The Epstein Rewind: The Jeffrey Epstein Document Dump Has Begun

Jes Staley had a long, established relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Both professionally and personally. Up until recently, he never had to answer for that relationship. Now though, after being shown the door at Barclays, he is also in jeopardy of losing out on big bucks as the company is withholding his deferred salary until the Epstein probe reaches its conclusion.(Commercial at 12:05)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.wsj.com/articles/barclays-profit-falls-on-slowdown-in-investment-banking-11645603658Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

When it comes to Bill Clinton and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, we've only seen a fraction of the the truth from the legacy media, and even less than that from Clinton himself. Yet, the question still remains: How come the relationship between Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein has not caused the outrage that other relationships that have been unearthed have caused? It couldn't be because the activist journalists are protecting him, could it? Let's dive in and see.(commercial at 9:59)to contact me:[email protected]:Prince Andrew's Ex: Epstein and Bill Clinton 'Were Like Brothers' (insider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The rolling document dump approved by Judge Loretta Preska kicked into action yesterday dropping a number of previous sealed documents relating to the defamation battle between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts. In this episode, we get an overview of that document dump and what to expect from this first batch that has been released and what we should expect moving forward as the rest of the documents begin to trickle out. (commercial at 9:53)to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein: Court records give new details on sex abuse allegations | AP NewsIf you'd like to help support the podcast:Fundraiser by Bobby Capucci : The Epstein Chronicles (gofundme.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

We have talked about a lot of wild situations concerning Jeffrey Epstein and his sordid criminal enterprise, but the scenario we are going to discuss on this episode is one of the oddest:According to Jeffrey Epstein, he was being stalked by a Gambino mobster, who was dressed as a ninja. That's right folks, Cosa Nostra are now cosplaying and dressing up like Ninjas. Just another weird and wild dive down an Epstein rabbit hole. So, let's get to it!(commercial at 7:46)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.the-sun.com/news/351095/jeffrey-epstein-mafia-mob-ninja-gambino/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In 1992 Jeffrey Epstein rented a townhouse from the State Department and then, in turn, subleased it to a lawyer named Ivan Fisher. The government then alleged that nobody paid rent on the townhouse and court proceedings began. It eventually led to both men being given the boot from the property. (commercial at 8:35)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rosiegray/jeffrey-epstein-state-departmentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell’s bail application was a contentious legal battle, as prosecutors argued she was a significant flight risk due to her wealth, multiple passports, and international connections. Initially, she was denied bail in July 2020, with the judge citing concerns that she had gone to great lengths to evade law enforcement before her arrest, including using an alias to buy a secluded New Hampshire property. Prosecutors further emphasized that she had access to millions of dollars and had demonstrated a pattern of deception, making her unlikely to return for trial if released. In response, Maxwell’s defense team countered that she was not a flight risk, claiming she had voluntarily remained in the U.S. and had no intention of fleeing. They proposed a bail package of $5 million secured by her and her family’s assets, as well as home confinement with electronic monitoring.Despite these assurances, her subsequent bail applications, including a December 2020 attempt offering a $28.5 million bond backed by her family and husband, were also denied. The court remained unconvinced, arguing that Maxwell’s financial resources, foreign ties, and history of evasive behavior outweighed any conditions that could be imposed. The judge noted that her extraordinary wealth, including funds in undisclosed accounts, and her ability to live abroad indefinitely presented an unacceptable risk. Maxwell’s legal team continued to argue that her pretrial detention was overly harsh and unjust, but she remained incarcerated until her trial, where she was ultimately convicted on multiple charges related to Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell’s bail application was a contentious legal battle, as prosecutors argued she was a significant flight risk due to her wealth, multiple passports, and international connections. Initially, she was denied bail in July 2020, with the judge citing concerns that she had gone to great lengths to evade law enforcement before her arrest, including using an alias to buy a secluded New Hampshire property. Prosecutors further emphasized that she had access to millions of dollars and had demonstrated a pattern of deception, making her unlikely to return for trial if released. In response, Maxwell’s defense team countered that she was not a flight risk, claiming she had voluntarily remained in the U.S. and had no intention of fleeing. They proposed a bail package of $5 million secured by her and her family’s assets, as well as home confinement with electronic monitoring.Despite these assurances, her subsequent bail applications, including a December 2020 attempt offering a $28.5 million bond backed by her family and husband, were also denied. The court remained unconvinced, arguing that Maxwell’s financial resources, foreign ties, and history of evasive behavior outweighed any conditions that could be imposed. The judge noted that her extraordinary wealth, including funds in undisclosed accounts, and her ability to live abroad indefinitely presented an unacceptable risk. Maxwell’s legal team continued to argue that her pretrial detention was overly harsh and unjust, but she remained incarcerated until her trial, where she was ultimately convicted on multiple charges related to Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell’s bail application was a contentious legal battle, as prosecutors argued she was a significant flight risk due to her wealth, multiple passports, and international connections. Initially, she was denied bail in July 2020, with the judge citing concerns that she had gone to great lengths to evade law enforcement before her arrest, including using an alias to buy a secluded New Hampshire property. Prosecutors further emphasized that she had access to millions of dollars and had demonstrated a pattern of deception, making her unlikely to return for trial if released. In response, Maxwell’s defense team countered that she was not a flight risk, claiming she had voluntarily remained in the U.S. and had no intention of fleeing. They proposed a bail package of $5 million secured by her and her family’s assets, as well as home confinement with electronic monitoring.Despite these assurances, her subsequent bail applications, including a December 2020 attempt offering a $28.5 million bond backed by her family and husband, were also denied. The court remained unconvinced, arguing that Maxwell’s financial resources, foreign ties, and history of evasive behavior outweighed any conditions that could be imposed. The judge noted that her extraordinary wealth, including funds in undisclosed accounts, and her ability to live abroad indefinitely presented an unacceptable risk. Maxwell’s legal team continued to argue that her pretrial detention was overly harsh and unjust, but she remained incarcerated until her trial, where she was ultimately convicted on multiple charges related to Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 1:24-cv-07975-AT, Defendant Shawn Carter, professionally known as Jay-Z, has filed a Memorandum of Law supporting his motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Carter argues that the Plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient legal basis and fail to meet the necessary pleading standards required to proceed with the case. He contends that the complaint does not present concrete facts to substantiate the claims made against him, rendering the lawsuit legally deficient.Furthermore, Carter emphasizes that the Plaintiff's complaint is not only baseless but also frivolous, warranting dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. He asserts that the allegations are unfounded and appear to be an attempt to misuse the legal system, potentially causing unwarranted harm to his reputation. Carter's memorandum seeks both the dismissal of the complaint and the imposition of sanctions against the Plaintiff for filing a meritless lawsuit.to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - Motion to Dismiss FAC (SDNY) (15549242_8) (004).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 1:24-cv-07975-AT, Defendant Shawn Carter, professionally known as Jay-Z, has filed a Memorandum of Law supporting his motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Carter argues that the Plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient legal basis and fail to meet the necessary pleading standards required to proceed with the case. He contends that the complaint does not present concrete facts to substantiate the claims made against him, rendering the lawsuit legally deficient.Furthermore, Carter emphasizes that the Plaintiff's complaint is not only baseless but also frivolous, warranting dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. He asserts that the allegations are unfounded and appear to be an attempt to misuse the legal system, potentially causing unwarranted harm to his reputation. Carter's memorandum seeks both the dismissal of the complaint and the imposition of sanctions against the Plaintiff for filing a meritless lawsuit.to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - Motion to Dismiss FAC (SDNY) (15549242_8) (004).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.