The Space In Between Podcast

What do women bring to leadership that may be especially valuable in today's unpredictable and often uncertain world? Research suggests that women leaders demonstrate strengths in collaborative leadership, building relationships, and bringing diverse perspectives into decision-making. These qualities aren't exclusive to women, of course. But at a time when trust is declining and polarization remains strong -- they may be more important than ever.Who better to explore what these strengths look like in practice than someone with a front-row view of women leading across the globe? In this episode of The Space In Between, host Leigh Morgan welcomes Stephanie Mathews O'Keefe, CEO of the International Women's Forum (IWF), a global network of more than 8,400 women leaders across 37 countries. Stephanie draws on her distinguished career and conversations across IWF's network to explore what it takes to navigate uncertainty at a time of low trust and polarization. She shares how diverse perspectives can strengthen impact and help us find common ground without compromising our convictions, and leaves us with one wish for anyone leading through uncertainty: That more people embrace listening, discernment, and the perspectives of others — bringing greater empathy to how we engage with the world. See a short clip of her insight on YouTube.One especially compelling idea from their conversation is the power of liminal spaces — the sometimes uncomfortable territory between what we know and what comes next. Stephanie shares how creating these spaces can help individuals and organizations move through transitions, make difficult decisions, and discover possibilities that might otherwise remain out of reach.Learn more about Stephanie and her inspiring career, and check out IWF and its global impact as well.Read more detailed show notes about this engaging conversation here.If this conversation resonates -- subscribe, share and leave us a review! And follow Leigh on her socials, check out her bi-monthly newsletter and more: ·     Detailed episode show notes: https://www.leighmorganleads.com/stephanie-o-keep-notes·     Episode video clips on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@SpaceInBetweenPodcast/videos·     Follow Leigh on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/leigh-morgan-speaks·     Learn about her strategic advisory services firm, Imaginal Leadership Strategies: https://www.leighmorganleads.com/ils·     Subscribe to Leigh’s Leadership Lessons newsletter: https://imaginal-leadership-strategies.beehiiv.com/

It’s election season in the U.S., and the tone of many campaigns can feel caustic, reactive, and relentlessly polarized. But the words we use matter far beyond politics. In this encore episode, host Leigh Morgan examines how binary, all-or-nothing language constricts our thinking - and how leaders can communicate in ways that open possibility, build trust, and hold clear convictions without widening the divide. She also explores how our words don’t simply communicate what we think. They physiologically shape how we feel, how we respond, and whether an interaction sparks connection or, shuts it down. Leigh shares cognitive research, a personal story about confronting her own black-and-white language, and practical tools to create room for curiosity, innovation, and agency -- the grounded belief that our choices and actions matter, especially in fractured times.What the Research Tells UsAll-or-nothing thinking is a cognitive distortion that reduces complex situations to stark categories: good or bad, success or failure, right or wrong.Rigid language can amplify emotional reactivity. Words like always, never, completely, and hopeless can intensify the emotions we are already experiencing.Certainty can feel reassuring when we are anxious or unsettled, which helps explain why simplistic narratives and sweeping claims can be so compelling.Political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt describe binary rhetoric, scapegoating, and negative stereotypes as tactics used by authoritarian leaders to turn complex problems into simplistic stories about who is to blame.Naming emotions as precisely as possible - a practice known as affect labeling - can reduce emotional reactivity. “I feel overwhelmed” creates a different internal response than “I’m freaking out.”Two Simple Practices1. Notice and Pause: Listen for words such as always, never, everyone, no one, completely, and hopeless—in your own language and in what you hear from others.2. Use Fit-for-Purpose Words: Experiment with language that leaves more room for the nuance of most situations: often, sometimes, I wonder if, from my perspective, or here’s what I’m seeing.The words we choose can become a bridge or a barrier. Especially when trust is low and uncertainty feels overwhelming -- choosing language with greater intention is a small and meaningful way to cultivate better conversations, stronger teams, and healthier communities.Guess what! Our Space in Between community is growing! Please leave a review, share with a friend or colleague, and 'follow' the show on your podcast platforms.Watch Leigh's YouTube video about the practices: https://youtu.be/3ImQ7e6ep5sDetailed episode notes: http://spaceinbetweenpodcast.com/watch-your-language-lessons/Check out Leigh's leadership insights on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/leigh-morgan-speaksLearn about her advisory services: www.imaginal-leadership.comGet her newsletter here: https://imaginal-leadership-strategies.beehiiv.com/

What if some of the courage we need most right now isn't about standing our ground -- but knowing when to negotiate, admit we're wrong, or put the common good ahead of our own side? In a polarized culture that often rewards strident loyalty to our group and political self-protection, those choices can carry a real cost. So, what does courage actually look like—and do we have enough of it?In this episode of The Space In Between, host Leigh Morgan talks with Marine Corps veteran and New York Times bestselling author Rye Barcott, about what courage looks like inside one of the hardest environments to practice it: the highest echelons of elected office. In his new book, Courage Can Save US, Rye examines the experiences of five elected officials – five Democrats and five Republicans - to understand what enables people to take principled risks when political and personal cost are all too real. Rye offers a refreshing and tender perspective on what he’s learned about the nature of courage itself, and how to transcend the vexing incentives that elected leaders face – even when they aspire to do the right thing. Follow Leigh on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/leigh-morgan-speaksDetailed Show Notes: http://spaceinbetweenpodcast.com/can-courage-can-save-us/Rye's website & book: https://couragecansaveus.com/The Space In Between Community is growing! Join us and please leave a review, share the podcast, and send feedback! We love hearing from you.

Artificial intelligence is advancing at dizzying speed. But the hardest questions about AI may not be technical at all. Who should decide what responsible AI looks like? Can we create meaningful AI regulation without stifling innovation? And at a moment of deep distrust in both government and Big Tech, how do leaders build the coalitions needed to move forward?In this episode of The Space In Between, Leigh Morgan sits down with Ambassador Karen Kornbluh, Senior Advisor for Emerging Technologies at the Milken Institute, to make sense of the fault lines shaping AI policy, governance, innovation, and leadership. Their conversation moves beyond the familiar choice between “let technology run” and “regulate it before it harms us.” Instead, they explore a more demanding space in between: how thoughtful guardrails, public accountability, human agency, and innovation can coexist—and what leaders can do right now rather than waiting for perfect answers.In This EpisodeKaren and Leigh unpack a central tension of the AI era: we need innovation, but we also need institutions capable of protecting the public interest and earning trust. Rather than treating AI as one enormous problem, Karen argues for breaking the challenge into specific, understandable issues—from data rights and accountability to the local impact of data centers—where people can see the stakes and exercise agency.Their conversation also challenges the assumption that guardrails automatically suppress innovation. Thoughtful rules can shape incentives, clarify responsibility, and help leaders address risk before a crisis forces the issue.Practices for Leading in AI Times· Demand more. Ask whether technology, government, and your vendors are actually serving people, organizations, families, and communities.·  Make it tangible. Choose one concrete AI issue rather than trying to solve “AI” as a whole. Look for a decision, cost, risk, or policy you can actually influence.·  Meet people where they are. Use language and forums that make sense to the people you serve—not just to experts inside your institution.·  Find your agency. Pay attention to local and organizational decisions, including data-center impacts, data use, reporting, and accountability, where your voice can affect what happens next.Share the podcast - help the Space In Between grow!Our community is growing, and so is our collective impact. Share this episode with a friend or colleague and please leave a rating and review wherever you listen—it helps others find The Space In Between.Check out the Space In Between website for more detailed show notes: http://spaceinbetweenpodcast.com/leading-across-ai-fault-lines/Find Leigh MorganLinkedIn — Leigh MorganThe Space In Between PodcastImaginal Leadership Strategies — Advisory Work

When division deepens and confidence in our institutions erodes, ordinary people still have far more influence than we may realize. In this episode, Leigh speaks with author and civic-engagement leader Paul Loeb about citizenship—not as a legal status, but as a civic mindset: the choice to care about what happens beyond our individual lives and to participate in shaping our communities, institutions, and democracy. At its heart, engaged citizenship is an expression of agency—the belief that our choices and actions matter, even in difficult and uncertain times. Their conversation offers a hopeful reminder that each of us can help change what happens next.Drawing on decades of research and the enduring lessons of his landmark books Soul of a Citizen and The Impossible Will Take A While, Paul offers practical, accessible ways to put that civic mindset into action. He and Leigh explore how to move forward without waiting for perfect circumstances, find courage through community, resist the paralysis of relentless bad news, and sustain hope when progress feels impossible. Leigh and Paul have a spirited discussion - sharing stories of principled action, times when things didn’t always go right, and sorting through the reality that agency matters even when the way ahead is not clear. A key take away is that history often turns because ordinary people decide to participate even amid risk and uncertainty. These are powerful lessons for citizens and leaders who work hard to build connection and alignment in polarized times. Four Key Themes1. Citizenship Is Agency in Action: Citizenship extends beyond voting, political affiliation, or legal status. It is the everyday practice of participating in the life of a community. Each of us can examine the roles we hold, the people we know, and the institutions we influence—and decide how to use that power responsibly.2. Hope Means Acting Without Guarantees: Hope is not certainty that everything will turn out well. It is the willingness to contribute even when results are delayed, unclear, or invisible. An action that appears unsuccessful may still sustain another person, expand what is possible, or become part of a longer arc of change.3. Perfection Can Become an Excuse for Inaction: Waiting for perfect knowledge, language, timing, or circumstances can keep us from ever beginning. Meaningful participation starts when we take a useful step with what we know and have today—then remain willing to learn, adjust, and repair mistakes along the way.4. Courage Grows Through Community: Agency becomes stronger when people act together. Communities provide encouragement, protection, and staying power. One person’s brave choice can make it easier for others to follow, allowing small acts to build into collective influence.Learn more about Paul and his books here: https://www.paulloeb.org/take-awhile/ Leave us a review on your podcast platform! Our community is growing, and your support and insights are much appreciated.Follow Leigh on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/leigh-morgan-speaks/Check out Leigh's advisory work: www.imaginal-leadership.com

AI agents going rogue. Systems behaving deceptively. Technology advancing faster than most of us can fully understand. It’s easy to feel as though AI is an unstoppable force and the rest of us are simply along for the ride. In this episode, Leigh challenges that passive stance with a simple but powerful shift: we don’t just need humans in the loop. Humans ARE the loop.If you’ve never heard the tech phrase “human in the loop,” the idea is reassuringly simple: let the AI do the work, but keep a person nearby to supervise, review, and step in if something goes wrong. But what if that framing already gives too much power to the technology? Leigh makes the case for putting humans back at the center—and offers three ways each of us can do it: pause before outsourcing our judgment, be intentional about what we create and share, and exercise our civic and consumer voice. Because navigating the AI era isn’t about choosing between optimism and fear. It’s about staying in the driver’s seat. As AI grows more capable, so too must our accountability for how it is used and what it creates.The familiar idea of keeping a “human in the loop” sounds reassuring: let automated systems do the work while a person supervises, reviews, and steps in when necessary. But Leigh argues that this framing subtly puts technology at the center and relegates human beings to the role of monitor—or emergency brake. Humans ARE the Loop offers a more assertive frame. AI is a tool created to serve human purposes. Humans remain responsible for deciding what we build, how we use it, what risks we accept, and what kind of future we want these technologies to help create.That responsibility matters precisely because humans are imperfect. We can be biased, careless, rushed, and wrong. Asserting "humans ARE the loop" brings these risks; it would be naive to think otherwise. Leigh is wide-eyed about this reality, choosing still to center humanness amidst dizzying technological advancement.The reason: algorithms cannot carry moral responsibility, repair broken trust, feel remorse, or answer to a community when something goes wrong. Accountability ultimately belongs on human shoulders.Three Practices for Staying in the Driver’s Seat1. Pause before you outsource. Before accepting an AI-generated answer, recommendation, or piece of content, ask: What am I asking this tool to do? What judgment must remain mine? Who is affected if the output is wrong? Use AI to extend your thinking—not replace your discernment, your voice, or your presence.2. Be intentional about what you create and share. Pay attention to the information you give AI systems. Understand your privacy and training settings, make conscious choices about what you share, and treat your personal information as the valuable asset it is.3. Exercise your civic and consumer voice. Agency extends beyond how you personally use AI. Support companies that demonstrate transparency and responsible safety practices, and make it clear to elected leaders that sensible, enforceable AI safeguards matter. You don’t have to be a technologist or policy expert to have a stake—or a voice—in what comes next.Key TakeawaysAI may continue to become dramatically more capable, but greater machine intelligence makes human leadership more important, not less. Ethical judgment, accountability, trust, discernment, and the ability to anticipate consequences cannot simply be handed over to an algorithm.And this is exactly the kind of tension we explore on The Space in Between. We don’t have to choose between blind optimism about AI and paralyzing fear of it. We can acknowledge extraordinary opportunity and serious risk at the same time—and then ask what responsibility that places on each of us. AI may produce astonishing intelligence. But intelligence alone cannot tell us what kind of future is worthy of us. That choice remains ours. Let’s own it.Like the podcast? Please leave a review, share with a friend or post on LinkedIn, X, or your favorite social media platform #SpaceInBetween @SIBFollow Leigh & Sign Up for Her Bi-Monthly NewsletterSIB on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@SpaceInBetweenPodcastLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/leigh-morgan-speaks/Newsletters: https://imaginal-leadership-strategies.beehiiv.com/?ref=TNiwr4XXDY&_bhlid=bf7a73b936aab597b0df9777ef50b28c5a049d32Her Advisory Business: www.imaginal-leadership.com

In this special bonus episode, I follow up on my conversation with Bree Rose, who shared her experience as the mother of Storm, her nonbinary teenager. I wanted to hear Storm’s perspective on their journey, and our conversation was fun, deep, and reminded me that young people today hold incredible wisdom and insight despite a world too often torn by polarization.Now 17, Storm speaks candidly about beginning to question their gender identity at age 12, the relief of discovering that they did not have to fit into a prescribed box, and the safety they felt knowing their family’s love would not change. They also share what it means to experiment with how they present themselves and navigate a world that does not always make room for people who defy conventional expectations.Storm brings both honesty and a roundedness far beyond their years to the everyday realities nonbinary and transgender young people can face -- from public scrutiny and other people’s discomfort to the anxiety of deciding which public restroom feels safest. Their experience makes visible the personal consequences of debates that can otherwise feel abstract or purely political. At the same time, Storm’s flourishing is a powerful testament to what becomes possible when someone can live in alignment with who they know themselves to be.Together, Storm, Bree, and I explore the difference between making an honest mistake and refusing to learn; how families can offer fierce support without being able to protect their children from every hurt; and why grace does not require us to remain silent in the face of prejudice. We also discuss the value of curiosity and the importance of allowing people to tell us who they are.Despite the challenges, Storm remains hopeful. They draw inspiration from people who advocate for change in ways large and small—from public protest to quiet acts of kindness, courage, and solidarity. Storm’s message is simple and powerful: as long as people keep trying, change remains possible.In this episode, we explore:What Storm experienced when they first began questioning their gender identityWhy their family’s love and support made it possible to speak openlyThe possibilities and limitations of identity labelsWhat it feels like to move through public spaces as a nonbinary young personThe difference between not yet understanding and refusing to understandHow grace, learning, and advocacy can coexistWhy everyday acts of courage give Storm hopeThis episode is an invitation to listen to a young person describe their own life in their own words—and to approach complex questions about gender identity with greater curiosity, humility, and humanity.Please follow The Space In Between podcast, leave a review and share on your social media plaforms.

Conversations about transgender youth and gender identity increasingly unfold in a highly polarized climate, where deeply personal decisions get pulled into cultural and political conflict. Behind those debates — and ongoing threats to the rights, safety, and well-being of transgender people — are real families trying to support their children and make consequential decisions without the benefit of certainty. In this episode, Leigh talks with Bree Rose about her family's path after her child, Storm, began questioning their gender identity at age 12.Ultimately, they explore a question that reaches beyond parenting: how do we lead with love and grace when there's no consensus on the right answer? Bree and Leigh talk about staying grounded in values that don't bend, exercising judgment when there is no roadmap, and lessons she learned dealing with judgement from multiple sides.Bree’s story centers on a mother’s love and a family determined to support and stand by Storm. It is also a story about navigating parental roles, choices about medical care, and the tension between what a child wants and what parents believe is best. Bree is careful to note that what her family experienced, and the choices they made, belong to them alone and that other loving, well-intended families may face different circumstances and reach different conclusions.In this conversation, Leigh and Bree explore:Loving a child without having all the answers. Bree shares her initial uncertainty when Storm first raised the subject, and how she shifted from trying to "solve" the situation to listening, learning, and accompanying her child and other family members on an unfolding journey.Supporting identity while navigating parental responsibility. Bree and her husband gave Storm room to explore gender identity while deciding, as a family, that they needed more time before making choices about certain types of medical care — a choice made thoughtfully, not lightly.Living with other people's judgment. Bree describes criticism from people who felt her family wasn't supporting Storm in the right way, and how many families often face the opposite: harsh judgment for supporting a transgender child's identity at all. Making room for different choices. Their conversation turns to how polarization can convert complicated, deeply personal decisions into harmful tests of allegiance — and why people who care about human dignity can disagree but also continue to center the flourishing and wellbeing of young people and their chosen expressions. About Bree RoseBree is a Seattle-area leader, advocate, philanthropic impact advisor, and certified Dare to Lead™ facilitator whose professional experience spans finance, leadership development, philanthropy, and community engagement.Permissions & Next Week's Bonus Episode: Bree, Storm, and their family have given permission for their story to be told. Next week's bonus episode features Storm themself, who shares their insights with similar clarity and warmth.How to Support the Podcast: The Space In Between podcast is growing! Your help will amplify its impact and message. Please take a moment to leave a review and share the podcast with others on via social media and by sending to family, friends and colleagues. Together, we can turn the tide on polarization and stay fierce about values that we hold dear.

What does it really mean to be authentic—and who gets to decide? In this episode of The Space in Between, host Leigh Morgan talks with author, political strategist, and podcast host Maya Rupert about how race, gender, identity, and power influence who is perceived as “real,” trustworthy, and qualified.Drawing from her book, The Real Ones: How to Disrupt the Hidden Ways Racism Makes Us Less Authentic, Maya challenges the idea that authenticity is simply a matter of “being yourself.” She and Leigh explore how code-switching and adapting to different environments can reflect awareness and agency—not dishonesty. In today’s divided and distrustful climate, understanding these dynamics can help us recognize the conditions shaping our choices while still acting from a place of clarity, dignity, and power.Topics Leigh & Maya ExploreSocietal norms and dynamics influence perceptions of authenticity. The dynamics behind code-switching. How bias shapes our judgments of leaders. How grace, humility, and accountability can strengthen public life. Key TakeawaysAuthenticity is not a fixed identity waiting to be uncovered. It develops through experience, reflection, relationships, and changing circumstances.Code-switching can be a strategic response to real social conditions. The important question is whether we are making conscious choices or losing contact with ourselves.Feeling misunderstood does not necessarily mean we have failed to be authentic. Sometimes the discomfort or incongruence exists in the observer’s expectations and biases.Authenticity can require effort. Working to live according to our values does not make those values less genuine.Agency includes knowing when to engage, when to step away, and when to ask an ally to enter a conversation that we do not have the safety or capacity to hold.Perceptions of identity, especially those outwardly expressed (race, ethnicity, gender identity, age, etc) must be acknowledged as influencing and shaping perceptions of authenticity.Why This MattersIn polarized times, people are hungry for leaders who seem “real.” But when authenticity is poorly defined or we aren't aware of its variability, bias can quietly determine who receives trust, forgiveness, and the benefit of the doubt. By asking better questions—What do we mean by authentic? What assumptions are influencing our judgment? What conditions shape how someone shows up?—we can become more discerning citizens, more humane leaders, and more powerful agents in our own lives.Practices to TryInterrogate your first assumptions: What you believed or wanted earlier in life is not automatically your most authentic truth. Give yourself permission to learn, reconsider, and grow.Ask the second question: When someone seems inauthentic, pause and ask what is creating that reaction. Is the person being dishonest—or are they behaving differently from what you expected?Lead with grace and humility: Remember that you rarely know another person’s full internal journey. Extend grace where human dignity and safety are present, while maintaining clear boundaries where they are not.About Maya RupertMaya Rupert is an author, political strategist, and former presidential campaign leader whose work explores race, gender, power, and democracy. She is the author of The Real Ones: How to Disrupt the Hidden Ways Racism Makes Us Less Authentic and the host of the NAACP Image Award–nominated podcast When We Win, a limited series featuring women of color who successfully challenged political conventions and transformed the way campaigns are run.If you enjoyed this episode, let us know! Please share with a friend or colleague and leave a review on your podcast platform.

What does it take to stay in the game when life doesn't go your way? In this engaging and deeply personal conversation, Space In Between host Leigh Morgan welcomes back longtime friend, former tech CEO, author, TEDx speaker, and fellow Duke University athlete Everett Harper for a conversation that begins on the playing field—but quickly expands into leadership, resilience, and what it means to stay connected in turbulent times.Drawing on stories from their years competing at Duke—Everett as a national championship soccer player and Leigh as a standout point guard for the Blue Devils—they revisit memorable victories, painful losses, difficult teammates, legendary competitors, and the coaches who shaped them. Together, they explore how the lessons learned in elite athletics continue to influence the way they lead organizations, navigate adversity, and show up for others.At a time when many people feel exhausted by polarization, uncertainty, and declining trust, Leigh and Everett offer a refreshing reminder that resilience isn't a solo pursuit. Staying in the game requires agency, connection, humility, and the willingness to lean on teammates when the pressure is greatest. Through laughter, candid storytelling, and thoughtful reflection, they reveal why some of life's most enduring leadership lessons were learned long before either stepped into the executive suite.