Karen Read Cult Tries To Pin Murder On 15 Year Old HS Student Who Wasn't At Scene Of Crime

Welcome to a special episode of "The Trial of Karen Read," where today, we find ourselves inside the courtroom of the case against Karen Read. As we set the stage, let's briefly summarize the case that has gripped the public's attention.    Karen Read is facing charges related to the death of John O'Keefe, whose unexpected passing under mysterious circumstances led to intense police scrutiny. The case hinges on a combination of forensic evidence, alleged motives, and Karen's own statements to the police. Prosecutors argue that Karen had both the means and opportunity to commit the crime, citing contentious relationships and financial disputes as possible motives. The defense counters that the evidence is circumstantial and that Karen's connection to John's death is being misconstrued.    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to a special episode of "The Trial of Karen Read," where today, we find ourselves inside the courtroom of the case against Karen Read. As we set the stage, let's briefly summarize the case that has gripped the public's attention.    Karen Read is facing charges related to the death of John O'Keefe, whose unexpected passing under mysterious circumstances led to intense police scrutiny. The case hinges on a combination of forensic evidence, alleged motives, and Karen's own statements to the police. Prosecutors argue that Karen had both the means and opportunity to commit the crime, citing contentious relationships and financial disputes as possible motives. The defense counters that the evidence is circumstantial and that Karen's connection to John's death is being misconstrued.   Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, delves into the complexities surrounding the trial of Karen Read. The case is marked by conflicting testimonies and a lack of concrete evidence, casting significant doubt on the prosecution's charges. Dreeke critiques the prosecution's reliance on dubious expert witnesses and highlights the toxic relationship dynamics revealed through text messages between Read and John O'Keefe. He underscores the importance of these messages, suggesting they indicate Read's lack of intent or knowledge about the crime. The discussion also touches on the problematic nature of some witness testimonies, such as those from first responders and a particularly anxious trooper, whose credibility might be questioned due to nervousness rather than factual inaccuracies. Brueski and Dreeke question the plausibility of the prosecution's scenario, especially regarding the physical evidence of the taillight damage and lack of injuries on O'Keefe's body, further muddying the case. The episode underscores the trial's ongoing uncertainty and the critical examination of each piece of evidence, pointing to a potentially flawed charge against Read. - The trial of Karen Read is plagued with doubt due to conflicting testimonies and evidence. - Toxic relationship dynamics between Karen Read and John O'Keefe are revealed through text messages. - Expert witnesses present contradictory evidence, weakening the prosecution's case. - Testimonies from first responders and a nervous trooper are scrutinized for credibility. - The physical evidence of taillight damage and lack of injuries on O'Keefe raises questions about the prosecution's scenario. - The episode highlights the overall uncertainty and complexity of the case against Karen Read. - Robin Dreeke and Tony Brueski critically examine the plausibility of the charges and evidence. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #RobinDreeke #TonyBrueski #TrialAnalysis #ExpertTestimony #DoubtInProsecution Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," defense attorney Bob Motta critiques the recent allegations made by attorney John Ray regarding Rex Heuermann’s daughter, Victoria Heuermann. Ray has accused Victoria of being involved in her father's crimes based on her macabre artwork found on social media and at the Heuermann home. Motta finds these accusations reckless and unfounded, emphasizing that there is no substantial evidence linking Victoria to the crimes. He trusts law enforcement's thorough investigation, which has so far shown that the family was out of town during the murders. Motta suggests that Ray's claims appear to be a clout grab, serving no real purpose. The conversation also touches on Ray’s bizarre and extreme claims, such as potential cannibalism, which Motta dismisses as lacking credibility. Overall, Motta stresses the importance of relying on law enforcement's meticulous work rather than speculative and damaging accusations. - Bob Motta criticizes John Ray's allegations against Victoria Heuermann as reckless and unfounded. - Ray's accusations are based on Victoria's macabre artwork, which Motta finds insufficient as evidence. - Motta emphasizes his trust in law enforcement's thorough investigation of Rex Heuermann's crimes. - Law enforcement has determined the Heuermann family was out of town during the murders. - Motta suggests Ray's claims seem like an attempt to gain attention rather than provide substantive evidence. - Discussion includes Ray’s extreme accusations, such as potential cannibalism, which Motta dismisses. - Motta stresses the need to rely on law enforcement rather than speculative claims. ### Hashtags #KarenRead #JohnRay #RexHeuermann #VictoriaHeuermann #DefenseDiaries #HiddenKillers #BobMotta Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott discusses the mysterious death of Mica Miller and the complex accusations surrounding her husband, John Paul Miller. Tony highlights the confusing and contradictory narratives presented by both John Paul and Mica's sister. Scott critically examines John Paul's behavior, including his claims about Mica's mental health issues and his own unsettling sermons, where he admitted to heavy lithium use and demon possession. The discussion points out several red flags, including John Paul's immediate public statements after Mica's death and his control over the narrative. Scott emphasizes the potential psychological impact of domestic abuse on Mica, which could lead to anxiety, depression, and PTSD, making the case more complex. The conversation underscores the importance of an objective investigation to uncover the truth behind Mica's tragic death. **Main Points:** - Mica Miller's death is shrouded in conflicting narratives from her husband, John Paul Miller, and her sister. - John Paul Miller's sermons reveal his heavy lithium use and claims of demon possession. - Several red flags include John Paul's immediate public statements and control over the narrative. - Mica's potential mental health issues and the psychological impact of possible domestic abuse are discussed. - The presence of more than one shell casing at the scene raises questions about the nature of her death. - Scott emphasizes the importance of an objective investigation to uncover the truth. - The case highlights the complexities of mental health, domestic abuse, and the control of narratives in tragic circumstances. **Hashtags:** #HiddenKillersWithTonyBrueski #ShavaunScott #MicaMiller #JohnPaulMiller #MentalHealth #DomesticAbuse #Investigation Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," former felony prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis discusses the perplexing case of Mica Miller, a preacher's wife who allegedly committed suicide. Mica, who had recently filed for divorce from her husband, John Paul Miller, had voiced numerous allegations of abuse against him, which he denies, attributing her claims to mental illness. The conversation delves into the troubling pattern of abuse allegations within religious contexts, drawing parallels with other high-profile cases. Despite the ruling of suicide, several red flags, such as multiple spent and unspent bullets at the scene, raise suspicions. Faddis emphasizes the need for a thorough investigation, particularly scrutinizing the spouse, as Mica's social media posts and the unusual 911 call she made before her death suggest she was in distress but determined to start anew, casting doubt on the suicide narrative. The episode underscores the complexity and potential manipulation in such cases, including the possibility of AI-generated evidence, necessitating careful and comprehensive scrutiny. - Mica Miller, a preacher's wife, allegedly committed suicide shortly after filing for divorce from her husband, John Paul Miller. - Mica had made multiple allegations of abuse against John Paul, which he denied, claiming she had mental health issues. - The case is part of a broader pattern of abuse allegations within religious contexts. - Despite the ruling of suicide, several inconsistencies, such as multiple spent and unspent bullets, raise suspicions. - Mica's social media posts shortly before her death indicated she was distressed but looking forward to a new beginning. - The unusual nature of Mica's 911 call before her death adds to the suspicion, with some speculating the use of AI in its fabrication. - Eric Faddis stresses the need for a thorough investigation, particularly focusing on the spouse and potential manipulation of evidence. #MicaMiller #JohnPaulMiller #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersPodcast #AbuseInChurch #SuspiciousSuicide #InvestigationNeeded Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discusses the mysterious death of Mica Miller, a 30-year-old preacher's wife found dead shortly after filing for divorce. Despite the initial ruling of suicide, various suspicious details, including multiple shell casings at the scene, have led to widespread speculation and accusations against her husband, John Paul Miller. He denies involvement but has admitted to previous abusive behavior and bizarrely plans to release supposed evidence on social media. Coffindaffer describes John Paul as narcissistic and controlling, questioning his sincerity and highlighting his troubling behavior both before and after Mica's death. The conversation raises concerns about the thoroughness of the investigation and explores the possibility that John Paul's psychological manipulation may have contributed to Mica's death. Additionally, potential financial and legal troubles related to John Paul's church are discussed, emphasizing the need for further investigation. ### Main Points - **Mica Miller's Death:** Found dead with a gunshot wound shortly after filing for divorce, initially ruled a suicide. - **Suspicious Details:** Multiple shell casings at the scene raise questions about the suicide ruling. - **Accusations Against John Paul Miller:** Allegations of abuse, controlling behavior, and involvement in Mica's death. - **Public Behavior:** John Paul's bizarre public behavior and plans to release evidence on social media. - **Psychological Manipulation:** Exploration of the possibility that John Paul's behavior contributed to Mica's death. - **Character Examination:** John Paul described as narcissistic and seeking the spotlight. - **Ongoing Investigation:** Concerns about the thoroughness of the investigation and potential financial/legal troubles. ### Hashtags #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #JenniferCoffindaffer #MicaMiller #JohnPaulMiller #DomesticAbuse #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a move to protect the privacy and dignity of the victims' families, Judge Steven Boyce has permanently sealed nearly 100 exhibits from the high-profile Chad Daybell murder trial. The decision, announced after Daybell was sentenced to death for the murders of Tammy Daybell, Joshua “JJ” Vallow, and Tylee Ryan, comes in response to multiple requests for access to the evidence from authors and media members. “Certain requests seek to obtain all of the exhibits in this case, with some expressly requesting the autopsy photos published to the jury,” Judge Boyce explained in his order. “The Court notes that at trial those photos were published to the jurors, the parties, the Court, and in some instances privately to the victims, upon their request. They were not, however, publicly disseminated.” Judge Boyce stressed the importance of balancing the victims' rights with the public's right to information, particularly highlighting the impact on the families involved. He noted that several victim impact statements during the sentencing expressed deep distress over the behavior of individuals claiming to be media. These individuals, Boyce pointed out, have often sensationalized the tragedy, causing ongoing psychological trauma to the families. “The Court was particularly moved by several victim impact statements at sentencing expressly criticizing individuals proclaiming to be ‘media’ who, in the course of this case, have disrupted the lives of the families of these victims,” Boyce wrote. “Some of those family members described in detail the psychological trauma they have unfairly been subjected to by the ‘media,’ simply because they had some familial relationship to the victims in this case.” Boyce clarified that his reference to “media” does not include established and historically recognized reporting agencies but rather targets "true crime" bloggers and YouTubers who have exploited the case for sensational content. By sealing 97 exhibits, including autopsy photos and images of human remains found on Daybell’s property, Boyce aims to protect the families from further distress. “The interests of the victims and their family members to be spared the ongoing trauma of such sensitive or gruesome material being disseminated is not outweighed by the right of public disclosure of this evidence,” Boyce wrote. “Victims Tylee Ryan, JJ Vallow, Tamara Douglas Daybell and their family members’ respect, dignity and privacy are best protected by the continued sealing of these exhibits.” This decision underscores the court’s commitment to prioritizing the mental health and privacy of those directly affected by the tragic events, ensuring that they are not further victimized by public exposure to graphic evidence. As the legal proceedings surrounding Chad Daybell's case continue to unfold, the court's ruling reflects a broader concern about the ethical responsibilities of media coverage in high-profile criminal cases. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The defense team in the high-profile Karen Read murder trial began presenting its case on Friday, following the prosecution's conclusion after calling 68 witnesses. Defense attorneys Alan Jackson and David Yanetti called their first witness, snowplow driver Brian “Lucky” Loughran, whose testimony they believe is crucial to challenging the prosecution's timeline and theory. Loughran, a Canton town employee, testified that he was plowing his regular route during a storm on the night of January 29, 2022, and passed by 34 Fairview Road, the location where Boston police officer John O’Keefe’s body was later found. According to Loughran, he drove by the house at 2:45 a.m. and 3:30 a.m. but saw no body on the lawn either time. “When you make that first pass by that residence at 2:45 in the morning, sir, with your headlights on,” Attorney David Yanetti asked, “What, if anything, did you see on the front lawn in the area of the flagpole?” “I saw nothing,” Loughran replied.  “If there had been a six-foot-two, 200-pound man lying in the snow there, would you have seen it?” Yanetti inquired.  Prosecutor Adam Lally objected to this line of questioning, and Judge Beverly Cannone sustained the objection. Loughran later testified that he saw a Ford Edge parked near the flagpole on a subsequent pass, a vehicle owned by Brian Albert, the then-owner of 34 Fairview Road. Prosecutor Lally challenged the reliability of Loughran’s testimony, suggesting that his account has changed over time and questioning his timeline. Despite these objections, the defense maintains that Loughran's observations are pivotal in disproving the prosecution's case. “I saw nothing,” Loughran reiterated, emphasizing that he had a clear view of the lawn and would have noticed a body if it had been there. He also mentioned seeing a car parked in front of the house during his later pass but chose not to report it due to his familiarity with the Albert family.  In a significant development in the Karen Read murder trial, Dr. Marie Russell, a retired emergency room physician and forensic pathologist, testified that the wounds on John O'Keefe's right arm were likely caused by an animal attack, potentially by a large dog. Dr. Russell's testimony aligns with the defense's theory that O'Keefe was attacked by "Chloe," a German shepherd mix living at the scene. "I have a very strong interest in wounds in general, and I have a strong interest in dog bites in particular," Russell explained. She has extensive experience in the field, having seen over 500 patients with animal-related injuries and authored several peer-reviewed papers on law enforcement dog bites. Defense attorneys Alan Jackson and David Yanetti used Dr. Russell's testimony to challenge the prosecution's claim that Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV. Projecting an image of O'Keefe's wounded arm, Jackson asked Russell to describe the injuries. She pointed to "a number of patterns" in the wounds, including parallel lines she identified as "inflicted by either teeth or claw marks" and "punctate" marks from a pointy tooth.    When asked if she believed the injuries were from an animal attack, Russell replied, "Yes, based on a reasonable degree of medical certainty." During cross-examination, Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally questioned Russell's qualifications, noting she is not certified in forensic medicine or pathology and last worked in a coroner's office in 1995. Russell acknowledged these points but stood by her assessment, stating she formed her opinion after reviewing hospital records, autopsy photos, grand jury testimony, and local dog bite reports. The defense argues that O'Keefe was beaten inside the house and bitten by Albert's dog before being placed outside, countering the prosecution's timeline that O'Keefe was hit by Read's SUV around 12:45 a.m. The defense pointed to Chloe, the dog living at 34 Fairview Road, as the likely culprit for O'Keefe's arm injuries. With a full week of testimony expected this week, the defense aims to conclude their presentation quickly. Attorney Yanetti suggested to Boston 25 Investigative Reporter Ted Daniel that they could wrap up by this week with only three witnesses left to call. Judge Cannone has also indicated that jury deliberations could begin this week. Karen Read maintains her innocence, telling reporters, “There is no case against me. After eight weeks, it’s smoke and mirrors and it’s going through my private life and trying to contrive a motive that was never there.” Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Buster Murdaugh, son of convicted murderer and fraudster Alex Murdaugh, has filed a defamation lawsuit against Netflix, Warner Bros. Discovery, and several other parties. The suit, lodged in the Court of Common Pleas in Hampton County, South Carolina, claims that the documentaries "Murdaugh Murders: A Southern Scandal," "Murdaugh Murders: A Deadly Dynasty," and "Low Country: The Murdaugh Dynasty" wrongfully implicated him in the 2015 death of 19-year-old Stephen Smith. The lawsuit, filed last Friday, also names Gannett, the publisher of the Hampton County Guardian, the newspaper’s editor, Michael Dewitt, Jr., and the production companies behind the documentaries. Murdaugh argues that the defendants defamed him by subtly or explicitly suggesting his involvement in Smith's death. Buster Murdaugh, who testified at his father’s trial regarding the shock of his mother, Margaret “Maggie” Murdaugh, and younger brother, Paul Murdaugh, being shot in June 2021, categorically denied any involvement in Stephen Smith’s death. "I have tried my best to ignore the vicious rumors about my involvement in Stephen Smith’s tragic death that continue to be published in the media as I grieve over the brutal murders of my mother and brother," Buster stated in 2023. Smith, an openly gay teenager and former classmate of Murdaugh, was found dead from a blow to the forehead, which an independent autopsy confirmed was likely from a hit-and-run. Despite these findings, Murdaugh claims the documentaries falsely portrayed him as Smith’s murderer. The lawsuit highlights a particular 10-minute segment from one series that alluded to Murdaugh as the killer. Murdaugh's complaint describes the documentaries as containing false statements that suggest he murdered Smith with a baseball bat in an anti-gay hate crime. It also disputes any romantic relationship between Murdaugh and Smith. "These statements are untrue in their entirety," the complaint reads. Eric Bland, the attorney for Stephen Smith’s family, criticized the lawsuit, predicting it would backfire. Bland noted that the powerful entities named in the suit would likely fight vigorously and might unearth further details damaging to Murdaugh. "Buster will have to answer questions in a multi-day deposition from every single defendant," Bland said, emphasizing the extensive questioning Murdaugh would face regarding his relationship with Smith and knowledge of his death. Bland also pointed out that Buster’s name appeared multiple times in the investigative file released by the South Carolina Highway Patrol in 2021. Buster Murdaugh seeks to clear his name of what he calls "baseless," "false," and "defamatory" accusations while offering condolences to Smith’s family. The outcome of this high-profile legal battle remains to be seen. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Karen Read Trial, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com