Diddy Defendants Move To Dismiss The Candice Mccrary Lawsuit With Prejudice (Part 2) (3/15/25)

Ashley Parham's lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs contains shocking accusations of sexual assault and physical violence. Parham claims that in 2018, after making a comment accusing Diddy of being involved in Tupac Shakur's murder, she became a target of his retaliation. According to the lawsuit, Diddy threatened her and eventually lured her to a private residence, where he allegedly assaulted her physically and sexually. Parham states that he held a knife to her face, threatened her with a "Glasgow smile," and humiliated her in front of others.Further details in the lawsuit describe how Diddy, along with his associates, sexually assaulted Parham using various objects, all while threatening her life. She recounts waking up from the ordeal, grabbing a knife, and confronting Diddy in a desperate attempt to escape. Parham alleges that Diddy begged for his life during the confrontation and that she narrowly escaped after grazing him with the knife. Despite reporting the assault to local police, Parham claims that no investigation was opened, intensifying her allegations against Diddy and his associates.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy is accused of raping woman as 'payback' for claiming he ordered Tupac's murder | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The dispute between Sean "Diddy" Combs and prosecutors regarding the alleged "freak-off tapes" has become a contentious aspect of the legal proceedings against the music mogul. Prosecutors claim the tapes, purportedly depicting illicit and non-consensual acts involving underage individuals, are critical evidence in their case. They argue that the tapes corroborate witness testimonies about Diddy’s alleged involvement in sexual misconduct and human trafficking. Prosecutors have emphasized that the tapes reveal a pattern of exploitation central to their charges and have sought to include them as key evidence, citing their relevance to proving Diddy’s intent and involvement in criminal activities.Diddy’s legal team, however, has vehemently opposed the inclusion of the tapes, arguing they are prejudicial and lack sufficient authentication. His attorneys have accused prosecutors of sensationalizing the case by focusing on the tapes to sway public opinion and taint the jury pool. They contend that the tapes were obtained unlawfully and do not definitively link Diddy to any criminal behavior. The defense has filed motions to exclude the tapes from evidence, maintaining that their introduction would violate his right to a fair trial. The legal back-and-forth highlights the high stakes and intense scrutiny surrounding the case, with both sides battling over the admissibility and implications of the tapes.(commercial at 8:40)to contact me:[email protected]:Top attorney reveals the REAL reason Diddy's legal team is demanding access to Cassie Ventura sex tapes | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

regarding a purported memoir attributed to Porter. Lane stated that Porter never authored such a manuscript and emphasized that, as someone who was with Porter daily, she would have been aware of any such writings. She also mentioned that after Porter's passing, she was responsible for organizing Porter's belongings and found no evidence of a memoir.Additionally, Lane expressed skepticism about individuals claiming to possess Porter's writings, suggesting that these assertions are unfounded. She highlighted that Porter was an extremely private person and would not have documented her personal experiences in a memoir. Lane's statements aim to dispel rumors and protect Porter's legacy from misinformation.(commercial at 7:59to contact me:[email protected]:Friend of Diddy's late girlfriend Kim Porter claims there is no manuscript for a book | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV, the defendants, including Sean Combs (also known as "P. Diddy") and associated business entities, filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The plaintiff, identified as "Jane Doe," alleges that Combs raped her and threatened her life in 2004. She asserts a claim under the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, which includes a provision that temporarily revives claims that otherwise would be barred by the statute of limitations.The defendants' motion to dismiss likely argues procedural and substantive grounds, such as the expiration of the statute of limitations and potential deficiencies in the plaintiff's allegations. They may also contend that the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, possibly challenging the sufficiency of evidence or the applicability of the cited legal provisions. The court's decision on this motion will determine whether the case proceeds to discovery and trial or is dismissed at this preliminary stage.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.57.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV, the defendants, including Sean Combs (also known as "P. Diddy") and associated business entities, filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The plaintiff, identified as "Jane Doe," alleges that Combs raped her and threatened her life in 2004. She asserts a claim under the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, which includes a provision that temporarily revives claims that otherwise would be barred by the statute of limitations.The defendants' motion to dismiss likely argues procedural and substantive grounds, such as the expiration of the statute of limitations and potential deficiencies in the plaintiff's allegations. They may also contend that the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, possibly challenging the sufficiency of evidence or the applicability of the cited legal provisions. The court's decision on this motion will determine whether the case proceeds to discovery and trial or is dismissed at this preliminary stage.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.57.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the State filed a Motion in Limine on February 24, 2025, seeking to delineate the permissible scope of references to Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) during the trial. The motion requests that the court limit mentions of IGG to the fact that law enforcement received a "tip" leading to the identification of the defendant, Bryan Kohberger, without delving into the specifics of the IGG process. Additionally, the State aims to exclude any testimony or evidence related to the United States Department of Justice's Interim Policy on Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Searching, the terms of service of genetic genealogy subscription services, debates on the use of IGG in criminal investigations, and any alleged discovery violations associated with IGG.to contact me:[email protected]:022425-States-Motion-in-Limine-RE-Investigative-Genetic-Geneology.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the memorandum supporting their motion to dismiss in Case No. 24-CV-07777 (LJL), the Combs Defendants argue that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, asserting that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated an "injury in fact" necessary for standing. They contend that the alleged injuries are speculative and not concrete or imminent, as required by legal standards.Additionally, the defendants assert that venue in the current district is improper, as no substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred there. They suggest that the case should be dismissed or, alternatively, transferred to a more appropriate venue where the defendants reside or where the alleged events took place.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.629910.47.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the memorandum supporting their motion to dismiss in Case No. 24-CV-07777 (LJL), the Combs Defendants argue that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, asserting that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated an "injury in fact" necessary for standing. They contend that the alleged injuries are speculative and not concrete or imminent, as required by legal standards.Additionally, the defendants assert that venue in the current district is improper, as no substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred there. They suggest that the case should be dismissed or, alternatively, transferred to a more appropriate venue where the defendants reside or where the alleged events took place.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.629910.47.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the memorandum supporting their motion to dismiss in Case No. 24-CV-07777 (LJL), the Combs Defendants argue that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, asserting that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated an "injury in fact" necessary for standing. They contend that the alleged injuries are speculative and not concrete or imminent, as required by legal standards.Additionally, the defendants assert that venue in the current district is improper, as no substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred there. They suggest that the case should be dismissed or, alternatively, transferred to a more appropriate venue where the defendants reside or where the alleged events took place.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.629910.47.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The open letter written by Rachel Morin’s mother, Patty Morin, expressed deep frustration over the handling of her daughter’s murder and the broader issue of violent crimes committed by illegal immigrants. In the letter, she called out the Biden administration’s lack of response, emphasizing that despite Rachel’s murder gaining national attention, there had been no outreach or condolences from government officials. She urged for tougher immigration policies, stating that her daughter's death was entirely preventable had the suspect, Victor Antonio Martinez-Hernandez, been kept out of the country. The letter also served as an emotional plea for justice and accountability, urging lawmakers to prioritize the safety of American citizens over political agendas.To assist in the investigation, the Morin family enlisted the help of criminal profiler and forensic expert John Kelly, who has worked on numerous high-profile murder cases. Kelly analyzed the crime scene and Martinez-Hernandez’s past offenses, concluding that the suspect exhibited serial predator behavior and was likely responsible for other violent crimes. He warned that had Martinez-Hernandez not been caught, he would have continued attacking women, describing him as a high-risk offender with escalating tendencies. Kelly’s insights helped contextualize the brutality of Rachel’s murder, offering a psychological breakdown of the killer’s motives and reinforcing the need for stronger investigative efforts to uncover any additional victims connected to Martinez-Hernandez.to co ontact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.