Research Paradigms
Here is the sixty-seventh episode of Quantum Foam, Research Paradigms. This is your overall world view about reality and knowledge that guides what you study, what questions you ask, what data you collect, and how you analyze it. Common paradigms include positivism, post-positivism, interpretivism, constructivism, pragmatism, and critical theory. A research paradigm is a foundational world view that shapes how researchers perceive reality and knowledge. It influences the entire research process including the questions posed, the methods used, and the interpretation of results. The key components are ontology, epistemology, and axiology. Positivism believe in a singular objective reality that can be observed and quantified through empirical methods. Post-positivism accepts that while an objective reality exists, it can only be known imperfectly due to human limitations. Interpretivism focuses on understanding the subjective meanings and experiences of individuals. Pragmatism advocates for using both qualitative and quantitative methods as needed to address research questions. Critical theory examines how power dynamics shape social realities and aims to challenge inequalities through research. Understanding and articulating your research paradigm is crucial for several reasons. It shapes the choice of research methods and data analysis techniques and enhances transparency. Research paradigms are essential for framing research questions and determining appropriate methodologies ultimately influencing the outcomes and impact of research studies. This is important and goes over the philosophy of how one is to do their research.
The aim is to outline different research paradigms. We explore 3 philosophical underpinnings of 3 major paradigms. They are positivism, interpretivism, and critical theory. There are up to 4 components including ontology, epistemology, methodology, and methods. Researchers can investigate different phenomena under any of the 3 paradigms and they should not askew the possibility of subscribing to different paradigms because any concerns that they have must be mutually exclusive. The decision of choosing a philosophical outlook to investigate a phenomenon should be guided by the necessities and requirements of a research study, rather than the obdurate insistence of adhering to 1 particular philosophical outlook to the exclusion of others. A paradigm is a basic belief system and theoretical framework with assumptions about ontology, epistemology, methodology, methods. It is our way of understanding the reality of the world and studying it. In this episode, we are looking at the 4 components of a research paradigm. Researchers have assumptions, sometimes implicit about reality, how it exists, and what can be known about it. A researcher can debate the possibility and desirability of objectivity, subjectivity, causality, validity, and generalizability in their area of expertise. The methods to use for a research project will depend on the design of that project and the researcher's theoretical mindset. There are different approaches to educational research that vary widely. These are some of the main ideas involved in current research paradigms.