Murder In Moscow: The States Motion (In Limine) For Investigative Genetic …

Jeffrey Epstein always seemed to find a way to come out on top in just about every financial deal he was involved in. In this episode, we take a look at how Jeffrey Epstein brought in a cool two hundred million right after the great recession of 2008 even after being a known sex offender and losing his biggest clients.(commercial at 7:35)to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-200-million-career-switch-financial-services-dna-research-2019-10

​On March 14, 2025, Sean "Diddy" Combs appeared in Manhattan federal court, pleading not guilty to a superseding indictment that expands previous charges to include allegations of forced labor. Prosecutors assert that between 2004 and 2024, Combs exploited his business empire to coerce employees into grueling work conditions and threatened those who resisted, as part of a broader sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy.During the hearing, Combs, 55, appeared with noticeable physical changes, sporting gray hair and a beard. The court discussed the admissibility of a hotel surveillance video from 2016, allegedly showing Combs assaulting his former girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. His defense contends the footage is misleading and manipulated. Combs has been detained without bail since his September 2024 arrest, with his trial scheduled to commence on May 5, 2025.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs pleads not guilty to new indictment in federal sex trafficking trial | Fox News

​In the Bryan Kohberger trial, the defense has filed a Motion in Limine #7 seeking to exclude any witness testimony referencing "bushy eyebrows" as an identifying feature of the intruder. This motion specifically targets the anticipated testimony of a surviving roommate, referred to as "D.M.," who reportedly described the intruder as having "bushy eyebrows" during her initial interviews with law enforcement. The defense argues that such testimony is unreliable due to D.M.'s limited opportunity to observe the intruder, her potential impairment from alcohol consumption, and the vague nature of the description, which could apply to a vast number of individuals.Additionally, the defense contends that D.M.'s artwork, which emphasizes prominent eyebrows, may have influenced her recollection, further questioning the reliability of her identification. They assert that allowing such testimony would be more prejudicial than probative, potentially leading the jury to make improper associations based solely on the defendant's physical appearance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protomail.comsource:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy_Eyebrows.pdf

​In the Bryan Kohberger trial, the defense has filed a Motion in Limine #7 seeking to exclude any witness testimony referencing "bushy eyebrows" as an identifying feature of the intruder. This motion specifically targets the anticipated testimony of a surviving roommate, referred to as "D.M.," who reportedly described the intruder as having "bushy eyebrows" during her initial interviews with law enforcement. The defense argues that such testimony is unreliable due to D.M.'s limited opportunity to observe the intruder, her potential impairment from alcohol consumption, and the vague nature of the description, which could apply to a vast number of individuals.Additionally, the defense contends that D.M.'s artwork, which emphasizes prominent eyebrows, may have influenced her recollection, further questioning the reliability of her identification. They assert that allowing such testimony would be more prejudicial than probative, potentially leading the jury to make improper associations based solely on the defendant's physical appearance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protomail.comsource:022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy_Eyebrows.pdf

​Kanye West, now known as Ye, released a new track titled "Lonely Roads Still Go to Sunshine," featuring his 11-year-old daughter, North West, alongside Sean "Diddy" Combs and his son, King Combs. The song, shared on March 15, 2025, begins with a phone conversation between West and Combs. North contributes a brief rap, delivering the line, "When you see me shining, then you see the light."The release has sparked significant controversy, as Kim Kardashian, West's ex-wife and North's mother, attempted to block the song's release. Citing concerns over their daughter's involvement and the association with Diddy, who is currently incarcerated awaiting trial for federal sex crimes, Kardashian sought legal intervention to prevent the song from being published. Despite her efforts, including a cease and desist demand and an emergency mediation attempt, West proceeded with the release, escalating tensions between the former couple.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Kim Kardashian left distraught as ex Kanye West drags their daughter North, 11, into Diddy scandal | Daily Mail Online

Dawn Richard filed an amended complaint against Sean "Diddy" Combs on March 10, 2025, as part of Case 1:24-cv-06848-KPF in federal court. The amended filing expands on her original September 2024 lawsuit, adding new allegations of financial misconduct, claiming that Combs misappropriated funds owed to her from Danity Kane and other music ventures. It also provides more specific details regarding her claims of sexual misconduct and abuse, including additional dates, locations, and alleged witnesses. Richard further alleges that Combs engaged in intimidation tactics, using threats and coercion to silence her.In response, Combs' legal team denied all allegations, calling them baseless and an attempt to damage his reputation. They have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing that the claims lack merit and fall outside the statute of limitations. The court has scheduled a hearing in April 2025 to address this motion, with the lawsuit continuing to unfold as part of the larger legal battles Combs is facing.to  contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.128.0.pdf

Dawn Richard filed an amended complaint against Sean "Diddy" Combs on March 10, 2025, as part of Case 1:24-cv-06848-KPF in federal court. The amended filing expands on her original September 2024 lawsuit, adding new allegations of financial misconduct, claiming that Combs misappropriated funds owed to her from Danity Kane and other music ventures. It also provides more specific details regarding her claims of sexual misconduct and abuse, including additional dates, locations, and alleged witnesses. Richard further alleges that Combs engaged in intimidation tactics, using threats and coercion to silence her.In response, Combs' legal team denied all allegations, calling them baseless and an attempt to damage his reputation. They have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing that the claims lack merit and fall outside the statute of limitations. The court has scheduled a hearing in April 2025 to address this motion, with the lawsuit continuing to unfold as part of the larger legal battles Combs is facing.to  contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.128.0.pdf

The jury selection process in the Lori Vallow Daybell trial was a meticulous and time-consuming effort due to the high-profile nature of the case and the widespread media coverage surrounding it. The process began in March 2023 in Ada County, Idaho, where the trial was moved from Fremont County to ensure a more impartial jury pool. Over the course of several days, dozens of potential jurors were questioned about their knowledge of the case, personal biases, and ability to remain fair and impartial. Attorneys on both sides focused heavily on whether potential jurors had been exposed to extensive media coverage, as well as their views on issues like mental illness and religious beliefs—both of which played a central role in Vallow’s defense. The court aimed to select a jury that could fairly weigh the evidence, considering the disturbing allegations against Vallow, who was accused of murdering her two children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, and conspiring to kill her husband’s previous wife, Tammy Daybell.After careful screening, a jury of 12 members along with six alternates was finalized. The prosecution and defense used their allotted peremptory challenges to strike jurors they felt might be unfavorable to their side, while also navigating challenges for cause—such as individuals who admitted they had already formed opinions about the case. The selection process was critical, as the defense sought jurors who might be open to arguments regarding Vallow’s mental state and alleged manipulation by her husband, Chad Daybell, while the prosecution sought individuals who could objectively analyze the evidence, including grisly forensic findings. Once seated, the jury was instructed to avoid outside influences, including media coverage, to ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The jury selection process in the Lori Vallow Daybell trial was a meticulous and time-consuming effort due to the high-profile nature of the case and the widespread media coverage surrounding it. The process began in March 2023 in Ada County, Idaho, where the trial was moved from Fremont County to ensure a more impartial jury pool. Over the course of several days, dozens of potential jurors were questioned about their knowledge of the case, personal biases, and ability to remain fair and impartial. Attorneys on both sides focused heavily on whether potential jurors had been exposed to extensive media coverage, as well as their views on issues like mental illness and religious beliefs—both of which played a central role in Vallow’s defense. The court aimed to select a jury that could fairly weigh the evidence, considering the disturbing allegations against Vallow, who was accused of murdering her two children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, and conspiring to kill her husband’s previous wife, Tammy Daybell.After careful screening, a jury of 12 members along with six alternates was finalized. The prosecution and defense used their allotted peremptory challenges to strike jurors they felt might be unfavorable to their side, while also navigating challenges for cause—such as individuals who admitted they had already formed opinions about the case. The selection process was critical, as the defense sought jurors who might be open to arguments regarding Vallow’s mental state and alleged manipulation by her husband, Chad Daybell, while the prosecution sought individuals who could objectively analyze the evidence, including grisly forensic findings. Once seated, the jury was instructed to avoid outside influences, including media coverage, to ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Jay-Z's attorney, Alex Spiro, is actively working to discredit recent allegations linking Jay-Z to Sean "Diddy" Combs in a sexual assault lawsuit. The lawsuit, filed by attorney Tony Buzbee on behalf of an unnamed woman, claims that Jay-Z and Combs sexually assaulted her in 2000 when she was 13 years old. Spiro has labeled these allegations as "provably, demonstrably false," highlighting inconsistencies in the accuser's account, such as the non-existent location of the alleged assault and timeline discrepancies. He argues that the claims are part of a financially motivated shakedown against Jay-Z, whose net worth exceeds $2.5 billion.In addition to challenging the lawsuit's credibility, Spiro has accused Buzbee's law firm of unethical practices. He alleges that Buzbee's firm pressured individuals to fabricate allegations against high-profile figures like Jay-Z and Diddy. For instance, Spiro claims that a woman seeking legal assistance for unrelated abuse was coerced to implicate Diddy falsely and was dropped as a client when she refused. Buzbee has denied these accusations, calling them "patently ridiculous."to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jay Z's lawyer denies rapper's 'close association' with Diddy as he shuts down 'demonstrably false' rape claim | Daily Mail Online