Critical Listening

To hear this episode in full, as well as all of our monthly Headlines episodes and more, become a member on Patreon for $5/month, but if the price is an obstacle just drop us a line at [email protected] and we'll get you sorted. As ever, thanks for listening.   On Spotify's most recent earnings call with investors, co-CEO Gustav Soderstrom declared that "Spotify is now an agent" that users can "not only click on in our app, but talk to, ask questions of, and instruct." And so our headlines episode for this month is largely dedicated to addressing the question: WTF does that mean? Spotify claims that in addition to becoming more "agent-like" itself, as a consumer product, it is also setting itself up to be the top service that other tech company-owned agents refer to when users ask for music. The earnings call included much hype for Spotify's growing integrations with ChatGPT, Claude, Meta and beyond.   We dive into what it all might mean, plus some more of the call's big takeaways, in this second installment of what we are now informally calling "We Read the Spotify Earnings Call Transcripts So You Don't Have To." This month we also have a bloom scroll in the mix, as we look into the new venues-specific campaign from the United Musicians and Allied Workers, Raise the Bar.  

We're back from Warsaw, Poland, where we recorded this episode live at the 24th edition of Unsound Festival. Our guests are the Polish composer Piotr Kurek, visual artist Wilhelm Sasnal, and Unsound co-founder Mat Schulz, who joined us to discuss a piece commissioned for this year's festival titled WARSZAWA. It's a wide-ranging and fascinating conversation involving David Bowie, the Polish state folk ballet, the nature of music influence and interpretation, and more. As the story goes, in 1976, David Bowie wandered off a train in Warsaw and was captivated by a record of local folk music, which he would go on to reinterpret with Brian Eno on the Low track “Warszawa.” Fifty years later, Unsound commissioned Kurek and Sasnal to again reinterpret the original folk song through music and visuals, accompanied by the Slask Song & Dance Ensemble, who made its original recording. As it turns out, the story of "Warszawa" itself has now become a piece of local legend, and there was much to unpack. On one hand, Unsound's WARSZAWA reclaims a Polish song that Bowie tended to describe more like a hazy, distant dream than actual source material for his composition, raising questions about crediting, co-optation and the creative process. On the other hand, today’s music business has become litigious to the point of misunderstanding how artistic ideas are created and exchanged. We were intrigued by where this work fits into those conversations, and making connections to how contemporary AI products invisibilize lineages and boost ahistoricism. Across an hour with Kurek, Sasnal and Schulz we reflected on all of the above, and took questions from the crowd too. Hope you enjoy this conversation as much as we did, and thanks again to Unsound for having us. Below are some links to Polish music referenced in the intro, too. Piotr Kurek: https://piotrkurek.bandcamp.com Slask Song & Dance Ensemble: https://www.youtube.com/ZESPOLSLASKOFFICIAL Traditional Polish village music archives on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@muzykaodnaleziona Radical Polish Ansambl: https://radicalpolishansambl.bandcamp.com/album/nierozpoznana-wie-2 Tercet Imperial: https://instantclassic.bandcamp.com/album/prymat

Earlier this month, Suno unveiled its new "v6" model, advertising it as the first product created with material licensed from Warner, BMG and Believe. But it also says the model is trained on the "creations" of its users, opening up new conversations in the gen-AI licensing discourse. If a so-called legal model is trained on user "creations" that were in-turn made using an old, unlicensed model, what is materially different? We get into all of the above, as well as Suno's claims that its "v6-wild" mode can help make user generations more "wild" and "weird".  What does that say about the state of popular gen-AI music apps?  For our second headline we're looking at a new "artist incubator program" Spotify announced tied to its Fresh Finds playlist, wherein 10,000 artists will get comp access to AI-assisted music platforms such as Splice, LANDR and (checks notes) Better Help. What is an artist incubator program to a streaming service? Why might the world's biggest streaming service be trying this out now? All this and more in the September edition of Headlines, our subscriber-bonus series where Max and Liz each bring a story from across the music-tech and biz press to summarize, contextualize and discuss. If you ever want to hear these convos but can't swing the 5 bucks a month, send an email, no questions asked, to [email protected] and we'll send it your way. But if you can afford it, consider becoming a subscriber here on Patreon to support our efforts to keep having critical conversation about music, technology and culture industry hell. Thanks for listening. 

Welcome back to another episode of Critical Listening, DIY Lifers edition. For our third installment of Listening Habits, our series where we talk to musicians about how they interact with music on an everyday basis, we're joined by Lira Mondal and Caufield Schnug of the Lawrence, Kansas group Sweeping Promises. We met on the occasion of their new record, You Say I Romanticize, released in August on Sub Pop, for a truly inspired and wide-ranging conversation. In the first half, we dig into: why Mondal and Schnug decided to move from Boston to Kansas, how they used their record label advance to buy a house and turn it into an affordable recording studio for DIY bands, joining the local all-ages show booking collective, how underground music culture can help teach political organizing skills to young people, and more. Then, in the Listening Habits segment, we talk about cassettes, music discovery parlor games, their love of record stores, and some really great ideas on what it means to be a critical listener. Lira and Caufield said their go-to source for music discovery these days has been email newsletters, and they were nice enough to even send us over a list of some of their favorites, which you can check out below in the show notes. Thanks for listening and thanks again to Sweeping Promises for joining us. This episode is free for everyone, but if you want to support us having more conversations with independent artists about the social power of music, consider becoming a subscriber. Sweeping Promises Recommend These Music Newsletters: Trick Bag → trickbag.substack.com Courtesy Desk → courtesydesk.substack.com YellowGreenRed  → yellowgreenred.com See/Saw  → see-saw.fun Death Rock Fairy → deathrockfairy.substack.com  Chasing Sundays  → elienis.com Sound Bites  → soundbitesnyc.substack.com The Future is Ours to Make  →  thefutureisourstomake.substack.com

As usual, this Headlines episode is for paid subscribers only. Head to Patreon.com/criticallistening to access all of our monthly Headlines episodes, as well as our Discord community, and occasional bonus segments. Jimmy Iovine recently told the New York Times that he "doesn't see a downside at all" when it comes to generative AI music, despite that tens of thousands of fully AI-generated recordings are reportedly flooding streaming services every day. Is he being sincere as a legendary producer, or is he speaking with his wallet as a billionaire? We dive into this question and much more in this episode of our Headlines series. Alongside our discussion of the much-talked-about Times interview with Iovine and Dr. Dre, we also discuss the new "AI Persona" badges that Spotify has announced in order to label non-human artist profiles on the platform, and whether or not this approach will make a difference in the long run.

For Episode 22, we spoke with songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, producer, and curator Taja Cheek, on the brink of her group L’Rain’s fourth record, fata morgana, out today on Mexican Summer. Taja is a lifelong New Yorker with roots in underground cultural organizing and the institutional art world alike; in addition to her work as a musician, she is also currently the Artistic Director at Performance Space New York. In the first half of the show, we spoke about the new album and what it means to challenge an audience in today's political and social climates. For the second half of the show, we return to our Listening Habits series to learn about how Taja listens to music on a daily basis, her relationship with music technology, how her work as a curator influences her approach to music discovery, how a music recommendation text message from Kyp Malone of TV On the Radio changed her life, and much more. Lastly, Max and Taja go way back, so we also talked at length about the makeshift venue they used to run together out of Taja's basement in Brooklyn, how that period shaped her creative trajectory, and DIY politics in general. That will be available for Patreon subscribers as a bonus segment early next week, so please sign up to hear material like that, our monthly Headlines episodes, and access our Discord community. Thanks again to Taja for joining us and thanks for listening!

The CEO of SoundCloud recently revealed that he regularly seeks advice from what he calls his “AI board”—a model he trained on the interviews and writings of top pop musicians and record industry executives. So for our July 2026 Headlines segment we are wondering: did AI Billie Eilish tell him to buy Nina Protocol? We might not be able to give you an exact answer but we do dive into what we know about the deal and what it might mean for musicians. We are also discussing the Kalshi power-users who recently learned that streaming is, in fact, not a meritocracy, and that digital charts are (shocker) very easily manipulated. Head to Patreon.com/criticallistening to subscribe for all of our monthly Headlines episodes, Discord community, and occasional bonus segments.

Why did Panda Bear and Sonic Boom decide to not put their new record, A ? of WHEN, on any streaming services? And how did they get their label, Domino Recording Co, on board? For episode 20 we're joined by the Lisbon-based Animal Collective and Spacemen 3 members to dive into all of this and more. Since the launch of the pod, we've been hoping to have these sorts of conversations centered on divestment from streaming platforms--not just about why artists are opting out, but the specifics of what they are doing instead--and we thank Noah and Pete for joining us to chat through it. We also couldn't pass the opportunity to ask the two about the ongoing AI debates in music, specifically for their perspectives on the differences between generative AI music and the culture of sampling, the latter of which has been integral to their artistic processes for many years. This episode is now available for free, but if you'd like to support the show so we can keep having more conversations with artists challenging the inevitability of streaming, please consider becoming a paid subscriber on our Patreon. Subscribers also get access to our monthly "Headlines" episodes, our Discord community, and occasional bonus clips.  

For this month's installment of our monthly headlines show, we're digging into two stories around the increasingly entwined worlds of generative AI and music streaming. First, a look into a new tool created by the French streaming platform Deezer that shows users how many gen-AI tracks are already on their own playlists. Is this just another hollow marketing campaign by a tech company, or something that's actually useful? What role should streaming services be playing in the fight to label AI slop? Who should be accountable for the labor impacts of extractive AI tech on music? Then we look to the role lawsuits are playing in that equation, as we unpack the recent announcement that the American Federation of Musicians is suing Universal and Warner, claiming their AI deals violate the collective bargaining agreement set between the union and the majors. As usual, this episode is available Critical Listening's Patreon members. If you are not yet a subscriber, please consider joining for five bucks a month to access this conversation along with all of our Headlines episodes, bonus segments, and Discord community. Thanks for listening!  

We're back for another Headlines episode for the month of May 2026. As with all Headlines episodes this season, this episode is a subscriber exclusive. You can listen to it in full and catch up on older headlines and more by signing up for our Patreon at patreon.com/criticallistening. This month we dive in to some major developments in the world of music tech as we discuss the acquisition of German music production software conglomerate Native Instruments by their American rivals InMusic, one of their only direct competitors as far as power and monopolization is concerned. We also discuss the recently announced details regarding the new proprietary generative AI tools made for Spotify in direct partnership with Universal Music Group and what this new precedent in licensing and "fan-made covers and remixes" might mean for the other major genAI developers on the market.