The Epstein Rewind: The Former Head Of CIA William Burns And His Epstein Connection (Part 2)

The U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) played a central role in enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s vast criminal enterprise, serving as both his primary base of operations and a jurisdiction that allowed his abuse to continue unchecked for decades. Epstein’s private island, Little Saint James, was the epicenter of his sex trafficking network, yet despite widespread knowledge of his illicit activities, local authorities turned a blind eye or, worse, actively facilitated his operations. The government granted Epstein extensive tax incentives and special treatment, allowing him to operate with impunity while funneling millions through shell companies registered in the territory. Even after his 2008 conviction in Florida, Epstein remained deeply entrenched in the USVI’s financial and political circles, securing sweetheart business deals and leveraging his wealth to maintain influence. The failure to regulate or investigate Epstein’s activities—despite glaring red flags—raises serious questions about corruption, complicity, and the true extent of the USVI’s role in protecting him.Recent legal battles have further exposed how deeply the USVI government was entangled with Epstein, with officials benefiting financially from his presence while ignoring repeated warnings about his trafficking network. The territory’s former first lady, Cecile de Jongh, was revealed to have worked directly for Epstein, helping him navigate regulatory loopholes and maintain access to power. Meanwhile, banks and financial institutions in the USVI facilitated the movement of Epstein’s funds, ensuring his trafficking operation remained well-funded and operational. Lawsuits against JPMorgan Chase have uncovered damning evidence suggesting that USVI officials were well aware of Epstein’s activities yet chose to look the other way, likely in exchange for financial incentives. The territory’s recent legal posturing against Epstein’s estate appears to be little more than an attempt to rewrite history, portraying themselves as victims rather than enablers. In reality, the USVI’s complicity in Epstein’s crimes is undeniable, raising broader concerns about the corruption and systemic failures that allowed one of the world’s most notorious predators to operate so freely.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the wake of Larry Nassar's victims settling with the DOJ/FBI after it was found that they were derlict in their duty to protect those victims, people are asking when the FBI is going to do the right thing and take responsiblity for their negligence when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein?After years of being told that Jeffrey Epstein was a smarmy, disgusting, sicko, the FBI refused to do anything about it and let him continue to abuse women and girls by the hundreds.   Yet the FBI, even after taking responsibility for their inaction, has yet to come to the table to negotiate a settlement with the Epstein survivors, and now attorney Jordan Merson is demanding answers.(commercial at 8:48)to contact me:[email protected]:FBI Ignores Jeffrey Epstein Victims After Larry Nassar Settlement (businessinsider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein moved amongst the halls of power with some of the most powerful people in the world. From top financiers to politicians to top officials in the intelligence community, Jeffrey Epstein considered them all friends and in this episode we take a look at his private calendar. One of the most interesting names on that calendar? William Burns. The man that Joe Biden chose to run the CIA.Let's dive in!(commercial at 9:11)to contact me:[email protected]:Epstein's Private Calendar Reveals Prominent Names, Including CIA Chief, Goldman's Top Lawyer (msn.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein moved amongst the halls of power with some of the most powerful people in the world. From top financiers to politicians to top officials in the intelligence community, Jeffrey Epstein considered them all friends and in this episode we take a look at his private calendar. One of the most interesting names on that calendar? William Burns. The man that Joe Biden chose to run the CIA.Let's dive in!(commercial at 9:11)to contact me:[email protected]:Epstein's Private Calendar Reveals Prominent Names, Including CIA Chief, Goldman's Top Lawyer (msn.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In todays episode we take a trip back to 2019 and an article that questions the narrative around Epstein's death. With hindsight as our guide and a couple of years in the books...we still are waiting on the official report. To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/26/barr-n26.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell has been moved to suicide watch ahead of her upcoming sentencing hearing on Tuesday. According to her lawyers, she was moved there without a psychological evaluation and because of this move and Ghislaine Maxwell not having 'adequate time to prepare' her team might ask the judge for an adjournment.(commercial at 7:45)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/25/us/ghislaine-maxwell-on-suicide-watch/index.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.to contact me:[email protected]:KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.eclBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene.Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights.to contact me:[email protected]:KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.eclBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The growing outrage over the delayed release of the Epstein files has reached a boiling point, with critics accusing authorities of deliberately stalling transparency in one of the most high-profile sex trafficking cases in modern history. The public was promised the full unsealing of documents that would expose key associates, enablers, and potentially high-profile figures tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal enterprise, yet months have passed with no significant updates. Many see this as another example of a two-tiered justice system, where the wealthy and powerful are shielded from scrutiny while the public is left in the dark. The delay has only fueled suspicions that critical information is being withheld to protect influential individuals, further eroding trust in institutions tasked with upholding the law.ocial media platforms, independent journalists, and advocacy groups have amplified calls for accountability, demanding to know why the files remain sealed despite previous commitments to release them. Hashtags like #EpsteinFiles and #ReleaseTheList continue to trend, with mounting frustration directed at both the justice system and mainstream media for their perceived lack of urgency in pursuing the full truth. The secrecy surrounding these documents only deepens concerns that the legal system is working to bury damning evidence rather than expose those complicit in Epstein’s trafficking network. Without full disclosure, many fear justice will remain elusive, and the powerful figures linked to Epstein will continue to evade consequences.to contact me:[email protected]:GOPers press for release of JFK, Epstein files: Here’s why they’re not out yet | Fox NewsFor those of you who would like to support my work you can do so here:https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (Case No. 1:24-cr-00542-AS), the defense has filed a memorandum supporting a motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants executed at Combs' residences in Los Angeles and Miami. The defense contends that federal authorities included false statements and omitted critical exculpatory information in their affidavits to secure these warrants, particularly regarding the voluntary nature of an alleged victim's participation in events described by the prosecution. Additionally, the defense argues that the warrants were overly broad, leading to the seizure of extensive personal data and records beyond the scope of the investigation. In the alternative, the defense requests a Franks hearing to examine the veracity of the affidavits supporting the search warrants.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.160.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.