This Week In Palestine

For decades, one of the most powerful narratives in the political conversation surrounding Israel and Palestine has been the claim that Zionism and Judaism are inseparable. The argument is repeated so often that many people have come to accept it as an unquestionable fact: that to oppose Zionism is to oppose Jews, and that criticism of the policies of the Israeli state is somehow an attack on Judaism itself.But what if that claim is not historically accurate?What if one of the most successful political projects of the past century has been convincing the world that a modern political ideology and a centuries-old religion are one and the same?That is precisely the question raised by Pulitzer Prize-winning author Benjamin Moser in his book Anti-Zionism: A Jewish History. In a revealing conversation with Mehdi Hasan, Moser challenges the idea that Zionism speaks for all Jews and argues that Jewish opposition to Zionism is not new, rare, or fringe, but deeply rooted in Jewish history itself. According to Moser, long before Palestinians resisted Zionism, many rabbis, scholars, writers, and Jewish intellectuals were already questioning the movement's goals, methods, and vision for the future. For generations, those voices were pushed to the margins of public discourse. The dominant narrative insisted that Zionism represented all Jews and that the interests of Judaism and the Zionist political project were identical. Yet today, more people are beginning to examine the historical record for themselves. They are discovering that Jewish communities have never been politically unified, that debates over Zionism have existed since its earliest days, and that some of its strongest critics have been Jewish thinkers, religious leaders, and activists.The reason this conversation matters is because the distinction between Judaism and Zionism changes everything. Judaism is an ancient faith, a civilization, and a people with thousands of years of history. Zionism is a modern political movement born in nineteenth-century Europe. Conflating the two has had enormous political consequences, shaping public opinion, influencing policy debates, and often shutting down legitimate discussion before it can begin. Moser argues that recognizing this difference is essential to understanding both the history of Israel and Palestine and the fierce debates that continue today.Across the world, a growing number of people are beginning to ask difficult questions. They are looking beyond slogans, beyond political talking points, and beyond the fear that often surrounds this topic. They are reading history, listening to diverse Jewish voices, and discovering that the story is far more complex than they were led to believe. Slowly but surely, a wall that stood for generations is beginning to crack. Information is more accessible than ever, historical documents are easier to find, and perspectives that were once excluded from mainstream conversations are now reaching millions.This does not mean everyone will reach the same conclusions. But it does mean that more people are refusing to accept simple narratives about one of the most consequential struggles of our time. They are asking where the line between religion and nationalism was drawn, who drew it, and why.Today, we'll explore that conversation. We'll examine the history, the controversy, and the arguments presented by Benjamin Moser. Most importantly, we'll consider a question at the center of this debate:Are Zionism and Judaism truly the same thing, or has the world been taught to believe they are?If you have thoughts, I want to hear them.Email me at [email protected] and tell me how you see it.This is This Week in Palestine. 

Today, we begin with a simple truth that rarely makes it into headlines. Somewhere, not far from the checkpoints and the walls, not far from the refugee camps and the demolished homes, not far from Gaza’s ruins and the West Bank’s olive groves, Israel is holding an election. A national ritual. A ceremony of democracy. A moment the world treats as a sign of stability and progress.But for Palestinians, this election is not a choice. It is a warning.Because every ballot cast in Israel carries consequences for the people living under occupation. Every campaign promise echoes through Gaza’s shattered streets. Every political speech reverberates in the hills of the West Bank. Every candidate’s victory shapes the fate of Palestinians across the region and across the world.And so we begin with a cold question. A question that cuts through the noise, the slogans, the posters, the televised debates.What does an Israeli election mean for a people who cannot vote in it, yet live under its shadow every single day?The other day, someone asked me, “Who do you want to win the Israeli election?” I looked her in the eyes and answered without hesitation. “What difference does it make?”Because when you peel back the layers, when you strip away the campaign ads and the speeches, you find a political landscape where every major candidate shares the same foundation. A foundation built on occupation. A foundation built on supremacy. A foundation built on the belief that Palestinians must remain controlled, contained, and silenced.One candidate promises harsher crackdowns. Another promises tighter borders. One vows to expand settlements. Another vows to legalize the ones already built. One speaks openly of removing Palestinians. Another speaks quietly of policies that achieve the same result.Different words. Same ideology.And while the world watches Israel’s election as if it were a beacon of democracy, Palestinians brace themselves for the next wave of consequences.In Gaza, families wonder whether the next government will tighten the siege or loosen it. Whether aid will be blocked or allowed. Whether reconstruction will begin or be halted. Whether the bombs will fall again.In the West Bank, communities wonder whether settler violence will increase. Whether land seizures will accelerate. Whether military raids will intensify. Whether the checkpoints will multiply.And beyond the borders of historic Palestine, millions of Palestinians in exile wonder whether the next Israeli government will make their return even more impossible. Whether their identity will be further erased. Whether their history will be rewritten yet again.This election does not happen in isolation. It happens on occupied land. It happens under apartheid conditions. It happens while millions live without rights, without freedom, without protection.And yet, the world treats it as normal.But Palestinians know better. They know that every Israeli election is a turning point. Not for Israel. But for them.Because when a country elects leaders who control another people’s land, another people’s movement, another people’s future, that election becomes a tool of domination.And today, as Israel prepares to choose its next government, Palestinians prepare for the consequences.They prepare for policies that will shape their daily lives. They prepare for decisions made in rooms they cannot enter. They prepare for laws written in a language they cannot vote in. They prepare for leaders who speak about them, legislate over them, and rule them — without ever seeing them as equals.This is the reality the world must confront. This is the truth behind the ballot box. This is the story rarely told.And today, we tell it.We begin with the election. We begin with the candidates. We begin with the ideology that binds them. And we begin with the people who will feel the impact most deeply — the Palestinians living under occupation and the Palestinians scattered across the world.This is This Week in Palestine. This is where truth stands unfiltered. This is where clarity does not bend. And this is where we begin.If you have thoughts, I want to hear them.Email me at [email protected] and tell me how you see it.This is This Week in Palestine. 

One day in the past, long before borders were drawn and flags were raised, there was a place called Palestine. A land of villages and orchards, of markets and minarets, of families who traced their roots back centuries. A land with its own rhythm, its own language, its own stories, its own soul.And then, strangers arrived.They came from the West. They came from Europe. They came from places that had never tasted the dust of Jerusalem or smelled the sea of Jaffa. They came with maps, with plans, with foreign ideologies, with promises whispered in diplomatic rooms thousands of miles away.They came not to visit. They came to take.Piece by piece, they stole the land. Piece by piece, they erased the history. Piece by piece, they claimed the culture as their own. They renamed the hills. They renamed the rivers. They renamed the villages. They renamed the ancient allies who had lived side by side for generations.And the world watched.The world saw the theft. The world saw the displacement. The world saw the uprooted olive trees, the emptied homes, the families forced into exile. The world saw it all, and still decided to believe the lie.The lie became the new fact. The occupier became the victim. The native became the threat. And Palestine, the real Palestine, began to vanish from global memory.Palestinians were ignored. Their testimonies dismissed. Their stories labeled exaggerations. Their history treated as myth. Their suffering treated as background noise.I am talking about the real stories. The stories of grandparents who walked out of their homes with only the clothes on their backs. The stories of farmers who watched their orchards burn. The stories of children who grew up in refugee camps holding keys to houses they would never see again. Stories that were repeated, documented, shouted, whispered, carried across continents.But nobody listened.For a hundred years, Palestinians tried to tell the world what was happening. For a hundred years, they tried to explain what was taken from them. For a hundred years, they tried to show the truth.And then came October 7th.A day that shattered the silence. A day that cracked open the narrative. A day that forced the world to look directly at the story it had ignored for generations.Suddenly, people began to ask questions. Suddenly, people began to doubt the official version. Suddenly, people began to see the footage, the testimonies, the contradictions. Suddenly, the world realized that Palestinians had been telling the truth all along.The truth that was dismissed. The truth that was buried. The truth that was mocked. The truth that was labeled propaganda.The truth that is now undeniable.October 7th did not create the Palestinian story. It revealed it. It exposed what had been hidden. It forced the world to confront the reality that Palestinians have been trying to explain for a century.And as the world finally opened its eyes, Gaza continued to burn.Even after ceasefire agreements were announced, the genocide did not stop. Bombs still fell. Homes still collapsed. Children still died. Aid still struggled to enter. The siege still suffocated an entire population.Ceasefire in name. Destruction in reality.And while Gaza endured relentless devastation, the West Bank lived under a different kind of terror.Every day, Palestinians in the West Bank face attacks from settlers who roam the hills armed and emboldened. Every day, families wake up wondering if today will be the day their home is burned, their land stolen, their children threatened. Every day, villages are raided, farms destroyed, lives shattered.This is the story the world ignored. This is the story Palestinians carried alone. This is the story that October 7th forced into the global spotlight.And now, the world cannot unsee it.Today, we begin with that truth. We begin with the land that once was. We begin with the theft that followed. We begin with the silence that lasted a century. And we begin with the moment the world finally woke up.This is This Week in Palestine. This is where truth stands unfiltered. This is where history speaks. This is where courage rises. And this is where we begin.If you have thoughts, I want to hear them. Email me at [email protected] and tell me how you see it.This is This Week in Palestine. 

Today, we begin with a question that has hovered over the last three years like smoke that refuses to clear. A question that Israel avoids, that media tiptoes around, and that survivors whisper behind closed doors.What exactly is the Hannibal Directive?Is it a military protocol? Is it a policy? Is it an unwritten rule? Or is it something far darker, a command that allows soldiers to kill their own citizens if they are at risk of being taken hostage?We ask this not to provoke, not to sensationalize, but because truth demands it. Because for three years, we have been fed a narrative that now collapses under the weight of evidence.And that brings us to October 7th.The day the world was told that one thousand one hundred and ninety‑five Israelis were killed by Hamas. The day Israel declared itself the victim of unimaginable brutality. The day that became the justification for genocide, for bombardment, for siege, for starvation, for the destruction of Gaza.But now, three years later, we must ask the question that refuses to die.Who really killed the 1,195 Israelis?Was it Hamas? Was it Israeli forces? Was it both? Was it chaos? Was it the Hannibal Directive?For three years, we were told stories that turned out to be false. We were told about beheaded babies. We were told about mass atrocities that evaporated under investigation. We were told numbers that shifted, details that changed, claims that collapsed.We were told a version of events designed to ignite rage, to justify war, to silence criticism, to erase context.But now, the truth is emerging. Survivors have spoken. Investigators have dug deeper. Journalists have uncovered testimonies. Analysts have examined footage. And the world is beginning to understand that the story of October 7th is not as simple as Israel claimed.And while the truth struggles to surface, Gaza continues to bleed.The genocide did not pause. It did not slow. It did not stop. Even after ceasefire agreements were announced, the bombs continued to fall. The drones continued to circle. The tanks continued to advance. The siege continued to suffocate.Children still die. Families still starve. Hospitals still collapse. Neighborhoods still vanish. And the world watches a genocide unfold in real time, even as leaders pretend the violence has ended.Ceasefire in name. Destruction in practice.And while Gaza burns, the West Bank lives under a different kind of terror.Every day, Palestinians in the West Bank wake up knowing that settlers may attack their homes, their farms, their children. Every day, they face armed groups who act with impunity, protected by the military, encouraged by extremist politicians, shielded by a system that treats Palestinian life as disposable.Villages are raided. Olive trees are burned. Homes are torched. Families are beaten. Children are kidnapped. Land is stolen.This is not a rare occurrence. This is daily life. This is the reality of occupation. This is the truth the world is finally beginning to see.And all of it, Gaza, the West Bank, the settlers, the siege, the genocide, circles back to the question we began with.What is the Hannibal Directive? What happened on October 7th? Who killed the 1,195 Israelis? Why were lies spread so quickly? Why were investigations blocked? Why were journalists silenced? Why were survivors ignored?And why, after three years, does Israel still refuse to answer?Today, we confront these questions. We confront the narrative. We confront the silence. We confront the truth buried under rubble, under propaganda, under fear.Because truth is not a threat. Truth is not antisemitic. Truth is not dangerous. Truth is necessary.And today, we begin.Let’s step into the conversation the world has avoided. Let’s examine the evidence. Let’s confront the lies. Let’s listen to the voices that were silenced. Let’s speak the truth that refuses to die.This is This Week in Palestine. This is where truth stands unfiltered. This is where clarity does not bend. This is where courage speaks.And this is where we begin.If you have thoughts, I want to hear them. Email me at [email protected] and tell me how you see it.This is This Week in Palestine.

How did AIPAC begin in America, and why did it rise to become one of the most powerful political forces in Washington? Today, we open a chapter that many Americans have never been invited to read. It is a chapter that explains why our foreign policy looks the way it does, why the Middle East remains locked in perpetual crisis, and why the voice of the American public so often feels drowned out by interests that do not serve them.To understand the present, we must go back to the origins.AIPAC did not emerge from a grassroots movement. It did not rise from the voices of ordinary Jewish Americans seeking safety or dignity. It began as a strategic project, a political engine designed to secure unwavering United States support for Israel, regardless of the cost, regardless of the consequences, and regardless of the shifting tides of global politics.In the aftermath of World War II, as Israel was being established, a small network of activists and political operatives recognized something crucial. America was the key. Not Europe. Not the United Nations. America, the superpower with the money, the military, the influence, and the global reach.And so the American Israel Public Affairs Committee was born.Its mission was simple. Make support for Israel a permanent fixture of American politics. Make it bipartisan. Make it untouchable. Make it so deeply woven into the fabric of Washington that no president, no senator, and no representative could challenge it without risking their career.Over the decades, AIPAC mastered the art of influence. It built relationships with lawmakers. It funded campaigns. It shaped narratives. It crafted talking points. It trained young politicians. It created a political environment where questioning Israeli policy became synonymous with political suicide.And slowly, quietly, and methodically, AIPAC became one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the United States.Its reach extended far beyond foreign policy. It influenced military spending. It shaped intelligence cooperation. It guided diplomatic strategy. It pressured administrations, Republican and Democrat alike, to align with Israeli interests even when those interests contradicted American values, American priorities, and American security.Critics argue that AIPAC’s influence has helped sustain occupation, fuel conflict, and silence dissent. They argue that AIPAC has pushed the United States into wars, sanctions, and regional entanglements that serve Israel’s strategic goals while leaving Americans to bear the cost in taxes, in debt, in instability, and in global backlash.They argue that AIPAC has created a political environment where genocide can be excused, where occupation can be normalized, and where human rights violations can be dismissed as security concerns.They argue that AIPAC’s power has grown so immense that it now shapes not only foreign policy, but domestic politics as well. It influences media narratives, shapes public opinion, and determines which voices are amplified and which voices are silenced.Now, we speak directly to our listeners about this influence. Not to demonize. Not to sensationalize. But to understand.Understanding AIPAC is essential to understanding why the Middle East remains in chaos. Understanding AIPAC is essential to understanding why American presidents, including our current one, make decisions that seem to serve interests far beyond our borders. Understanding AIPAC is essential to understanding why the United States continues to fund wars, occupations, and military operations that do not benefit the American people.This is not a story about Judaism. This is not a story about Jewish identity. This is a story about political power, power wielded by a lobbying organization that has shaped American policy for generations.And now, we open that story. We examine its origins. We explore its rise. We confront its consequences. And we ask the question that many fear to ask.Who truly shapes America’s decisions in the Middle East? Who benefits from the chaos? Who profits from the conflict? Who writes the script our leaders follow?This is This Week in Palestine. This is where truth does not hesitate. This is where clarity does not bend. And this is where we begin.If you have thoughts, I want to hear them. Email me at [email protected] and tell me how you see it.This is This Week in Palestine.

Can someone explain to me why a documentary movie turned Israel upside down and made Netanyahu scream? Is telling the truth really that dangerous, or is it simply something powerful people fear?So now, we open with a question that has echoed across continents, across newsrooms, across the hearts of people who still believe in the right to speak freely. Because what happened with the film NAZA is not just a controversy. It is a warning. A flare shot into the sky, revealing how fragile truth becomes when it threatens the foundations of a state built on narrative, control, and silence.A film, a piece of art, a testimony, a mirror, shook Israel so violently that its prime minister demanded the filmmakers be stripped of their citizenship. Think about that. Not fined. Not criticized. Not debated. Stripped of citizenship. Erased from the national body for daring to show what Palestinians have been trying to tell the world for generations.And so we ask again: Is truth really that dangerous?Because if a documentary can destabilize a government’s confidence, what does that say about the government? If a film can expose cracks in the official story, what does that say about the story? If two filmmakers, Yuval Abraham and Rachel Shore, can shake the political establishment simply by documenting reality, what does that say about the reality itself?This moment did not emerge from nowhere. It sits inside a global pattern; one we’ve been watching unfold for years. A pattern where governments claim to defend freedom of speech while punishing anyone who uses it. A pattern where artists, journalists, and ordinary citizens are chased across borders for speaking truths their leaders cannot tolerate. A pattern where the right to speak becomes a privilege granted only to those who repeat the approved script.We’ve seen people arrested in countries they don’t even live in, simply because they spoke openly somewhere else. We’ve seen activists forced to hide in China, Turkey, or pockets of Europe just to breathe without fear. We’ve seen governments collaborate across borders to silence voices that refuse to bow.And we’ve seen it here in America too. We’ve watched our own president lash out at reporters, mock journalists, and treat the press as an enemy rather than a pillar of democracy. We’ve watched truth become a battlefield, not a shared foundation.So when Carter Sherman of the Guardian’s Stateside podcast sat down with the filmmakers of NAZA, she didn’t just conduct an interview. She opened a door. She illuminated a moment that reveals the global stakes of free speech. She showed us what happens when artists refuse to be intimidated, when witnesses refuse to be silenced, when truth refuses to die quietly.Abraham and Shore did not create propaganda. They created testimony. They captured what Palestinians endure, not through slogans, not through speeches, but through lived reality. And for that, they were labeled a threat to national security.For me, and for many people like me, they are heroes. For many Israelis, they are traitors. For Palestinians, they are proof. Proof that the world is finally beginning to see what has been hidden behind walls, checkpoints, and official statements.This film did not shake Israel because it lied. It shook Israel because it told the truth. A truth that has been buried, denied, distorted, and weaponized for decades. A truth that refuses to stay quiet any longer.Today, we bring that truth into this space. We bring the courage of those filmmakers. We bring the clarity of Carter Sherman’s interview. We bring the voices that governments try to erase.And we ask you to listen, not passively, not casually, but with the full weight of your conscience.Because when a film can make a prime minister scream, it means the truth inside it is powerful. And when truth becomes powerful, it becomes unstoppable.And today, we begin that conversation.If you have thoughts, I want to hear them. Email me at [email protected] and tell me how you see it.This is This Week in Palestine. 

For more than a century, Zionism has worked tirelessly to convince the world that the creation of a “Jewish state” is not only justified, but inevitable, a destiny written in stone, a promise etched into history, a truth so self‑evident that questioning it becomes taboo. It is a narrative repeated in parliaments, echoed in textbooks, reinforced in media, and carried by diplomats who treat it as an unquestionable foundation of global politics.But today, we speak directly to our listeners about the widening gap between that narrative and the reality unfolding on the ground.Because the claim of a “Jewish state” is not ancient scripture. It is not a timeless truth. It is not a natural evolution of history. It is a political project, constructed, marketed, defended, and exported with extraordinary force. A project that relies on repetition, on mythmaking, on the constant reshaping of public memory.Zionism tells the world that this state is necessary. Reality keeps proving that it is maintained through violence.Zionism tells the world that this state is democratic. Reality shows millions living without rights under its rule.Zionism tells the world that this state is secure. Reality reveals a nation perpetually at war with the people it displaced.Zionism tells the world that this state represents all Jews. Reality shows countless Jewish voices, scholars, activists, rabbis, rejecting the idea that their identity must be tied to a state built on dispossession.And so we ask: If the idea of a “Jewish state” were truly self‑evident, why must it be defended with walls, checkpoints, surveillance, and military force? If the narrative were truly unbreakable, why must it silence critics, punish dissent, and rewrite history?Because reality has a way of speaking louder than propaganda.Reality is the Palestinian child in Gaza who has never known a day without drones overhead. Reality is the family in Hebron living under military rule while settlers walk freely. Reality is the refugee in Lebanon whose grandparents were expelled so a “Jewish state” could be declared. Reality is the global movement, Muslim, Jewish, Christian, secular, demanding justice, dignity, and equality.Reality is the simple truth: A state built on exclusion cannot claim moral authority. A state built on supremacy cannot claim democracy. A state built on erasure cannot claim permanence.And yet, Zionism continues to sell the world a story. A story of inevitability, of divine right, of historical destiny. A story that insists the “Jewish state” is the only possible future.But the world is changing. People are asking questions. Young voices are rising. Scholars are challenging old assumptions. Journalists are exposing what was once hidden. And Palestinians, in Jerusalem, in the villages and towns of the West Bank, in Gaza, and across the diaspora, continue to live, resist, and speak with a clarity that no narrative can erase.Today, we explore the tension between myth and reality. Between the story Zionism tells and the truth the world can no longer ignore. Between a political project built on power and a lived reality built on struggle.This is not a debate about identity. It is a conversation about ideology. About a project that claims inevitability while reality keeps proving otherwise.This is This Week in Palestine, where truth does not hesitate, where clarity does not bend, and where the call for liberation continues.And today, we begin that conversation.If you have thoughts, I want to hear them. Email me at [email protected] and tell me how you see it.This is This Week in Palestine. 

Today we open a chapter of American politics that is often whispered about, rarely confronted, and almost never acknowledged openly. It is the story of how a foreign‑policy lobby — powerful, organized, well‑funded, and deeply embedded in Washington — has shaped the direction of the United States for decades. It is the story of how the Israel lobby became one of the most influential political forces in America, capable of steering debates, silencing dissent, and defining what can and cannot be said in the halls of power.This is not a story about individuals. It is a story about a system. A network of think tanks, advocacy groups, donors, media relationships, and political pressure that has woven itself into the fabric of U.S. policymaking. A system that ensures military aid flows without question, diplomatic cover is provided without pause, and political loyalty is rewarded without hesitation. A system that has convinced Congress that supporting Israel is not a foreign‑policy choice, but a political necessity.For decades, lawmakers have learned that criticizing Israeli policy carries consequences. Careers stall. Committees are lost. Donors disappear. Media narratives shift. And so, silence becomes the safest path. Compliance becomes the easiest path. And unconditional support becomes the expected path. The result is a foreign policy that often reflects the priorities of the lobby more than the interests of the American public.This influence is not subtle. It is visible in the billions of dollars in military aid approved every year. It is visible in the diplomatic protection offered at the United Nations. It is visible in the way presidential candidates speak about Israel with identical language, as if reading from the same script. It is visible in the way journalists, academics, and analysts are pressured, attacked, or marginalized when they challenge the narrative.And it is visible in the wars America enters, the alliances it chooses, and the crises it escalates. From the Middle East to the Persian Gulf, from Iran to Lebanon, from Gaza to the West Bank, U.S. policy often mirrors the strategic priorities of Israel more closely than the strategic interests of the United States.Today, we revisit this story not to provoke, not to generalize, and not to target any community. We revisit it to understand how power works. How influence is built. How narratives are shaped. And how a lobby became strong enough to guide the foreign policy of a superpower.Because understanding the Israel lobby is not about blame. It is about clarity. It is about recognizing the forces that shape America’s decisions abroad and the silence that surrounds them at home. It is about asking who benefits, who pays the price, and who decides the direction of a nation that claims to act in the name of democracy.And today, we begin that conversation.If you have thoughts, I want to hear them. Email me at [email protected] and tell me how you see it.This is This Week in Palestine.

Today we revisit a moment in history when Israel claimed to be the victim of an attack by its neighbors, blaming them for daring to free their own occupied land in the Golan Heights of Syria and the Sinai Peninsula of Egypt. The October War, known in the West as the Yom Kippur War, was not a sudden act of aggression. It was a coordinated attempt by Arab nations to reclaim territories taken in 1967, territories recognized by the world as occupied. Egypt crossed the Suez Canal to retake Sinai. Syria launched a massive offensive to recover the Golan Heights. For the Arab world, this was not an invasion. It was self‑defense. It was liberation. It was the restoration of land that had been seized and held under military rule.Yet even in this context, Israel presented itself as the victim. It framed the war as an unprovoked attack timed to exploit a religious holiday. It shaped the narrative so that the world saw only surprise and danger, not occupation and resistance. This pattern did not begin in 1973. It stretches back decades, into the very foundations of the conflict.In 1946, long before Israel became a state, the King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed by the Irgun paramilitary organization. The explosion killed ninety‑one people. British officials, staff, civilians, Jews, Palestinians. The dead were not soldiers. They were administrators, clerks, hotel workers, and visitors. It was one of the deadliest attacks of the British Mandate period. Yet over time, the event was reframed, softened, justified, or buried beneath a larger narrative of victimhood.Two decades later, in 1967, the USS Liberty, an American Navy intelligence ship, was attacked in international waters. Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats struck the vessel repeatedly. Rockets, machine‑gun fire, napalm. When the assault ended, thirty‑four American sailors were dead and one hundred seventy‑one were wounded. The United States never received a clear explanation. Families never received closure. And the world moved on, as if the deaths of American servicemen were a footnote rather than a tragedy.These events reveal a pattern in how wars involving Israel have been remembered. A pattern where the state presents itself as the perpetual victim, even in moments when its own actions caused devastation. A pattern where history is edited, where context is removed, where occupation is erased, and where retaliation is portrayed as aggression. A pattern where the suffering of others is overshadowed by a narrative crafted for political survival.Today, we revisit these moments not to inflame hatred and not to generalize about any people. We revisit them to understand how states shape memory, how governments rewrite history, and how narratives become shields that protect power. Because the wars with Israel cannot be understood through slogans or headlines. They must be understood through the events that were forgotten, the stories that were buried, and the truths that were never allowed to surface.If you have thoughts, I want to hear them. Email me at [email protected] and tell me how you see it.This is This Week in Palestine. 

Today we begin with a question that every American should be asking, a question that echoes through every ruined base, every broken alliance, every shattered promise: Why are we in war with Iran? And why, somehow, are we in conflict with half the world?How did a nation that once led through diplomacy, alliances, and economic strength become a nation defined by endless wars, sanctions, tariffs, and isolation? How did we go from building bridges to burning them? From leading coalitions to losing them? From being respected to being feared, and then resented?The Iran war did not begin with strategy. It began with arrogance. It began with the belief that America could reshape the Middle East with missiles, threats, and pressure. It began with the fantasy that Iran would collapse under sanctions, that its alliances would crumble, that its people would turn against their government. Instead, Iran grew stronger. Its networks expanded. Its influence deepened. And America found itself fighting a war it could not win, against a country that never attacked it.But Iran was only the beginning.Tariffs followed, sweeping, punishing tariffs that struck not enemies, but allies. Europe, Canada, Mexico, South Korea, Japan, China, nations that stood with us for decades, suddenly found themselves treated as adversaries. Their industries were hit. Their economies strained. Their trust shattered. They watched America weaponize trade, not against dictators, but against partners. And slowly, quietly, they began to walk away.Countries that once relied on American leadership began building their own alliances. Countries that once trusted American promises began preparing for American abandonment. Countries that once feared American power began doubting American competence.And then came the war, the war with Iran that spiraled into a regional collapse. Bases destroyed. Supply lines broken. Allies refusing to host American forces. Nations refusing to join American coalitions. The world watched the United States stumble into a conflict it did not understand, did not prepare for, and could not control.Why are we in war with Iran? Because we chose ideology over strategy. Why are we in conflict with the world? Because we chose tariffs over diplomacy. Because we chose pressure over partnership. Because we chose dominance over cooperation.And now, America stands more isolated than at any point in modern history, not because the world turned against us, but because we pushed the world away.This brings us to the conversation that every American must hear the one with John Mearsheimer, one of the most respected foreign‑policy scholars alive. In his discussion with Chris Hedges, Mearsheimer lays out the truth with brutal clarity: The Iran war is the biggest strategic blunder in U.S. history.He explains how the war destroyed American credibility, empowered Iran, fractured alliances, drained billions, and exposed the limits of American military power. He shows how the United States misread the region, misunderstood its enemies, and overestimated its own strength. He reveals how lobby networks, ideological pressure, and political delusion pushed America into a conflict that served no national interest.And he warns that great powers do not fall because they are defeated. Great powers fall because they make catastrophic decisions and refuse to admit they were wrong.Today, we stand inside the consequences of those decisions. Today, we live in the shadow of a war that never should have happened. Today, we confront the cost of arrogance, isolation, and empire.And now, with the stage set, with the truth laid bare, with the questions finally asked, we turn to the conversation that explains how America lost its way, and how it might still find a path back.If you have thoughts, I want to hear them. Email me at [email protected] and tell me how you see it.This is This Week in Palestine.