Moscow Murder Rewind: The Warrant For The Match Group Records

​Sarah Kellen Vickers, also known as Sarah Kensington or Sarah Vickers, served as Jeffrey Epstein's assistant from the early 2000s until at least 2013. During this period, she was responsible for scheduling Epstein's "massages," sessions during which many victims reported being sexually assaulted. Witnesses have testified that Kellen played a pivotal role in facilitating Epstein's abuse, with some alleging she coordinated and assisted in recruiting minors for these encounters. Despite these serious allegations, Kellen has not faced criminal charges, partly due to a 2007 non-prosecution agreement that granted immunity to certain Epstein associates. She has since portrayed herself as one of Epstein's victims, asserting that she was also subjected to his manipulations and abuse.In the Phase 1 release of Epstein-related documents, Kellen's name surfaced multiple times, underscoring her involvement in his operations. These documents revealed that attorneys representing Epstein's victims sought to depose Kellen, highlighting her as a key witness due to her extensive interactions with both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. However, attempts to serve her with subpoenas were reportedly unsuccessful, suggesting possible evasion. The unsealed documents further detailed allegations that Kellen maintained a list of underage girls for Epstein, arranging their visits for illicit purposes. Despite these revelations, Kellen continues to live a private life, reportedly residing in luxury properties in Miami and New York, and has not publicly addressed the recent document disclosures.to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein left wads of cash stuffed in envelopes for 'top recruiter' Sara Kellen raising new questions of why she was never charged | Daily Mail OnlineTo help  support  the  podcast:https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support

​In March 2025, Jay-Z filed a lawsuit against attorney Tony Buzbee, his colleague David Fortney, and their client, referred to as Jane Doe, alleging malicious prosecution, abuse of process, civil conspiracy, and defamation. This legal action stems from a previous lawsuit filed in October 2024, in which Doe accused Jay-Z and Sean "Diddy" Combs of raping her at an MTV Video Music Awards afterparty in 2000, when she was 13 years old. Jay-Z's current lawsuit asserts that these allegations were knowingly false and malicious, intended to inflict maximum harm on his reputation and personal well-being.Jay-Z claims that Doe admitted to his representatives that the assault did not occur and that Buzbee pressured her to pursue the false narrative for financial gain. He alleges that these unfounded accusations have caused substantial harm, including the loss of contracts exceeding $20 million and significant emotional distress. In response, Buzbee maintains that the new lawsuit mirrors previous meritless claims and denies any attempts at intimidation, asserting that his client stands by her original allegations.to contact me:[email protected]:Jay-Z files lawsuit against former sexual assault accuser, her legal team | Fox News

​Attorney General Pam Bondi's recent announcement regarding the FBI's delivery of a "truckload" of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents raises several concerns. The timing of this disclosure, following public disappointment over the initial release of largely redundant information, suggests a reactive rather than proactive approach to transparency. Bondi's claim that these documents were previously withheld by the FBI's New York office without clear justification further undermines confidence in the thoroughness and integrity of the investigationThe lack of new revelations in the earlier releases, coupled with the sudden appearance of these additional files, raises questions about the efficacy of the Justice Department's efforts to uncover the full extent of Epstein's network and activities. This situation highlights potential systemic issues within federal agencies regarding the handling and disclosure of critical evidence in high-profile cases.to contact me:[email protected]:Pam Bondi says 'truckload' of Epstein files have arrived from FBI, she plans to release 'as fast as we can' | Daily Mail Online

​In December 2021, Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Donald W. Hafele denied The Palm Beach Post's request to release the 2006 grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein's case, citing legal constraints on disclosing such materials. This decision was met with criticism from those advocating for transparency, as the grand jury's proceedings had resulted in Epstein facing minimal charges despite substantial evidence of his involvement in sexual misconduct with minors.However, in May 2023, the Fourth District Court of Appeal overturned Judge Hafele's ruling, stating that he possessed the authority to release the transcripts if it served the "furtherance of justice." The appellate court directed Judge Hafele to review the transcripts and determine which portions could be disclosed, emphasizing the public's interest in understanding the judicial processes that led to Epstein's lenient plea deal. This development underscored ongoing concerns about potential systemic failures and preferential treatment within the justice system regarding Epstein's case.The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) played a crucial role in exposing the injustices surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s sweetheart deal in 2008. Under federal law, the CVRA mandates that victims be informed of and allowed to participate in plea agreements, yet Epstein’s victims were deliberately kept in the dark when then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta brokered a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) granting Epstein immunity from federal charges. The secretive deal, which also shielded his co-conspirators, was exposed years later when victims sued under the CVRA, arguing that their rights had been violated. In 2019, a federal judge ruled that prosecutors had indeed violated the CVRA by failing to notify the victims, but no legal remedy was provided. This blatant disregard for victims’ rights reinforced public skepticism about how Epstein’s wealth and connections influenced the justice system, fueling demands for greater transparency and accountability in high-profile criminal cases.to contact me:[email protected]

Jeffrey Epstein’s fixation with transhumanism—a pseudo-scientific movement focused on using technology to enhance human evolution—was as disturbing as it was delusional. Epstein, a man with no scientific credentials yet an inflated sense of his own intellectual prowess, sought to ingratiate himself with top scientists by funding their research, often in ethically dubious fields. Among his most unsettling ambitions was his reported desire to "seed the human race" with his own DNA by impregnating as many women as possible. Epstein frequently held discussions at his New Mexico ranch, where he allegedly planned to establish a breeding program in which select women would bear his children, thus ensuring his genetic legacy. He saw himself as a modern-day eugenicist, obsessed with propagating what he believed to be his superior intellect. His interest in transhumanism wasn’t just about advancing science—it was about his own twisted narcissism and desire for control over life itself.Beyond his breeding fantasies, Epstein’s transhumanist obsessions extended to cryonics and longevity research, where he entertained grotesque ideas about preserving his head and penis after death in the hopes of being resurrected in the future. He surrounded himself with influential scientists, including those from Harvard and MIT, some of whom were all too willing to entertain his bizarre visions in exchange for financial support. His funding of research into artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, and even mind-uploading suggests he wanted to defy mortality itself, likely driven by a pathological fear of death. The fact that he was able to insert himself into legitimate scientific circles and push these ideas without serious public scrutiny speaks to the unsettling power and influence he wielded. Epstein’s transhumanist ambitions weren’t about human progress—they were a chilling reflection of his megalomania, a grotesque attempt to play god while indulging in a level of control over human life that mirrored his predatory behavior in every other aspect of his existence.to contact me:[email protected]

Leon Black channeled his inner Eminem and busted into a rap song in 2018 during a MoMa event. And yes... It was as cringe as you are thinking. To contact me:[email protected] Source:https://nypost.com/2020/11/01/moma-still-backing-rapping-leon-black-a-year-after-jeffrey-epsteins-death/

OpenLux is an investigative project that unveiled the extensive use of Luxembourg's financial system for tax avoidance and potential money laundering by global elites, corporations, and criminal entities. In February 2021, a consortium of journalists, led by the French newspaper Le Monde and including partners like the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), analyzed approximately three million documents from Luxembourg's public registers. Their findings revealed that Luxembourg, a nation half the size of Delaware, hosts around 55,000 offshore companies managing assets worth at least €6 trillion. Notably, over half of these companies failed to declare their beneficial owners, highlighting significant transparency issues within the European Union's financial regulations.The investigation uncovered that approximately 80% of Luxembourg's private investment funds did not disclose their beneficiaries, raising concerns about the nation's vulnerability to money laundering activities. The leaked documents implicated various high-profile individuals and entities, including multinational corporations, celebrities, and political figures, in utilizing Luxembourg's financial structures for tax optimization and asset concealment. For instance, the investigation revealed that 29 out of 37 companies listed on France's CAC 40 stock index had subsidiaries in Luxembourg, with only 28% of these entities engaging in genuine economic activities. These revelations underscored the need for more robust anti-money laundering measures and greater financial transparency within the EU.To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.google.com/amp/s/promarket.org/2021/02/28/openlux-why-the-era-of-financial-secrecy-needs-to-end/%3famp

From the archive: 11-29-22One of Xana And Madison's sorority sisters spoke with Fox news and discussed how leading up to the horrible murders how the night was just a normal night in Moscow and how nothing was out of the ordinary. She also had a few other things to say.Let's dive in!(commercial at 9:14)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/idaho-coed-murders-sorority-sister-recalls-victim-s-hours-before-tragedy-a-normal-night-in-moscow/ar-AA14GRkW?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=eef817684da749f7a1dc1ec49081f80b

Jeffrey Epstein left a trail of misery and pain on his wake wherever he went. New Mexico was no different. Even though multiple women have claimed to be assaulted at Zorro Ranch, the state attorney general has decided to punt the investigation away to the SDNY. In a move that many find baffling, questions remain unanswered with the most glaring question being:Why was Zorro Ranch never raided?To contact me:[email protected] Source:https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/woman-says-epstein-raped-her-at-his-new-mexico-ranch/article_aefe54c9-2cd6-5f95-a570-7d281f671922.html

Judge John Judge has ruled in favor of the defense when it comes to personnel records from the three main officers involved in the investigation. The state had been reticent to agree to this, but after being ordered by the Judge to do so, they will have to hand the records over by July 14th.(commercial at 7:29)to contact me:[email protected]:Bryan Kohberger's Team Granted Access to Officers' Training Records (newsweek.com)