The Epstein Rewind: Team Maxwell Responds To the BOP

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On the twenty-fourth day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the prosecution presented a detailed timeline of text messages exchanged among Lori, Chad Daybell, and Alex Cox, focusing on key dates surrounding the deaths of Tylee Ryan, J.J. Vallow, and Tammy Daybell. These communications provided insight into the trio's coordination and activities during critical periods. ​Additionally, Rexburg Police Detective Ray Hermosillo retook the stand to elaborate on the investigation's findings. He highlighted the significance of the text exchanges and their alignment with the movements and actions of Lori, Chad, and Alex during the times in question.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On the twenty-third day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the court delved into the circumstances surrounding the death of Tammy Daybell, Chad Daybell's first wife. Dr. Lily Marsden, Utah's Deputy Chief Medical Examiner, testified about the autopsy performed on Tammy's exhumed body. Dr. Marsden noted the presence of bruises on Tammy's arms and the discovery of pink foam in her airway, both indicative of asphyxia. She concluded that Tammy's death was a homicide resulting from asphyxiation.Additionally, FBI Special Agent Doug Hart presented evidence from Lori Vallow's iCloud account, revealing communications that shed light on the events leading up to the deaths of Tylee Ryan and J.J. Vallow. These messages provided insight into Lori's state of mind and her interactions with key individuals during that period.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

From the archives: 3-3-23The raid of Bryan Kohberger's family home in Pennsylvania unleashed a treasure trove of goods into the hands of the authorities. Those items included a knife, a gun, black face masks as well as several other pieces of evidence that could be damning for Bryan Kohberger.In this episode, we take a look at the full list of items seized and what signifigance they might play in the future trial of Bryan Kohberger.(commercial at 7:04)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Search Reveals 'Most Incriminating' Items in Case Against Him (newsweek.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Forensically speaking, a latent footprint refers to an imprint left by a person's foot on a surface that is not immediately visible to the naked eye. These footprints are typically created when an individual transfers natural oils, dirt, or other substances from their feet onto a surface as they walk. These impressions are often faint and can only be revealed through specialized techniques like dusting, chemical treatments, or photography. Forensic experts use these methods to make latent footprints visible and then compare them to known footwear patterns to help identify or exclude potential suspects in criminal investigations.In the affidavit, investigators stated that they found a latent footprint at the scene of the crime that was consistent with the type of print you would find on a pair of Vans shoes. The problem with that? Just about everyone has Vans.In this episode, we take a look at the latent footprint as evidence and how it might be used by the prosecutors during the trial for Bryan Kohberger.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com(commercial at 7:22)source:Clue in Idaho Murder Case Leaves Question About Bryan Kohberger Evidence (newsweek.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn and the estate of Jeffrey Epstein has been accused by the USVI AG of moving over 13 million dollars into accounts of their own. The battle between Denise George and the estate has been raging for several years now, but this is certainly an escalation. (commercial at 8:19)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/22/business/jeffrey-epstein-estate-assets.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense has filed an objection to the State's motion in limine concerning the admissibility of AT&T timing advance records. Timing advance records are utilized to estimate the distance between a mobile device and a cell tower, which can be pivotal in establishing a defendant's location at a specific time. The State seeks to introduce these records as evidence to place Kohberger near the crime scene during the time of the offense.The defense's objection challenges the reliability and accuracy of the AT&T timing advance data, arguing that such records are prone to significant errors and may not accurately reflect a device's precise location. They contend that admitting this evidence could mislead the jury and result in unfair prejudice against Kohberger. This objection aligns with broader concerns raised in the case regarding the use of cell phone data mapping, as defense experts have previously highlighted substantial inaccuracies in the FBI's cell data collection methods.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:031725-Defendants-Obj-States-MiL-ATT-Timing-Advance-Records.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.