The TAG Collab Podcast

This week, Edna Uribe and I had the opportunity to lead The Culture of Innovation, an interactive seminar for more than 100 experienced executives transitioning into entrepreneurship, as part of Right Management’s Entrepreneurial Mindset Alliance.We explored a fascinating paradox: What if the very experience that made you successful is now limiting your ability to innovate?After decades of building expertise, developing instincts, and learning what works, we become incredibly good at recognizing patterns. But sometimes, those same patterns prevent us from seeing new possibilities.And when you’re transitioning from corporate leadership to entrepreneurship, that’s a particularly important distinction.A Few Highlights From Our Conversation1. Innovation doesn’t always mean invention.We often associate innovation with breakthrough technologies or enormous investments. But innovation can happen in how we deliver services, solve problems, build partnerships, or create value for customers.Sometimes the opportunity isn’t to invent something new. It’s to see something familiar differently.2. Experience is an asset. Until it becomes an assumption.We introduced the concept of vuja dé, the opposite of déjà vu: looking at something familiar as though you’re seeing it for the first time.It’s a powerful reminder that what worked in one environment may not necessarily work in another.3. There’s power in thinking like a rookie.Drawing on Liz Wiseman’s research in Rookie Smarts, we explored why curiosity, adaptability, and a willingness to ask questions can become competitive advantages, especially when navigating unfamiliar territory.The goal isn’t to abandon your expertise. It’s to combine it with a beginner’s mindset.4. Innovation requires experimentation, not perfection.One of our biggest messages was that you don’t need a fully developed business plan, unlimited resources, or complete certainty to begin learning.Sometimes a conversation, a small experiment, or a different question can reveal more than months of planning.The Question We Left Everyone WithWhat assumption are you carrying into your next chapter that might deserve a second look?For those of us who have spent our careers becoming experts, perhaps the greatest challenge isn’t learning something new.It’s recognizing when what we already know is getting in the way.A special thank-you to Right Management and the Entrepreneurial Mindset Alliance for bringing together such an engaged community of professionals willing to challenge their thinking and explore what’s next.At The TAG Collab, we believe reinvention begins with curiosity—and that innovation is a mindset we can all continue to develop.This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.About the AuthorTeri Arvesú González is a bilingual and bicultural media and communications executive, leadership strategist, educator, and the creator of The TAG Collab. With more than 25 years of experience across newsroom leadership, content strategy, audience engagement, business transformation, and social impact, she writes about leadership, performance, communication, cultural fluency, and the behavioral science behind how we work and grow.She is also the author of The Stories We Inherit, a family memoir exploring identity, generational patterns, reinvention, and the stories that shape who we become.The TAG Collab explores leadership, performance, identity, communication, and the behavioral science behind how we work and grow.2 Likes∙1 Restack This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thetagcollab.substack.com/subscribe

You leave the meeting thinking you know exactly what your boss wants. You get to work, put in the hours, anticipate the questions, and deliver something you feel good about. Then comes the response: “This isn’t quite what I had in mind.”And there it is—that familiar mix of frustration and self-doubt. Then why didn’t you tell me what you had in mind?Sometimes, that is exactly the right question. Leaders have a responsibility to communicate clearly. Employees should not need psychic abilities to succeed. But there is also a skill we rarely teach: how to listen closely enough to understand the purpose, concern, or expectation behind an assignment.Your boss may ask for an update because they need to defend a budget. They may request more collaboration because another department feels excluded. They may ask you to “be more strategic” because your work describes what happened without recommending what should happen next. These are possibilities to explore. You uncover the real need by asking.The challenge is that the moment we hear an assignment, we can stop listening. Our brains move into execution. We hear the deadline and begin organizing the work. We hear “presentation” and start imagining slides. We want to be responsive, capable, useful. But sometimes we begin solving before we understand the problem.Imagine your boss says, “We need something for Thursday’s leadership meeting. There have been a lot of questions about what this initiative is accomplishing.” You register Thursday. You register leadership meeting. You begin gathering accomplishments. Yet the most revealing part of the sentence may have been, There have been a lot of questions.Questions from whom? About the cost? The results? Whether the initiative should continue? A presentation celebrating activity will not necessarily answer a concern about impact. Before opening a document, you could ask, “What do you need the leadership team to understand or decide by the end of that meeting?” One question can change the direction of the entire assignment.Listening well means staying curious a little longer than feels necessary. Pay attention to what keeps returning in the conversation. If your boss repeatedly mentions alignment, ownership, or visibility, ask what those words mean in this situation. “You’ve mentioned ownership a few times. Where are you seeing uncertainty about who is responsible?” Perhaps two departments think they have final approval. Perhaps everyone is contributing, but no one is accountable for the deadline. You need that context to respond effectively.The questions your boss asks can also help you understand what matters to them. You explain the creative idea, and they ask about measurement. You describe the audience experience, and they ask about cost. You outline the rollout, and they ask whether you can test it first. It can feel as though they are picking apart something you are excited about. They may also be showing you what they need to evaluate before supporting it.Instead of continuing to sell the idea in the same way, pause. “It sounds like you need a clearer picture of the cost, how we’ll measure success, and what we can learn from a smaller test. What else would help you make the decision?” You have given them a chance to clarify their concerns—and given yourself a clearer path forward.This becomes harder when feedback touches our sense of competence. “This needs to be more strategic” can quickly become They don’t think I’m strategic. “I need you to take ownership” can become They don’t see how hard I’m working. Before the other person has finished, we are preparing our defense.For those of us who learned to earn our place by being prepared, dependable, and useful, asking a clarifying question can feel strangely vulnerable. We want to demonstrate that we already understand. We may worry that asking will make us seem inexperienced. Yet leaving with an unclear assignment creates far more room for misunderstanding.You can give yourself permission to ask, “When you say ‘more strategic,’ what would you want to see me do differently? Could you give me an example?” That question asks your boss to turn an abstract judgment into something actionable. You deserve feedback you can use.It also helps to understand the pressures surrounding the work. Your boss may be navigating competing expectations, a deadline you cannot see, or concerns from someone you rarely interact with. “What is the biggest concern you need this work to address?” can open a conversation that a simple “When do you need it?” never would.Understanding that pressure does not require absorbing all of it. You can be responsive while making the tradeoffs visible. If a new priority arrives, say, “I can move this forward. How should it rank against the two deliverables already due this week?” Listening includes understanding what matters enough to move—and getting agreement about what will have to wait.Before leaving the conversation, put your understanding into plain language. “So for Thursday, you need a short recommendation showing the results so far, the cost of continuing, and my proposed next step. The goal is to help leadership decide whether to expand the initiative. I’ll send you a draft Tuesday. Is that right?”That brief confirmation gives both of you a chance to catch a misunderstanding while it is still easy to fix. Then comes the part that gives the conversation credibility: doing what you agreed to do, raising obstacles early, and communicating when something changes.You do not have to become a mind reader to become a better listener. You can notice patterns, ask respectful questions, and check whether your interpretation is accurate. Your boss remains responsible for communicating clearly. You can help create the conditions for that clarity.The next time you receive an assignment, give yourself a moment before rushing to prove you can deliver it. Ask, “What do you need this work to make possible?” Then leave enough space to hear the answer. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thetagcollab.substack.com/subscribe

By Teri Arvesu | The TAG CollabYears ago, a friend of mine who worked at the corporate level shared something with me that I probably wasn’t supposed to know.My name had come up during a succession-planning meeting. Senior executives were discussing potential candidates for future leadership opportunities, and someone fairly high up in the organization had offered an opinion about me.“She’s good, but she’s not ready yet. She needs to sharpen her editorial edge.”Wait. What?Of all the things someone could have said about me, that was probably the last thing I expected.I was working in news. Editorial judgment was one of my greatest strengths. I knew how to identify a story, make editorial decisions, and lead news coverage. If anything, I was still learning the management side of the business, figuring out how to lead people and navigate the complexities of a leadership role.So hearing that someone thought my editorial skills needed sharpening was almost comical.Almost.Because my first reaction, if I’m being completely honest, was annoyance.How could someone who had barely worked with me have such a strong opinion about my readiness? How was that fair? And how many career decisions were being influenced by perceptions that didn’t necessarily reflect someone’s actual capabilities?My friend, who was also a mentor, let me vent. Then he said something that completely changed how I looked at the situation.“Look, this is good information to have. Now you know what he thinks, and you can do something about it.”He was right.Once I got over being annoyed, I realized I had been given something incredibly valuable: insight into how someone who could influence my career perceived me.And even though I didn’t agree with the assessment, I could do something about it.My mentor suggested that the next time I had an opportunity to speak with this executive, I should be intentional about what I chose to discuss.Instead of focusing on the leadership and management responsibilities I was taking on, why not talk about editorial strategy, news judgment, and the decisions I was making every day?After all, those were the things that mattered most to him.A few weeks later, I had a work-related call with that same executive.I never mentioned what I’d heard. I didn’t challenge his opinion or try to prove him wrong. I simply approached the conversation differently.I talked about editorial decisions, my thinking behind them, and the strategy guiding our news coverage.Nothing exaggerated. Nothing manufactured. These were things I already knew and did well. I was simply being intentional about making that side of my experience visible.Not long afterward, another colleague told me they had spoken with that executive.Apparently, he had been talking about how strong I was editorially.Bingo. One conversation.Now, I can’t tell you that single conversation changed the trajectory of my career. But it did change how that executive spoke about me.And it taught me a lesson I’ve carried throughout my career.Sometimes the gap between where you want to go and how others see you isn’t a gap in capability. It’s a gap in perception.And here’s the uncomfortable part: most of us never get the benefit of knowing what’s being said about us behind closed doors.The Conversations That Shape Our CareersSomewhere, a conversation is happening that could change someone’s career.Maybe it’s in a leadership meeting, over coffee, or during a succession-planning discussion when an executive asks, “Who do we think is ready for this opportunity?”Names come up. Opinions are shared. Someone makes a recommendation. Someone else expresses hesitation.And the people being discussed have no idea the conversation is taking place.We spend years building our résumés, developing expertise, and delivering results. We assume that if we work hard enough, the right people will notice.But as you move into senior leadership, the rules change.Your accomplishments matter. But so does how people experience you, what they believe about your judgment, and whether they trust you with greater responsibility.Your reputation enters the room before you do. Somewhere, a conversation is happening that could change someone’s career.Maybe it’s in a leadership meeting, over coffee, or behind closed doors when an executive asks, “Who do we think is ready for this opportunity?”A few names come up. Opinions are shared. Someone makes a recommendation. Someone else expresses hesitation.And the people being discussed have no idea the conversation is taking place.Here’s what we don’t talk about enough: Your next career opportunity may depend on what people say about you when you’re not in the room.We spend years building our résumés, developing expertise, delivering results, and preparing for interviews. We assume that if we work hard enough and do our jobs well, the right people will notice.But as you move into senior leadership, the rules change. Your accomplishments matter, but so does something less tangible: how people experience you, what they believe about your judgment, and whether they trust you with greater responsibility.I’ve spent enough time in leadership environments to know that when executives discuss potential candidates, they aren’t simply comparing qualifications. They’re thinking about risk, trust, and readiness.Can this person handle pressure? Do they exercise good judgment? Can they navigate difficult personalities and sensitive situations? Do they understand the bigger picture, or are they focused only on their own responsibilities? Would I feel confident putting this person in front of the CEO, the board, or an important client?These are the questions that often determine who gets considered.And the answers aren’t formed during an interview. They’re formed over time, through everyday interactions that may seem insignificant in the moment.How do you carry yourself in meetings? How do you react when someone disagrees with you? Do you participate in office gossip? Can you be trusted with confidential information? Do you take accountability when something goes wrong, or immediately become defensive? Do you bring solutions, or are you known for pointing out problems?People notice these things.They also notice whether you treat everyone with respect, whether you remain composed when tensions rise, and whether you can communicate an opinion without needing to dominate the conversation.These behaviors create a reputation. And that reputation often travels further than your résumé.Think about the difference between hearing someone say, “She’s incredibly talented, but she can be difficult,” and “She’s someone I would trust in any situation.”Both people may be equally qualified. But which one would you feel more comfortable recommending for a senior leadership role?That’s the part of executive presence that rarely gets discussed. It’s not about how you dress, how loudly you speak, or whether you look the part. It’s about the confidence you inspire in others. It’s the way you think, communicate, listen, respond, and make people feel when they work with you.And it’s not always fair. Perceptions can be influenced by bias, organizational politics, and outdated ideas about what leadership should look like. But that doesn’t make them any less consequential.There’s also an important difference between being well-known and having someone willing to advocate for you. When an executive recommends you for an opportunity, they’re putting their own credibility behind that recommendation. They need to believe you can deliver, represent the organization well, and handle situations they may not be there to supervise.That’s why sponsorship matters. It’s why relationships matter. And it’s why being exceptional at your job doesn’t automatically mean you’re being positioned for the next one.And Here’s the Cold, Hard TruthYou can be the hardest-working, most qualified person in the organization and still be passed over.Not because you aren’t capable, but becaus… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thetagcollab.substack.com/subscribe

By Teri Arvesú GonzálezThere’s something incredibly satisfying about crossing things off a to-do list.You answer twelve emails. Return three phone calls. Fix a problem nobody else could solve. Respond to a last-minute request. Put out a fire.By lunchtime, you’ve already accomplished more than most people would expect in a day.You feel productive. Capable. Needed.And yet, that one thing you promised yourself you’d work on—the business proposal, the strategic plan, the difficult conversation, the book, the investment in your own development—remains untouched.Again.You were busy all day. But did you actually move forward?I find this tension particularly interesting because I spent much of my career in newsrooms, where urgency is part of the operating system. Breaking news demands decisions. Deadlines are real. Responsiveness matters.But here’s the distinction I’ve come to appreciate:Being excellent at responding to what’s happening is not the same as being intentional about what happens next.And our brains don’t always make that distinction easily.The Eisenhower Matrix: Simple on Paper, Complicated in PracticeThe Eisenhower Matrix is one of the most familiar productivity tools around. It organizes our responsibilities into four categories:The logic is straightforward.Handle what is both urgent and important. Reduce or delegate what doesn’t deserve your attention. And intentionally invest time in the important work that isn’t immediately demanding.But if we understand this intellectually, why do so many of us keep gravitating toward the urgent categories?The answer has less to do with our calendars than we might think.1. Our Brains Confuse Urgency With ImportanceIn 2018, researchers Meng Zhu, Yang Yang, and Christopher Hsee published a study in the Journal of Consumer Research identifying what they called the mere urgency effect.Across five experiments, they found that people sometimes prioritized tasks with lower rewards over more valuable alternatives simply because the less valuable tasks appeared urgent.Even when the urgency was artificial.Think about that.We can know that one activity offers greater value and still choose the less valuable option because it feels time-sensitive.An independent replication published in September 2026 reinforced the finding.Urgency captures our attention.Importance requires us to evaluate consequences.And those are two very different mental processes.An email marked urgent creates an immediate demand. A strategic initiative that could transform your career six months from now doesn’t necessarily create that same internal alarm.So we respond to the email.And tell ourselves we’ll get to the strategy when things calm down.Except things rarely calm down on their own.What’s Happening in Our Brains? The Neuroscience of UrgencyHere’s where this gets really interesting.Our brains are constantly evaluating information, directing attention, assessing potential rewards, risk, and deciding when to act.But what’s immediately demanding doesn’t always align with what’s ultimately valuable.Three neuroscience concepts help explain why.First, urgency captures our attention before we’ve evaluated its importance.Our brains have interconnected systems that help us detect and respond to potentially relevant information.One is known as the salience network, which involves regions including the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex. These areas help identify events that may deserve our attention and coordinate responses.Think about what happens when your phone lights up with a notification.Something has changed. There’s new information. Someone may need something.Your attention shifts.But here’s the distinction:Something can successfully capture your attention without deserving priority over what you were already doing.Research on decision-making also shows that time pressure can change how quickly the brain prepares and initiates responses. In certain experimental tasks, people under greater speed pressure act with less accumulated evidence.That doesn’t mean every urgent email creates a neurological emergency. But it illustrates something worth remembering: pressure can influence how we direct attention and make decisions.The question becomes whether we’re responding because something matters—or simply because it interrupted us.Second, immediate rewards are easier to value than distant ones.Consider what happens when you finish a small task.The email is answered. The problem is resolved. The item disappears from your list.You have something tangible to show for your effort.Now compare that with spending an hour developing a strategic plan that might produce meaningful results six months from now.One offers an immediate payoff.The other requires you to invest effort today in anticipation of a future benefit.This connects to a well-established phenomenon called temporal discounting: our tendency to assign less present value to rewards that arrive further into the future.Neuroscientists Joseph Kable and Paul Glimcher used brain imaging to study how people evaluate immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Their research found that activity in brain regions involved in valuation, including the ventral striatum and medial prefrontal cortex, reflected how much participants subjectively valued future rewards.In other words, our decisions aren’t driven exclusively by the objective size of a potential reward.They’re influenced by how valuable that reward feels to us right now.And that’s a challenge for important, nonurgent work.The benefits are often meaningful but delayed.We may intellectually understand why something matters while still feeling more motivated to complete an immediately satisfying alternative.Our future goals have to compete with the psychological appeal of today’s accomplishments.That’s one reason an hour spent responding to messages can feel more productive than an hour spent developing a vision.The immediate task gives us something concrete.The long-term task asks us to trust a process.Third, we can make the future feel more valuable by imagining it more concretely.Here’s the encouraging part.Our brains aren’t permanently locked into prioritizing immediate rewards.In a 2010 neuroscience study, researchers Jan Peters and Christian Büchel examined episodic future thinking—our ability to imagine specific events that may happen in our future.They found that prompting participants to imagine personally relevant future experiences reduced their tendency to discount delayed monetary rewards.The effect was associated with interactions between brain networks involved in imagining future events and evaluating decisions.Think about how we usually describe our long-term priorities:“I need to work on my business.”“I should invest more time in developing my team.”“I want to write that book.”Those goals matter, but they’re abstract.Now imagine something more specific:“What opportunities might I have a year from now if I consistently dedicated two hours each week to building my business?”Or:“What would my team be capable of six months from now if I invested more time developing people instead of solving every problem myself?”Suddenly, the future becomes easier to picture.The research doesn’t guarantee that imagining a future outcome will translate into action. But it does suggest that making future rewards more concrete can change how we value them today.When the future feels more real, it becomes easier to give it a place in our present decisions.And this brings us back to the Eisenhower Matrix.Maybe the challenge isn’t simply that we don’t know what’s important.Maybe it’s that what’s important doesn’t always feel as compelling as what’s urgent.2. Urgent Tasks Give Us Something Important Work Often Doesn’t: Immediate SatisfactionUrgent tasks frequently have a clear beginning and end.Answer the email. Done.Submit the form. Done.Resolve the scheduling conflict. Done.Each completed task offers visible evidence of progress.Important but no… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thetagcollab.substack.com/subscribe

By Teri Arvesú GonzálezThere is a moment in many careers when being really good at your job starts working against you.You know the details.You know which person dropped the ball, which spreadsheet had the wrong number, which vendor changed the deadline, which meeting went sideways, which workaround saved the project, and exactly how many miracles your team performed to get the final product across the finish line.So when your boss asks, “Where are we?” you tell them. All of it.You explain the history. The obstacles. The process. The personalities. The seventeen things you tried before landing on the thing that worked.And somewhere around minute four, you notice their eyes drifting toward their laptop.It can feel dismissive. It usually isn’t.Your boss probably doesn’t want to know how the sausage is made. They want to know: Is the sausage good? Is it going to be ready on time? Is there anything here that could hurt us? And what, if anything, do you need from me?That distinction becomes increasingly important as you move into leadership. Because senior communication isn’t primarily about proving how much you know. It’s about demonstrating that you know what matters.Expertise Says, “Look How Much I Understand.”Leadership says: “Here is what you need to understand.”Early in our careers, detail often signals competence. You show your work. You demonstrate that you did the research. You explain the thinking behind the recommendation because part of your job is proving that you can be trusted with the work.But as your responsibilities grow, the expectation changes. Your value is no longer simply your ability to gather information. It is your ability to process complexity and convert it into clarity.That is a fundamentally different skill.You may have spent ten hours solving the problem. Your boss may need the ten-minute version. The CEO may need the two-minute version. The board may need one sentence.Same work. Different altitude. And knowing which version belongs in which room is part of executive judgment.The Curse of Knowing Too MuchThere is a cognitive bias called the curse of knowledge: once we know something deeply, it becomes difficult to imagine what it feels like not to know it.This happens constantly inside organizations. The person closest to the work sees twenty variables. The person overseeing five departments sees five priorities. The executive running the organization may be balancing fifty competing issues before lunch.None of those perspectives is inherently better. They simply operate at different levels of resolution.The mistake happens when we assume everyone needs the same resolution we do. They don’t.One of the most underrated forms of leadership is learning to ask: What level of information does this person actually need to make the decision in front of them?Not: How much information do I have? Not: How much work did we do? Not even: What would make me feel fully understood?But: What does this person need in order to move?That is audience awareness. And audience awareness is power.Your Boss Is Probably Listening for Four Things1. Where are we?Give me the headline. Are we on track? Behind? Ahead? Has something materially changed? Start there—not with the history. Start with: “We’re on track for the November launch.” You can always go backward if they want more detail.2. What matters?Not every complication deserves escalation. If five things went wrong but none of them materially changes the outcome, your boss may only need: “We encountered several execution issues, but none currently affects timing or budget.” That communicates judgment.3. What could change the outcome?Senior leaders care deeply about variables that could materially affect revenue, reputation, people, timing, customers, legal exposure, strategic priorities, or organizational risk. If one of those is moving, say it early. Signal first. Context second.4. What do you need from me?Before walking into an update, know whether you are asking for awareness, a decision, resources, air cover, a relationship, an escalation—or nothing at all. Sometimes the strongest update ends with: “Nothing needed from you. I wanted you aware because the situation has reputational implications, and we’ll continue managing it.”The Executive Communication FormulaTry this the next time someone senior asks you for an update.THE HEADLINE — What is happening?We’re still on track to launch October 15.THE SIGNAL — What should they pay attention to?One vendor delay has compressed our testing window by four days.THE IMPLICATION — Why does that matter?It doesn’t currently jeopardize launch, but it removes most of our contingency time.THE RECOMMENDATION — What do you think should happen?My recommendation is that we keep the launch date and move two nonessential features into phase two.THE ASK — What do you need from them?I need your approval on that scope change today.Five pieces. You may have fifty pages of information behind them. That’s fine. Have the details. Know the details. Be prepared to answer the details. But don’t confuse having the details with leading with the details.This Is Where High Performers Sometimes Get StuckHigh performers are particularly vulnerable to overexplaining because high performers often build their identity around being prepared.We want people to understand how carefully we thought something through. We want them to know how complicated it was. We want them to see the invisible work. Sometimes, if we’re being particularly human, we want credit for surviving the mess.So we explain. And explain. And explain.But at a certain level, your boss is no longer evaluating how hard you worked. They are evaluating: Can I trust your judgment? Can you determine what’s important? Can you separate signal from noise? Can you identify risk before it becomes a crisis? Can you bring me solutions instead of simply transporting problems upward? Can you represent this issue when I’m not in the room?That is a very different test.A Word of Warning: Pressure Can Make You Do the Exact OppositeThis becomes particularly important when you are under enormous pressure—or when you begin to suspect that your boss is questioning your performance.That is often the moment when people double down on exactly the wrong thing.You feel scrutinized. So you bring more documentation. You make the spreadsheet bigger. You explain every call you made. You list every stakeholder you contacted. You recount every obstacle you navigated. You make absolutely certain that your boss can see how much you are doing.It makes sense. When we feel evaluated, our instinct is often to produce evidence.Psychologists sometimes describe this broadly as defensive impression management: attempts to protect how others perceive our competence when we feel our performance or credibility is under scrutiny.There is also an element of evaluation threat. When we feel watched, judged, or questioned, we can move toward defending, explaining, documenting, and justifying.So we start showing our work. All of it.The problem is that at senior levels, the volume of work is rarely the question. Impact is.Your boss may not be wondering, “Is she busy?” They may be wondering: Is this strategy working? What has changed? Are we getting the result? Does she understand what’s driving the result? What should we do next?And if your answer is a giant inventory of activity, you may accidentally reinforce the very perception you are trying to correct.The Effort-Signaling TrapCall it effort signaling or activity signaling. It happens when we use the visible volume of our work as evidence of our value.Look how many meetings I held. Look how many people I contacted. Look how many deliverables we produced. Look at this spreadsheet. Look at all these initiatives. Look how much I’m doing.There is nothing wrong with effort. There is nothing wrong with documenting work. The trap is believing that activity automatically communicates effectiveness.It doesn’t.In fact, excess… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thetagcollab.substack.com/subscribe

Written by Teri Arvesú GonzálezYears ago, a coach told me something about myself that has stuck with me: “You have a unique ability to see the macro and the micro at the same time.”I didn’t have language for it then, but I think I do now.Forward focus and peripheral vision.Throughout my career, I was both a planner and an innovator. I could see where we were trying to go, build the plan to get there, and at the same time notice the details, shifts and opportunities happening around us.That balance feels even more important today.Since leaving corporate life, some of the most meaningful things I’ve built weren’t on a carefully mapped-out plan.I started writing a blog. It led to an invitation to speak, which led to a contract, and then another. I had an impulse to write a letter to my son. I followed it, and that letter eventually became The Stories We Inherit, now a bestseller. A contact led to an introduction that put me in a college classroom. Curiosity about AI led me to teach myself how to use it, completely changing how quickly I could research, test and build ideas. Then I started getting asked to teach other women and seniors how to use it too.One thing kept leading to another.There’s a phrase I find myself using more and more: when you’re innovating, sometimes you’re building the bridge as you walk across it.It wasn’t always like this. But lately, when I use that phrase with leaders, entrepreneurs or people navigating career changes, I see a lot more heads nodding.We still need plans. Companies need strategies. Leaders need to give their teams, bosses, boards and investors confidence that they know where they’re going. Individuals need direction too.But we also need enough flexibility to recognize that the world may change while we’re executing the plan.And AI is accelerating that reality.A goal we set yesterday may still be exactly the right goal. But it was created with yesterday’s understanding of what was possible.That’s why I think we need both: forward focus and peripheral vision.Forward focus keeps us moving toward something. Peripheral vision allows us to notice what is emerging around us without losing our direction.Too much focus and we can execute yesterday’s plan perfectly while missing today’s opportunity. Too much peripheral vision and we’re chasing every shiny new thing.So how do we create a healthy balance?That’s what I’ve started calling MOVE.The MOVE FrameworM — Make Space. Look up from execution long enough to notice what’s changing. What might you be missing because you’re so focused on the existing plan?O — Open the Experiment. Test something. Learn the skill. Take the meeting. Write the article. Pilot the technology. Give an idea enough room to show you what it might become.V — Validate Through Movement. Let action create information. What worked? What didn’t? Did people respond? Did an opportunity emerge that you couldn’t have anticipated?E — Expand What Responds. Put more time, money or attention behind what is showing evidence. Adjust what isn’t. Let some things go. Then MOVE again.MOVE isn’t a replacement for strategy. It’s a way of giving strategy peripheral vision.I still believe in long-term thinking. I think we need a healthy balance between three things:Horizon gives us forward focus: Where are we trying to go?Path gives us strategy: Based on what we know today, what’s our best route?MOVE gives us peripheral vision: What are we seeing, testing and learning along the way that might change how we get there?Looking back at the last two years, I couldn’t have put everything that has happened into a five-year plan. Some of the opportunities weren’t visible when I started.They became visible because I was moving.Maybe that’s the real challenge for leaders, companies and individuals right now: not choosing between planning and experimentation, but getting better at doing both.Keep looking ahead.But don’t become so focused on the destination that you miss what’s developing beside you.Forward focus. Peripheral vision. Keep moving.Teri Arvesu Gonzalez is the founder of The TAG Collab, a corporate consultancy that partners companies ands to align purpose, brand, and strategy from the inside out.With a Master’s in Management and Leadership and more than 25 years of experience leading newsrooms, launching initiatives, and driving transformation across Miami, Chicago, and national corporate teams, she brings deep expertise in storytelling, culture-building, and operational alignment.She is the author of the Stories we Inherit (English) and Las Historias que Heredamos (Spanish) #1 for New Hot Release and best seller on AmazonAlso find me on:Podcast: on Apple Podcasts and Spotify The TAG CollabInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/the_tag_collab/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61576206521962Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/teriarvesu/Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/thetagcollab/ This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thetagcollab.substack.com/subscribe

Written by Teri Arvesú GonzálezSomewhere along the way, the path of least resistance became shorthand for taking the easy way out. We were taught that if something is hard, push harder. If the door won’t open, keep pushing. If you’re exhausted, dig deeper.I believe in hard work. I just don’t believe hard for hard’s sake is a strategy.In business, we do the opposite all the time. We reduce friction. We look at data. We eliminate unnecessary steps. We try to align people with the work where their strengths can create the most value. Nobody celebrates a process that takes 14 steps when it could take five. We optimize it.Yet when it comes to careers, we can glorify resistance.Sometimes work is hard because we are stretching, learning, and getting better. But sometimes it is hard because we are compensating for poor alignment.You may be perfectly capable of succeeding in something that barely uses your strengths, doesn’t hold your interest, or requires enormous energy just to maintain your performance. The question isn’t only Can I do this? It’s What is all this effort producing?That’s why I think the path of least resistance deserves a rebrand. Least resistance does not mean no resistance. It means less unnecessary resistance.When ability, interest, environment, and opportunity begin to line up, there can be less friction. Less friction can create more small wins. Small wins give us evidence that we’re capable. That evidence can build confidence, and confidence can create momentum.The reverse can happen too: misalignment → more friction → fewer wins → lower confidence → less momentum. Same person. Same work ethic. Different alignment.I’ve written before about the idea of stopping the endless effort to fix every flaw and instead understanding where our strengths naturally create value. If that resonates, you can read that article or listen to the podcast.But I’ve been taking that idea one step further.Because being good at something does not automatically mean you are interested in it.You can have an ability that comes naturally and have zero desire to build a career around it. And you can be deeply interested in something that requires skills you haven’t developed yet.So what happens when we stop looking at any one piece by itself and start asking where they line up?ABILITY + INTEREST + OPPORTUNITY + FITThat is the framework I’m increasingly interested in.Especially now.I have kids thinking about what they may want to study and do with their lives. At the same time, I hear constantly from people in my industry—and people around my age—who are asking some version of “What’s next?”Different stages of life. Same underlying question.How do I make a better decision about where to invest my time, energy, education, and effort?That is where the idea of return on effort comes in.There is Compounding Hard: the difficult work that builds skill, judgment, credibility, relationships, or knowledge you can use again.And there is Compensating Hard: working incredibly hard just to stay in place because you are constantly fighting poor fit.Both feel hard. But they are not producing the same return.So before automatically deciding the answer is work harder, I think we should ask: Am I getting better? Does my interest survive the difficulty? Does this environment let me use my strengths? Is the work building something I can use again? Is there a real need for what I’m learning to do?Hard work matters. But hard work is fuel. Alignment is navigation. Fuel without navigation can take you very far in the wrong direction.Nothing guarantees success. Timing, economics, access, family responsibilities, health, luck, and plenty of other forces matter. No assessment or framework is a crystal ball.But that doesn’t mean we should ignore the information we can gather.We use data to make better decisions in business. We use it when we invest. We use it when we buy a home, evaluate risk, hire people, allocate resources, or make other major life decisions.So why wouldn’t we use data to help make one of the biggest investments of all: where we put our time, talent, education, and career energy? That is the question I’ve been sitting with.I’ve been using research-backed tools and assessments to collect better information for my own kids and for people trying to figure out their next move. Not to predict the future, but to see patterns, narrow possibilities, reduce some of the guesswork, and make the next investment more intentionalMaybe that’s as close to future-proofing as any of us can realistically get: not predicting exactly what the future will look like, but knowing ourselves well enough to make smarter decisions as it changes.If you’re thinking about a first career move, a pivot, or simply asking yourself “What’s next?”, DM me. I’m happy to share more about the tools and framework I’m using to bring a little more clarity—and a lot less guesswork—to the decision.Teri Arvesu Gonzalez is the founder of The TAG Collab, a corporate consultancy that partners companies ands to align purpose, brand, and strategy from the inside out.With a Master’s in Management and Leadership and more than 25 years of experience leading newsrooms, launching initiatives, and driving transformation across Miami, Chicago, and national corporate teams, she brings deep expertise in storytelling, culture-building, and operational alignment.She is the author of the Stories we Inherit (English) and Las Historias que Heredamos (Spanish) #1 for New Hot Release and best seller on AmazonAlso find me on:Podcast: on Apple Podcasts and Spotify The TAG CollabInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/the_tag_collab/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61576206521962Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/teriarvesu/Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/thetagcollab/ This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thetagcollab.substack.com/subscribe

Written by Teri Arvesú GonzálezHave you ever had someone mention a certain car—and then suddenly you see that car everywhere?The cars didn’t multiply overnight. You just started noticing them.There’s a name for this: the frequency illusion, also known as the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon. Once something becomes relevant to us, our brains become more likely to notice it among everything competing for our attention.I think goals can work the same way.“I need to figure out what I want to do” is hard for your brain to act on. But when you begin identifying your strengths, interests, natural aptitudes, what gives you energy, and the environments where you may thrive, you give your brain something more specific.You are essentially telling it: This is important. Start looking for it.Psychologists call part of this selective attention. Your brain is constantly filtering information. Clarity helps shape that filter.And alignment matters too.When the opportunities you pursue are better aligned with your skills, interests, and strengths, there may be less friction between who you are and what you are trying to do. That doesn’t mean everything becomes easy. It means the effort can feel more natural and worth sustaining.That can create a powerful cycle:Clarity → Alignment → Action → Learning → Confidence → MomentumI learned this personally.When I left corporate America, I had spent decades knowing what success looked like and what came next. Then suddenly, I didn’t.I was so numb from the transition that I wasn’t even sure what I wanted to say, much less what I wanted to do.That experience pushed me deeper into the science of leadership, human behavior, career alignment, and performance. One of the most useful things I learned was that we do not have to figure ourselves out entirely through intuition.There are assessments, tools, and frameworks that can provide more objective insight into our interests, strengths, aptitudes, motivations, and working styles.They are not crystal balls. But they can give us evidence.And evidence gives us something to test.There is another useful concept called prospective memory—our ability to hold onto an intention even when we are not consciously thinking about it every minute.In normal language: you plant the thought, go live your life, and then something makes your brain say, Wait. This might matter.That is why clarity can help create momentum. It does not magically attract opportunities. It can make us better able to recognize relevant ones when they appear.At The TAG Collab, we have used these kinds of tools and frameworks with leaders, organizations, and people navigating career transitions—helping them better understand their strengths, clarify what comes next, identify where they may be best aligned, and turn that insight into action.Then I started looking at my own kids.I have kids in high school and college, and I found myself watching them make decisions about majors, careers, internships, and what comes next.And I kept thinking:Why aren’t we doing this for them in the first place?Why do we wait until someone is 35, 45, or 55 and questioning their career to help them understand their strengths and where they may thrive?Why are we asking 17- and 18-year-olds to make expensive, consequential decisions with so little objective information about themselves?So I started applying some of these same principles with my own kids.Not to tell them what they should become.To give them better information about themselves.Instead of asking, What do you want to be when you grow up? I think there are better questions:What does the evidence tell us about where you might thrive?And then:What can you do next to find out?Talk to someone. Take the class. Shadow a professional. Try the internship. Build the project. Test the hypothesis.Every action gives you more information.That is what career clarity means to me. Not choosing your entire future. Knowing enough about yourself to identify promising directions and start moving.Clarity creates a direction for discovery. Alignment can reduce friction. Action creates evidence. Evidence builds confidence. And confidence fuels momentum.Sometimes the opportunity you need is not missing.You just haven’t told your brain what to look for yet.At The TAG Collab, we are now adapting many of the principles we have used with leaders and people navigating career change into our emerging College & Career Clarity work for young people and families.I am doing this with my own kids because I believe we can help young people approach these decisions with more insight, more intention, and less guesswork.If this resonates with you and you have a high school or college-age child trying to figure out what comes next, reach out to me to schedule a conversation. We can explore where your child is today, the questions your family is trying to answer, and whether this approach is the right fit for you.You don’t need to know their entire future. You just need enough clarity to help them take a better next step and use the right tools to help make it flow better!Send me an email to schedule a call [email protected] Arvesu Gonzalez is the founder of The TAG Collab, a corporate consultancy that partners companies ands to align purpose, brand, and strategy from the inside out.With a Master’s in Management and Leadership and more than 25 years of experience leading newsrooms, launching initiatives, and driving transformation across Miami, Chicago, and national corporate teams, she brings deep expertise in storytelling, culture-building, and operational alignment.She is the author of the Stories we Inherit (English) and Las Historias que Heredamos (Spanish) #1 for New Hot Release and best seller on AmazonAlso find me on:Podcast: on Apple Podcasts and Spotify The TAG CollabInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/the_tag_collab/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61576206521962Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/teriarvesu/Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/thetagcollab/ This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thetagcollab.substack.com/subscribe

I have a confession to make. I’ve been a little slow here on Substack.Not because I ran out of things to say. I’ve been writing a book.Actually, the book is now out. The Stories We Inherit has been published, and the response on Amazon has been incredible. I am still taking that in.Link on Amazon to buyFor a while, I thought of the book and The TAG Collab as separate things. The TAG Collab Substack and podcast were where I wrote and talked about leadership, performance, confidence, reinvention, fear, perfectionism, identity and ambition.Then there is The TAG strategic agency, where we ask many of the same questions at an organizational level. What is getting in the way of performance? Is it the structure? The environment? The culture? The process? The incentives? Are we asking people to change when the system around them is actually what needs fixing?And then there was the book, which felt much more personal. Family. Identity. The stories we inherit. The things that get passed down whether anyone intends to pass them down or not.But eventually I realized I had been asking the same question in all three places:What gets in the way of becoming who—or what—we are capable of becoming?That is probably the thread running through most of my work.And I rarely stop with the first answer. I tend to double-click. Then sometimes triple-click. I want to know what is underneath the behavior, the decision, the performance problem or the pattern.It is easy to tell someone to be more confident, stop procrastinating, speak up, take the opportunity or network more. It is also easy for an organization to say its people need to be more innovative, collaborative or accountable.What interests me is what comes next.Why aren’t they?That is where I keep coming back to psychology, behavioral science and neuroscience. Our brains learn from experience. We build patterns around what feels safe, what gets rewarded, what creates embarrassment, what threatens belonging and what helps us avoid discomfort. Over time, some of those responses become automatic.Organizations do something similar. They build processes, habits, incentives and cultural norms that can reinforce behavior long after anyone remembers why they were created in the first place.So whether I am looking at a person or a company, the visible behavior is often only the first clue.I want to know: Why does this feel risky? When did we learn this? What is this behavior protecting? What is being rewarded? What is being discouraged? And sometimes the most interesting question of all: Was this lesson even ours to begin with?Sometimes what gets in the way is external. It is the structure, the system, the boss, the access, the opportunity or the environment. You cannot mindset your way out of every barrier, and you cannot coach people into thriving inside a system that continually works against the behavior you say you want.Sometimes it is internal. Fear. Self-doubt. Perfectionism. The belief that you have to be completely ready before you act. Maybe somewhere along the way you learned that visibility is risky, mistakes are expensive or being liked matters more than being heard.And sometimes it is inherited.A family story. A survival strategy. A definition of success. An expectation about what a good daughter does, what a responsible son does, how much risk is acceptable, how much sacrifice proves gratitude or what “people like us” are supposed to do.Nobody necessarily sits us down and gives us these rules. We absorb them by watching. We notice what gets praised, what creates tension, what people avoid talking about, who is considered successful and what happens when someone steps outside the norm.That is a big part of what I found myself exploring while writing The Stories We Inherit.And then the book gave me one more lesson.I grew up in a Hispanic home where English was my stronger language. I was the kid placed in basic Spanish throughout elementary and high school. Spanish was part of my culture, my family and my identity, but mastering it academically was another story.And because apparently nothing is impossible to me once I decide I am going to figure something out, I put the book together in Spanish too.I am seriously considering calling my third-grade Spanish teacher.But there is a deeper reason the Spanish edition mattered to me.Those of us who did not live through that first wave of Cuban exile are still living its aftereffects. We grew up inside the stories, fears, sacrifices, expectations and survival strategies that came from it. They shaped our families, even when we did not experience the original events ourselves.And very few people are talking about what that means for the generations that came after. Even fewer are having that conversation in Spanish.That matters to me.Because these stories do not disappear simply because a generation passes. They can show up in how we think about security, ambition, money, family, risk, success, loyalty and even the choices we believe are available to us.Which, when you think about it, brings me right back to the question behind The TAG Collab.What are we carrying? Where did it come from? And is it helping us become who we want to become now?There is something wonderfully full-circle about publishing this story in Spanish, because how many times do we carry an old label long after it has stopped being true?The kid who was not good at Spanish. The person who is not creative. The one who is bad with numbers. The one who is too shy. The one who is not leadership material. The one who could never write a book.Sometimes the tag was put on us by someone else. Sometimes we put it on ourselves. And sometimes it may have been accurate for one moment in our lives and somehow became a permanent definition.That is really the work across all of it.The TAG Collab Substack and podcast explore what may be getting in the way for us as individuals. The strategic agency asks the same questions of organizations, systems, culture and structure. And The Stories We Inherit goes further back and asks what we may have absorbed before we even knew we were absorbing it.Different applications. Same curiosity.Keep digging until we get closer to the root cause.Because you cannot solve the right problem if you have diagnosed the wrong one.So maybe I haven’t really been away from The TAG Collab.I’ve just been digging deeper.And apparently, writing in two languages while I was at it.I’m gonna go call my 3rd grade Spanish teacher now. She would be so impressed Spanish Trailer buy book on Amazon Teri Arvesu Gonzalez is the founder of The TAG Collab, a corporate consultancy that partners companies ands to align purpose, brand, and strategy from the inside out.With a Master’s in Management and Leadership and more than 25 years of experience leading newsrooms, launching initiatives, and driving transformation across Miami, Chicago, and national corporate teams, she brings deep expertise in storytelling, culture-building, and operational alignment.She is the author of the Stories we Inherit (English) and Las Historias que Heredamos (Spanish) #1 for New Hot Release and best seller on AmazonAlso find me on:Podcast: on Apple Podcasts and Spotify The TAG CollabInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/the_tag_collab/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61576206521962Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/teriarvesu/Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/thetagcollab/Tik Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@thetagcollab This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thetagcollab.substack.com/subscribe

What business are you really in?It’s one of the first questions I ask when working with leaders.It’s also one of the questions that most often stops a room.Organizations are usually quick to tell me what they manufacture, what services they provide, what technology they use, or what industry they compete in.Far fewer can clearly explain the progress their customers are hiring them to create. Problem they want solved, the need they want you to fulfill or the job to be done. At The TAG Collab, we’ve found that breakthrough innovation rarely begins with brainstorming sessions or the latest technology. It begins with asking better questions.By combining behavioral science, strategic advisory, leadership development, and innovation frameworks, we help organizations uncover hidden opportunities, challenge long-held assumptions, and navigate what we call The Great Disruption—a time when technology, AI, workforce expectations, and business models are changing simultaneously.One of my favorite frameworks for helping leaders think differently comes from Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen: Jobs to Be Done.Customers Don’t Buy Products. They Hire Progress.There are countless frameworks for innovation, strategy, and growth. I’ve studied many of them throughout my career.But Jobs to Be Done has consistently changed the way I look at organizations.Because it fundamentally changes the questions you ask.As a journalist, I learned that the quality of an answer depends on the quality of the question. Years later, leading organizations through transformation, I discovered the exact same principle applies to business.When a company tells me what it sells, I’m interested.When they tell me what problem they’re solving, I become curious.But when we uncover what job customers are actually hiring them to do, that’s when hidden opportunities begin to emerge.Christensen argued that customers don’t simply buy products or services.They hire them to make progress.People don’t buy a drill because they want a drill.They hire it because they want a hole.More importantly, they want to hang a picture, create a home, solve a problem, or accomplish something meaningful.The product isn’t the destination.Progress is.That subtle shift changes everything.Discovering the Job Is Harder Than It SoundsIf identifying the “job to be done” were as simple as sending a customer survey, every organization would already know it.The reality is much more complex.One of the reasons Christensen’s work has always resonated with me is that it recognizes something journalists, anthropologists, and behavioral scientists have understood for decades:People aren’t always able to explain why they do what they do.Ask customers why they purchased something, and they’ll often describe features.Observe them.Watch what frustrates them.Notice the workarounds they’ve created.Understand what was happening in their lives when they made the decision.Listen for what they don’t say.That’s where the real story lives.The real job is often hidden beneath the surface.Which is why discovering it requires curiosity far more than certainty.A Refrigerator Company That Stopped Designing RefrigeratorsOne of my favorite examples of Jobs to Be Done doesn’t come from Silicon Valley.It comes from a refrigerator company.For decades, refrigerator manufacturers competed the same way. They built larger models, added more features, improved energy efficiency, and searched for ways to lower costs.The assumption was simple:People wanted refrigerators.The challenge was building a better one.Then Godrej & Boyce, one of India’s oldest manufacturing companies, began looking at the problem differently.Instead of asking how to sell more refrigerators, they spent time observing families in rural communities.What they discovered changed everything.Many households weren’t trying to own a refrigerator.They were trying to keep milk from spoiling.Protect medicine.Preserve vegetables for another day.Reduce food waste.Improve their family’s quality of life.A traditional refrigerator wasn’t simply too expensive.It was too large.It consumed too much electricity in areas where power was unreliable.It was designed for a lifestyle many families simply didn’t have.The job wasn’t:“Help me buy a refrigerator.”The job was:“Help me keep essential items cool long enough to improve my daily life.”That insight completely reframed the opportunity.Instead of designing a cheaper refrigerator, Godrej created ChotuKool, a compact, portable cooling device designed around the customer’s actual circumstances rather than the industry’s assumptions.Notice what happened.The innovation wasn’t born from asking customers what features they wanted.It came from observing their lives.From understanding their struggles.From seeing the world through their circumstances instead of through the product category.That’s why I believe observation is becoming one of the rarest—and most valuable—competitive advantages organizations have today.Observation Is Becoming a Competitive AdvantageWe live in an era overflowing with data.Dashboards.Analytics.Artificial intelligence.Predictive models.Organizations know more than ever about what customers click, purchase, watch, and abandon.Yet many understand less than ever about why those behaviors occur.Data tells us what happened.Observation helps us understand why.As a journalist, some of the biggest stories I ever uncovered weren’t found in a press release.They emerged by paying attention to what others overlooked.Watching.Listening.Asking one more question.Seeing the gap between what people said and what they actually did.Innovation works the same way.Sometimes the next breakthrough isn’t hidden inside another dashboard.It’s hiding in plain sight.Why Great Industries Struggle to Reinvent ThemselvesOne of Christensen’s most famous observations is that industries rarely disrupt themselves.That idea has fascinated me throughout my career.Successful organizations become exceptionally good at optimizing what already exists.Their budgets reward it.Their culture reinforces it.Their reporting structures measure it.Their incentives depend on it.Ironically, those strengths often become barriers when markets change.Organizations don’t usually fail because they’re poorly managed.They struggle because they’re incredibly well designed—for yesterday.Which is why disruption so often comes from outside the industry.Outsiders aren’t protecting existing assumptions.They simply ask different questions.It Doesn’t Just Unlock Innovation. It Reveals Your Brand.Jobs to Be Done is often introduced as an innovation framework.I believe it’s much more than that.It helps organizations rediscover who they really are.Many companies define themselves by what they produce.Customers define them by the progress they create.That’s an entirely different lens.When leaders truly understand the job customers are hiring them to do, they gain clarity far beyond product development.They strengthen their brand.They sharpen their messaging.They improve the customer experience.They build stronger cultures.They make better strategic decisions.Because brands aren’t built around products.They’re built around the promise of helping people make progress.Understanding that promise changes everything.Better Questions Build Better BusinessesThis is why I return to this framework again and again.Not because it offers easy answers.Because it teaches leaders to ask better questions.What assumptions have we stopped questioning?What problem are we really solving?If we started this organization today, would we build it the same way?What business are we actually in?Those questions unlock conversations that rarely happen inside organizations—and that’s often where the greatest opportunities are hiding.That’s Why We Created The TAG CollabAt The TAG Collab, we believe the future belongs to organizations that can see what others overlook.We help executive teams uncover hidden assumptions, identify… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thetagcollab.substack.com/subscribe