Moscow Murder Rewind: The Warrant For The Surveillance Footage From Umpqua Bank

The Sinaloa Cartel is a drug trafficking organization based in the Mexican state of Sinaloa. It was founded in the late 1980s and is named after its home state. The cartel is one of the largest and most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world, with operations in the United States, Europe, Asia, and South America.The Sinaloa Cartel is led by Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada and was previously led by Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, who was extradited to the United States in 2017 and sentenced to life in prison in 2019.The cartel is involved in the production, transportation, and distribution of drugs, including marijuana,fentanyl, cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine. It is known for its use of violence and intimidation to maintain its power and control over drug trafficking routes and territories.Despite numerous efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel, it continues to operate and remains a significant force in the global drug trade. Its operations have been linked to corruption, money laundering, and violence, and have had a significant impact on the social and economic fabric of the regions in which it operates.In this episode we take a look at how things have become increasingly worse since El Chapo was arrested and how his sons, The Los Chapitos have elevated their industrial sized labs to a size and in a number not seen before which in turn has helped drive the pandemic of overdose deaths in America. (commercial at 10:29)to contact me:[email protected]:Sinaloa cartel: Fentanyl experiments, crypto payments and feeding people to tigers: A look inside the criminal empire of El Chapo’s sons | International | EL PAÍS English (elpais.com)

The Hells Angels in Australia have been actively collaborating with the Kinahan cartel to smuggle significant quantities of cocaine into the country. The Kinahan cartel, a notorious organized crime group based in Ireland with extensive international operations, has been instrumental in supplying the cocaine that is distributed in Australia through the Hells Angels' network.This alliance has been highlighted by several recent developments. For instance, the Australian authorities have identified key figures within both organizations working together to ensure the successful trafficking of narcotics. The Hells Angels, known for their organized crime activities, provide the local distribution network necessary for the cartel's operation.The partnership between these groups has also extended to other criminal activities, including money laundering and weapon trafficking, as seen in various international operations that have involved these organizations. The crackdown on these networks has resulted in several high-profile arrests and seizures, emphasizing the global reach and the complex nature of these criminal enterprises​. In this episode, we head down under to see what's up!(commercial at 10:10)to contact me:[email protected]:Australian biker chief working with Kinahan cartel to move cocaine around the world, top podcast claims - Irish Mirror Online

The trafficking of weapons meant for warzones often involves complex networks of arms dealers, corrupt officials, and organized crime groups. Here's a summary of how this process generally unfolds:AcquisitionConflict Zones: Weapons are initially acquired from conflict zones, where they are often plentiful due to ongoing wars or civil unrest.Military Surplus: Arms dealers obtain surplus weapons from military stockpiles. These might be obsolete or excess to the needs of the armed forces.Black Market: Weapons can also be sourced from the black market, where they are sold illegally by corrupt military personnel or officials.TransportationSmuggling Routes: Arms dealers use established smuggling routes to transport weapons. These routes often overlap with those used for drug trafficking.Bribes and Corruption: Bribes are paid to corrupt border officials, customs agents, and police to facilitate the smooth transit of weapons across borders.Disguised Shipments: Weapons are hidden in shipments of legal goods, such as food or machinery, to avoid detection.DistributionCriminal Networks: Weapons are sold to organized crime groups, gangs, or other non-state actors. These groups use their existing distribution networks to move the weapons further.Drug Cartels: Arms dealers often trade weapons directly for drugs. This is particularly common in regions where drug cartels operate, as they have both the resources and the demand for firearms.Barter System: In some cases, weapons are bartered for other illicit goods or services, including drugs, making it a mutually beneficial exchange for both parties.Final Sale or TradeEnd Users: The end users of these trafficked weapons can range from gang members and drug cartels to terrorist organizations and insurgent groups.Profit Generation: The sale or trade of weapons for drugs allows arms dealers to profit significantly, which they reinvest into further illegal activities.Market Dynamics: The illicit arms market is influenced by supply and demand. As conflicts flare up or as the need for drugs increases, the trafficking patterns and prices fluctuate accordingly.ImpactViolence and Instability: The influx of trafficked weapons exacerbates violence and instability in both conflict zones and areas plagued by drug-related crime.Enforcement Challenges: Law enforcement agencies face significant challenges in tracking and intercepting these illegal arms due to the sophisticated methods used by traffickers.About a year ago we were having the discussion about MANPADS and other shoulder fired systems falling into the hands of the cartels and the legacy media was quick to deny it.   Well, like usual, it would seem as if the legacy media wasn't exactly telling you the truth.    So in this episode, we are going to swim through the muck and find some clarity.(commercial at 12:59)to contact me:[email protected]:Mexican cartels boast of increased firepower, including U.S. weapons (usatoday.com)

The way that the prosecution conducted itself during the Epstein investigation/trial is one of the most disgusting displays of negligence in quite some time. Yet, nobody was ever punished for it or held accountable for the ridiculous deal that Jeffrey Epstein received. In this episode we take a look at that monstrous deal once again and some of those who participated in handing out a stay out of prison card in the process.(commercial at 18:52)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8953871/How-sloppy-federal-prosecutors-foolish-mistakes-got-Jeffrey-Epstein-15-months-jail.html

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's legal team filed a notice on March 26, 2025, submitting an affidavit from expert Sy Ray in support of their Motion in Limine #2, which seeks to exclude vague and undisclosed expert testimony. The affidavit critiques the anticipated testimony of FBI Special Agent Nicholas Ballance, highlighting concerns about the lack of clarity and detail in his reports regarding the analysis of AT&T call detail records. Ray points out that Ballance's methodologies are either vaguely described or entirely absent, making it challenging to assess the validity of his conclusions. Additionally, Ray notes that Ballance's failure to analyze specific data, such as AT&T handoff information, has resulted in the omission of potentially exculpatory evidence. The defense argues that these deficiencies could mislead the jury and compromise Kohberger's right to a fair trial.to contact me:[email protected]:032625+Defendants+Notice+of+Filing+Affidavit+iso+MIL+2+RE+Vague+Undisclosed+Expert+Testimony.pdf

​Virginia Giuffre, widely recognized for her allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, has disclosed that she is in critical condition following a severe car accident involving a school bus. In an Instagram post, Giuffre shared a photo from her hospital bed, revealing significant bruising and injuries. She stated that she has entered renal failure and has been informed by medical professionals that she has only four days to live. Expressing a deep desire to see her children one last time, she conveyed gratitude to her supporters for their role in her life.Her father, Sky Roberts, responded to her post, expressing his love and offering prayers for her recovery. He emphasized his hope that she receives appropriate medical treatment to prolong her life. Giuffre's recent personal challenges include a separation from her husband and estrangement from their three teenage children. She has previously been in the public eye due to her legal actions against Prince Andrew, which concluded with an out-of-court settlement supporting her charity for abuse victims.to  contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking victim Virginia Giuffre's disturbing Instagram post claims 'they've given me four days to live' | Daily Mail Online

​Karen Read is set to face her second trial in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, beginning April 1, 2025. O'Keefe was found deceased outside a fellow officer's home in Canton, Massachusetts, during a snowstorm on January 29, 2022. Prosecutors allege that Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV after a night of drinking and left the scene, leading to his death from blunt force trauma and hypothermia. Read has pleaded not guilty, maintaining that she is being framed and asserting that the actual events differ from the prosecution's narrative.The initial trial concluded with a mistrial on July 1, 2024, due to a hung jury. During the proceedings, credibility issues arose concerning lead investigator Michael Proctor, who was later terminated from the Massachusetts State Police for unprofessional conduct, including inappropriate text messages about Read. Additionally, a juror from the first trial has joined Read's defense team for the retrial, expressing concerns about the integrity of the initial investigation. The retrial is expected to address these controversies and re-examine the circumstances surrounding O'Keefe's death.to  contact  me:[email protected]:Karen Read case: What to know as she prepares for 2nd trial in John O'Keefe death | Fox News

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdf

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdf

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al., the defendants have submitted a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. They argue that the plaintiff has not sufficiently demonstrated the need for anonymity, as required by the factors established in Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. The defendants contend that the plaintiff's claims, while sensitive, do not involve matters that typically warrant anonymity, such as challenging governmental actions or involving minors.They also assert that there is no substantial risk of physical retaliation or mental harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. Furthermore, they highlight that the plaintiff's identity has not been kept confidential, pointing to prior public disclosures related to the case. The defendants emphasize that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous would prejudice their ability to defend themselves, as it hampers the investigation and gathering of evidence. They also argue that the public has a legitimate interest in open judicial proceedings, which includes knowing the identities of the parties involved. In conclusion, the defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for anonymity, asserting that the balance of factors weighs against permitting her to proceed under a pseudonym.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.630375.54.0.pdf