBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we travel back in history to learn the incredible story of how pirates from the Barbary coast embarked on a over 6k mile round trip to enslave over 400 people from Iceland only to bring them to Algiers to be sold into slavery. One man who was captured documented his journey and what he went through. This is his story.(commercial at 12:57)To contact me:[email protected]:https://jddavies.com/2017/02/20/the-barbary-corsair-raid-on-iceland-1627/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A Prison guard is being charged with selling a key to the women's section of the lock up to male prisoners who then, it is alleged in the complaint, gained access to that wing of the jail where they abused, assaulted and even raped some of the female prisoners. Authorities, however, dispute this account and say that their "exhaustive" investigation does not show the same thing as the allegations state.(commercial at 8:06)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/female-inmates-raped-after-jailer-sells-key-to-cell-for-1k-lawsuit-claims/ar-AA101RqI?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=c4ce6843eb2f41da9da907f2436826beBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Alexander Acosta has received the lion's share of the public ire over the Epstein NPA and much of it has hit the mark.However,Acosta wasn't the person who signed off on the deal. That came from the top. Let's dive in and see who else was involved.(Commercial at 10:55)to contact me:[email protected]:https://nypost.com/2021/02/04/top-doj-officials-okd-epstein-deal-maxwell-lawyers/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

As the back and forth between JP Morgan and The USVI continues to heat up, JP Morgan has launched a new salvo at the USVI, claiming that the past three governors of the territory all had relationships with Epstein and all profited from his criminal enterprise.This comes on the heels of the USVI claiming that JP Morgan, as an entity was aware of Epstein's criminal behavior and chose to profited from it instead of stopping him.Meanwhile, back in reality, we all know that both entities are responsible and that plenty of people should be behind bars.The trial is set to kick off in October.(commercial at 10:06)to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein had 'close ties' to Gov. Albert Bryan: Doc (lawandcrime.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.