The Epstein Rewind: Jeffrey Epstein And The Infrastructure He Built Around Himself

When JP Morgan dropped Epstein as a client, Deutsche Bank was right there to soften the fall for the pedophile.Today we add more context to the relationship and dig a little deeper into the financials.(commercial at 16:44)to contact me:[email protected]:https://fortune.com/2020/07/09/deutsche-bank-clients-jp-morgan-chase-fines/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The financial sector still has a lot to answer for when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein. Even after it was known that he was a predator, these banks continued to not only do business with him, but look at him as preferred member who was afforded all kinds of benefits that normal members of these banks could never dream of. So, the question is...will the financial sector ever be held to account? For some reason, I doubt it.(commercial at 9:20)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/8/13/20803869/jeffrey-epstein-bank-finances-jpmorgan-deutsche-bankBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the prosecution has filed an objection to the defendant's motion to unseal the Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) suppression briefing and related hearing. The prosecution argues that the sealed materials contain sensitive information critical to the integrity of ongoing investigations and the privacy of individuals not directly connected to the case. They assert that unsealing these documents could compromise law enforcement techniques, hinder active investigations, and violate the privacy rights of individuals whose genetic information may be involved.Additionally, the prosecution emphasizes the importance of maintaining confidentiality in cases involving advanced investigative methods like IGG, to protect the broader interests of justice and public safety. They contend that the defendant’s arguments for transparency do not outweigh the potential harm that could result from public access to these materials. The objection requests that the court preserve the sealed status of the briefing and hearing records to ensure that sensitive investigative methods and third-party information remain protected.to contact me:[email protected]:011325-Motion-Unseal-IGG-Suppression-Briefing-Hearing.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defendant has filed a motion to unseal the Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) suppression briefing and hearing. The defendant argues that the sealed materials are critical to ensuring transparency and accountability in the judicial process. They contend that access to these documents is necessary to evaluate the legality of the investigative methods used and to safeguard their constitutional rights, including the right to a fair trial. By unsealing the records, the defendant seeks to expose potential violations in the application of IGG and foster public confidence in the judicial system.The motion emphasizes the principle of open courts and asserts that sealing such records without compelling justification undermines public trust and accountability. The defendant’s legal team argues that the government has not demonstrated sufficient harm that would outweigh the public's right to access these records. They further state that unsealing the briefing and hearing is essential for legal oversight and to set a precedent for the responsible use of advanced investigative technologies in criminal cases.to contact me:[email protected]:011325-Motion-Unseal-IGG-Suppression-Briefing-Hearing.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has strongly criticized the Investigation Discovery (ID) documentary series "The Fall of Diddy," which features allegations of misconduct against the music mogul. In response to claims made by former Vibe editor-in-chief Danyel Smith—who alleges that Combs threatened her during a dispute over a magazine cover—Combs' attorneys have dismissed these accusations as "pure fiction." They argue that the narrative presented in the documentary misrepresents the 30-year professional relationship between Smith and Combs. Furthermore, Combs' legal representatives contend that the producers of the documentary failed to provide sufficient time or details for his team to address the unsubstantiated claims, many of which come from unidentified participants whose allegations lack context. They assert that by withholding this information, the producers made it impossible for Combs to present facts to counter these fabricated accusations, resulting in a one-sided and prejudicial narrative. Additionally, Combs' legal team has filed a $50 million defamation lawsuit against Courtney Burgess, her attorney Ariel Mitchell, and Nexstar Media Group, the parent company of NewsNation. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants fabricated and amplified false claims for financial gain, including allegations involving sex tapes with celebrities and minors, which were broadcasted by NewsNation without proper due diligence. Combs claims these actions have caused him economic and reputational harm and affected his right to a fair trial. His attorneys emphasize that Combs cannot respond to every publicity stunt or facially ridiculous claim but maintains full confidence in the facts and the judicial process, where they believe the truth will prevail.to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy's lawyers condemn ID's The Fall of Diddy as cash grab full of 'unsubstantiated' and 'fabricated' claims | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a recent Wall Street Journal interview, Bill Gates revisited his controversial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, acknowledging that meeting with the convicted sex offender was "a huge mistake." However, Gates’s admission of “foolishness” rings hollow to critics, who question why such a highly intelligent and influential figure would repeatedly associate with Epstein, even after his criminal history was publicly known. Gates claimed he engaged with Epstein in hopes of advancing global health philanthropy, yet no tangible benefits emerged from these meetings, raising concerns about his judgment and motivations. Critics argue that Gates’s wealth and power afforded him ample resources to explore other philanthropic avenues without involving a figure as toxic as Epstein.Additionally, Gates’s attempts to downplay the personal fallout from his ties to Epstein invite further skepticism. Reports suggest that Epstein tried to exploit their acquaintance by threatening to expose an alleged affair involving Gates, adding a layer of complexity to the narrative. Gates’s repeated meetings with Epstein—despite his then-wife Melinda French Gates expressing discomfort—cast doubt on his sincerity and decision-making. His efforts to frame the relationship as a lapse in judgment fail to address the broader implications of why someone in his position would disregard ethical concerns for potential personal or professional gain. This relationship has left a lingering stain on Gates’s reputation, with critics questioning whether his contrition comes from genuine regret or the need to repair his public image.to contact me:[email protected]:Bill Gates Addresses His Friendship with Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein: ‘I Was Foolish’Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Marriott International, Inc. has requested a pre-motion conference with Judge Vyskocil in anticipation of filing a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Candice McCrary’s Complaint in the case McCrary v. Sean Combs, Marriott International, Inc., et al. Marriott states that despite seeking the Plaintiff's consent for the motion, no response was received. While Marriott expresses sympathy for the abuse described in McCrary’s Complaint and acknowledges the seriousness of allegations involving gender-motivated violence, it argues that it is not a proper party to the claim. Marriott asserts that the Complaint fails to meet the notice pleading standard under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), describing the allegations as too vague.Furthermore, Marriott contends that McCrary’s claim relies on the 2022 amendment to the Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Law (VGMVPL), which cannot be applied retroactively to conduct that occurred before the amendment. Citing the recent decision in Doe v. Combs (2024), Marriott notes that corporate defendants cannot be held liable under this statute for actions predating 2022. Since the alleged conduct against Marriott occurred in 2004, it argues that the claim should be dismissed for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - Letter re_ Request for Pre-Motion Conference (Marriott _ McCrary).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted in 2021 for her role in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations, is currently serving a 20-year sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Tallahassee in Florida. Reports indicate that the facility has faced criticism for substandard living conditions, including issues with moldy food, rodent infestations, and structural disrepair. Inmates have reported plugging leaks with tampons due to inadequate maintenance.In this episode, we take a look!to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has firmly denied allegations involving a second victim in his purported sex trafficking activities. They assert that these claims are baseless and part of a broader effort to tarnish Combs' reputation. His attorneys emphasize that the accusations lack credible evidence and are driven by individuals seeking financial gain or media attention.Combs, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges, remains in custody after being denied bail. His defense team is actively preparing for the upcoming trial, maintaining that the allegations are unfounded. They argue that the prosecution's case relies on unsubstantiated claims and that Combs will be exonerated once all evidence is presented in court.In a recent interview, aspiring singer-songwriter Tanea Wallace recounted her experience at a 2018 party hosted by Sean "Diddy" Combs, which she described as unsettling and traumatic. She claimed that upon arrival, guests were required to surrender their phones, and the atmosphere was marked by loud music and individuals engaging in various explicit activities. Wallace alleged that certain attendees, including herself, were invited to a more exclusive area of the party, where she observed behavior that left her feeling uncomfortable and concerned for her safety.Wallace further described seeing individuals she referred to as "little people" dressed provocatively, which led her to question the appropriateness of their presence at the event. She implied that some attendees might have been minors, though she refrained from making explicit accusations. These revelations have surfaced amid ongoing legal challenges faced by Combs, including allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse.to contact me:[email protected]:Woman claims she saw minors dressed as 'Harajuku Barbies' at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' Freak Off partysource:Diddy's lawyers slam claims of a SECOND victim in alleged sex trafficking operation | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ariel Mitchell-Kidd, an attorney representing one of Sean "Diddy" Combs' accusers, has accused the Orinda Police Department of covering up a 2018 rape case involving her client. Mitchell-Kidd asserts that the police have refused to release the rape report filed by her client, which she claims is critical to the ongoing investigation into Diddy. She expressed concern that the authorities might be deliberately withholding evidence to protect influential individuals, fueling suspicions of a larger cover-up involving the case.Sean Combs, also known as Puff Daddy or P. Diddy, was involved in a highly publicized shooting incident on December 27, 1999. The incident occurred at Club New York in Manhattan, New York City. The shooting took place during a confrontation between individuals associated with Sean Combs and another group, which included rapper Jamal "Shyne" Barrow and his associates.The altercation reportedly began after a dispute over a spilled drink escalated into a physical confrontation. Shots were fired inside the club, resulting in injuries to three individuals, including Natania Reuben, a clubgoer, and Julius Jones, a member of Combs' entourage. Combs and his then-girlfriend, actress-singer Jennifer Lopez, were present at the club during the incident but were unharmed.Following the shooting, Sean Combs, his bodyguard, Anthony "Wolf" Jones, and rapper Shyne were arrested. Combs was charged with illegal possession of a firearm, as well as bribery charges for allegedly offering his driver, Wardel Fenderson, money to claim ownership of the weapon found at the scene. Shyne was charged with attempted murder, assault, and reckless endangerment.During the trial, the prosecution argued that Combs had brandished a gun during the altercation and that Shyne had fired shots in the club. However, Combs maintained his innocence, claiming that he never possessed or fired a weapon during the incident. The case drew significant media attention and raised questions about celebrity involvement in criminal activity.In March 2001, Sean Combs was acquitted of all charges related to the shooting. However, his bodyguard, Anthony Jones, was found guilty of attempted assault and weapons charges. Shyne was convicted of assault, reckless endangerment, and gun possession and was sentenced to 10 years in prison.In this episode, we hear from Natania Reuben who says she is positive that it was Diddy who shot her and the extrodinary lengths she says she's willing to go to in order to prove her allegations.to contact me:[email protected]:Victim of infamous New York City nightclub shooting renews claims Diddy shot her despite rapper never being charged in the case which left her with nine bullet fragments in her face | Daily Mail Onlinesource:Diddy accuser's lawyer alleges a 'cover up is going on' as officials refuse to hand over police reports | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.