Should pet abduction be a specific offence?

What happens when animals are treated as "machines" to be manipulated by law and technology? We welcome back Peter Stevenson OBE, the Chief Policy Advisor at Compassion in World Farming (CiWF) and a driving force behind major EU welfare bans. In this profound and challenging discussion, Peter dissects the hidden crisis of modern animal agriculture: the relentless pursuit of hyper-productivity through genetic selection and its alarming successor, precision breeding. Peter reveals how legal gaps, like the lack of a species-specific directive for dairy cows, have allowed suffering to escalate, and he outlines the legislative battle to enforce basic duties, such as the right of animals to "exhibit normal behaviour patterns." This is a must-listen for anyone interested in the future of animal law, policy enforcement, and the ethical conflict between technological innovation and sentience. Key Topics & Timestamps 02:30 | CiWF's Core Mission: The triple disaster of factory farming: cruelty, environmental ruin, and human health problems (type 2 diabetes, heart disease).  03:49 | The Labelling Lie: Why consumers are intentionally kept in the dark about farming methods for meat and milk (especially dairy).  06:09 | The Hidden Crisis of Selective Breeding: Why hyper-productivity is often ignored, and the specific suffering of broiler chickens and their painful leg disorders.  07:38 | The Sow & Piglet Catastrophe: Sows bred for 15-20 piglets per litter, leading to high piglet mortality, starvation, and the cruel practice of routine teeth clipping.  10:35 | The Dairy Cow Exhaustion: How breeding for 10,000+ litres of milk creates "broken" cows, leading to exhaustion, lameness, and metabolic disorders.  13:30 | The Legislative Void: The lack of species-specific law for dairy cows and how broad EU/UK provisions on "unnecessary suffering" are failing.  15:58 | The Untapped Legal Weapon: Using the UK Animal Welfare Act, Section 9 (duty to exhibit "normal behaviour patterns") to challenge intensive practices, citing the example of ducks and their need for water.  21:06 | Metrics for Welfare: The argument for mandatory, measurable metrics (like caps on lameness rates or growth rates) to make general welfare law enforceable.  24:23 | The Threat of Gene Editing: How the new Precision Breeding Act risks entrenching factory farming and repeating the mistakes of past genetic technologies.  26:09 | The Technological Fix Trap: The danger of using gene editing to create "disease resistance" when diseases are caused by crowded, stressful conditions.  28:59 | Sentience vs. Production: The ethical conflict when governments champion technological innovation, ignoring the EU Treaty Article 13 duty to pay full regard to animal sentience.  35:10 | The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Peter's argument that Animal Welfare must become the fourth essential pillar alongside Environmental, Social, and Economic sustainability.  38:20 | Actionable Advice: Peter's practical recommendation for individual consumers. Quotable Moments "Factory farming is not just cruel to animals, but that it is a disaster from the point of view of food security and the environment." (02:30) "Governments are very determined to make sure that consumers are not aware of how the animals have been kept. It's probably at its worst with milk." (04:14) "We've actually bred sows that can produce more piglets than they have teats to feed them with. And a number of problems then arise from that." (07:38) "Today's dairy cows... the biggest problem for these cows is just exhaustion... a cow that is broken in body and possibly also in spirit." (11:28) "In general, what we've said is that we're opposed to it [gene editing] unless it can really be shown that... it's not in effect going to entrench factory farming." (26:09) "At the moment it's just been treated as some sort of rather nice window dressing and the EU... in formulating and implementing its agriculture policies at times pays no attention at all to the welfare requirements of animals." (28:59) Resources & Links Peter Stevenson's Contact: [email protected] (for specific legal or dairy scheme questions) Compassion in World Farming Website: ciwf.org.uk CiWF Selective Breeding Report: (Referenced at 37:20) Look for the latest report on the problems involved with selective breeding on the CiWF website. Upcoming UK Report: Look out for the report from the UK Animal Welfare Committee on the problem of selective breeding (Referenced at 37:20). #AnimalWelfareMustLead #AnimalLaw #PeterStevenson #CiWF #FactoryFarming #PrecisionBreeding #GeneticSelection #DairyWelfare #FourthPillar #AnimalSentience #LegalAdvocacy  

In this inspiring episode, host Alison Burns sits down with Wayne Hsiung, a prominent attorney, co-founder of Direct Action Everywhere (DxE), and the force behind his new initiative, The Simple Heart. Wayne shares his remarkable journey from a top academic and lawyer to a leading animal rights activist. He explains his philosophy that law is not a fixed concept but a dynamic force shaped by social movements. This conversation explores the pivotal moments that led him to embrace direct action, including a powerful childhood experience with his family's dog and a jarring trip to China. Wayne delves into his strategy of using the courtroom as a stage for public opinion, likening his approach to historical figures like Susan B. Anthony and Martin Luther King Jr.. He also discusses the nuances of legal victories and losses, the significance of his California appeal, and the contrasting approaches of the animal rights movements in the US and the UK. Wayne's insights offer a powerful and hopeful vision for the future of animal law and personhood.       Timestamps 00:00 - 02:22 — Introduction of Wayne Hsiung and his background. 02:22 - 05:18 — The professional background: How a lawyer sees the law as a social construct. 05:18 - 09:58 — The personal reason: A childhood experience with bullying and a pivotal moment with a dog in China. 09:58 - 18:48 — The pivotal moments: From a failing vegan outreach to entering a slaughterhouse. 18:48 - 25:11 — Using the courtroom as a platform: The strategy of combining legal challenges with public opinion. 25:11 - 28:03 — The effectiveness of direct action and the attention-grabbing nature of courtroom drama. 28:03 - 34:18 — Legal setbacks as a tool for progress: The strategy behind the California appeal and the concept of credibility-enhancing displays. 34:18 - 38:46 — The significance of the Nonhuman Rights Project and the legal argument for animal personhood. 38:46 - 41:57 — The concept of the "reasonable person" and the opportunity presented by outdated laws. 41:57 - 45:17 — International activism: Differences between the animal rights movements in the US and the UK. 45:17 - 47:45 — The future of the movement: The importance of institutional scaffolding and learning from past mistakes. 47:45 - 52:22 — A hopeful message for the future of the animal rights movement and actionable advice for listeners.     Topics Covered The Law as a Social Construct: Wayne's legal background and the "mythology" that law is a fixed thing. He argues that social movements, not just legislation or judicial decisions, are the primary drivers of legal change. Personal Motivation: A childhood marked by bullying and racism shaped his worldview. A transformative trip to China, where he saw a dog in a restaurant, made him realize that if a rule is wrong, it must be broken. The Power of Direct Action: Wayne recounts how his early vegan outreach efforts were ineffective. A pivotal experience of walking into a slaughterhouse showed him that these boundaries were not as "impenetrable" as he once believed. Courtroom Strategy: The concept of using the courtroom as a platform for public opinion, drawing parallels with historic figures like Susan B. Anthony and her trial. Losing to Win: Wayne argues that legal losses can be more valuable than victories. He introduces the concepts of credibility-enhancing displays and the backlash effect, explaining how his incarceration and felony conviction in California have generated enormous public support. Animal Personhood: The significance of the Nonhuman Rights Project's amicus curiae brief in his appeal. Wayne challenges the legal idea that animals are "something" rather than "someone," and draws a parallel to the Dred Scott case and the fight for personhood for people of color. International Differences: The contrast between the US movement's focus on legal defense and the UK movement's emphasis on direct action. Wayne highlights the "dishonesty" element in UK theft law as a huge opportunity for activists and lawyers. Hope for the Future: Wayne expresses his confidence that institutionalized animal exploitation will be abolished within his lifetime. He shares his advice for activists: "find your voice, find some friends and fight like hell".     Key Quotes "The primary mechanism to which it's changed has been social movements, political movements." "If this is the rule, this rule must be broken." "There's something about the battle in the courtroom that really draws an enormous amount of attention." "I suspect...that losing in court is more valuable than winning." "If a corporation can be a person, so can an animal." "This is one area where the law just is not in alignment with the basic common sense intuitions that most people have." "I would be stunned if by the end of my lifetime, factory farming hadn't been completely abolished."     #WayneHsiung #AnimalLaw #AnimalRights #DirectAction #TheSimpleHeart #DXE #AnimalAdvocacy #LegalStrategy #SocialJustice #AnimalPersonhood #OpenRescue #LawForAnimals #AnimalCruelty

In this episode of Talking Animal Law, we're joined by Dr. Angus Nurse, Professor of Law and Environmental Justice at Anglia Ruskin University and a core member of A-Law's Wildlife Law Working Group. Dr. Nurse takes us on a journey through his career, from his early days as an investigator to becoming a leading voice in green criminology. We dive into his groundbreaking research, including the "System Set to Fail" report and his book, Cleaning Up Greenwash, to uncover why our current legal systems often fall short in protecting animals and the environment. This episode explores the crucial links between animal welfare and the criminal justice system, offering a new perspective on how we can create a more just world for animals. Timestamps & Topics 0:08 - 1:19 — Introduction: Introducing Dr. Angus Nurse, his work at Anglia Ruskin University, and his role with the UK Centre for Animal Law (A-Law). 1:20 - 4:24 — Investigative Roots: Dr. Nurse reflects on his career as an investigator for the Local Government Ombudsman and how it shaped his interest in law and justice. He discusses the recurring nature of problems and the disconnect between what the law says and how it is applied. 4:25 - 6:02 — Policy and Animals: The conversation touches on how new legislation, such as the planning and infrastructure bill, can have negative consequences for wildlife and that human benefit often takes priority over animal welfare. 6:03 - 7:27 — Dogs and Human Responsibility: Dr. Nurse addresses the complexities of responsible dog ownership and dangerous dogs, arguing that many dog attacks are preventable and are rooted in human-centered issues. 7:28 - 10:50 — Beyond Punishment: Dr. Nurse delves into the "investigative mind" and the limitations of a justice system focused solely on punishment, arguing that a retributive approach fails to achieve justice for animal victims. 10:51 - 12:46 — Corporate Crime: Discussion of corporate environmental crime and why traditional penalties like fines are often ineffective against major corporations. 12:47 - 18:37 — The "System Set to Fail" Report: Dr. Nurse explains why animal victims don't receive the same resources as human victims, highlighting systemic issues like resource allocation, rural policing, and lack of training for courts and lawyers. 18:38 - 22:34 — Transforming Justice for Animals: Dr. Nurse reflects on his changing perspective, from believing the system "broadly works" to becoming less confident in its effectiveness and the need for radical rethinking. He discusses how the law can be better constructed to consider the "victimization of the animal". 22:35 - 26:27 — Unpacking "Greenwash": An explanation of why corporate environmental crime is an "inevitable consequence of capitalism" and how companies use greenwashing to hide harmful practices. 26:28 - 30:22 — Public Awareness and Newsworthiness: The conversation explores why some animal and environmental issues, such as cat torture or elephant ivory, receive media attention, while others, like low-level habitat destruction, go unnoticed. 30:23 - 37:44 — Research Methods & Obstacles: Dr. Nurse details the empirical methods used in his research, including questionnaires and interviews, to understand the barriers to effective wildlife crime prosecution. 37:45 - 42:20 — Notifiable Offenses: He explains the crucial need to make wildlife crimes "notifiable offenses," which would require police to record them and help address the problem of patchy data collection. 42:21 - 45:39 — Elevating Animal Crimes: Dr. Nurse shares his belief that making crimes notifiable elevates their status and signals that they are a policing priority. He gives an example of the challenge of obtaining data on dog attacks due to inconsistent recording. 45:40 - 48:45 — Recommended Resources & Actionable Advice: Dr. Nurse recommends books like Stephen Wise's Rattling the Cage and Joan Schaffner's Introduction to Animals and the Law. His advice to listeners: "Don't give up," as incremental change takes time. 48:46 - 49:22 — Outro & Contact Information: Dr. Nurse shares where listeners can find his work and connect with him online. Learn more about the UK Centre for Animal Law at https://www.alaw.org.uk/   #TalkingAnimalLaw #DrAngusNurse #AnimalLaw #GreenCriminology #WildlifeCrime #EnvironmentalJustice #AnimalWelfare #LegalReform #Podcast #LawAndJustice #AnimalRights #IFAW #ALaw #JusticeForAnimals

Ankita Shanker, founder of WMILAR kindly talks to us about her vision for the World's 1st Global Moot Competition & Moot Training Courses on Animal Rights Law. As the website explains, 'The WMILAR combines traditional aspects of International Law (including but not limited to International Human Rights Law and International Environmental Law) with contemporary issues of animal rights. It does so through a mooting competition aimed at law students, and a 2-pronged training course aimed at law students and law teachers.'  

What is on the agenda for animal law and policy in Scotland? Guest host, Alison Burns talks to Kirsty Jenkins, Policy Officer at OneKind about their campaign to 'Stand up for pigs' centred around the use of farrowing crates, the National Good Food Nation Plan for Scotland and it's potential to drive up animal welfare standards and much more. 

In this episode, we speak to Stefan Blakiston Moore and Madison Rogers from the national charity, Cats Protection about their work advocating for cats in law and policy, alongside their education and welfare programmes. Drawing upon the 'Cats and Their Stats 2023' report, published by the charity, we learn about the current welfare landscape for cats and the needs and challenges faced by their keepers. We cover the rise of selective breeding and unethical importation of cats into the UK, the trend in pedigree cat ownership, new mandatory microchipping of cats, coming into force in June 2024, the renters market and much more.

In this episode we speak to Claire Bass, Senior Director of Campaigns and Public Affairs at Humane Society International-UK, who has been working in the animal protection movement for two decades, with recent significant involvement in the successful passage of the Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act. Claire outlines her New Year's wishlist for animals in 2024, from ending the cage age for farmed animals to wildlife crime and more. 

In this episode we welcome guests, Dr Roshni Ladny and Erin Leach to explore research about the potential impact upon children of witnessing violence towards animals. We discuss this research with our guests in the context of General Comment 26 published by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child's (CRC), which implicitly recognises (as part of a broader statement about the impact upon children of the climate crisis, loss of biodiversity and exposure to pollution) the negative impact that witnessing violence inflicted on animals can have on children and conversely the positive benefits for children of interacting with animals as part of the natural world. 

This extended episode is co-hosted with Tamara Bedic, President of the National Lawyers Guild NYC (2022) and Chair of the NLGNYC Animal Rights Committee, and features three prominent guests talking about veganism and how it engages fundamental human rights across the UK, Germany and Italy. We hear from Dr. Jeanette Rowley and Dr. Carlo Prisco, co-editors of Law and Vegansism: International Perspectives on the Human Right to Freedom of Conscience (2022) and Ralf Muller-Amenitsch.  Dr. Jeanette Rowley holds a PhD in veganism and human rights and has published widely and presenting globally on the subject of legal protection for vegans. Dr. Carlo Prisco is a lawyer and PhD in Philosophy of Law and Ralf Müller-Amenitsch is a German lawyer specialising in labour, social and family law. 

In this episode we discuss the capture and slaughter of fish in commercial fisheries with John Garratt,  co-author of a paper with Dr Steven McCulloch 'Wild Fish Welfare in UK Commercial Sea Fisheries: Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Views'. This is a deep dive into fish welfare during the capture and killing processes, exploring opportunities for law reform and how measures to protect fish welfare can support other objectives.