Concepts with Shawn Whatley

If you believe nations matter, then you're a nationalist. And if you believe a particular philosophy should inform civic life, then you are a particular kind of nationalist. Of course, you can be a strong nationalist or a weak one. You can hold strong or weak versions of your particular philosophy.  We need to spend some time thinking about this. I haven't sorted it out myself, and I'd love to hear what you think.  Thanks again for checking out this content! Shawn Full disclosure: I received a copy of this book in return for interviewing Professor Reno. Chapters and AI summary: Host Shawn Whatley interviews First Things editor Rusty Reno about the book Five Views on Christian Nationalism and why the debate hinges as much on nationalism as on “Christian.” Reno defines nationalism as prioritizing the nation’s common good and argues that shared loves, not utility calculations, bind a people, drawing on St. Augustine and examples like Canada’s identity and multicultural project. He critiques post–Cold War globalism through “empires of rights and commerce,” warning of human-rights inflation, managerial technocracy, and a soul-dissolving nihilism tied to confected diversity. They discuss America’s paradox of universal ideals fused to patriotism, the limits of proceduralism and pluralism amid metaphysical disputes about truth and human nature, and prudence in governance, including reactions to Douglas Wilson, Paul Miller, and Albert Mohler, and Joe Rigney. Reno closes by urging civic engagement without political idolatry. 00:00 Why Nations Matter 01:49 Meet Rusty Reno 03:00 Defining Christian Nationalism 06:35 Augustine on Peoplehood 08:56 Canada Multicultural Ideal 10:27 America Universal Mission 12:19 Empire of Rights Commerce 13:09 Human Rights Inflation 15:15 West Universalism Tension 25:38 Disenchantment and Diversity 29:51 Augustine Modern Moralism 32:46 Immanentizing the Eschaton 34:17 Between Two Cities 35:17 Why Nations Matter 38:02 Rights Commerce And Love 39:31 Elusive Real Things 41:10 Critiquing Calvinist Politics 43:53 Prudence Over Theocracy 54:47 Metaphysics Returns 58:45 Politics As Idolatry 01:00:40 Advice Beyond Politics 01:02:17 Post Interview Reflections

Is it time to abandon Canada's Human Rights Tribunals and Commissions? Colin May was appointed as Chief of the Alberta Human Rights Commission only to be dismissed shortly after appointment. Political activists dug up an academic book review as proof that May as Islamophobic and, thus, unfit to continue in his role. Cancellation hold less interest for media these days, but it has not gone away. It continues to erode and corrupt essential institutions. Do we have the resolve to stop it? Check out Colin's book: From Cancel Culture to Incarceration Culture: Prosecutorial Democracy and the Future of Cancellation Let me know what you think! Thanks again, Shawn   Chapters and AI summary: Host Shawn Whatley interviews lawyer and University of Calgary adjunct lecturer Colin May about May’s book, "From Cancel Culture to Incarceration Culture: Prosecutorial Democracy and the Future of Cancellation," beginning with May’s cancellation after his 2022 appointment as chief of the Alberta Human Rights Commission. May recounts how a 2009 academic book review was used in a politically driven campaign that led to his termination on September 15, 2022, severe career and financial losses, and major psychological and health impacts. They discuss the psychology and phases of cancellation, why apologies worsen outcomes, and the role of institutions in enabling or stopping cancellations. The conversation broadens to critique administrative tribunals, human rights bodies, and professional regulators, arguing for major reforms or abolition in favor of courts, and ends with concerns about Canada’s centralized, managerial governance and shrinking political discourse. 00:00 Cancellation Hits Home 01:29 Meet Colin May 02:51 How the Cancellation Began 06:13 Aftermath and Fallout 09:09 Denial and Justification 12:11 From Political Correctness 15:59 Psychology of Cancellation 19:36 Apologies and False Confessions 27:28 Institutions Decide Outcomes 31:17 Beyond Cancel Culture 33:49 Regulators as Enforcers 39:11 Regulators Tough Image 42:16 Fixing Professional Oversight 45:38 Natural Rights Debate 47:26 Human Rights As Narrative 53:26 Reforming Tribunal Process 57:06 Abolish Tribunals Option 01:00:25 How Tribunals Are Structured 01:05:17 Neufeld Case Warning 01:07:05 What Keeps Him Up 01:16:47 Host Closing Call

Conservatives need to put more emphasis on aesthetics. Sage MacGillivray has spent her career in art, first as a metal fabricator, now as a studio director. In many ways, craft is the embodiment of conservatism. Craft overlaps physical reality with experience, skill, the limits of reality, meaning, insight, intuition, transcendence, and much more. It demands humility in its quest for awe. I'd love to hear what you think of this! Thanks again,  Shawn The Human Hunger for Art that Creates Meaning and Connection   Chapters and AI summary:   Host Shawn interviews Sage MacGillivray, director of Robinson Studios in Vancouver and a longtime maker and metal fabricator, about her Without Diminishment essay arguing conservatives should use modern technology but not gamble on AI to shape culture. Drawing on Iain McGilchrist, she contrasts narrow, abstracting attention with holistic, contextual understanding and links left-hemisphere dominance to distorted models of reality. She describes how working with “real, raw materials” builds accountability and resists utopian abstractions, critiques expert-driven public art processes disconnected from the public, and discusses awe, ambiguity, and ritual in art. Using Harold Innis’ time- vs space-biased media, she defends localized, sensory, ephemeral art and warns digital media and AI break the “creative chain of custody,” risking alienation and weakened human capacities. 00:00 Reality Check Ideologies 01:15 Meet Sage MacGillivray 02:54 Craft Background And Art World 04:21 Why She Wrote The Essay 05:59 McGilchrist Brain Hemispheres 11:38 Left Brain Culture Drift 12:53 Art Beyond Conservative Themes 16:57 Awe Transcendence And Practice 23:44 Materials Fight Back Accountability 25:46 Abstraction Proxies And Public Art 31:03 Innis Media And Digital Ephemera 32:53 Space Bias and Distraction 34:27 Ephemeral Art and Time 36:33 Vivianite and Indigenous Meaning 39:50 Numbering Leaves Project 43:37 Milky Way Versus Projection 47:55 Tradition and Craft Lessons 54:52 Visualization and AI Limits 01:03:40 Technocracy and Safetyism Worries 01:06:59 Host Reflection on Aesthetics

Healthcare is the headline that keeps on giving in Canada. As Canadians, we have redefined ourselves as the people who get free care. We live with two medicares: one that we imagine will be there for us when we get sick, and another medicare that actually exists. Josh Dehaas has a deep understanding of the legal issues around healthcare legislation. His report of the legal challenges helps give us a sense of the greater challenge of medicare overall. Josh is part of a team that has planned an exciting conference in a few weeks. There's more about it in the summary below. Let me know what you think of this! Thanks again Shawn Healthcare Choice in Canada, ebook.   Chapters and AI summary:     Host Shawn Whatley interviews Josh Dehaas, interim litigation director at the Canadian Constitution Foundation, about major Canadian healthcare litigation and a cross-ideological “Prescriptions for Health Reform” conference (Nov 5–6, Toronto, Albany Club) co-hosted with SecondStreet.org and the Montreal Economic Institute, featuring keynotes Matt Gurney and André Picard and panels including Tony Clement, Christy Clark, and Stephen McNeil. They discuss the 2005 Chaoulli decision striking Quebec’s ban on private insurance under the Quebec Charter, its narrow implementation by Jean Charest, and the later Cambie Surgeries case led by Dr. Brian Day and patients in BC, which advanced Section 7 arguments but ultimately lost and triggered a $1.7M cost award. They also cover barriers to litigation, Alberta’s dual-practice reforms, and Vienna Patella’s judicial review over denied out-of-country funding for scoliosis surgery. Whatley closes with a timeline of federal involvement in medicare (1948, 1957, 1966, 1977, 1984) and declining federal cost-sharing. 00:00 Federal Overreach Problem 01:25 Health Reform Conference 04:29 Why Cross-Ideology Talks 06:39 Patients First Mindset 07:55 Cambie Case Preview 11:20 Chaoulli Case Explained 15:06 Why Quebec Only 19:37 Hogg and Spending Power 24:13 Cambie Case Breakdown 27:43 Nurses and Capacity Myths 30:58 Doctor Workload Reality 32:54 International Comparisons 33:33 Case For Private Options 35:10 Polling And Public Priorities 36:52 Cambie Case Legal Imbalance 39:37 Patients Behind The Lawsuit 40:54 Vienna Scoliosis Story 44:42 Litigation Hurdles And Tort Limits 49:31 Alberta Dual Practice Reforms 54:46 Why Choice Changes Care 56:43 Conference And Closing Thoughts 57:43 Canada Medicare Timeline Explained 01:11:39 Final Wrap Up

It's easy to be smug about the Alberta Referendum scheduled for Oct 19th. The questions aren't simple. The Alberta Independence campaign can't match the resources and expertise of the 'remain' voices. And the referendum itself isn't even a referendum on whether or not to leave. Professor Bruce Pardy has followed this issue closely. He's even written a short book about it: Articles of Freedom.  In many ways, this is a referendum on the Constitution of Canada. Does Canada make sense? Can it continue without addressing the concerns of Alberta and Quebec? No matter the outcome, this is a pivotal moment. We can expect more of these until longstanding constitutional issues get sorted. Thanks for checking this out! Shawn Chapters and AI summary: Host Shawn Whatley interviews Queen’s law professor Bruce Pardy about Alberta’s October 19 referendum, emphasizing that Question 10 is not a vote for independence but a signal about whether Albertans want to pursue one later. Pardy criticizes the confusing wording and argues the other nine questions—especially constitutional ones—are largely a mirage because meaningful constitutional change is effectively impossible, while independence may be the “easiest” route. He contends Alberta is treated as a resource colony by “Laurentian” Canada, that cultural and ideological differences are irreconcilable, and that establishment opposition could backfire as with Brexit. The discussion spans whether Canada is a nation, limits of federalism, equalization, Indigenous treaties under a new state, and Pardy’s proposed minimalist constitutional model with strict limits on state power and time-limited public service to prevent a professional ruling class. 00:00 Establishment Versus Alberta 02:38 Referendum Stakes Explained 05:49 Question Ten Confusion 07:01 Brexit Warning System 09:42 Who Decides Sovereignty 13:47 Is Canada A Nation 16:40 Federalism And Culture Clash 20:21 Equalization And Power Voting 25:28 Resource Colony Leverage 29:07 Alberta Identity Versus Welfare State 34:57 Establishment Lines Up Again 36:03 Constitutional Change Mirage 38:07 Ballot Mirage Warning 40:15 Equalization Referendum Lessons 42:10 Independence And Treaties 47:14 Rule Of Law Debate 49:39 Paradox Of The State 54:05 Minimalist Constitution Blueprint 01:01:24 Who Holds Power 01:05:30 What Keeps Him Up 01:07:03 Canada Needs Shock 01:09:32 Closing And Book Plug

Liberty is a fragile and precious thing. Thoughtful libertarians know that it requires more than simply No Rules! Matt Bufton is a winsome libertarian. Listening to him helps you understand why libertarian thought has such a big influence on the non-Left. He's the Executive Director and co-founder of the Institute for Liberal Studies. Libertarians keep us accountable. They force the rest of us to defend why any proposed limitation on liberty cannot be avoided. Let me know what you think of this. Thanks again for checking it out! Shawn   Chapters and AI summary Host Shawn Whatley speaks with Matt Bufton, executive director and co-founder of the Institute for Liberal Studies, about how social crises (homelessness, fentanyl use, safety in places like Ottawa’s market) can fuel demands for authoritarian solutions and reduced liberty. Bufton argues many drug-related harms stem from prohibition and that enforcement should target crimes with victims rather than drug use, favoring voluntary help over coerced rehab. They discuss community safety versus militarized policing, how government policies concentrate homelessness via shelter location and zoning that restricts rooming houses, and concerns about the Charter’s shift from negative rights to expansive positive-right claims, alongside risks of normalizing the notwithstanding clause. Bufton critiques post-liberal power politics, supports liberal neutrality, opposes Quebec/Alberta separatism, and says his main worry is declining civil society and work-from-home-driven social isolation, calling for rebuilding common bonds outside government. 00:00 Government Creates Crises 00:40 Civil Society Decline 01:21 Podcast Intro Setup 03:15 Drug Prohibition Harms 07:17 Freedom Not Binary 10:00 Public Authoritarian Reflex 12:05 Crime Focus Not Drugs 15:33 Ottawa Market Safety 18:46 Shelters Zoning Bottleneck 23:42 Charter Rights Debate 25:01 Positive Rights Overreach 26:02 Notwithstanding Clause Risks 26:52 Institutions Under Strain 27:34 CCF Examples Teaser 28:07 Charter Weaponization 29:33 Kids and Conflict 32:20 Government as Parent 33:47 Post Liberalism Debate 42:32 Neutrality and Values 50:10 Separatism Alberta Quebec 56:24 Civil Society Decline 57:45 Rebuilding Common Bonds

The Conservatives seem lost after Mark Carney stole economic liberalism from the CPC. Trump's tariffs keep voters distracted, while separatism grows in Alberta and Quebec. All of this promises an exciting fall session with the Alberta referendum and elections in Quebec and B.C. Cole Hogan spends his life watching these events. We try to find the concepts and assumptions behind the excitement. Let me know what you think! Thanks again, Shawn Chapters and AI summary: Host Shawn Whatley speaks with political strategist Cole Hogan about Canadian politics heading into the fall. They discuss Mark Carney’s investment summit and political capital, Harper and Kenney’s support for Carney, and why Conservatives under Pierre Poilievre should refocus EU and trade debates through cost-of-living impacts while rebuilding on issues where they’re most trusted, such as immigration, crime, drugs, and housing. The conversation explores shifts in Canadian identity from the Trudeau era, Canada’s cultural and political relationship with the U.S., and regional insecurity and patriotism debates, including criticism of elite definitions of patriotism. They examine Alberta separatism and the October referendum as rooted in long-standing western grievances over resources, representation, immigration, and constitutional jurisdiction, and note key dates for Parliament, Quebec’s election, and Alberta’s vote. 00:00 Oil and Gas Reality Check 01:51 Welcome and Guest Intro 02:29 Doug Ford and Olivia Chow 04:54 Mark Carney Outlook 06:49 Conservatives After Election 10:36 Make It Cost of Living 13:15 Canada Identity and Europe 19:08 Canada Mirrors America 25:11 National Insecurity and Trump 32:45 Patriotism Purity Tests 37:12 Alberta Referendum Stakes 44:07 Regional Solitudes Explained 52:15 Immigration Pendulum Warning 56:07 Fall Political Calendar Wrap

Just when you thought Red Tories had gone extinct, Mark Graham and colleagues start an online journal called the Red Tory Standard. Very few people run around with Tory banners, but then again, Torys aren't the running-around types. But if they were, I suspect we still wouldn't see very many of them. Mark Graham worked to prove me wrong. For someone who grew up in Northern Ontario, as I did, I found it interesting to hear his passion for the monarchy and polite criticism of what he called American rugged individualism.  I have no natural fondness for the monarchy. I grew up (in the bush) skeptical of the monarchy's lack of ruggedness. But having grown up, in so far as it can be said that I have done so, I've come to value it. Conservatism is changing in Canada. Everything is up for grabs, as Ginny Roth said last year. Will we see a revival of Red Toryism, or any kind of Toryism, or are Mr. Graham and company singing it's requiem? We shall see. Thanks for checking this out. Let me know what you think! Shawn   Chapters and AI summary: Host Shawn Whatley interviews Mark Graham, co-founder of The Red Tory Standard, about Red Toryism and conservatism in Canada. Graham rejects the idea that Red Tories are “liberal but fiscally conservative,” describing them instead as culturally conservative, economically oriented to the common good, anti-radical, anti-continentalist, and wary of market worship, rugged individualism, and deeper integration with the United States. He argues for cultural and economic protectionism to preserve Canadian identity, emphasizes citizens over taxpayers, and supports institutions such as the monarchy as a nonpartisan head of state central to Canada’s purpose. The discussion contrasts liberal and conservative political anthropology, focusing on human nature, rights, legitimacy, inherited wisdom, and the role of government, and ends with Graham calling for diversified trade, stronger military capacity, and reclaiming the establishment from within. 00:00 Reclaiming Institutions 00:35 Citizen Over Taxpayer 00:52 Canada Not America 01:14 Meet The Red Tory 01:53 Red Tory Misconceptions 03:53 Anti Continentalism 04:47 Markets Serve Culture 05:46 Protectionism And Identity 06:57 Against Rugged Individualism 08:50 Liberalism Versus Conservatism 11:46 Rights And Human Nature 14:12 Hooker On Consent 15:35 Legitimacy And Inherited Wisdom 19:44 Ethos Character And Culture 22:12 What Is Conservatism 24:21 Anti Ideology Debate 29:14 Policy And Presuppositions 32:17 Human Nature Assumptions 34:04 Distrusting Policy Power 35:37 Common Good Citizenship 37:46 Nationalism Not Ethnic 42:31 CANZUK Internationalism 44:37 Brexit And Empire Ties 47:42 Why Keep The Monarchy 51:35 Free Trade Sovereignty Fears 56:44 Reclaim Institutions Inside 01:00:55 Closing Thanks And Links

The Honorable Jason Kenney has spent his life observing, critiquing, and serving in Canadian politics. He offers wisdom you won't find anywhere else. Kenney reflected on how he has changed. He said, "GDP growth...is not a metric of human happiness or fulfillment or necessarily a health society." Let me know what you think! AI Chapters: Host Shawn Whatley interviews former Alberta Premier and longtime federal minister Jason Kenney about what makes Canada and Alberta distinctive, arguing Canada remains highly desirable globally despite recent stagnation, affordability issues, national unity strains, and a “wrecked” immigration system under Trudeau. Kenney describes prairie resilience and communitarianism shaped by harsh geography, recounts a COVID-era near-default and a bank CEO’s praise for Alberta’s unique entrepreneurial risk-taking culture, and critiques right-of-centre politics that reduce human flourishing to GDP growth. He rejects Alberta separatism as grievance-driven compared with Quebec’s cultural nationalism, defends Canada’s pluralistic British-French institutional inheritance, warns that high immigration and modern media can slow integration, and urges relearning Canadian history and resisting a demoralizing “Gramscian” cultural project. On Trump and tariffs, he stresses national solidarity, doubts durable deals, supports firmness and retaliation, and suggests tabling a modest energy export tax as leverage. 00:00 Alberta Risk Culture 01:38 Show Intro and Guest 04:09 How Canada Is Doing 08:04 Prairie Optimism Roots 09:58 COVID Oil Crash Story 13:13 Land Shapes Community 15:54 Chesterton and Settlers 20:11 Beyond GDP Politics 25:16 Canada as a Nation 35:06 Culture After Empire 41:44 Trump Tariffs Strategy 48:36 Wrap Up and Thanks

Robert Nisbet is not a communitarian in the modern sense. He combines an older view with a resolute concern about state power.  Nisbet offers the best and most readable resources for thinking about community from a non-Left perspective.  Prof. Luke Sheahan wrote the forward to a re-release of Nisbet's Social Philosophers. The book is more like a review of intellectual history through the social lens of community.  Check out Dr. Sheahan's website to learn more about his work, articles, and published material. Thanks again for checking this out! Shawn   AI summary and chapters: Host Shawn Whatley interviews political scientist Luke Sheahan about Robert Nisbet’s thought and Sheahan’s foreword to the re-release of Nisbet’s The Social Philosophers: Community and Conflict in Western Thought. Sheahan describes Nisbet as a major 20th-century conservative whose The Quest for Community argued that modern state power erodes the authority of families, churches, and voluntary associations, producing alienation and instability. They discuss Nisbet’s “idea-systems” of community and his typology of military, political, religious, withdrawal, revolutionary, and plural communities, with the plural community linked to the American constitutional order and multiple overlapping authorities. The conversation addresses legitimacy versus raw power, authority’s dependence on local institutions, the role of political theology, and how weakening intermediate communities contributes to loneliness, deaths of despair, and ideological movements. 00:00 State Power and Alienation 00:33 Meet Luke Sheahan 01:29 Who Was Robert Nisbet 03:17 Quest for Community Thesis 04:07 National We-ness Critique 06:02 Social Philosophers and Ideas 08:05 Reprinting the Lost Book 10:09 Three Core Communities 11:32 Military to Political Shift 13:33 Religious Community Rise 15:12 Withdrawal Communities 16:55 Revolutionary Community 19:59 Plural Community Vision 22:13 Pluralism and Authority 24:43 Protestant vs Catholic Order 29:15 Community Beyond Protestantism 29:51 Legitimacy From Local Ties 31:58 Alienation And Mass Society 36:41 Authority Versus Power 41:19 Prejudgments And Liberal Crisis 45:22 Do Ideas Shape History 54:37 Social Health Versus State Power 58:19 Rebuilding Associations Closing