A Look Back: The Impact Streaming Services Had On The Epstein Investigation

The DEA has had it's share of controversies in it's history and it has also had it's share of embarrassments because of those controversies. In todays episode we hear from a disgraced agent who has some very, very concerning things to say about his colleagues and how the corruption didn't stop or start with him.Let's check it out.(commercial at 11:11)to contact me:[email protected]:https://lasvegassun.com/news/2022/nov/14/deas-most-corrupt-agent-parties-sex-amid-unwinnabl/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Luis Eduardo González García was a significant figure in international drug trafficking, particularly connected to the operations in the Chicago area. He orchestrated a sophisticated smuggling and money laundering network from 2012 to 2017, during which he partnered with Mexican drug cartels to transport thousands of kilograms of cocaine into the United States. González García set up numerous front companies in Chicago and its suburbs, as well as in Texas and Georgia, to disguise his illegal activities. These companies, purportedly selling furniture, snack foods, and laundry detergents, concealed cocaine shipments and laundered millions of dollars in proceeds​.His operation involved hiding drugs and cash in box pallets of legitimate goods, which were transported from Mexico using semi-trailer trucks with unsuspecting drivers. Over this period, González García managed to distribute thousands of kilograms of cocaine and launder over $50 million back to cartel accounts in Mexico​.In 2022, after pleading guilty to federal drug conspiracy and money laundering charges, González García was sentenced to 30 years in federal prison and fined $1.5 million. His arrest in 2018 by DEA agents in Guatemala marked the culmination of his criminal activities, which had significantly enriched both himself and his cartel partners, such as the Sinaloa cartel and the New Generation cartel​.When you are dealing with cartels such as the Sinaloa cartel, you know that they are going to have many different front operations to move their product and many different ways to wash the money as it comes back to them. In this episode, we take a look at one of these elaborate operations that utilized trucks to bring tons of cocaine into the United States and the eventual arrest of the man behind it. (commercial at 8:21)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.vice.com/en/article/jgp4pb/how-a-drug-smuggler-moved-cocaine-around-the-us-and-sent-dollar56-million-to-mexican-cartelsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse have filed a lawsuit against the United States Virgin Islands (USVI), alleging that the territory enabled and benefitted from Epstein's trafficking activities. The lawsuit claims that USVI officials, including then-Governor John P. de Jongh Jr., facilitated Epstein's criminal enterprise by providing him with tax incentives, political influence, and a cover for his illegal activities in exchange for financial contributions and other benefits.Key points of the lawsuit include:Allegations of Facilitation: The survivors argue that USVI officials were aware of Epstein's activities and actively helped him by allowing him to operate freely within the territory. This facilitation allegedly included ignoring or suppressing reports and complaints about his actions.Financial Incentives: Epstein was granted significant tax benefits and financial incentives by the USVI government, which the lawsuit claims were awarded in exchange for donations and investments that Epstein made in the territory. This relationship allegedly allowed Epstein to continue his activities without fear of intervention from local authorities.Accountability and Compensation: The plaintiffs are seeking accountability from the USVI government for its alleged role in enabling Epstein's trafficking network. They are also seeking compensation for the harm they suffered as a result of Epstein's actions, which they argue were facilitated by the USVI's complicity.Ongoing Legal Battle: The lawsuit is part of a broader legal effort by Epstein's survivors to seek justice and compensation from various entities that they believe played a role in his criminal activities. This includes other lawsuits against Epstein's estate and individuals or organizations associated with him.(commercial at 9:56)to contact me:bobbycapucci!protonmail.comsource:Jane Does Suing USVI Over Epstein Seek Records from JPMorgan Case | St. Thomas Source (stthomassource.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Authorities in Houston have announced that they have arrested two men Franklin Jose Pena Ramos, 26, who was fitted with an ankle bracelet by border patrol when crossing the border and then being released into the populace and Johan Jose Rangel Martinez, 21, who was also detained but released by border patrol agents.   The two of them are now charged with murdering Jocelyn Nungaray and now her family and the nation as a whole is demanding sweeping changes be enacted at the border, however, like usual, the big shots in D.C. have other ideas.   Meanwhile, over 53,000 people who should be monitored by the government, are walking amongst us, in a city near you.    (commercial at 9:45)to contact me:[email protected]:Illegal migrant charged with murdering Jocelyn Nungaray, 12, was released into the US just weeks ago: Texas girl was found raped and strangled in creek | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

An order of the judgment of the court is a formal decision issued by a court at the end of a legal proceeding. It represents the court's final determination on the matters presented during the trial or hearing. Here's a summary of its key elements:Formal Decision: It is the official, written determination by the court on the issues presented in the case.Binding: The order is legally binding on the parties involved in the case, meaning they must comply with its terms.Content: It typically includes:The findings of fact: the court's conclusions about the facts of the case.The conclusions of law: the court's interpretation and application of the relevant laws to those facts.The final ruling: the court's decision on the relief or penalties, such as awarding damages, issuing injunctions, or imposing sentences.Implementation: It may direct specific actions to be taken by the parties, such as payment of money, transfer of property, or compliance with certain conditions.Appeal: Parties who are dissatisfied with the judgment may have the right to appeal to a higher court, seeking a review and possible reversal of the order.The circus down in Delphi continues in this episode as we take a look at the scathing response by Richard Allen's legal team, letting Judge Gull know that they plan to call her as a witness.  (commercial at 6:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource2024-6-18-Delphi-Case-Defense-Response-to-Order-and-Notice-of-Conflict.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

An order of the judgment of the court is a formal decision issued by a court at the end of a legal proceeding. It represents the court's final determination on the matters presented during the trial or hearing. Here's a summary of its key elements:Formal Decision: It is the official, written determination by the court on the issues presented in the case.Binding: The order is legally binding on the parties involved in the case, meaning they must comply with its terms.Content: It typically includes:The findings of fact: the court's conclusions about the facts of the case.The conclusions of law: the court's interpretation and application of the relevant laws to those facts.The final ruling: the court's decision on the relief or penalties, such as awarding damages, issuing injunctions, or imposing sentences.Implementation: It may direct specific actions to be taken by the parties, such as payment of money, transfer of property, or compliance with certain conditions.Appeal: Parties who are dissatisfied with the judgment may have the right to appeal to a higher court, seeking a review and possible reversal of the order.The circus down in Delphi continues in this episode as we take a look at the scathing response by Richard Allen's legal team, letting Judge Gull know that they plan to call her as a witness.  (commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource2024-6-18-Delphi-Case-Defense-Response-to-Order-and-Notice-of-Conflict.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

We continue our discussion about Leon Black and Jeffrey Epstein and add some context to the news that Black was subpoenaed by the court over his financial ties to the Epstein criminal enterprise.(commercial at 11:33)To contact me :[email protected]:https://www.crainsnewyork.com/finance/epstein-had-door-apollo-his-deep-ties-blackBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this look back episode...Reports have brought to light the fact that Epstein had a previously undisclosed property in Vail, Colorado. This property was not listed in his holdings and his estate has never mentioned it.It was sold in July....the question now is...where is the money?(Commercial at 12:13)To contact me:[email protected]:https://okmagazine.com/exclusives/jeffrey-epstein-colorado-ski-chalet/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

As the back and forth between JP Morgan and The USVI continues to heat up, JP Morgan has launched a new salvo at the USVI, claiming that the past three governors of the territory all had relationships with Epstein and all profited from his criminal enterprise.This comes on the heels of the USVI claiming that JP Morgan, as an entity was aware of Epstein's criminal behavior and chose to profited from it instead of stopping him.Meanwhile, back in reality, we all know that both entities are responsible and that plenty of people should be behind bars.The trial is set to kick off in October.(commercial at 10:06)to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein had 'close ties' to Gov. Albert Bryan: Doc (lawandcrime.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

jeffreyepstein ghislainemaxwell maxwell maxwellnews jeffreyepsteinupdates jeffreyepsteinsisland epsteinsisland epsteinandmaxwell princeandrew andrew corruption news newsupdates breakingnews breakingnewsupdates dailynewsupdates newstory theyallknew worldnews newsreports newscommentary epsteindailynewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.