Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Years Long Lawsuit Against The Jeffrey Epstein Estate

The United States Virgin Islands has set themselves up as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and they've capitalized on that to the tune of a 105 million dollars. They have even taken it a step further and have sued JP Morgan for enabling Jeffrey Epstein. However, that move could come back to bite them as the USVI and their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein is anything but spotty.In this episode, we take a look at Jeffrey Epstein's special bank that was white gloved through the system in the USVI and who profited from it's operation.(commercial at 14:00)to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein's mystery bank got millions from his estate (chicagotribune.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Judge Rakoff has given the final seal of approval to the 290 million dollar settlement between the Epstein survivors and the bank. After considering an objection from 17 states about the settlement, Judge Rakoff told them that they had their chance to do what the USVI did and none of them did it. So, he ruled against them and let the settlement proceed as drawn up. In our second article we take a look at the grandstanding that happened in the Senate. Senator Marsha Blackburn announced during a fiery senate hearing that she was drawing up subpoena's for Jeffrey Epstein's flight records. She says that since everyone is so interested in transparency and ethics all of a sudden, that they might as well take a look at who was on those planes. I have to say, I agree. The question is, will the subpoena have any teeeth? Or is it just more political posturing?(commercial at 8:51)to contact me:[email protected]:JPMorgan's $290 million settlement with Epstein accusers approved by US judge | ReutersSen. Blackburn Requests Subpoena Of Jeffrey Epstein’s Estate, Demanding Infamous Flight Logs | The Daily WireBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell has said for years that Jeffrey Epstein promised to pay any legal fees that she might incur due to her work with him. However, there is no documentation of this agreement that the estate says is legally binding. With the two sides at odds, the issue was taken to a courtroom.Now, four years later and with no resoloution, the estate is asking that the suit be thrown out based on the fact that Maxwell no longer has representation and hasn't responded to demands by the court to respond. Let's dive in!(commercial at 7:35)to contact me:[email protected]:Epstein Estate Files to Toss Out Ghislaine Suit Demanding Millions | Inside EditionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Peter Mandelson is just another in a long line of politically connected people to be revealed to have a relatioship with Jeffrey Epstein. Not only a relationship, but according to sources, a relationship that was strong enough that Madelson, a wealthy, grown man, decided to have a sleep over at Jeffrey Epstein's townhouse.In this episode, we take a look at Peter Mandelson and the his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.(commercial at 8:21)to contact me:[email protected]:Peter Mandelson had four dates scheduled in the diary to see Jeffrey Epstein... | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In July 2024, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a co-founder of the Sinaloa Cartel, was apprehended by U.S. authorities in El Paso, Texas. Zambada contends that he was ambushed and forcibly taken to the United States against his will. According to his attorney, Frank Pérez, Joaquín Guzmán López, son of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, orchestrated the abduction. Zambada alleges that Guzmán López, accompanied by six armed men in military attire, ambushed him near Culiacán, Mexico. They allegedly restrained him, placed a bag over his head, and transported him to an airstrip, where he was flown to El Paso and handed over to U.S. authorities. Zambada maintains that he neither surrendered nor negotiated any terms with the U.S. government.Vicente Zambada Niebla, El Mayo's son, has a complex relationship with the U.S. government. Extradited to the United States in 2010, he pleaded guilty to drug trafficking charges in 2013. As part of his plea agreement, Zambada Niebla cooperated extensively with U.S. authorities, providing valuable intelligence on the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His cooperation was considered significant, leading to a reduced sentence of 15 years in prison, which was notably lenient given the severity of his charges. This collaboration has been instrumental in U.S. efforts to combat drug trafficking and dismantle cartel networks.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On October 4, 2024, I predicted that Sean "Diddy" Combs would eventually be hit with a superseding indictment, following the pattern commonly seen in high-profile federal cases involving RICO charges and allegations of sex trafficking. That prediction became reality on January 30, 2025, when federal prosecutors in New York unsealed a new, expanded indictment against Combs, introducing additional charges and new alleged victims—including accusations involving minors. This indictment replaces the previous one, adding more weight to the government’s case and signaling that federal investigators have uncovered further damning evidence against him.A superseding indictment is a legal tool used by prosecutors when they obtain new information that strengthens their case. In Combs' situation, this means the government has broadened its charges, likely as a result of witness cooperation, forensic evidence, or ongoing investigations into his alleged sex trafficking network. The new indictment not only increases the potential penalties Combs faces—raising the possibility of a life sentence—but also alters the legal landscape of the case. With new charges and additional victims included, his defense team is now forced to rework their strategy while prosecutors push forward with a more comprehensive case.This development is a major turning point in the trial and could have several immediate effects. First, it may delay the trial, originally set for May 2025, as both sides will need time to prepare for the expanded scope of the prosecution’s case. Second, the new charges make plea negotiations more difficult, as prosecutors now hold even more leverage. Third, the inclusion of allegations involving minors could further shift public perception and make it harder for Combs’ legal team to counter the growing pressure from both the media and law enforcement. Ultimately, this superseding indictment confirms what I anticipated months ago—that the government was building a larger case behind the scenes, and that Diddy’s legal troubles are far from oveOn January 30, 2025, federal prosecutors in New York filed a superseding indictment against Sean "Diddy" Combs, expanding the scope of the existing charges to include two additional alleged victims. The indictment now covers a 20-year period from 2004 to 2024, alleging that Combs engaged in a pattern of coercing multiple women into sexual acts through intimidation, threats, and the use of narcotics. One particularly disturbing allegation describes Combs dangling a victim over a hotel balcony to enforce compliance. These actions are said to have been facilitated by his business enterprises, including Bad Boy Entertainment, which prosecutors claim he used to lure and exploit victims. Combs, who has been detained without bail since his arrest in September 2024, continues to deny all allegations. His attorney, Marc Agnifilo, has criticized the updated indictment, asserting that the prosecution's theory is flawed and that the relationships in question were consensual.(commercial at 8:54)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.144.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On October 4, 2024, I predicted that Sean "Diddy" Combs would eventually be hit with a superseding indictment, following the pattern commonly seen in high-profile federal cases involving RICO charges and allegations of sex trafficking. That prediction became reality on January 30, 2025, when federal prosecutors in New York unsealed a new, expanded indictment against Combs, introducing additional charges and new alleged victims—including accusations involving minors. This indictment replaces the previous one, adding more weight to the government’s case and signaling that federal investigators have uncovered further damning evidence against him.A superseding indictment is a legal tool used by prosecutors when they obtain new information that strengthens their case. In Combs' situation, this means the government has broadened its charges, likely as a result of witness cooperation, forensic evidence, or ongoing investigations into his alleged sex trafficking network. The new indictment not only increases the potential penalties Combs faces—raising the possibility of a life sentence—but also alters the legal landscape of the case. With new charges and additional victims included, his defense team is now forced to rework their strategy while prosecutors push forward with a more comprehensive case.This development is a major turning point in the trial and could have several immediate effects. First, it may delay the trial, originally set for May 2025, as both sides will need time to prepare for the expanded scope of the prosecution’s case. Second, the new charges make plea negotiations more difficult, as prosecutors now hold even more leverage. Third, the inclusion of allegations involving minors could further shift public perception and make it harder for Combs’ legal team to counter the growing pressure from both the media and law enforcement. Ultimately, this superseding indictment confirms what I anticipated months ago—that the government was building a larger case behind the scenes, and that Diddy’s legal troubles are far from oveOn January 30, 2025, federal prosecutors in New York filed a superseding indictment against Sean "Diddy" Combs, expanding the scope of the existing charges to include two additional alleged victims. The indictment now covers a 20-year period from 2004 to 2024, alleging that Combs engaged in a pattern of coercing multiple women into sexual acts through intimidation, threats, and the use of narcotics. One particularly disturbing allegation describes Combs dangling a victim over a hotel balcony to enforce compliance. These actions are said to have been facilitated by his business enterprises, including Bad Boy Entertainment, which prosecutors claim he used to lure and exploit victims. Combs, who has been detained without bail since his arrest in September 2024, continues to deny all allegations. His attorney, Marc Agnifilo, has criticized the updated indictment, asserting that the prosecution's theory is flawed and that the relationships in question were consensual.(commercial at 8:54)to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.144.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case Doe v. Combs et al., Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-07975-AT, defendant Shawn Carter (professionally known as Jay-Z) has filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion for monetary sanctions and dismissal of the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Carter contends that the plaintiff's counsel, Anthony Buzbee of The Buzbee Law Firm, failed to conduct a reasonable investigation into the factual allegations before filing the complaint, which accuses Carter of serious misconduct. He argues that many of the claims are demonstrably false or highly implausible, suggesting a violation of Rule 11(b), which mandates that attorneys ensure factual contentions have evidentiary support.Carter emphasizes that the allegations have caused significant harm to his reputation and personal life. He asserts that the complaint was filed without proper verification of facts, as evidenced by discrepancies such as incorrect descriptions of events and locations. Carter seeks dismissal of the complaint and requests monetary sanctions against Buzbee and his law firm to deter similar conduct in the future. He underscores the importance of attorneys adhering to ethical standards to maintain the integrity of the judicial process. to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - Rule 11 Reply(15569784.8).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case Doe v. Combs et al., Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-07975-AT, defendant Shawn Carter (professionally known as Jay-Z) has filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion for monetary sanctions and dismissal of the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Carter contends that the plaintiff's counsel, Anthony Buzbee of The Buzbee Law Firm, failed to conduct a reasonable investigation into the factual allegations before filing the complaint, which accuses Carter of serious misconduct. He argues that many of the claims are demonstrably false or highly implausible, suggesting a violation of Rule 11(b), which mandates that attorneys ensure factual contentions have evidentiary support.Carter emphasizes that the allegations have caused significant harm to his reputation and personal life. He asserts that the complaint was filed without proper verification of facts, as evidenced by discrepancies such as incorrect descriptions of events and locations. Carter seeks dismissal of the complaint and requests monetary sanctions against Buzbee and his law firm to deter similar conduct in the future. He underscores the importance of attorneys adhering to ethical standards to maintain the integrity of the judicial process. to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - Rule 11 Reply(15569784.8).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In 2009, Vicente "Mayito" Zambada Niebla, son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, was indicted by the U.S. government on charges of trafficking vast quantities of cocaine and heroin into the United States. As a high-ranking member of the Sinaloa Cartel, he was accused of coordinating drug shipments from Central and South America to Mexico, and subsequently into the U.S., utilizing various methods such as private aircraft, submarines, and speedboats. Following his arrest in Mexico City in March 2009, Zambada was extradited to the U.S. in February 2010 to face these charges.In April 2013, Zambada pleaded guilty to the charges and agreed to cooperate with U.S. authorities. His cooperation included providing testimony against key cartel figures, notably Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán. As part of his plea agreement, Zambada acknowledged his role in coordinating the smuggling of multi-ton quantities of narcotics and agreed to forfeit assets totaling $1.37 billion. In May 2019, he was sentenced to 15 years in prison, with the court considering his substantial assistance to prosecutors. Due to his cooperation, Zambada was released in 2021 after serving part of his sentence.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.