Cassie Ventura Speaks Out After The Video Of Diddy Assaulting Her Goes Public

In a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian, the Government opposed Sean "Diddy" Combs’s request to bar witnesses from speaking with their attorneys during breaks in cross-examination. Prosecutors argued that the defense provided no legal precedent supporting such a prohibition, especially regarding third-party witnesses with independent counsel. The Government noted that the defense’s reliance on Perry v. Leeke was misplaced, as that Supreme Court decision focused specifically on a testifying defendant’s communication with their attorney during a brief recess—not third-party witnesses.The letter emphasized that the Supreme Court, in Perry, actually underscored the constitutional limits of such communication bans, particularly that overnight restrictions would violate the Sixth Amendment. The Government also cited United States v. Triumph Capital Group, a Second Circuit case, to highlight that brief, mid-day limitations on defendant-attorney discussions may be permissible, but broader restrictions—especially those impacting non-party witnesses—pose serious constitutional concerns. Ultimately, the Government asked the court to reject the defense’s request and preserve witnesses' rights to consult with counsel during trial breaks.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.333.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has alleged that CNN altered and destroyed the original surveillance footage depicting Combs assaulting his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, in a 2016 incident. According to a letter filed in Manhattan federal court, Combs' attorneys claim that a forensic video analysis revealed significant alterations, including the removal of timestamps, sequence changes, and speed adjustments, which they argue misrepresent the events. They assert that CNN purchased the sole known copy of the footage from the hotel, edited it using free software, and subsequently destroyed the original, despite being aware of an ongoing federal investigation.CNN has refuted these allegations, stating that they neither modified the video nor destroyed the original footage, which was retained by their source. Cassie Ventura's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, dismissed the claims as disingenuous attempts to exclude the video from evidence, expressing confidence that the footage accurately depicts the incident and will be admitted in court. This dispute arises as Combs faces charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, with his trial scheduled to commence on May 5, 2025.Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team is currently engaged in a battle to prevent the use of a video showing him assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, from being used as evidence in his upcoming trial. The video, reportedly from a 2016 incident at a hotel, surfaced publicly through CNN in May 2024. Diddy’s lawyers argue that the government, specifically the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), unlawfully leaked the footage to tarnish his reputation and compromise his right to a fair trial.In their legal filings, Diddy’s team claims that the release of the video was strategically aimed at influencing public opinion and tainting the potential jury pool. They have requested an evidentiary hearing to investigate the alleged government misconduct, along with access to related documents and communications. Additionally, they are pushing for a gag order to prevent further leaks from government personnel and seeking to suppress the video from being admitted in court as evidence.The legal strategy centers on the argument that the video’s publication has led to damaging pre-trial publicity, which they claim jeopardizes Diddy's ability to receive an impartial trial. Meanwhile, Diddy faces serious charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking, and remains in custody awaiting his trial, scheduled for May 2025.This legal move reflects the high stakes for both Diddy and his legal team, as the video serves as a critical piece of evidence in the broader criminal case against him, alongside multiple civil lawsuits alleging abuse and misconduct.to contact me:[email protected]:CNN Diddy video beating Cassie altered, lawyers claim; network defendsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

NDAs, or non-disclosure agreements, will not protect Sean "Diddy" Combs in his criminal trial because NDAs are primarily civil agreements designed to prevent parties from disclosing certain information publicly. However, they do not shield individuals from testifying in criminal cases. Criminal law supersedes any private agreements, as the government has a vested interest in prosecuting crimes and ensuring justice. Therefore, if someone has relevant knowledge about criminal activities, they can still be compelled to testify, even if they have signed an NDA.In the case of Cassie Ventura, although she signed an NDA as part of her settlement with Diddy, this does not prevent her from being called to testify in a criminal trial. NDAs cannot override a subpoena or prevent someone from providing testimony if it pertains to criminal conduct. The court can compel Ventura to testify about any relevant events, even if they were covered by the terms of the NDA, as the pursuit of justice in criminal cases takes precedence over any civil agreement. Thus, despite the NDA, Cassie can be legally obligated to provide testimony in the ongoing criminal proceedings against Diddy.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:[email protected]:Cassie may be called to testify at Diddy trial despite signing NDA, lawyer says | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Cassie Ventura, the former partner of Sean "Diddy" Combs, has chosen to testify under her real name in his upcoming federal trial, where he faces charges including racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution. Identified in court documents as "Victim-1," Ventura's decision contrasts with three other alleged victims who have requested to remain anonymous due to concerns about media harassment and personal safety. Prosecutors have filed motions to allow these individuals to use pseudonyms during the trial to protect their identities.Ventura's willingness to publicly associate her name with the case is significant, given her previous allegations against Combs. In November 2023, she filed a lawsuit accusing him of rape, physical abuse, and sex trafficking, which was settled the following day. Additionally, in May 2024, surveillance footage from a 2016 incident surfaced, allegedly showing Combs physically assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel. This footage has become a focal point in the current proceedings. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges and remains in custody awaiting trial, which is scheduled to commence on May 5, 2025to contact me:[email protected]:Cassie to Testify Against Diddy Using Her Name in Sex Trafficking Trial (Exclusive)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In November 2023, Cassie Ventura filed a lawsuit against her ex-boyfriend, Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging a decade-long pattern of abuse, violence, and sex trafficking during their relationship. The lawsuit was filed under New York's Adult Survivors Act, which allows victims to pursue legal action beyond the usual statute of limitations. The following day, both parties announced an out-of-court settlement, with terms undisclosed. Combs stated, "We have decided to resolve this matter amicably," and wished Cassie and her family well.Legal experts suggest that Combs could have avoided the public legal battle and subsequent allegations by settling privately before the lawsuit was filed. The public nature of the lawsuit brought renewed scrutiny to Combs' handling of the case, leading to a series of additional lawsuits and federal charges that now threaten his career and freedom.(commercial at 7:16)to contact me:[email protected]:Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs could have settled Cassie Ventura’s suit privately but didn’t | Sean ‘Diddy‘ Combs | The GuardianBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode, we hear from Cassie Ventura as she speaks out for the first time following the release of a shocking 2016 video showing her being physically abused by ex Sean "Diddy" Combs.On Thursday, May 23, Cassie, 37,  shared her story on Instagram, expressing heartfelt gratitude for the overwhelming love and support she has received from family, friends, and strangers alike. She reveals how this outpouring of kindness has provided a sanctuary for her younger self, allowing her to finally feel a sense of safety.Cassie candidly discusses the profound impact of domestic violence on her life, describing it as a force that broke her down into someone she never thought she would become. Despite the immense challenges, she emphasizes that with hard work, she has emerged stronger but acknowledges that the journey of recovery is ongoing.Let's dive in!to contact me:[email protected]:Cassie breaks her silence after video of Sean 'Diddy' Combs beating her up was released - as she urges people to 'believe victims the first time' after she was accused of lying | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sean "Puffy" Combs is no stranger to having run ins with the law and he is certainly no stranger to accusations being leveled against him.In this episode, we hear about the shocking accusations of assault being made against Combs by his ex girlfriend and now we are also hearing that their is a criminal investigation surrounding Puffy as well.So, what are the accusations and who are making them? Let's dive in and find out.(commercial at 7:08)to contact me:[email protected]:Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs accused of rape and abuse in lawsuit filed by former girlfriend Cassie Ventura | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a formal letter addressed to Judge Arun Subramanian, the legal team representing Casandra Ventura opposed a motion filed by various news organizations seeking access to sealed sexually explicit videos that are to be introduced as evidence in the federal sex trafficking trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. Ventura’s attorneys argued that the request to unseal and publicly disseminate such deeply personal and graphic material is unprecedented in the context of a sex trafficking case. They emphasized that the videos in question allegedly depict coercive sexual acts and should remain sealed to protect Ventura’s privacy, dignity, and emotional well-being, especially given the trauma associated with the alleged abuse.The letter further asserted that the news organizations failed to cite any legal precedent supporting their demand and that permitting reporters to watch and listen to these videos during trial proceedings would only serve to sensationalize Ventura’s victimization. Her counsel urged the court to uphold the integrity of the proceedings by balancing the public’s right to access against the victim’s right to be shielded from unnecessary exploitation and re-traumatization. The motion, they argued, could deter future victims from coming forward if courts begin allowing graphic evidence of their abuse to be broadcast or publicly scrutinized in the name of transparency.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.328.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On May 12, 2025, a coalition of major news organizations—including ABC News, The Associated Press, The New York Times, and NPR—submitted a formal letter to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian. They expressed concern over proposed restrictions on public access to certain audiovisual exhibits in the federal sex trafficking trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. The government had indicated plans to present sensitive evidence, including sexually explicit videos, in a manner that would be visible and audible only to the jury, court, and parties involved, excluding the public and press. The media coalition argued that such limitations would infringe upon the First Amendment rights of the public and press to access criminal trials, especially given the high-profile nature of the case and the serious allegations involved.The news organizations acknowledged the sensitive content of the exhibits and the privacy interests of the alleged victims. However, they contended that these concerns could be addressed without entirely closing the courtroom. As an alternative, they proposed allowing a limited number of pool reporters to view and hear the exhibits as they are presented to the jury. This approach, they argued, would balance the need for public oversight with the protection of victim privacy. The letter emphasized the significant public interest in the proceedings, noting Combs' prominence in the entertainment industry and the gravity of the charges he faces, which include sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. The court's decision on this matter will set a precedent for how sensitive evidence is handled in high-profile criminal trials.to contact me:[email protected]:https://dwt-my.sharepoint.com/personal/perla_dwt_com/Documents/Documents/Closed Cases & Short-Term Projects/Diddy/Diddy Trial Access 5.12.2025 6.10pmBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

During her testimony in Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, Cassie Ventura detailed a decade-long relationship marked by control, abuse, and coercion. She described how Combs exerted dominance over her personal and professional life, dictating aspects such as her clothing choices and daily interactions. Ventura recounted being subjected to physical violence for minor infractions, including being beaten for making "the wrong face." She also testified about being forced to carry a firearm for Combs, which she believed was intended to intimidate her .Ventura's testimony included accounts of being compelled to participate in "freak-offs," which she described as drug-fueled, multi-day sex parties involving male escorts, orchestrated and filmed by Combs. She alleged that during these events, she was forced into degrading acts, such as being urinated on, and was left to clean up afterward. Ventura expressed feelings of humiliation and worthlessness, stating that she engaged in these acts out of fear and a sense of obligation. She also recounted a 2016 incident, captured on surveillance video, where Combs assaulted her in a hotel hallway. Throughout her testimony, Ventura emphasized the pervasive control and abuse she endured, which she said led her to abandon her music career .to contact me:[email protected]:May 13, 2025 - Day 2 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.