Murder In Moscow: The State Responds To Bryan Kohberger's Motion To Limit Expert Testimony (Part 2) (3/23/25)

A New York judge has dismissed five out of nine claims in producer Rodney "Lil Rod" Jones' $30 million sexual assault and harassment lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs. Jones had alleged that Combs, along with his team, sexually harassed, drugged, and assaulted him during his work on Combs' "Love" album from September 2022 to November 2023. While Judge J. Paul Oetken dismissed several claims, including under the RICO and TVPA acts against Combs Global, he allowed some specific allegations of sexual assault and premises liability to move forward. The judge found Jones' allegations of being drugged and sexually assaulted plausible but dismissed the emotional distress and breach of contract claims due to lack of adequate pleading and non-written agreement. Jones' lawyer Tyrone Blackburn deemed the partial ruling a victory and looks forward to further proceedings. Combs is simultaneously detained on unrelated prostitution and trafficking charges, with a trial scheduled for May 5.The judge criticized Jones' attempt to frame the allegations as a racketeering case, writing that he had failed to properly argue the point and noting, “Jones fails to address any of these arguments in his opposition brief, and while the Court prefers to decide issues on the merits, it should not be necessary to root around a 402-paragraph complaint to contrive novel arguments on Jones’s behalf.” The court also took the unusual step of calling out Blackburn by name in a section titled “Warning to Counsel.” Judge Oetken slammed the attorney’s filings as “replete with inaccurate statements of law, conclusory accusations, and inappropriate ad hominem attacks on opposing counsel,” and called one legal claim “not just disturbing, but shocking.”to contact  me:[email protected]:Majority of Producer Rodney Jones' Claims Against Sean 'Diddy' Combs in Sexual Assault Lawsuit DismissedBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On the twenty-second day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the court heard testimony from multiple witnesses, providing further insight into the events surrounding the deaths of Tylee Ryan, J.J. Vallow, and Tammy Daybell. FBI Tactical Specialist Nicole Heideman testified about digital evidence recovered between Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow, such as romantic text messages exchanged under the names "James" and "Elena." These messages, read aloud in court, revealed the depth of their relationship and plans for the future, including discussions about being together and searching for rings while their respective spouses were still alive.Additionally, FBI Agent Nick Ballance presented cell phone data analysis, highlighting communications between Chad Daybell's burner phone, Alex Cox, and Lori Vallow. The data placed Alex Cox near Chad Daybell's property on the night Tammy Daybell died, following a 16-minute call with Lori, who was in Hawaii at the time. This evidence aimed to establish a timeline and suggest coordination among the parties involved.to contact  me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On the twenty-first day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the court heard testimony from Ian Pawlowski, Lori's nephew-in-law. Ian recounted his brief marriage to Lori's niece, Melani, and detailed his interactions with Lori and Chad Daybell. He testified about the couple's apocalyptic beliefs, including their discussions on "light" and "dark" spirits and the concept of individuals being possessed by evil entities. Ian also revealed that he had cooperated with law enforcement by recording conversations with Lori and Chad, during which they discussed their religious ideologies and attitudes toward the police.Additionally, FBI Tactical Specialist Nicole Heideman returned to the stand to provide further insights into the relationship between Lori and Chad. She presented evidence of their joint visits to LDS temples, highlighting that their access cards were scanned within seconds of each other, indicating coordinated visits. Heideman also discussed a narrative written by Chad, referred to as the "James and Elena" story, which paralleled his real-life relationship with Lori. This story depicted characters engaging in a romantic and spiritual journey, mirroring the events and beliefs shared by Chad and Lori.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein and his finances remain shrouded in mystery even in death.On today's show we will take another look at Epstein's finances and one of the vehicles he used to increase his wealth.(Commercial at 16:08)To contact me:[email protected]:https://wallstreetonparade.com/2019/07/tax-filing-suggests-child-sex-offender-jeffrey-epstein-made-his-wealth-flipping-hot-ipos-on-wall-street/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

John Brockman is a legend in the literary world. He has represented some of the finest minds in science in regards to their written works. His firm is considered the most prestigious. He was also one of Epstein's biggest enablers.Brockman was used by Epstein to open the door to relationships with the top scientists on the planet. The door he used was called the Edge foundation.Who is John Brockman? What was his role in this whole macabre story?To contact me:[email protected]:https://newrepublic.com/article/154826/jeffrey-epsteins-intellectual-enablerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In today's episode we learn a bit more about the court battle between Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell over documents that pertain to the case.Maxwell is arguing that they should stay sealed to prevent harm and embarrassment to the powerful people who are contained within.Virginia Roberts attorneys argue that the public deserves to know who is named.What will the Judge decide?Join me as I take a look.To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.google.com/amp/s/lawandcrime.com/high-profile/ghislaine-maxwell-argues-it-would-be-too-difficult-to-release-full-epstein-files/amp/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense filed a motion to preclude the death penalty and adopt other necessary procedures, alleging that the prosecution committed disclosure violations by providing an overwhelming volume of disorganized and unsearchable data, thereby hindering the defense's ability to prepare effectively. The defense argued that these alleged violations compromised Kohberger's rights to a fair trial, due process, and effective legal representation.In response, the State asserted that it has complied with Idaho Criminal Rule 16 and its obligations under Brady v. Maryland, emphasizing that discovery materials were provided promptly and in the same format as received. The prosecution contended that the defense had not identified specific evidence that was improperly withheld or disclosed late, and therefore, there was no basis to preclude the death penalty as a sanction. The State requested that the court deny the defense's motion, affirming that Kohberger's due process rights have been upheld throughout the proceedings.to contact me:[email protected]:031725-States-Response-Defendants-Motion-Preclude-Death-Penalty-Disclosure-Violations.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.