The Virtue of Strictness (Severitas) a Part of Justice - VirTrue Episode 56
When was the last time you heard someone described as strict and thought, “Now there’s a virtuous person”?Probably not recently.When we hear the word strict, we imagine someone angry, inflexible, or impossible to please.Maybe you picture a Catholic nun standing at the front of a classroom in her religious habit, holding a wooden ruler, ready to strike the hand of any student who steps out of line.Or perhaps you imagine a parent who demands perfect obedience and punishes every mistake.Our culture has developed a deep suspicion of strictness.We want children to feel safe. We want people to feel accepted. We want everyone to feel comfortable.These are good things.But what happens when our desire to avoid discomfort prevents us from correcting wrongdoing?What happens when parents refuse to enforce their own rules, teachers avoid confronting disruptive students, or Church leaders overlook serious misconduct?And what happens when someone becomes so determined to enforce discipline that punishment exceeds what justice requires?There is a virtue between these two errors.A virtue that gives us the firmness to administer deserved consequences, while requiring us to remain governed by reason, justice, and charity.And that’s why Strictness matters.The Social Catholic is a listener-supported podcast. To receive new posts and support our work, become a paid subscriber today!IntroWelcome to VirTrue where we work together to turn away from vice and to adopt the virtuous life we’re all called to. I’m your host Jethro Higgins, and today on VirTrue we’re going to be talking about Strictness.Virtue DescriptionStrictness comes from the Latin Severitas, often translated as severity.We usually associate severity with harshness, but St. Thomas Aquinas identifies it as a virtue.Strictness is the virtue of firmly administering deserved consequences according to reason and justice, for the correction of wrongdoing and the protection of the common good.Strictness requires firmness. When someone under our authority does wrong, we must be willing to impose a deserved consequence, even when doing so creates discomfort or conflict.But consequences must also be proportionate. An accidental mistake does not deserve the same response as deliberate wrongdoing. A first offense may require a different consequence from repeated disobedience.Strictness also serves justice. When wrongdoing goes uncorrected, the consequences often extend beyond the offender.Consider a classroom where one student repeatedly disrupts lessons. If the teacher refuses to intervene, the other students lose opportunities to learn. The disruptive student also loses an opportunity to develop self-control.By enforcing reasonable consequences, the teacher serves the good of the entire classroom.In the Summa Theologiae, II-II, Question 157, Article 2, Aquinas asks whether severity is a virtue.He explains that severity requires firmness in imposing punishment when right reason demands it.But he also identifies clemency as a virtue. Clemency permits punishment to be reduced when reason justifies mercy.Both can be virtuous because both follow reason.Sometimes justice requires a consequence. Sometimes circumstances justify reducing it.Aquinas also distinguishes severity from anger. Meekness governs anger, while severity concerns the administration of punishment.A father can calmly discipline his child. A teacher can patiently enforce classroom rules. A bishop can correct a priest without acting out of personal resentment.Strictness requires a firm commitment to justice.The medieval work De fructibus carnis et spiritus, historically attributed to Hugh of St. Victor and now generally attributed to Conrad of Hirsau, places Severitas among the virtues associated with Justice.This helps explain why Strictness belongs in our Justice season.Justice requires more than recognizing right and wrong. It also requires acting upon that knowledge.We may know that correction is necessary yet hesitate because it is uncomfortable.Strictness gives practical force to our commitment to justice.St. Bernard of Clairvaux frequently addressed obedience, humility, and discipline in his teachings on monastic life.A monastery depends upon its members faithfully fulfilling their obligations. When someone neglects those obligations, the entire community can suffer.Bernard’s broader teaching on charity and spiritual formation reminds us that discipline must serve the good of the person being corrected.The purpose of correction is to encourage repentance, restore order, and help others grow in virtue.When discipline becomes an expression of pride or anger, it loses that purpose.Vice of Deficiency — Laxity (Laxitas)Laxity is the failure to administer deserved consequences because of weakness, discomfort, fear of conflict, or misplaced leniency.Imagine a father who tells his children that they must finish their chores before playing.They ignore him. He repeats the instruction several times. Eventually, he gives up and completes the chores himself.The children learn that persistence in disobedience can make their responsibilities disappear.The father has avoided an argument, but he has also neglected an opportunity to teach responsibility.We see the same problem in professional life.A manager knows that an employee repeatedly fails to complete important work. Other employees must compensate, deadlines are missed, and morale suffers.But the manager avoids addressing the problem because he dislikes confrontation.His inaction becomes an injustice toward the rest of the team.We must distinguish laxity from mercy.A teenager who breaks a serious household rule, admits his fault, and sincerely repents may reasonably receive a reduced consequence. That can be clemency.But continually eliminating consequences for someone who refuses to accept responsibility can encourage further wrongdoing.The distinction depends upon what reason and justice require.Hebrews 12:11 reminds us that discipline can be painful in the moment but can produce righteousness in those trained by it.Correction is sometimes an expression of genuine love.When we refuse to correct someone, we should ask ourselves:Are we acting for that person’s good, or are we protecting ourselves from an uncomfortable conversation?Laxity often disguises itself as kindness.Vice of Excess — Harshness (Asperitas)Harshness is the administration of unnecessarily severe or disproportionate consequences beyond what reason and justice require.Imagine a child who accidentally spills a glass of milk.Perhaps the child was careless and needs correction.But if his father begins shouting, humiliates him before his siblings, and imposes an excessive punishment, the response has become unjust.The father’s authority does not make the punishment reasonable.Harshness often arises when anger begins to govern our decisions.We may want someone to suffer because we feel offended or disrespected.But punishment should correct wrongdoing and restore justice, rather than satisfy our emotions.Sometimes the most prudent response is to wait until we can judge the situation calmly.A father who tells his child, “We will discuss the consequences after I have had time to think,” may be exercising greater self-control than one who immediately lashes out.Harshness can appear effective.A harsh teacher may have a quiet classroom. A harsh parent may have obedient children. A harsh manager may have employees who never openly challenge him.But people may comply because they fear humiliation rather than because they understand what is right.Excessive punishment can teach people to conceal mistakes, avoid responsibility, or deceive those in authority.The goal of discipline should be to help others recognize and choose the good.That requires proportion.We must distinguish accidents from deliberate wrongdoing, minor offenses from serious ones, and genuine repentance from continued defiance.Harshness loses these distinctions.My StoryStrictness never seemed … Get full access to The Social Catholic at socialcatholic.substack.com/subscribe