The Mega Edition: Diddy Loses The Battle For Sanctions And His Leak Narrative Is Crushed (1/24/25)

In a recent essay for The New York Times, former Vibe editor-in-chief Danyel Smith recounted a 1997 incident where Sean "Diddy" Combs allegedly threatened her life over a cover dispute. Smith claimed that after she refused Combs' demand to review his cover photos before publication—citing company policy—he responded by stating he would see her "dead in the trunk of a car." Following this threat, Smith involved her lawyer, leading to an apology faxed from Combs. Shortly thereafter, Vibe's offices experienced a theft of servers containing the magazine's content, which Smith suspected was an inside job possibly linked to Combs' associates. These revelations have resurfaced amid multiple recent allegations against Combs, including sexual assault and abuse.to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy told me I'd might end up 'dead in a trunk' over approval of magazine cover, claims editor | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Bryan Kohberger, accused of the November 2022 stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students, is scheduled for a court appearance today in Boise, Idaho. His defense team has filed motions to suppress key evidence, arguing that the use of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) violated his constitutional rights. They contend that law enforcement's application of IGG, which involves using DNA from public genealogy databases to identify potential suspects, was conducted without proper warrants, rendering the subsequent evidence inadmissible. Additionally, the defense claims that search warrants for Kohberger's phone, car, and residences were obtained through misleading information presented to the court.In a broader strategy to remove the death penalty as a potential sentence, Kohberger's attorneys have previously argued that capital punishment violates contemporary standards of decency and international treaties against prisoner torture. They also assert that prolonged periods on death row constitute cruel and unusual punishment. However, these arguments were rejected by the court in November 2024, allowing the death penalty to remain on the table if Kohberger is convicted.   The outcome of today's hearing could significantly impact the admissibility of critical evidence and the overall trajectory of the case as it moves toward trial.to contact me:[email protected]:Bryan Kohberger looks to dodge death penalty with Lori Vallow's playbook | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In response to Defendant Shawn Carter's motion for sanctions, the Plaintiff argues that the motion is both frivolous and procedurally improper. The Plaintiff contends that Carter's reliance on a single television interview to challenge the veracity of events that occurred twenty-four years ago, when the Plaintiff was thirteen, does not substantiate a claim for sanctions. They emphasize that discrepancies in recollection, especially concerning traumatic events from decades prior, are common and do not equate to bad faith or warrant sanctions. Furthermore, the Plaintiff highlights that Carter's attempt to bypass the mandatory twenty-one-day safe harbor provision under Rule 11 lacks legal precedent and justification, rendering his request to expedite the filing deadline to one day as unfounded.The Plaintiff also underscores that expecting a sexual assault victim, particularly one who was a minor at the time and has disclosed being autistic, to have precise recall of all details is unreasonable. They reference New York courts' recognition that survivors of childhood sexual abuse may not remember exact dates or times, which does not invalidate their claims. The Plaintiff asserts that Carter's threats of immediate sanctions are intended to intimidate and silence the Plaintiff and other potential claimants, constituting an abuse of the judicial process. They conclude by urging the court to deny Carter's motion, stating that it lacks substantive merit and is procedurally defective.to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - NYC-#6394976-v8A-Draft_Rule_11_Opp__MoLBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In response to Defendant Shawn Carter's motion for sanctions, the Plaintiff argues that the motion is both frivolous and procedurally improper. The Plaintiff contends that Carter's reliance on a single television interview to challenge the veracity of events that occurred twenty-four years ago, when the Plaintiff was thirteen, does not substantiate a claim for sanctions. They emphasize that discrepancies in recollection, especially concerning traumatic events from decades prior, are common and do not equate to bad faith or warrant sanctions. Furthermore, the Plaintiff highlights that Carter's attempt to bypass the mandatory twenty-one-day safe harbor provision under Rule 11 lacks legal precedent and justification, rendering his request to expedite the filing deadline to one day as unfounded.The Plaintiff also underscores that expecting a sexual assault victim, particularly one who was a minor at the time and has disclosed being autistic, to have precise recall of all details is unreasonable. They reference New York courts' recognition that survivors of childhood sexual abuse may not remember exact dates or times, which does not invalidate their claims. The Plaintiff asserts that Carter's threats of immediate sanctions are intended to intimidate and silence the Plaintiff and other potential claimants, constituting an abuse of the judicial process. They conclude by urging the court to deny Carter's motion, stating that it lacks substantive merit and is procedurally defective.to contact me:[email protected]:Microsoft Word - NYC-#6394976-v8A-Draft_Rule_11_Opp__MoLBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (1:24-cr-00542-AS), Judge Arun Subramanian issued an opinion and order denying the defendant's motion for discovery and an evidentiary hearing. Sean Combs had alleged that the government improperly leaked information about the case and sought further investigation into these claims. Specifically, the motion (Dkt. 30) called for disclosure of relevant materials and a formal hearing to address the purported leaks.Judge Subramanian, however, found no sufficient evidence to warrant granting the motion. The ruling emphasized that the defendant failed to meet the legal threshold required to demonstrate a credible basis for the allegations or to justify the requested relief. Consequently, the court declined to authorize further discovery or proceedings on the matter, leaving the case to proceed without additional inquiry into the alleged leaks.In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.(commercial at 10:26)to contact me:[email protected]:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing three new lawsuits from anonymous male plaintiffs who allege drugging and sexual assault incidents between 2019 and 2022. The lawsuits describe encounters where Combs allegedly provided the men with spiked drinks, leading to unconsciousness and subsequent sexual assaults at various locations, including his East Hampton residence and Manhattan hotels. One plaintiff claims he was assaulted after being drugged during an afterparty at a Manhattan hotel, with parts of the incident reportedly recorded. Another plaintiff, a long-time employee of Combs, alleges he was assaulted during a meeting at a Times Square hotel to discuss unpaid compensation. The third accuser states he was drugged and raped by Combs and associates at a 2020 party at the East Hampton property.Combs’ legal team has denied the allegations, calling them fabricated and expressing intent to challenge the claims and seek sanctions against the plaintiffs’ attorneys. These lawsuits add to a series of legal challenges for Combs, who is also facing federal charges of sex trafficking and racketeering. Attorney Thomas Giuffra, representing the three plaintiffs, revealed that over 60 individuals have come forward with similar allegations, though only these three cases have been filed after vetting. The plaintiffs are seeking damages and jury trials, with their identities kept confidential due to safety concerns and fears of intimidation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to the federal charges and awaits a trial scheduled for May 2025.Sean "Diddy" Combs, currently detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering, has been granted access to a laptop to review discovery materials for his defense. This decision follows his legal team's complaints about restrictive conditions hindering his trial preparation.Initially, Combs' attorneys highlighted delays in providing the laptop and objected to limitations on its use, such as restricted hours and designated locations within the facility. They argued these constraints were "untenable" and impeded his ability to collaborate effectively with his defense team.In response, Judge Arun Subramanian ruled that Combs should have daily access to a laptop pre-loaded with discovery materials. The device is configured solely for viewing documents, without capabilities for note-taking or internet access, to maintain security protocols. Combs is permitted to use the laptop in his jail unit from 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM daily, with any additional access requiring further discussion with the government.to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy judge sparks uproar by granting 'rapist' rapper's diva jail request | Daily Mail OnlineDiddy's 'perverted three word excuse when victim woke up while being raped' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The CJNG cartel (Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion) is running a sophisticated timeshare scam targeting American timeshare owners, especially the elderly. This scam involves scammers, often posing as legitimate buyers, making unsolicited offers to purchase timeshares. Once the offer is accepted, they ask the owners for advance fees and taxes, purportedly to facilitate the sale. After several payments, the timeshare owners realize there is no buyer, and their money is gone.The CJNG uses this fraud as a significant revenue stream to fund their broader criminal activities, including drug trafficking. They operate mainly in tourist destinations like Puerto Vallarta and use extreme violence and intimidation to control these fraudulent networks. The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the FBI are actively working to disrupt these schemes in collaboration with Mexican authorities.This scam has caused over $300 million in losses, primarily affecting older Americans. Victims are advised to report any suspicious activities to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) as quickly as possible for the best chance of recovering lost funds.Now, given the amount of money and number of people who have been victimized by the scam as well as the ongoing genocide in America known as the drug overdoses, the DOJ has turned it's full attention to the CJNG and those they say are behind the plot.In our second episode..We've talked about the mexican cartels and their move south into Colombia multiple times now on the podcast, but due to a recent leak in Colombia, we are getting confirmation of those assertions.According to the leak, CJNG and Sinaloa have both established beachheads in Colombia and both groups continue to work towards complete domination of the narco game. From the harvesting to the sale, both CJNG and Sinaloa are looking to control the game from the bottom up.In this episode, we take a look at the newest leaks and how the cartels and their corrupt pals in government planned on making it happen.(commercial at 7:42)to contact me:[email protected];Así fue como el Cártel de Sinaloa y el CJNG expandieron su control en Colombia, según NarcoFiles - Infobaesource:Fentanyl and scams against American tourists place the Jalisco New Generation Cartel in Washington’s sights | International | EL PAÍS English (elpais.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

From the archives: 11-23-22The authorities in Moscow held a press conference today where they went over a lot of the same ground that they have covered previously and unfortunately, there wasn't very much new information for the public to consume. In this episode, we take a look at what went down at the presser and what it could mean for the investigation going forward(commercial at 8:43)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/idaho-students-killed-update-11-23-22/index.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On this edition of the evening update, we once again take a look at the NPA that Epstein weaseled himself and his friends into and we hear from prosecutors and lawyers who have worked these kinds of cases for decades and none of them could ever recall anyone getting a deal such as this. So, how was Epstein able to cash in?(commercial at 11:35)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.floridabulldog.org/2021/04/jeffrey-epstein-cushy-federal-deal-one-of-a-kind/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a lawsuit filed in October 2024, a businessman identified as "John Doe" alleges that Sean "Diddy" Combs sexually assaulted him during a 2022 launch party for Combs' Ciroc vodka brand. The plaintiff, who operates a luxury car and jewelry rental business in Los Angeles and had previously worked with Combs, claims that during the event, Combs invited him into a private office, exposed himself, and forcibly grabbed his genitals. The alleged assault was interrupted when an unnamed professional athlete entered the room, allowing the plaintiff to leave. This lawsuit is among several recent allegations against Combs, who is currently facing multiple legal challenges, including federal charges of sex trafficking and racketeering.(commercial at 7:12)to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.