Scott (Kid Cudi) Mescudi & Deonte Nash: Why Diddy's Defense Is Crying Foul (6/13/25)

In a letter to Judge Subramanian regarding United States v. Combs, the defense addressed the government’s intent to introduce out-of-court statements during Casandra Ventura’s (Cassie’s) testimony under Rule 801. Following the Court’s directive from the April 25, 2025 pre-trial conference, both sides met and conferred on the matter. The government provided the defense with a chart outlining the statements it wishes to admit along with its proposed legal justifications. In turn, the defense submitted detailed objections to certain statements, which they attached as Exhibit A for the Court’s review.Additionally, the defense used the letter to elaborate on its opposition to the government’s attempt to introduce prior consistent statements through Ms. Ventura’s testimony, arguing that their admission would be improper. The defense also objected to new exhibits the government has indicated it intends to present during Ventura’s testimony, raising concerns about their admissibility and relevance. The letter signals an effort by the defense to limit what it views as prejudicial or legally unsupported material from being placed before the jury through Ms. Ventura’s account.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.397.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

After lunch on June 13th, 2025, Jonathan Perez resumed his testimony in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, offering damning details that reinforced the government’s racketeering and sex trafficking allegations. Perez, a former Combs security employee turned cooperating witness, testified about a specific 2016 incident in Miami where he claimed he witnessed Combs physically assault a woman at a private party and later direct staff to “clean it up” and “get her quiet.” He stated that money was exchanged afterward and that Combs instructed him never to speak of the incident. The prosecution used Perez’s recollection to suggest a pattern of coercion, witness silencing, and obstruction of justice — aligning it with earlier testimony from female accusers who alleged that payouts and intimidation were standard after violent encounters.Perez also told the court that Combs maintained a private surveillance system on his properties, allegedly used to record and archive footage of parties, including potential incriminating material. He said that some of these recordings were stored in a “vault room” accessible only to a small group of trusted insiders, further fueling the prosecution's theory that Combs operated a tightly controlled criminal enterprise. Under cross-examination, the defense sought to discredit Perez by pointing to past drug use and his motivation for cooperating with prosecutors, implying he was seeking leniency for unrelated charges. Still, Perez remained composed and firm in his answers, drawing a clear picture of systemic abuse and calculated coverups under Combs’ direction.to contact me:[email protected]:June 13, 2025 - Day 23 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

First, the morning opened with testimony from a Homeland Security Investigations agent, Andre Lamon. He told the jury that during the March 2024 raid on Combs’s Los Angeles home, agents located a “security room” where firearms, armor-piercing ammunition, and sixteen boxes of AstroGlide lubricant—alongside hundreds of bottles of baby oil—were stored. When questioned by defense attorney Marc Agnifilo, he confirmed this was the only trafficking case in which he had seized lubricant in such quantities.   The agent clarified that none of the weapons were scattered around the mansion—they were all contained within that secure area .After the agent’s testimony, the prosecution called Jonathan Perez, Combs’s former personal assistant, to the stand. Perez detailed his long shifts (initially $85K, later $100K per year) preparing Combs’s “king nights”—the so-called “freak-offs”—which involved organizing overnight sex events often featuring sheets, oils, massages, and IV drips. He recounted discovering explicit videos of “Jane” and another man, which he reported to Combs and his chief of staff, Kristina Khorram. Perez also described how Combs began paying Jane’s $10,000 monthly rent in 2023 after she resisted attending more of these events—reinforcing the prosecution’s narrative of coercion.   As the testimony wrapped, the judge moved into a sidebar discussing naming a “very successful rapper” tied to a trip Jane mentioned, and shortly thereafter, the jury was dismissed for a lunch break.to contact me:[email protected]:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ trial continues as Kanye West shows up at court | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:[email protected]:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe, represented by Tony Buzbee, accuses Sean "Diddy" Combs of sexual assault, coercion, and control from 2020 through 2024. Doe alleges she was drugged during visits to Combs’ homes, subjected to abuse, and monitored by his associates. The complaint describes an instance where Doe became pregnant after an assault and was pressured to terminate the pregnancy. Seeking damages for emotional and physical harm, Doe’s case forms part of broader legal action involving over 120 accusers represented by Buzbee against Combs for similar misconduct.to contact me:[email protected]:combs-biggie-video-party-complaint.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In response to the Court's request during the November 22, 2024, hearing, defendant Sean Combs has submitted a letter addressing the permissible scope of his communications under the Court's order and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23.1. Combs' legal team outlines the types of interactions he is allowed to engage in, ensuring compliance with the Court's directives while upholding his First and Sixth Amendment rights. The letter emphasizes the importance of balancing the need to prevent potential jury tampering or undue influence with Combs' constitutional rights to free speech and a fair trial.The submission seeks to clarify the boundaries of acceptable communications, proposing guidelines that would allow Combs to maintain necessary personal and professional interactions without violating legal restrictions. By providing this detailed briefing, Combs' attorneys aim to assist the Court in establishing clear parameters that protect the integrity of the judicial process while respecting the defendant's fundamental rights.United States District Judge Arun Subramanian has denied Sean Combs's renewed motion for bail following a November 22, 2024, hearing. Combs originally filed the motion on November 8, 2024, with both parties providing supplemental letters on November 25 and 26, 2024, to support their arguments. The court evaluated the presented evidence and legal arguments during the proceedings and determined that the conditions of bail sought by Combs were not appropriate under the circumstances.The decision to deny bail highlights the court's assessment that Combs's release might pose legal or procedural risks that outweigh any arguments for his freedom pending further proceedings. Details of the ruling emphasize the seriousness of the case against him, with Judge Subramanian concluding that Combs must remain in custody as the legal process continues.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.92.0_1.pdfgov.uscourts.nysd.628425.85.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Photographer Selma Fonseca, who attended numerous parties hosted by Sean "Diddy" Combs, recently opened up about the shocking and controversial experiences at these events. Fonseca revealed that Diddy often served food and drinks laced with drugs at his notorious gatherings, which were highly sexualized and featured scantily clad women, wild behavior, and a party atmosphere that intensified after dark. She described the events as "opulent" but also "shocking," with many guests engaging in explicit activities. Fonseca even mentioned personally receiving a drink from Diddy that made her feel unusually euphoric, which she suspected was drugged.The photographer emphasized that while these parties were filled with celebrities and luxury, they often veered into unsettling territory, with rumors of drug use and manipulation circulating throughout the night. In this episode, we hear what she had to say.(commercial at 10:16)to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy party photog who reportedly broke 1999 Jennifer Lopez romance says nude bashes included warning for kids | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prosecutors in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs have expressed concerns about revealing the identities of anonymous accusers, citing serious issues of witness safety and potential obstruction. They argue that early disclosure of these identities could expose witnesses to intimidation or harm, especially given Combs' influence and the nature of the allegations. This stance is in response to Combs' defense team's request for the accusers' names to prepare for trial, which prosecutors contend is premature and could jeopardize the integrity of the proceedings.Additionally, prosecutors emphasize that disclosing accusers' identities at this stage is tantamount to providing an early witness list, which is not customary in criminal cases. They maintain that protecting the anonymity of the accusers is crucial to prevent any potential interference with the judicial process and to ensure that witnesses can testify without fear of retaliation. This approach aims to balance the defendant's right to a fair trial with the necessity of safeguarding the accusers and upholding the integrity of the legal process.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:[email protected]:Diddy investigators raise ‘serious concerns’ for victims’ safety | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Singer Good Fridae has made serious allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs regarding an event she attended at the age of 16. Fridae claimed she met Diddy at a Toronto autograph signing in 1999, where he invited her and a friend to one of his infamous "freak off" parties. Despite informing Diddy that they were underage, Diddy allegedly dismissed the concern, stating that he didn’t check IDs at his parties. At the hotel event, Fridae recalled seeing heavy drug use, including ecstasy and cocaine, and sexual activities involving dancers and hired individuals. Although she was not involved, the scene deeply disturbed her, especially when she observed a locked, guarded room that appeared to be hosting even more explicit activities. The experience left her feeling vulnerable and uneasy, as she had previously sensed negative energy from Diddy during their initial encounter​.As the night progressed, Fridae was told that there were two separate parties, with the second, more exclusive gathering, being referred to as the "freak off." A security guard allegedly prevented her from leaving the party until Diddy invited her to this second room. Frightened, Fridae managed to escape by pretending her phone was still working, threatening to call her father. She claims Diddy chased after her angrily as she fled down the hallway. These allegations have surfaced amidst a wave of accusations against Diddy, who is currently facing multiple charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking. Fridae expressed relief over Diddy's arrest, stating that many people had anticipated this outcome due to his behavior at such events.Let's dive in and see what she had to say!(commercial at 10:40)to contact me:[email protected]:Inside Diddy's 'freak-off' parties with NBA players, ‘terrified’ teen girls, piles of cocaine, and public sex | The SunBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a recent interview, aspiring singer-songwriter Tanea Wallace recounted her experience at a 2018 party hosted by Sean "Diddy" Combs, which she described as unsettling and traumatic. She claimed that upon arrival, guests were required to surrender their phones, and the atmosphere was marked by loud music and individuals engaging in various explicit activities. Wallace alleged that certain attendees, including herself, were invited to a more exclusive area of the party, where she observed behavior that left her feeling uncomfortable and concerned for her safety.Wallace further described seeing individuals she referred to as "little people" dressed provocatively, which led her to question the appropriateness of their presence at the event. She implied that some attendees might have been minors, though she refrained from making explicit accusations. These revelations have surfaced amid ongoing legal challenges faced by Combs, including allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse.to contact me:[email protected]:Woman claims she saw minors dressed as 'Harajuku Barbies' at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' Freak Off partyBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.