Firing Lane

Everyone is arguing over whether the latest governor’s race poll is “real.” They’re asking the wrong question. In this episode of Firing Lane, Croaky breaks down how professional campaigns actually use polling, why message testing isn’t election prediction, what the crosstabs reveal that headlines don’t, and why Jay Collins may have an introduction problem—not a persuasion problem. Stop reading polls like sports scores. Start reading them like strategy.

I sat down with Daniel Hassan, a major Fishback donor and Renner donor, despite being on opposite sides of the governor’s race. What followed was not a shouting match. It was a real conversation about old Florida, overdevelopment, corporate power, AI, H-1Bs, DeSantis, Byron Donalds, James Fishback, Paul Renner, and Jay Collins. Most interesting part? Daniel called Jay Collins “an American hero” and said he thinks Jay “would make a good governor” His criticism wasn’t ideological. It was whether Jay can connect with a wider audience. That’s a serious conversation worth having.

The second-place food fight vs. the real debate Florida Republicans deserve. Renner and Fishback want Jay Collins dragged sideways into a side-show without Byron. But a debate without Byron Donalds does not test Byron Donalds. It protects him. The real question remains: Why is the protected frontrunner being kept from a side-by-side comparison with the Green Beret DeSantis trusted to help carry the mission forward?

On this episode of Firing Lane, I debated former Florida State Senator Jeff Brandes on property taxes, local government, and the question nobody in Tallahassee wants to answer plainly: If you bought the home, paid for the home, insured the home, maintained the home, survived the interest rates, survived the premiums, and survived hurricane season… why are you still paying rent to the government? Brandes made the very real institutional case: police, fire, roads, rural counties, budget buckets, and the fear of disruption. I made the homeowner’s case: local government matters, but that does not make every dollar sacred — and it sure as hell does not make your house a permanent revenue farm. This is the real fight behind property tax reform. Not slogans. Not spreadsheets alone. A basic question of power: Does government exist to serve the homeowner, or does the homeowner exist to fund the government? Listen now.

There’s a theory floating around Florida politics that Ron DeSantis built the most consequential conservative governing project in America, fought the institutions, took the arrows, reshaped the state, advanced property tax reform, elevated Jay Collins, and then—when the succession question finally arrived—decided he had no meaningful view on who gets the keys. I don’t buy it. Not because anyone is owed anything. Nobody is owed anything in politics. But builders care who inherits the machine. Fighters care whether the next guy can fight. And the Florida model does not survive through coronation, name ID, or hiding from comparison. This episode breaks down why the endorsement question matters, why debate pressure matters, why the “DeSantis sits it out” theory makes little sense, and why this race is not just a primary. It’s a succession test.

On this episode of Firing Lane Croaky breaks down the fake binary in the AI data-center fight. The choice is not “let Big Tech build wherever it wants” or “pretend a ban will magically stop the future.” Open floodgates mean Floridians subsidize massive water, power, land, and infrastructure demands they never voted for. Fake bans sound tough, but collapse into lawsuits, loopholes, carve-outs, and backroom exemptions. The real conservative answer is governance: Build here, maybe — but on Florida’s terms. No subsidies. No cost-shifting onto ratepayers. No draining local water systems. No sweetheart deals hidden behind legal word games. Real standards. Local control. Transparency. Infrastructure paid by the companies creating the demand. Because serious leaders don't ban the future. They make the future negotiate with Florida.

Florida Republicans are being told the race is over. But if Byron Donalds already has it locked up, why won’t he stand on a stage and prove it? In this episode, we break down the debate problem at the center of the Florida governor’s race: not as theater, not as Twitter drama, but as a job interview for one of the most important governorships in America. Polls don’t answer questions. Endorsements don’t explain policy. Prediction markets don’t defend school choice, fix insurance, implement property-tax reform, or preserve the Florida Blueprint. Only the candidate can do that. And if Byron wants the keys to Florida, voters deserve to see whether he can handle pressure before he gets handed the mansion. This is the paradox: The more a frontrunner claims he has no incentive to debate, the more voters have every incentive to demand one

DeSantis got it on the ballot. Now the grassroots have to win it. The property-tax fight is no longer just in Tallahassee. It is in the mind of every Florida homeowner who is about to be told that relief means chaos, schools vanish, roads dissolve, and civilization ends. That is the fear machine. Our job is civic literacy. Explain homestead. Explain school funding. Explain non-homestead property. Explain the fee shell game. Explain why local-government panic should not be accepted at face value. If homeowners understand the amendment, they are harder to scare. This episode of Firing Lane: The Amendment Is Not Self-Defending.

Every poll is apparently sacred scripture when it helps your guy and fake news when it doesn’t. In this episode of Firing Lane, we do the forbidden thing: read the damn map. Donalds is ahead. Jay is under-known. Fishback is noise with data attached. And Florida deserves a race decided by knowledge, not recognition.

People like Byron Donalds are now pitching IEP’s for all students and “individualized learning” for every child mandated by the state. That means: – statewide tracking – AI-generated trajectories – behavioral data – permanent profiles Today we just learned of new AI models that may exploit vulnerabilities faster than humans can defend them. They want to spreadsheet childhood… and plug it into systems even their creators say are dangerous.