Cross Examining Cyber EP24: Cross Examining David Moffatt

In this episode of On Just Terms, Jason Betts and Melissa Gladstone speak with Stuart Price, CEO of CASL, about the role litigation funding plays in Australia’s corporate risk landscape. The conversation explores how funders assess and select cases, the legal and commercial factors that influence funding decisions, and what these dynamics mean for companies facing complex litigation. Stuart also shares insights into how risk appetite, case selection, and regulatory settings continue to shape the evolving litigation funding market.

Welcome to Cross Examining Cyber, a podcast brought to you by Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer. In this podcast series, we speak to our business leaders about all things cyber, including the legal, governance, technical, regulatory and policy developments that impact corporates around the world. I'm really excited to announce that this is the first of our Cross-Examining Cyber Director Series. For the next six months, we will speak to some of our leading directors, including David Gonski, Anne Templeman-Jones, John Mullen, Catherine Brenner, just to name a few. Today's the first in our series, and today we cross-examine David Moffatt. David has over 40 years' experience in executive leadership positions. He's worked and lived almost everywhere, Australia, the US, Europe and Asia. He's currently the chair of Ventia Services Group, Environmental Remediation and Social Services and Apollo Global Management. David is also the chair of the American Chamber of Commerce here in Australia. David has first-hand experience dealing with a cyber incident as part of his role at Ventia. His insights are not only considered but come from direct experience. Thanks again for listening. This is Cross Examining David Moffatt, the first in our Director Series. Here we go.

Partners Toby Eggleston, Nick Heggart and Ryan Leslie discuss Treasury’s 10 April 2026 exposure draft legislation implementing and expanding the 2024 budget proposals on when non-residents pay Australian CGT. The draft materially broadens “taxable Australian real property” beyond general law real property (post the YTL and Newmont decisions) to include rights over land, contractual rights, and fixed or installed assets expected to be on land for most of their useful life (e.g., wind/solar assets, pipelines, mining equipment, tenant fixtures), plus water entitlements, with some elements proposed to apply retrospectively to 12 December 2006. It also includes a treaty-override via the International Tax Agreements Act, changes the principal asset test to a 365-day lookback, introduces a limited 50% CGT discount for certain renewable generation disposals to 1 July 2030, and tightens the non-resident CGT withholding/declaration and clearance certificate processes, all amid a 14-day consultation period. Want to go deeper? Read our briefing note here: https://www.hsfkramer.com/insights/2026-04/australias-non-resident-cgt-changes 00:10 Welcome and agenda 00:32 Budget shock announcement 02:34 Overview of reforms 02:57 Expanded real property definition 06:25 Assets newly in scope 09:07 Uncertainty and edge cases 11:25 Retrospective start dates 14:39 Treaty override explained 23:26 Indirect interest test changes 27:54 Renewables CGT discount 31:14 Withholding and notifications 34:18 Consultation and wrap up

The Employment Rights Act 2025: Union Rights – what employers need to know In this third episode of the Employment Espresso Pods mini-series on the Employment Rights Act 2025, Jenny Andrews and Sian McKinley, both Of Counsel, together with Knowledge Counsel Anna Henderson, turn to the significant reforms being made to trade union rights — changes that matter to all employers, whether or not they currently recognise a union. The episode covers the changes to industrial action law already in force since February 2026, as well as further changes expected in the autumn. The team also examines the reformed statutory recognition process, with lower thresholds making it significantly easier for unions to win recognition. Looking ahead to October 2026, they discuss the new obligation to inform workers of their right to join a trade union, and the landmark new right of trade unions to access workplaces — physically and digitally — to meet, recruit and organise, without needing to demonstrate any existing membership in the business. The episode closes with seven practical action points to help employers — unionised and non-unionised alike — get ahead of these changes before the October deadline.

In this episode of Inside Safety, Steve Bell is joined by Shane Allison, CEO of Phronesis, to explore the real cost of reputational damage for organisations. Drawing on original research into ASX 200 reputation incidents, they unpack what defines a reputational crisis, why many are foreseeable, and which issues cause the greatest and most lasting harm. From executive misconduct and employee class actions to governance and psychosocial risk, this episode offers practical insights for safety, legal and risk professionals looking to better anticipate and manage reputation risk.

Following the Australian Government’s new federal hate crimes legislation that commenced in January 2026, HSF Kramer Partners Jacqui Wootton and Alice Molan and Solicitor Shaun Milligan unpack the new offences relating to “prohibited hate groups”, including what the recklessness standard means in practice for corporates, particularly across procurement, supply chains and corporate groups. We also explore proposed changes to the AML/CTF Rules and the practical steps reporting entities can take now to identify, escalate and manage prohibited hate group risk alongside other serious financial crime risks.

In this special bonus episode, we share a recording from a recent client webinar exploring the major corporate crime trends shaping the APAC region in 2026. Drawing on the firm’s newly launched Corporate Crime 360 Guide, HSF Kramer APAC partners Kyle Wombolt, Jacqui Wootton and Leon Chung break down the critical regulatory, enforcement and risk developments businesses should have firmly on their radar over the year ahead.

In this episode, Employment Partner Tony Wood and Executive Counsel Lucy Boyd are joined by HSF Kramer partner (and Corporate law icon), Priscilla Bryans. The team unpack what really happens behind the AFR headlines and discuss an array of issues, starting with the recent data showing a spate of CEO turnovers from both Australia and the US. Tony, Lucy and Priscilla also discuss: • Why succession planning is so important, and why it takes so much time • The impact on the cap on termination benefits under the Corporations Act • How STI and LTI incentives are a key issue in executive separations and why there is more interest than ever from shareholder activists and proxy advisors • The greater accountability of executives for misconduct and behavioural issues, coupled with the plethora of laws regulating bullying and whistleblowing • The changing composition of Boards and why the critical mass of female non-executive directors is changing the leadership culture of big business

EP31: Collective Bargaining Under Pressure: Wages, Inflation, and the Fight for Fair but Sustainable Wages In this episode of Inside IR, Rohan Doyle and Natalie Gaspar explore the growing pressure on enterprise bargaining wage negotiations as we see unions pressing for wage increases that outpace the rising cost of living in the face of inflation and interest rate increases, at a time when employers are under immense pressure to reduce costs. Natalie and Rohan examine why productivity has become central to achieving sustainable wage outcomes, and discuss some of the other key developments driving up wage costs, including same job, same pay orders, and expanding enterprise agreement coverage. A timely and practical discussion for employers, HR and IR professionals navigating a highly charged bargaining environment.

Breach of Principle 1 – Banque Havilland vicariously liable for senior employees’ lack of integrity On 3 February 2026, the Upper Tribunal handed down its judgment finding, among other things, that Banque Havilland had breached Principle 1 of the FCA’s Principles for Businesses (the requirement to conduct business with integrity), on the basis that the firm was vicariously liable for the actions of its senior employees. In Episode 11 of the FSR Brief, Jon Ford, Kate Meakin and Izzy Salzedo discuss the Upper Tribunal’s exploration of vicarious liability and agency law as a novel route to establishing a breach of Principle 1, and consider questions of liability and attribution from both a corporate crime and financial services regulatory perspective. The discussion also touches on the Upper Tribunal’s more generous approach to penalty and mitigation when compared with the FCA’s decision. For further background read our blog post: https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/fsrandcorpcrime/2026-posts/the-curious-case-of-banque-havilland-a-firm-held-vicariously-liable-for-a-lack-of-integrity