Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger Objects To The Admission Of Self Authentication Files (Part 2) (3/27/25)

​Eugene Henley Jr., widely known as "Big U," is a prominent figure in the Los Angeles music scene and a reputed leader of the Rollin' 60s Neighborhood Crips. In March 2025, Henley was indicted on 43 federal charges, including racketeering, murder, extortion, fraud, and tax crimes. The indictment alleges that from 2010 to 2025, Henley led a criminal enterprise, referred to as the "Big U Enterprise," which engaged in various illegal activities across Los Angeles.One of the most serious allegations involves the 2021 murder of an aspiring rapper identified as "R.W." According to prosecutors, R.W. was signed to Henley's music label, Uneek Music, and recorded a defamatory song about Henley. In response, Henley allegedly traveled to Las Vegas, confronted R.W., and fatally shot him before leaving his body in a desert ditch off Interstate 15.Henley is also accused of exploiting his anti-gang charity, Developing Options, as a front for fraudulent activities. While presenting the organization as dedicated to providing alternatives to gang involvement for South Los Angeles youth, Henley allegedly embezzled large donations from celebrities and companies, diverting funds into his personal bank account. Notably, Developing Options received significant funding from the City of Los Angeles's Mayor’s Office through the Gang Reduction Youth Development (GRYD) Foundation, which includes federal funds.Beyond these charges, Henley faces accusations of submitting fraudulent applications for COVID-19 relief loans, engaging in extortion and robbery, and participating in human trafficking activities. Prosecutors allege that he used his influence within the Rollin' 60s and other street gangs to intimidate businesses and individuals, expanding his enterprise's power through violence and fear. Additionally, Henley purportedly leveraged social media platforms, documentaries, and interviews to bolster his reputation and instill fear, furthering the reach of his criminal organization.Henley was taken into federal custody on March 19, 2025, and is scheduled for arraignment on April 8. If convicted on all charges, he faces a maximum sentence of life in federal prison.to contact me:[email protected]:gov-uscourts-cacd-962315-1-0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Eugene Henley Jr., widely known as "Big U," is a prominent figure in the Los Angeles music scene and a reputed leader of the Rollin' 60s Neighborhood Crips. In March 2025, Henley was indicted on 43 federal charges, including racketeering, murder, extortion, fraud, and tax crimes. The indictment alleges that from 2010 to 2025, Henley led a criminal enterprise, referred to as the "Big U Enterprise," which engaged in various illegal activities across Los Angeles.One of the most serious allegations involves the 2021 murder of an aspiring rapper identified as "R.W." According to prosecutors, R.W. was signed to Henley's music label, Uneek Music, and recorded a defamatory song about Henley. In response, Henley allegedly traveled to Las Vegas, confronted R.W., and fatally shot him before leaving his body in a desert ditch off Interstate 15.Henley is also accused of exploiting his anti-gang charity, Developing Options, as a front for fraudulent activities. While presenting the organization as dedicated to providing alternatives to gang involvement for South Los Angeles youth, Henley allegedly embezzled large donations from celebrities and companies, diverting funds into his personal bank account. Notably, Developing Options received significant funding from the City of Los Angeles's Mayor’s Office through the Gang Reduction Youth Development (GRYD) Foundation, which includes federal funds.Beyond these charges, Henley faces accusations of submitting fraudulent applications for COVID-19 relief loans, engaging in extortion and robbery, and participating in human trafficking activities. Prosecutors allege that he used his influence within the Rollin' 60s and other street gangs to intimidate businesses and individuals, expanding his enterprise's power through violence and fear. Additionally, Henley purportedly leveraged social media platforms, documentaries, and interviews to bolster his reputation and instill fear, furthering the reach of his criminal organization.Henley was taken into federal custody on March 19, 2025, and is scheduled for arraignment on April 8. If convicted on all charges, he faces a maximum sentence of life in federal prison.to contact me:[email protected]:gov-uscourts-cacd-962315-1-0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's response concerning his motion to exclude Amazon click activity evidence at trial. Kohberger's defense argues that the State's recent expert disclosures, submitted on March 14, 2025, are untimely and violate discovery deadlines, potentially infringing upon his constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial. The defense emphasizes that Amazon's data is intricate, involving complex algorithms and machine learning processes that cannot be accurately interpreted without expert testimony. They contend that presenting this data without proper context would mislead the jury, especially given the incomplete and selectively presented nature of the evidence.Furthermore, the defense highlights that the State's attempt to self-authenticate the Amazon records without expert explanation is inappropriate due to the complexity of the data. They assert that the State's pattern of late disclosures and failure to comply with court orders regarding evidence and expert opinions hampers Kohberger's ability to prepare an effective defense. As a result, the defense seeks to protect Kohberger's constitutional rights by requesting the exclusion of the Amazon click activity evidence from the trial.to contact me:[email protected]:Ty ABecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's response concerning his Motion in Limine #7, which seeks to exclude testimony related to a witness's identification of the intruder based on "bushy eyebrows." The defense argues that such testimony is highly subjective and could lead to wrongful convictions, emphasizing that mistaken identifications have historically been a leading cause of such outcomes in the United States. They contend that allowing the witness, referred to as D.M., to describe the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" would be tantamount to an in-court identification of Kohberger, which they believe is inappropriate given the circumstances.Furthermore, the defense highlights that D.M. has a personal interest in drawing eyes and eyebrows, suggesting that her focus on this feature may not be a reliable basis for identification. They also point out that D.M. was interviewed multiple times by law enforcement, and her descriptions evolved over these interviews, raising concerns about the consistency and reliability of her testimony. The defense asserts that admitting such subjective identification could unfairly prejudice the jury and undermine Kohberger's right to a fair trial.to contact  me:[email protected]:Ty ABecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the March 2025 Opinion and Order for case Rodney Jones v. Sean Combs et al. (24-CV-1457), Judge J. Paul Oetken ruled on motions to dismiss brought by Sean Combs and several co-defendants. While five of Jones's seventeen claims were dismissed—including claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against Combs Global and Love Records—multiple key allegations were allowed to proceed. These surviving claims include sexual assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and premises liability against Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram, Justin Combs, Cuba Gooding Jr., and Jane Doe 1 (allegedly “Yung Miami’s cousin”). The court found that many of Jones’s accusations, including being drugged, sexually assaulted, and trafficked across state and international lines, were sufficiently detailed to survive the defendants’ efforts to have the case dismissed entirely.The ruling outlines severe and graphic allegations, including incidents where Jones claims he was sexually assaulted, manipulated, and trafficked while working closely with Sean Combs between 2022 and 2023. Jones alleges Combs used power and influence in the music industry to coerce him into unwanted sexual activity, promising professional success in return. The complaint details incidents in Los Angeles, Miami, New York, the US Virgin Islands, and Saint-Barthélemy, including claims of being drugged, groped, and assaulted by Combs and others in his circle. The court emphasized that while some claims lacked sufficient legal basis or specificity, the core allegations—particularly those describing direct physical and psychological abuse—were compelling enough to proceed to discovery and potentially trial.to contact me:[email protected]:24cv1457 Jones v Combs MTD Opn.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the March 2025 Opinion and Order for case Rodney Jones v. Sean Combs et al. (24-CV-1457), Judge J. Paul Oetken ruled on motions to dismiss brought by Sean Combs and several co-defendants. While five of Jones's seventeen claims were dismissed—including claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against Combs Global and Love Records—multiple key allegations were allowed to proceed. These surviving claims include sexual assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and premises liability against Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram, Justin Combs, Cuba Gooding Jr., and Jane Doe 1 (allegedly “Yung Miami’s cousin”). The court found that many of Jones’s accusations, including being drugged, sexually assaulted, and trafficked across state and international lines, were sufficiently detailed to survive the defendants’ efforts to have the case dismissed entirely.The ruling outlines severe and graphic allegations, including incidents where Jones claims he was sexually assaulted, manipulated, and trafficked while working closely with Sean Combs between 2022 and 2023. Jones alleges Combs used power and influence in the music industry to coerce him into unwanted sexual activity, promising professional success in return. The complaint details incidents in Los Angeles, Miami, New York, the US Virgin Islands, and Saint-Barthélemy, including claims of being drugged, groped, and assaulted by Combs and others in his circle. The court emphasized that while some claims lacked sufficient legal basis or specificity, the core allegations—particularly those describing direct physical and psychological abuse—were compelling enough to proceed to discovery and potentially trial.to contact me:[email protected]:24cv1457 Jones v Combs MTD Opn.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In July 2023, Karen Read's defense team filed a motion requesting Judge Beverly Cannone to recuse herself from presiding over Read's murder trial. The defense argued that Judge Cannone had personal connections to individuals involved in the case, which could lead to a perception of bias and potentially undermine public confidence in the judicial process. They cited alleged social interactions and familial ties between the judge and key witnesses, suggesting that these relationships might compromise the judge's impartiality.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In July 2023, Karen Read's defense team filed a motion requesting Judge Beverly Cannone to recuse herself from presiding over Read's murder trial. The defense argued that Judge Cannone had personal connections to individuals involved in the case, which could lead to a perception of bias and potentially undermine public confidence in the judicial process. They cited alleged social interactions and familial ties between the judge and key witnesses, suggesting that these relationships might compromise the judge's impartiality.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we take a look back to Maxwell buying the property in New Hampshire and some of the rather odd questions, in hindsight, she asked the realtor. (Commercial at 13:44)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8485729/Ghislaine-Maxwell-asked-realtor-flight-patterns-New-Hampshire-home.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A  report from the New York Post cites a a reformed Jewel Thief who claims to have seen videos of powerful figures engaging in incriminating behavior with Epsteins orbit.We take a look at the credibility of such a claim.(commercial at 8:00)To contact me:[email protected]:https://nypost.com/2020/07/11/ghislaine-maxwell-allegedly-filmed-politicians-with-underage-girls/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.