Did Diddy Attempt To Pay Kalenna Harper Hush Money?

Ghislaine Maxwell and her legal team are at it again!They sent another letter to Judge Nathan whining about her living Conditions and basically recycling old complaints.(commercial at 10:31)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2021/02/16/ghislaine-maxwell-losing-hair-abused-by-guard-behind-bars-lawyer/amp/

In this episode we dive right back into the guilty verdict for Ghislaine Maxwell and continue the discussion on the legacy media and their use of the word socialite to describe the convicted human trafficker.(Commercial at 13:20)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jan/02/lets-call-ghislaine-maxwell-what-she-is-a-heartless-sex-offender-not-a-fallen-socialite

In this filing, the government submits its proposed jury instructions, also known as “requests to charge,” ahead of Sean Combs’ upcoming trial. These instructions lay out how the jury should interpret the law as it applies to the charges in the Third Superseding Indictment, including conspiracy, racketeering (RICO), drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and related offenses. The government requests standard instructions on presumption of innocence, burden of proof, credibility of witnesses (including cooperating witnesses and law enforcement), and the meaning of reasonable doubt. Critically, it also asks the court to include specific legal definitions tied to each alleged crime—for example, the elements of a RICO enterprise and the requirements for proving participation in a drug distribution conspiracy.Furthermore, the government includes instructions regarding the consideration of co-conspirator statements, evidence of prior bad acts, and accomplice testimony, reflecting the sensitive and complex nature of the allegations against Combs. The proposed charges emphasize that the jury must evaluate the case based solely on the evidence presented, without speculation or bias, and that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. These instructions, if accepted by the judge, will guide the jury through the legal standards necessary to determine whether Combs is guilty on any or all of the multiple felony counts he faces. The submission underscores the government's intent to secure clear, legally sound guidance for the jury in what is expected to be a high-profile and multifaceted trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.275.0.pdf

In this filing, the government submits its proposed jury instructions, also known as “requests to charge,” ahead of Sean Combs’ upcoming trial. These instructions lay out how the jury should interpret the law as it applies to the charges in the Third Superseding Indictment, including conspiracy, racketeering (RICO), drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and related offenses. The government requests standard instructions on presumption of innocence, burden of proof, credibility of witnesses (including cooperating witnesses and law enforcement), and the meaning of reasonable doubt. Critically, it also asks the court to include specific legal definitions tied to each alleged crime—for example, the elements of a RICO enterprise and the requirements for proving participation in a drug distribution conspiracy.Furthermore, the government includes instructions regarding the consideration of co-conspirator statements, evidence of prior bad acts, and accomplice testimony, reflecting the sensitive and complex nature of the allegations against Combs. The proposed charges emphasize that the jury must evaluate the case based solely on the evidence presented, without speculation or bias, and that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. These instructions, if accepted by the judge, will guide the jury through the legal standards necessary to determine whether Combs is guilty on any or all of the multiple felony counts he faces. The submission underscores the government's intent to secure clear, legally sound guidance for the jury in what is expected to be a high-profile and multifaceted trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.275.0.pdf

In this filing, the government submits its proposed jury instructions, also known as “requests to charge,” ahead of Sean Combs’ upcoming trial. These instructions lay out how the jury should interpret the law as it applies to the charges in the Third Superseding Indictment, including conspiracy, racketeering (RICO), drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and related offenses. The government requests standard instructions on presumption of innocence, burden of proof, credibility of witnesses (including cooperating witnesses and law enforcement), and the meaning of reasonable doubt. Critically, it also asks the court to include specific legal definitions tied to each alleged crime—for example, the elements of a RICO enterprise and the requirements for proving participation in a drug distribution conspiracy.Furthermore, the government includes instructions regarding the consideration of co-conspirator statements, evidence of prior bad acts, and accomplice testimony, reflecting the sensitive and complex nature of the allegations against Combs. The proposed charges emphasize that the jury must evaluate the case based solely on the evidence presented, without speculation or bias, and that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. These instructions, if accepted by the judge, will guide the jury through the legal standards necessary to determine whether Combs is guilty on any or all of the multiple felony counts he faces. The submission underscores the government's intent to secure clear, legally sound guidance for the jury in what is expected to be a high-profile and multifaceted trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.275.0.pdf

In this filing, the government submits its proposed jury instructions, also known as “requests to charge,” ahead of Sean Combs’ upcoming trial. These instructions lay out how the jury should interpret the law as it applies to the charges in the Third Superseding Indictment, including conspiracy, racketeering (RICO), drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and related offenses. The government requests standard instructions on presumption of innocence, burden of proof, credibility of witnesses (including cooperating witnesses and law enforcement), and the meaning of reasonable doubt. Critically, it also asks the court to include specific legal definitions tied to each alleged crime—for example, the elements of a RICO enterprise and the requirements for proving participation in a drug distribution conspiracy.Furthermore, the government includes instructions regarding the consideration of co-conspirator statements, evidence of prior bad acts, and accomplice testimony, reflecting the sensitive and complex nature of the allegations against Combs. The proposed charges emphasize that the jury must evaluate the case based solely on the evidence presented, without speculation or bias, and that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. These instructions, if accepted by the judge, will guide the jury through the legal standards necessary to determine whether Combs is guilty on any or all of the multiple felony counts he faces. The submission underscores the government's intent to secure clear, legally sound guidance for the jury in what is expected to be a high-profile and multifaceted trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.275.0.pdf

In a motion filed on April 4, 2025, the U.S. government asked the court to implement protective measures for three key victim-witnesses expected to testify in the criminal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. The government argued that Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4 should be permitted to testify under pseudonyms to safeguard their privacy, dignity, and mental well-being. Unlike Victim-1—confirmed to be Cassie Ventura—who has agreed to testify using her full name, the other three requested anonymity due to concerns about harassment, stigma, and professional fallout. Prosecutors further requested that the defense be barred from revealing these individuals' personal details in open court and that any court exhibits containing their names be sealed, with redacted versions available to the public.The motion cited precedent from similar federal cases, including those involving sex trafficking and abuse, where anonymity was granted to protect victims from retraumatization and undue exposure. The government emphasized that these requests were narrowly tailored to balance the victims’ privacy rights with the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights. The motion was brought under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771), which ensures victims are treated with fairness and respect, and it stressed that denying these protections could discourage victim cooperation or inhibit truthful testimony. If granted, the court’s decision would mark a significant procedural step in shaping how key testimony will be handled in Diddy’s high-profile federal trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.211.0_2.pdf

The superseding indictment expands the timeline of Combs' alleged criminal activities, now spanning from 2004 to 2024, and introduces additional charges. Combs is accused of operating a criminal enterprise involving racketeering, sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. The indictment details that Combs allegedly coerced multiple women, identified as Victim-1, Victim-2, and Victim-3, into engaging in commercial sex acts through force, fraud, and coercion. It also describes incidents where Combs purportedly used violence and intimidation to control his victims, including an instance in March 2016 where he allegedly assaulted a woman in a Los Angeles hotel, an event reportedly captured on video.Furthermore, the indictment alleges that Combs utilized his business entities, such as Bad Boy Entertainment, to facilitate and conceal these illicit activities. He is accused of orchestrating events termed "freak offs," involving orchestrated sexual performances with male sex workers, and transporting individuals across state lines for prostitution. The indictment also includes charges related to Combs allegedly showing a firearm to a female victim during a kidnapping and dangling a woman over an apartment balcony. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges and remains in custody awaiting trial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.209.0_3.pdf

Ghislaine Maxwell and her legal team have tried many strategies thus far in the case and just about all of them have failed.In their latest gambit to prove their clients innocence, they have decided to resort to the tried and true tactic of victim shaming.I have a sneaking suspicion this strategy is doomed to fail.Join me as I dive in!(Commercial at 15:39)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://abcnews.go.com/US/fresh-off-bail-defeat-ghislaine-maxwell-claims-alleged/story?id=74996453

In this look back episode, we first take a look at the reports that Dershowitz tried to get Trump to pardon Maxwell in the waning days of his presidency and we also take another look at the possibility of the Maxwell verdict being overturned and the trial being declared a mistrial.(Commercial at 19:28)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://nypost.com/2022/01/10/alan-dershowitz-lobbied-trump-to-pardon-ghislaine-maxwell-report/https://www.reuters.com/world/us/no-guarantee-new-maxwell-trial-after-jurors-revelations-experts-say-2022-01-07/