10/28/26 - Mark Levin: Democrats Are Playing Dirty to Seize Power
On Wednesday’s Mark Levin Show, the Democrat Party is trying to steal the Senate. A New York Times report says that allies of Mary Peltola orchestrated a “Ballot Composition Project” in Alaska aimed at recruiting spoiler candidates, including another candidate named Dan Sullivan, to create voter confusion and weaken support for incumbent Senator Dan Sullivan. Campaign aides, Democratic operatives, lawyers, and officials connected to Chuck Schumer’s Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee were involved in a coordinated effort to shape the ballot. The operation sought to recruit multiple candidates to dilute the incumbent’s vote and improve Peltola’s chances in a closely watched Senate race. The objective of this plot is simple: power at all costs. Also, there are allegations surrounding Abdul El-Sayed’s family connections to Life for Relief and Development, a charity he says had members with Muslim Brotherhood ties and a history of federal investigations, FBI and U.S. military raids, sanctions violations, and a settlement with the Office of Foreign Assets Control over allegations of funneling money to Saddam Hussein’s regime. El-Sayed’s father, Dr. Mohammed El-Sayed, served on the organization’s board, while other family members were connected to related organizations that later faced scrutiny for alleged terrorist ties. Michigan needs to disregard the polling and vote. Later, Bruce Blakeman calls in and makes his closing case for New York governor. NY is in a death spiral under Kathy Hochul - high taxes, rising utility costs, job losses, population decline, and poor economic performance. Blakeman warned that the state is running out of time to reverse its decline. A victory would protect rights, reduce taxes, improve public safety, and put NY on a path toward renewal. Afterward, Netanyahu, Likud, and the conservative parties have defeated Eisenkot and the opposition non-Arab parties. Netanyahu won. Eisenkot lost. Why would President Herzog, as reported, choose the Eisenkot opposition to take the first shot a building a majority coalition when they lost to the Netanyahu coalition? And, if the Netanyahu coalition cannot pull together a majority, and the Eisenkot opposition fails, why shouldn't there be another election? Why should Netanyahu agree to a plan, also in the press, where Herzog offers Netanyahu a deal in which he is PM for 2-years plus he will pardon him on the legal charges (when, in fact, the charges have fallen to pieces and the abuses around them are now public and appalling), if Netanyahu agrees to hand the PM job to Eisenkot thereafter? Finally, Sen Ed Marrkey calls for a national strike, which mirrors a plan being promoted by the Democratic Socialists of America to disrupt the economy, create chaos through protests, road blockages, and civil unrest, and provoke a government response. Communists, Islamists, and billionaire-backed groups are organizing toward this objective. Political opponents are seeking to undermine constitutional norms, eliminate the filibuster, and use organized protests, radical unions, Antifa, and other activist groups to pressure the country if they face resistance. Such actions encourage mob rule, violence, riots, and attacks on American institutions while presenting themselves as opposition to those outcomes.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices