A Look Back: Ghislaine Maxwell And The 36 Moves While She Was On The Lam

The Wall Street journal has obtained a copy of the internal report that JP Morgan had worked up by a law firm as they investigated Jes Staley and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. This document was previously unavailable for public consumption, but as JP Morgan looks to strengthen it's position in it's throwdown with Jes Staley, the gloves are now coming off.In this episode, we take a dive into the internal memo and how the leadership staff at JP Morgan as a whole failed the Epstein survivors.(commercial at 16:12)to contact me:[email protected]:JPMorgan report found exec invited Epstein to meetings with foreign government officials | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Radaronline has been engaged in a legal dispute with the FBI for years now over secret FBI files on Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The government has contended that the files must stay secret because they might have to re-try Ghislaine Maxwell and if the files are released it will give her a head start on her defense.A Judge who is hearing the case has a different perspective though and has ruled that some of the documents must be turned over. (commercial at 7:02)to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein Files May Be Blocked for 'Possible' Ghislaine Maxwell Retrial (knewz.com)source:'FBI seeks to block release of secret Jeffrey Epstein files' | US News | Metro Newssource:FBI Can't Shield All Epstein Records From FOIA Request - Law360Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In previous court filings it was revealed that there is an active grand jury investigation still underway in the Epstein case and that the co-conspirators are directly in the crosshairs. With the Maxwell verdict now in, where does that leave the grand jury and their investigation?(Commercial at 11:01)To contact me:[email protected]:https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/prosecutors-reveal-secret-investigation-of-ghislaine-maxwell-other-epstein-co-conspirators-is-ongoing/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we take a look back at the strategy of Maxwell's legal team in the lead up to the trial...Ghislaine Maxwell and her legal team have been frantically at work searching for loopholes to help get their client off.Today we discuss 12 requests recently made by Maxwell and her team.(Commercial at 14:13)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9187959/Ghislaine-Maxwell-asks-judge-dismiss-charges-against.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Massachusetts Rule of Criminal Procedure 17 (Mass. R. Crim. P. 17) outlines the procedures for subpoenas in criminal cases within the Massachusetts court system. Here's a detailed summary of its key provisions:Authority and Purpose: Rule 17 derives its authority from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and is designed to facilitate the production of evidence and the summoning of witnesses in criminal proceedings.Issuance of Subpoenas: The rule allows for the issuance of subpoenas by the clerk of the court, a notary public, or any attorney authorized to practice law in Massachusetts. Subpoenas may be issued for the attendance of witnesses or the production of documents or other tangible evidence.Form and Content: Subpoenas must be issued in writing and must command the person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony, or to produce specified documents or tangible things, at a specified time and place.Service of Subpoenas: Subpoenas may be served by any person who is not a party to the case and who is at least 18 years old. Service may be made by delivering a copy of the subpoena to the person named in it, or by leaving a copy at their residence with a person of suitable age and discretion.Witness Fees and Mileage: Witnesses who comply with a subpoena are entitled to receive witness fees and mileage reimbursement as provided by law.Protection of Persons Subject to Subpoenas: Persons subject to subpoenas may seek protection from undue burden or harassment by filing a motion with the court. The court may quash or modify a subpoena if it is unreasonable or oppressive.Contempt for Failure to Obey Subpoena: Failure to obey a subpoena without reasonable excuse may result in a finding of contempt by the court. Contempt may be punished by fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions.Service of Subpoenas Outside the Commonwealth: The rule provides procedures for the service of subpoenas outside the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.Service of Subpoenas on Behalf of the Commonwealth: When the Commonwealth is the party seeking evidence or witnesses, subpoenas may be issued and served by any attorney authorized to represent the Commonwealth.Notice to Parties: The rule requires that notice of the issuance of a subpoena must be given to all parties in the case.Overall, Mass. R. Crim. P. 17 is designed to ensure the efficient and fair gathering of evidence and witness testimony in criminal cases, while also providing protections for individuals subject to subpoenas. It establishes clear procedures for the issuance, service, and enforcement of subpoenas within the Massachusetts court system.As we continue to get prepared for the Karen Read trial that kicks off April 29th, we are now taking a look at the Commonwealth's memorandum in opposition to defendants motion pursusant to rule 17 of criminal precedure directed to Brian Albert, Verizon and AT&T.(commercial at 7:40)to contact me:[email protected]:PDF.COMMONWEALTH - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

When a prosecutor seeks to limit the alibi of a suspect, it means they are attempting to challenge or restrict the evidence or testimony that supports the suspect's claim of innocence. An alibi is a defense strategy in which the accused asserts that they were somewhere else at the time the crime was committed, thus making it impossible for them to have committed the offense.Here's a breakdown of what it typically entails:Investigation of the Alibi: The prosecutor may investigate the alibi thoroughly to determine its validity. This may involve interviewing witnesses, examining physical evidence, reviewing surveillance footage, or obtaining records that could corroborate or refute the alibi.Challenging the Alibi: If the prosecutor believes the alibi is weak or fabricated, they may seek to challenge it during the trial. This could involve presenting contradictory evidence, questioning the credibility of alibi witnesses, or arguing that the suspect had the opportunity to commit the crime despite the alibi.Motion to Limit or Exclude Alibi Evidence: In some cases, the prosecutor may file a motion to limit or exclude certain aspects of the alibi evidence from being presented in court. This could be based on legal grounds such as relevance, reliability, or procedural rules. For example, if the alibi witness has a history of dishonesty or bias, the prosecutor may argue that their testimony should be excluded.Pretrial Hearing: The judge may hold a pretrial hearing to consider the prosecutor's motion to limit the alibi evidence. Both the defense and the prosecution would have the opportunity to present arguments and evidence supporting their positions.Ruling by the Judge: The judge will make a decision based on the arguments presented and applicable legal standards. If the judge grants the prosecutor's motion, certain aspects of the alibi evidence may be restricted or excluded from the trial. If the motion is denied, the defense will be allowed to present the alibi evidence to the jury.In this episode, we head back up to Idaho to check in on the Bryan Kohberger trial and the battle over his alibi that continues to rage inside of the courtroom.    (commercial at 8:41)to contact me:[email protected]:Attorneys in Idaho student homicides argue for pretrial wins | Idaho StatesmanBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On January 29, 2022, Boston police officer John O'Keefe was found dead outside a home in Canton, Massachusetts. He had been dropped off by his girlfriend, Karen A. Read, to attend a gathering hosted by another police officer, Brian Albert. O'Keefe was discovered hours later and transported to a local hospital where the cause of death was determined to be blunt force trauma and hypothermia.Following the incident, police arrested Read on February 1, alleging that she hit O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow. Subsequently, Read was indicted on charges of second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter, and leaving the scene of a collision. Read has denied hitting O'Keefe and claimed that she was framed by the police.In this episode, we recap what went down during day number two of the trial.   (commercial at 9:35)to contact me:[email protected]:Karen Read lawyers cross-examine Canton police officers on day 2 of testimony - masslive.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The FBI has had many issues when it comes to internal behavior and proecdure not being followed, but two of the most egregious examples of the FBI's malfeasance are the Epstein disaster and the fact that they knew that Larry Nassar was abusing young girls and women.   That last misstep is now costing the tax payers 137 million dollars and more is probably on the way.In this episode, we hear from the attorney representing over two dozen Epstein survivors in their lawsuit against the FBI.to contact me:[email protected]: DOJ settlement with Larry Nassar victims could benefit Epstein accusers | Fox News                                                                                           Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Massachusetts Rule of Criminal Procedure 17 (Mass. R. Crim. P. 17) outlines the procedures for subpoenas in criminal cases within the Massachusetts court system. Here's a detailed summary of its key provisions:Authority and Purpose: Rule 17 derives its authority from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and is designed to facilitate the production of evidence and the summoning of witnesses in criminal proceedings.Issuance of Subpoenas: The rule allows for the issuance of subpoenas by the clerk of the court, a notary public, or any attorney authorized to practice law in Massachusetts. Subpoenas may be issued for the attendance of witnesses or the production of documents or other tangible evidence.Form and Content: Subpoenas must be issued in writing and must command the person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony, or to produce specified documents or tangible things, at a specified time and place.Service of Subpoenas: Subpoenas may be served by any person who is not a party to the case and who is at least 18 years old. Service may be made by delivering a copy of the subpoena to the person named in it, or by leaving a copy at their residence with a person of suitable age and discretion.Witness Fees and Mileage: Witnesses who comply with a subpoena are entitled to receive witness fees and mileage reimbursement as provided by law.Protection of Persons Subject to Subpoenas: Persons subject to subpoenas may seek protection from undue burden or harassment by filing a motion with the court. The court may quash or modify a subpoena if it is unreasonable or oppressive.Contempt for Failure to Obey Subpoena: Failure to obey a subpoena without reasonable excuse may result in a finding of contempt by the court. Contempt may be punished by fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions.Service of Subpoenas Outside the Commonwealth: The rule provides procedures for the service of subpoenas outside the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.Service of Subpoenas on Behalf of the Commonwealth: When the Commonwealth is the party seeking evidence or witnesses, subpoenas may be issued and served by any attorney authorized to represent the Commonwealth.Notice to Parties: The rule requires that notice of the issuance of a subpoena must be given to all parties in the case.Overall, Mass. R. Crim. P. 17 is designed to ensure the efficient and fair gathering of evidence and witness testimony in criminal cases, while also providing protections for individuals subject to subpoenas. It establishes clear procedures for the issuance, service, and enforcement of subpoenas within the Massachusetts court system.As we continue to get prepared for the Karen Read trial that kicks off April 29th, we are now takign a look at the Commonwealth's memorandum in opposition to defendants motion pursusant to rule 17 of criminal precedure directed to Brian Albert, Verizon and AT&T.(commercial at 7:28)to contact me:[email protected]:PDF.COMMONWEALTH - Google DriveBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

We have discussed Ellen Pao and her tweets saying that everyone knew what Maxwell was up to previously and in this episode we take a look at the party that they were all attending together, and the people who threw that party. (commercial at 8:29)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.businessinsider.com/ghislaine-maxwell-attended-kleiner-perkins-vc-party-alleges-ellen-pao-2020-7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.