Iran Uprising 2026, US Involvement & Tehran Crackdown Explained

Explore the 2026 Iran uprising, the massive nationwide protests triggered by deep economic collapse and rising public anger against the Islamic Republic, and learn why this movement has drawn global attention. We break down the violent Tehran crackdown, the internet blackout, and how Iranian security forces are responding amid reports of hundreds killed and thousands arrested. This episode also digs into the potential role of the United States, including diplomatic pressure, warnings from the Trump administration, and discussions in Washington about possible intervention military, cyber, or symbolic as tensions rise between Tehran, Washington, and allies. Understand the historic context of Iran’s government, the factions driving current events, and what could happen next in this critical geopolitical flashpoint. Tune in for a clear, in-depth analysis of what’s happening now and why it matters worldwide.

In this episode, we break down the developing story out of Minneapolis involving the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent. We walk through the major headlines and official reporting, examine the known facts, and identify what details remain unclear as the investigation continues. We also discuss the role and authority of federal agents, how use-of-force incidents involving ICE are reviewed, and what standards are typically used to determine whether an officer acted within policy and the law. The episode also looks at how both political parties are responding to the incident, how the story is being framed across media outlets, and why cases like this rapidly become national political flashpoints before investigations are complete. This is a fact-focused discussion aimed at evaluating what’s being reported, how narratives are forming, and what questions still need answers.Our Merchandise StoreMy New Song "Smell Of Your Perfume"

Tonight we break down the most talked-about moments from the recent Theo Von podcast episode featuring Dave Smith, where the conversation went straight into territory most media avoids. We analyze the claims and theories surrounding the alleged U.S. raid on Venezuela, what it would actually mean if elements of that operation are real, and why Venezuela keeps surfacing in discussions about regime change, oil, and U.S. foreign policy. We also unpack the broader implications of U.S.–Israel policy, including how American leadership navigates alliance, restraint, and power projection in the Middle East. Finally, we zoom out and look at Donald Trump’s first year as president through the lens of foreign policy, military posture, and executive authority, separating media narratives from actions that reshaped America’s role on the world stage. This episode is not about headlines, it’s about context, motive, and consequences. If you want a grounded breakdown of what’s being said, what’s being implied, and what most outlets won’t connect, this is the conversation you don’t want to miss.My New Song Smell Of Your PerfumeOur Merch Store

In a stunning overnight development, reports indicate that Nicolás Maduro has been taken into custody following a U.S. military operation inside Venezuela. For years, Maduro’s rule has been marked by disputed elections, allegations of cartel and narco-state ties, brutal crackdowns on political opposition, and the collapse of Venezuela’s economy that sent millions fleeing the country. Now, the man who once seemed untouchable is reportedly no longer in power. In this episode, we break down what is known so far, what remains unconfirmed, and why this moment did not come out of nowhere. We examine the long trail of election controversies, international criminal accusations, and why capture operations that resemble past CIA renditions appear to be making a return. We also explain the difference between Title 10 and Title 50 authorities, and what this operation signals for Venezuela, the region, and global power dynamics going forward. This is not just a breaking news story, it may be the beginning of a major geopolitical shift.Our Merch Store

The Epstein files were finally released, or at least that’s what we’re being told. But the more people dig into what was actually made public, the more obvious it becomes that this wasn’t transparency, it was a controlled leak. Names are still redacted. Documents are missing. Timelines don’t line up. And once again, the most powerful figures connected to Jeffrey Epstein seem to remain just out of reach. The question isn’t whether files were released, it’s why so much is still being withheld. Tonight, we’re going to talk about what didn’t come out, and why that matters. Was this about protecting ongoing investigations, or protecting reputations? Was this damage control, political insulation, or something even bigger? When the crime touches intelligence agencies, global elites, and untouchable institutions, the truth rarely comes out clean. So we’re going to speculate, connect dots, and ask the uncomfortable questions the media still won’t. Because if this was the full truth, they wouldn’t still be hiding so much.Visit our merchandise store here

Last night at AmericaFest, the Turning Point USA event that’s supposed to represent the future of the conservative movement, we didn’t just get speeches, we got a very public fracture. Ben Shapiro took the stage and delivered what was essentially a warning shot, aimed not at the left, but at parts of the right. His message was clear, that conservatism loses credibility when it tolerates extremists, conspiracy culture, and figures he believes poison the movement from within. Whether you agree with him or not, it was a declaration that the old coalition lines are shifting, and some people are being deliberately pushed outside the tent. Then came Tucker Carlson, and while he didn’t respond point by point, the contrast couldn’t have been sharper. Tucker framed his speech around free speech, power, and who gets to decide what ideas are acceptable. Instead of policing the movement, he questioned why dissent and uncomfortable conversations are suddenly treated as threats. Taken together, these two speeches weren’t just disagreements, they were competing visions for the soul of conservatism, one focused on gatekeeping and respectability, the other on open confrontation with power, and last night made it clear that this divide isn’t going away anytime soon.Visit our merchandise store 

Tonight we break down the private, behind-closed-doors meeting between Candace Owens and Erika Kirk, a sit-down that comes after months of public accusations, internal disputes, and growing distrust surrounding the attempted assassination of Charlie Kirk. Candace has openly challenged the official narrative coming from within TPUSA, claiming that key employees were not truthful about what really happened, and that challenge has sent shockwaves through conservative media and grassroots circles alike. We unpack why this meeting matters, what led to it, and what it signals for the future of transparency, accountability, and truth inside influential political movements. With rumors, contradictions, and unanswered questions still circulating online, we focus on separating speculation from substance and ask the question many people are still afraid to ask, what happens when loyalty collides with accountability, and who actually benefits when the full story never comes out.Visit our merchanidse store

In this episode, we break down the terror attack at Bondi Beach, which occurred during a public Hanukkah celebration, by separating what authorities have confirmed from the questions that still remain. We walk through the known timeline, the official explanation, and the immediate response from law enforcement and government officials, while also examining gaps, inconsistencies, and details that are being debated online and in independent media. As with any major breaking event, early narratives move fast, especially when an attack targets a religious gathering, and not all facts emerge at once. We take a careful look at security decisions, media framing, and the broader context surrounding the attack without jumping to conclusions or pushing an agenda. The goal is simple, understand what actually happened, what is verified, and what deserves further scrutiny as more information comes out.Visit our merchandise store

Tonight’s episode gets straight into the fire. We’re looking at Erika Kirk’s reaction to the wave of conspiracy theories swirling around the attempted assassination of Charlie Kirk, and why she decided to push back publicly on Fox News. We break down what she said, what she didn’t, and how her response fits into the larger media storm surrounding this moment. Then we turn to Marjorie Taylor Greene. Her split from the MAGA movement has become impossible to ignore, and her recent sit-down on 60 Minutes only added fuel to the conversation. We dig into the interview, the tension building behind the scenes, and what her shift might mean for the movement going forward.Check out our merchandise store with fresh new winter gear