The Epstein Rewind: The Morally Bankrupt Ghislaine Maxwell

Jeffrey Epstein had several documented parole violations after he "served" his original sentence, yet nothing was ever done about it. Even when he was caught by a police officer in a place where he wasn't supposed to be, his parole officer, Carmen Sloan covered for him, even after her supervisor said that he was in violation.Let's dive in and take a look.(commercial at 10:04)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/story/news/2012/04/01/jeffrey-epstein-house-arrest-missteps/9629975007/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

John Brockman is a legend in the literary world. He has represented some of the finest minds in science in regards to their written works. His firm is considered the most prestigious. He was also one of Epstein's biggest enablers.Brockman was used by Epstein to open the door to relationships with the top scientists on the planet. The door he used was called the Edge foundation.Who is John Brockman? What was his role in this whole macabre story?To contact me:[email protected]:https://newrepublic.com/article/154826/jeffrey-epsteins-intellectual-enablerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this look back episode we hear more about Jeffrey Epstein's "secret" girlfriend, Children's author, Shelley Anne Lewis. Her nickname? Chocolate Sauce. Let's see where she fits in.(Commercial at 8:49)To contact me:[email protected]:https://nypost.com/2020/08/02/everything-you-need-to-know-about-jeffrey-epsteins-secret-girlfriend/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein and his finances remain shrouded in mystery even in death.On today's show we will take another look at Epstein's finances and one of the vehicles he used to increase his wealth.(Commercial at 16:08)To contact me:[email protected]:https://wallstreetonparade.com/2019/07/tax-filing-suggests-child-sex-offender-jeffrey-epstein-made-his-wealth-flipping-hot-ipos-on-wall-street/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case United States v. Sean Combs (Case No. 1:24-cr-00542-AS), the defense submitted a reply memorandum supporting their motion for a hearing, suppression of evidence, and other relief. They contended that certain evidence was obtained in violation of Combs' constitutional rights, specifically citing a recent incident where federal agents allegedly conducted a warrantless search of his jail cell and seized handwritten notes intended for his legal defense. The defense argued that this action breached attorney-client privilege and infringed upon Combs' Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights, necessitating the suppression of the seized materials.Additionally, the defense raised concerns about potential government misconduct, including the alleged leaking of a 2016 video involving Combs and his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, to the media. They asserted that such actions were intended to prejudice public opinion and undermine Combs' right to a fair trial. The memorandum requested a comprehensive hearing to examine these issues, determine the admissibility of the contested evidence, and address any violations of Combs' constitutional protections.(commercial at 7:53)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.120.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case United States v. Sean Combs (Case No. 1:24-cr-00542-AS), the defense submitted a reply memorandum supporting their motion for a hearing, suppression of evidence, and other relief. They contended that certain evidence was obtained in violation of Combs' constitutional rights, specifically citing a recent incident where federal agents allegedly conducted a warrantless search of his jail cell and seized handwritten notes intended for his legal defense. The defense argued that this action breached attorney-client privilege and infringed upon Combs' Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights, necessitating the suppression of the seized materials.Additionally, the defense raised concerns about potential government misconduct, including the alleged leaking of a 2016 video involving Combs and his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, to the media. They asserted that such actions were intended to prejudice public opinion and undermine Combs' right to a fair trial. The memorandum requested a comprehensive hearing to examine these issues, determine the admissibility of the contested evidence, and address any violations of Combs' constitutional protections.(commercial at 7:53)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.120.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jay-Z, facing a lawsuit alleging the rape of a 13-year-old girl at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards after-party, is seeking dismissal based on timing and location discrepancies. His attorney, Alex Spiro, argues that the statute under which the accuser, identified as Jane Doe, is suing became effective in December 2000, three months after the alleged incident. Additionally, Spiro contends that the described location of the assault does not correspond to any venue within New York City, suggesting a geographical inconsistency that could undermine the lawsuit's validityThese defense strategies follow earlier legal maneuvers, including attempts to reveal the accuser's identity, which were criticized by Judge Analisa Torres as inappropriate and a waste of judicial resources. Both Jay-Z and Sean "Diddy" Combs, also named in the lawsuit, have denied the allegations. The case continues to unfold, with the court evaluating the merits of the defense's arguments concerning the statute's enactment date and the alleged assault's location.(commercial at 8:56)to contact me:[email protected]:Jay-Z Tries To Get Rape Of Minor Case Dismissed Based On Two Key FactorsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In January 2024, Sean "Diddy" Combs faced a $10 million lawsuit filed by Charles Kenyatta Jr., also known as Charlie Cee, an inmate at New York's Collins Correctional Facility. Kenyatta accused Diddy of trademark infringement and breach of contract, alleging unauthorized use of the phrase "Act Bad," which Kenyatta claimed to have trademarked. He asserted that Diddy released a single titled "Act Bad" in 2023 and sold related merchandise without his consent. Kenyatta further claimed that his attorney's attempts to address the issue with Diddy's legal team were ignored, leading to the lawsuit seeking substantial damages. Kenyatta contended that, due to his incarceration, he was unable to sign any agreements and expected contracts to be managed through his Power of Attorney. He alleged that Diddy, along with an unidentified associate referred to as John Doe, conspired to exclude him from potential profits associated with the "Act Bad" brand. Kenyatta also expressed concern that Diddy's involvement in various controversies, including sexual assault allegations, had tarnished the "Act Bad" trademark. Representing himself in the lawsuit, Kenyatta sought $10 million in damages for the alleged unauthorized use and the subsequent impact on his brand.(commercial at 9:42)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628369.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the United States government submitted a brief urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold her conviction and sentence. The government contended that Maxwell's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that her prosecution was not barred by Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida. They argued that the NPA did not extend immunity to Maxwell for crimes prosecuted in the Southern District of New York, asserting that her conviction was based on substantial evidence demonstrating her pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minors.Additionally, the government's brief addressed Maxwell's claims of juror misconduct and alleged procedural errors during the trial. They maintained that the district court had appropriately handled these issues, ensuring Maxwell's right to a fair trial was preserved. The government further argued that the sentence imposed was reasonable and proportionate to the severity of her offenses. Ultimately, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her appeal and supporting the government's position. to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.