True Crime Rewind: Legal Experts Break Down The Kohberger Evidence That Was Collected In Pennsylvania

Southern California is currently facing a series of devastating wildfires, particularly in Los Angeles County, where multiple blazes have resulted in at least five fatalities and the destruction of over 2,000 structures. The most affected areas include Pacific Palisades and the Hollywood Hills, with the Palisades, Eaton, Hurst, Lidia, and Sunset fires causing widespread devastation. These fires have been exacerbated by strong Santa Ana winds, which have reached speeds up to 100 mph, complicating firefighting efforts and prompting mandatory evacuations for approximately 150,000 residents.The economic impact of these wildfires is substantial, with estimates suggesting potential damages exceeding $50 billion, potentially making them the most expensive in California's history. High-value real estate areas such as Santa Monica and Malibu are under significant threat, and the destruction of homes, businesses, and infrastructure is expected to have long-term effects on the local economy. In response to the crisis, President Joe Biden has declared a major disaster, facilitating federal assistance for affected communities. Firefighters are working tirelessly to contain the blazes, and while a slight decrease in wind intensity has provided some relief, the situation remains dire with forecasts predicting continued dry conditions and the possibility of further wind events.(commercial at 8:29)to contact me:[email protected]:Fires in California kill at least 5, scorch Los Angeles area as over 100,000 told to evacuate: Live Updates

In January 2025, Noushin Faraji, a former hairstylist at Fox Sports, filed a lawsuit against the network and several individuals, including former host Skip Bayless. Faraji alleges that Bayless subjected her to repeated unwanted advances, including lingering hugs, kisses on the cheek, and inappropriate comments about her appearance. The most egregious claim involves Bayless offering her $1.5 million for sexual favors, which she refused. Following her rejection, Faraji contends that Bayless's behavior became increasingly hostile, culminating in false accusations that she was involved in a sexual relationship with his co-host, Shannon Sharpe.The lawsuit further alleges that Faraji endured a workplace environment at Fox Sports characterized by misogyny, racism, and ableism, where executives and on-air talent engaged in abusive behavior without fear of repercussions. Faraji claims that after reporting these incidents to Human Resources, she faced retaliation, including fabricated reasons leading to her termination in 2024. Additionally, the suit includes allegations against other Fox Sports personnel, such as executive Charlie Dixon, accused of groping Faraji at a social event. Faraji is seeking unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial, asserting claims of sexual battery, hostile work environment, failure to prevent harassment, and wrongful termination.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:[email protected]

In January 2025, Noushin Faraji, a former hairstylist at Fox Sports, filed a lawsuit against the network and several individuals, including former host Skip Bayless. Faraji alleges that Bayless subjected her to repeated unwanted advances, including lingering hugs, kisses on the cheek, and inappropriate comments about her appearance. The most egregious claim involves Bayless offering her $1.5 million for sexual favors, which she refused. Following her rejection, Faraji contends that Bayless's behavior became increasingly hostile, culminating in false accusations that she was involved in a sexual relationship with his co-host, Shannon Sharpe.The lawsuit further alleges that Faraji endured a workplace environment at Fox Sports characterized by misogyny, racism, and ableism, where executives and on-air talent engaged in abusive behavior without fear of repercussions. Faraji claims that after reporting these incidents to Human Resources, she faced retaliation, including fabricated reasons leading to her termination in 2024. Additionally, the suit includes allegations against other Fox Sports personnel, such as executive Charlie Dixon, accused of groping Faraji at a social event. Faraji is seeking unspecified monetary damages and a jury trial, asserting claims of sexual battery, hostile work environment, failure to prevent harassment, and wrongful termination.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:[email protected]

Jes Staley, the former JPMorgan executive, filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against him by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse. However, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff denied this motion, allowing the case to proceed to pre-trial evidence gathering..Staley is accused of protecting Epstein during his tenure at JPMorgan, where he worked from 1979 to 2013. The bank claims that Staley was instrumental in maintaining Epstein's business relationship with JPMorgan despite Epstein's criminal activities. JPMorgan seeks to make Staley financially responsible for any damages the bank might incur from other related lawsuits and to recover compensation paid to him from 2006 to 2013. Staley has denied these allegations, stating that JPMorgan is using him as a scapegoat for its own supervisory failures and claims he was unaware of Epstein’s criminal behavior​.(commercial at 8:14)to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - MTD Mem. of Law - (11148357.16).docx (courtlistener.com)

Jes Staley, the former JPMorgan executive, filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against him by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse. However, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff denied this motion, allowing the case to proceed to pre-trial evidence gathering..Staley is accused of protecting Epstein during his tenure at JPMorgan, where he worked from 1979 to 2013. The bank claims that Staley was instrumental in maintaining Epstein's business relationship with JPMorgan despite Epstein's criminal activities. JPMorgan seeks to make Staley financially responsible for any damages the bank might incur from other related lawsuits and to recover compensation paid to him from 2006 to 2013. Staley has denied these allegations, stating that JPMorgan is using him as a scapegoat for its own supervisory failures and claims he was unaware of Epstein’s criminal behavior​.(commercial at 8:14)to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - MTD Mem. of Law - (11148357.16).docx (courtlistener.com)

In this episode we get right back into the weeds of the court documents and take a look at the second Ebay warrant.(commercial at 9:19)to contact me:[email protected]:022823+Order+to+Seal+and+Redact+-+Ebay.pdf (amazonaws.com)

There has been much discussion about Bryan Kohberger and his profile in the wake of his arrest. One of the nagging questions has been: If Bryan Kohberger was capable of killing four people in cold blood, is it possible that he had killed before that morning?In this episode, we hear from several experts who discuss it.(commercial at 6:50)to contact me:[email protected]:Expert Backs Up Reported New Probe Into Idaho Murder Suspect With Chilling Argument - Exclusive (grunge.com)

We have the new media motion to intervene, the notice regarding the hearing and zoom and finally the notice of intent not to cross examine.Let's dive in!(commercial at 7:25)to contact me:[email protected]:083023-Motion-to-Intervene.pdf (amazonaws.com)source:083023-PUBLIC-Order-Regarding-Notice-of-Hearing-Zoom-Information.pdf (amazonaws.com)source:082923-PUBLIC-Notice-of-Intent-Not-to-Cross-Exam-Def-Witnesses.pdf (amazonaws.com)

There have been several search warrants executed against Bryan Kohberger but none of them that we have see thus far, has yielded the haul that the authorities seized in Pennsylvania.In this episode, we hear from some legal experts who weigh in on that evidence and where it all might fit in.(commercial at 7:44)to contact me:[email protected]:Bryan Kohberger's Pennsylvania warrants: Experts break down key evidence | Fox News

Genealogy is used in solving crimes by tracing the lineage of DNA found at crime scenes to identify possible suspects and then confirming or excluding them through further DNA testing. This method, called genetic genealogy, involves comparing the crime scene DNA profile to publicly available genetic genealogy databases, and then using traditional genealogical research to identify potential relatives of the person whose DNA was found at the crime scene. The goal is to find a close relative of the person whose DNA was found, and then work backwards to identify the person responsible for the crime. This approach has been successfully used to solve a number of cold cases, particularly in the United States.In this episode, we see how this applies to the Bryan Kohberger arrest and how a new trend using genealogy to solve current cases is beginning to emerge.(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:[email protected]:How a suspect was identified in the Bryan Kohberger case (wpbf.com)