Weekly Review With Clay and Buck H3 - Speaker Newt Gingrich

Michigan Hezbollah Terror Plot, Democrats Defend Iran, and America’s Self‑Inflicted Energy Crisis The latest episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, hosted by Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson, opens with humor but quickly pivots to a sobering examination of terrorism, radical ideology inside American politics, and the consequences of years of failed policy decisions. What begins as an April Fools’ joke becomes a serious warning: the threats facing the United States are real, growing, and being ignored—or excused—by those in power. From a Hezbollah‑inspired terrorist attack in Michigan to Democratic candidates openly defending Iran and criticizing Israel, this episode draws a clear line between ideology and national security failures. It concludes with a striking acknowledgment that the left’s energy agenda has left America and its allies dangerously exposed. Below is a comprehensive, theme‑by‑theme summary of the episode. April Fools’ Day and the Joke That Exposes a Harsh Reality The show opens with what sounds like breaking news: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has apologized to the American people for open borders, defunding the Department of Homeland Security, and enabling national insecurity. The reveal comes quickly—it’s April Fools’ Day. But as Senator Cruz explains, the joke cuts deeper because none of the accusations are untrue. The real April Fools’ joke, he argues, is that for the other 364 days of the year, Democratic leadership refuses to acknowledge the consequences of their own policies. This framing sets the stage for the episode’s central argument: denial does not prevent disaster—it enables it. Hezbollah‑Inspired Terrorism Strikes MichiganA Targeted Attack on a Jewish Synagogue and School The most alarming story discussed is the Hezbollah‑inspired terrorist attack on a synagogue and Jewish school in West Bloomfield, Michigan. A naturalized U.S. citizen from Lebanon deliberately rammed his truck into the building while more than 100 children were inside. Federal authorities later confirmed the attack was an act of terrorism inspired by Hezbollah propaganda. The vehicle was loaded with gasoline and commercial‑grade fireworks, effectively turning it into an explosive weapon. The attacker exchanged gunfire with security officers before killing himself. A security guard was injured, and the building sustained extensive damage. Media Narratives vs. Terrorist Reality Early media coverage described the attacker as a “Michigan man” motivated by grief over his brother’s death. What was initially omitted is that the brother was a Hezbollah commander—an active terrorist leader. Investigators later revealed the attacker had been radicalized for months, consuming Hezbollah and Iranian propaganda, researching Jewish institutions across Michigan, and planning the assault well in advance. He sent messages minutes before the attack stating his intent to kill as many Jews as possible. This was not an emotional outburst. It was premeditated jihadist violence enabled by systemic failures. Vetting Failures and DHS DefundingKnown Terrorist Ties That Were Ignored One of the most troubling revelations is that federal databases already showed the attacker had connections to known or suspected Hezbollah terrorists. Senator Cruz repeatedly asks why someone flagged in government systems was allowed into the country and later naturalized. The conversation turns to broader vetting failures, which are tied to Democratic opposition to border enforcement and repeated defunding of the Department of Homeland Security. According to Cruz, the attack in Michigan is not an isolated event—it is a warning of what lies ahead if policy does not change. Red Flags at Gun Stores and Missed Interventions Ben Ferguson, drawing on his experience as a former gun store owner, explains that two gun stores refused to sell the attacker a firearm due to concerning behavior. A third store completed the sale. The hosts raise serious questions: Were authorities notified? Why were clear red flags missed? And how many similar individuals may already be inside the country? The discussion reinforces a recurring theme of the episode—warnings existed, but action did not follow. New York Politics and the Moral Defense of IranNew York City Mayor's Shocking Statements The focus shifts to New York City, where Mayor Zohran Mamdani criticized U.S. military action against Iran as illegal and unjustified. He argued the money spent on the conflict should instead be used for domestic programs. Senator Cruz responds forcefully, noting that Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism and has killed nearly 1,000 Americans over several decades. The regime funds Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis and regularly leads chants of “Death to America.” To Cruz, calling opposition to Iran immoral represents a complete reversal of moral clarity. “Sad” About the Ayatollah: Michigan’s Senate RaceA Strategy to Avoid National Security The episode returns to Michigan, where a Democratic Senate candidate was caught on tape admitting he did not want to comment on Iran because “a lot of people in Dearborn are sad” about the death of the Ayatollah. Rather than addressing terrorism or national security, the candidate appeared focused on avoiding political discomfort. Additional recordings reveal campaign staff discussing how to pivot away from Iran, attack President Trump with inflammatory accusations, and refocus on affordability to avoid the topic altogether. Anti‑Israel Politics as a Primary Strategy Senator Cruz connects this Michigan race to a broader pattern within the Democratic Party, pointing to prominent progressive figures who have made attacking Israel a central feature of their political identity. According to Cruz, hostility toward Israel and silence—or sympathy—toward Islamist extremism has become a viable and even successful strategy in Democratic primaries. He warns that this shift poses a direct threat to U.S. national security and America’s global standing. The Energy Crisis and a Stunning Admission from the LeftEnergy Policy Is National Security The episode concludes with an unexpected development: a Washington Post editorial acknowledging that green‑driven energy policies have left regions like Germany, Taiwan, and California dangerously vulnerable amid global energy shocks tied to Iran. The discussion highlights premature shutdowns of nuclear power, over‑reliance on renewables, refinery closures, and dependence on foreign energy sources. California, in particular, is singled out for policies that have driven refineries out of the state and made gasoline supplies fragile and expensive. The central takeaway is clear: good intentions are no substitute for serious planning, and energy independence is inseparable from national security. In a rare moment of agreement, Senator Cruz states plainly that the editorial is correct. Final Thoughts: Weakness Has Consequences This episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz delivers a stark warning. From terrorism on American soil to radical ideology gaining ground in U.S. politics and an energy crisis years in the making, the cost of denial is now undeniable. 👉 Listen and Subscribe to Verdict with Ted Cruz Listen to Verdict with Ted Cruz every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. You can find Verdict with Ted Cruz podcast on iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Don’t miss out on expert analysis and insider perspectives from Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson. YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowFollow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of The Truth with Lisa Boothe, Lisa sits down with author and policy expert Heather Mac Donald to break down the real drivers behind America’s homelessness crisis, rising urban disorder, and shifting crime trends. Drawing on her latest analysis, Mac Donald argues that homelessness is not simply an economic issue—but a policy choice fueled by ideology, weak enforcement, and government mismanagement. The two also dive into the role of sanctuary cities, illegal immigration, and the broader cultural shift away from law and order. Plus, they unpack: Why homelessness is surging in major cities The role of mental illness, addiction, and public policy How crime data is reported—and what it may be missing Whether political leadership is driving changes in crime trends Why voters continue to support policies that critics say worsen conditions Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Birthright Citizenship Scam   Clay Travis and Buck Sexton discuss President Trump’s national address on Iran. They highlight Trump’s assertion that the military campaign has been highly successful and that Iran will never be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons. They focus on Trump’s most consequential comment: a two‑to‑three‑week timeline for intensified strikes, paired with ongoing negotiations. The hosts analyze the strategy as classic Trump-style pressure—applying overwhelming force while leaving room for a deal—and predict the conflict will be resolved by early May. They also discuss market reactions, particularly energy prices, predicting oil volatility will calm as shipping lanes stabilize. They also discuss the Supreme Court and the birthright citizenship case, with intense criticism directed at Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson following her questions during oral arguments. Clay and Buck play and analyze a clip in which Jackson compares birthright citizenship to criminal jurisdiction while traveling abroad, calling the analogy legally incoherent and emblematic of deeper concerns about preparation, competence, and judicial philosophy. The hosts argue that Supreme Court justices should represent the very top of the legal profession, and they denounce what they describe as ideological appointment criteria under former President Joe Biden. Buck expands the critique into a broader examination of elite legal education, affirmative action, and merit, contrasting Jackson with Justice Clarence Thomas, whom they praise as a historically significant legal thinker. Both hosts stress that their objections are not personal but institutional, warning that lifetime appointments at the Supreme Court have consequences measured in decades. They argue that poorly reasoned questions and factual errors undermine public trust and diminish the gravity of the Court’s role as the final arbiter of constitutional law. AG Pam Bondi Out Attorney General Pam Bondi has officially been removed from her role by President Donald Trump, following a turbulent stretch marked by the mismanaged “Epstein Files” release and heightened criticism from inside the MAGA base. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton revisit why Bondi’s tenure drew frustration from Trump supporters rather than Democrats, pushing back on a listener claim that her removal was a “scalp” handed to the left. They argue that Bondi’s exit reflects Trump’s effort to tighten his administration ahead of Senate confirmation battles and the rapidly approaching midterms—framing the transition as strategic, not reactive. Clay and Buck detail the emerging shortlist of possible replacements, including EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, widely rumored as the frontrunner. They also explore alternative names that could instantly stabilize the DOJ and navigate Senate confirmation with ease, such as Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Harmeet Dhillon, and interim Deputy AG Todd Blanche. They analyze the political calculus required for each option—particularly red‑state Senate seats that governors could safely fill—and even speculate on whether the Attorney General role could be used as a power‑balancing move in internal Republican conflicts, such as the GOP civil war unfolding in Texas. Throughout the discussion, they emphasize that Trump is not “panicking” but rather strengthening his cabinet while timing and Senate control still allow significant personnel changes. Hollywood Freefall  Legal strategist Katie Zachariah weighs in on the removal of former Attorney General Pam Bondi and the question of who should be President Donald Trump’s next pick to lead the DOJ. Zachariah strongly backs Todd Blanche, praising his loyalty to Trump during the post‑presidency legal battles and arguing that his willingness to risk his career for the president proves he has the toughness and credibility required for the role. The discussion broadens into California Democratic politics, particularly speculation that the DOJ leadership change could expose renewed scrutiny of Congressman Eric Swalwell, including past allegations connected to a Chinese spy and questions about his residency. Zachariah argues that the Democratic Party lacks a deep bench in California, suggesting candidates like Swalwell and Katie Porter reflect broader party weakness as the state faces fiscal decline, population loss, and policy failure. Clay and Buck sharply criticize the idea of Swalwell as a potential governor, framing California as a case study in one‑party rule and systemic dysfunction. Yes, We Talk to Democrats Too An interview with retired Brigadier General Shawn Harris, a Democrat running in the special election for Georgia’s 14th Congressional District. Harris, a 40‑year military veteran and former senior defense official in Israel, presents himself as a “moderate Democrat” heavily recruited by Republicans in his rural district. Buck presses him on why he is running as a Democrat given his policy alignment on major issues, including border security, ICE enforcement, gender in sports, and foreign policy. Harris repeatedly emphasizes that he supports Trump’s border policies, believes the southern border must remain closed, and insists men should compete only in men’s sports—a position at odds with mainstream Democratic leadership. He explains that his campaign is focused on “kitchen‑table” issues, job creation, and restoring representation for rural communities neglected by Washington. The conversation turns geopolitical as Clay and Buck ask Harris, given his national security background, whether he would support Trump’s military actions against Iran. Harris argues that Congress must be fully briefed at the top‑secret level before authorizing force, emphasizing lessons learned from past “forever wars.” He stresses the importance of having clear entry and exit strategies and warns that the United States could “win militarily but lose politically” if leaders fail to communicate objectives to the American public. The wide‑ranging interview also touches on internal Democratic politics, including whether Harris would vote for Hakeem Jeffries as Speaker. He declines to commit, insisting his allegiance is to rural Georgia rather than any party leader. Harris admits he voted for Kamala Harris in 2024 but says he will support Trump’s policies when they are correct—arguing that Marjorie Taylor Greene’s recent positions have moved closer to his, not the other way around. He closes with an ambitious vision for bringing “generational jobs” tied to aerospace and future moon‑to‑Mars projects into Northwest Georgia. Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8   For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/   Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton:  X - https://x.com/clayandbuck FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/ IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/ YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuckFollow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hour 1 of The Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show opens with a sweeping look at two historic developments: America’s return to deep‑space exploration and a rapidly shifting moment inside the Trump administration and the Supreme Court. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton begin by celebrating the successful launch of NASA’s Artemis II mission, which now has astronauts orbiting the moon for the first time since 1972, a milestone they frame as symbolic of renewed American ambition and technological leadership. The hosts connect the space achievement to broader national momentum, while also noting market volatility tied to geopolitical uncertainty following President Donald Trump’s address on Iran and ongoing concerns surrounding the Strait of Hormuz and fluctuating oil prices. The hour quickly pivots to major breaking political news, as multiple outlets report that Attorney General Pam Bondi has been informed by President Trump that her tenure is ending. Clay and Buck discuss the significance of a potential leadership shake‑up at the Department of Justice, noting reports that EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin could be elevated to replace Bondi. They frame the move as evidence that Trump is entering a decisive phase of governance, reshaping his cabinet while Republicans still control the Senate and confirmations remain feasible ahead of the midterm election cycle. The hosts argue the timing reflects strategic urgency, not instability. A large portion of Hour 1 is devoted to a sharp critique of Bondi’s performance, with Clay calling the “Epstein Files 2.0” rollout the most significant unforced error of Trump’s second term. Buck uses a tennis analogy to describe the difference between hard shots that miss and obvious mistakes, arguing that DOJ missteps were avoidable and damaging. While both hosts praise Bondi’s loyalty and character, they conclude she was not prepared for the demands of the role, emphasizing Trump’s need for competence as well as loyalty at this stage. Clay suggests alternative high‑profile successors, including Ron DeSantis and Sen. Ted Cruz, framing the discussion around DOJ leadership and institutional seriousness. The hour then transitions into foreign policy and national security, closely examining President Trump’s national address on Iran. Clay and Buck highlight Trump’s assertion that the military campaign has been highly successful and that Iran will never be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons. They focus on Trump’s most consequential comment: a two‑to‑three‑week timeline for intensified strikes, paired with ongoing negotiations. The hosts analyze the strategy as classic Trump-style pressure—applying overwhelming force while leaving room for a deal—and predict the conflict will be resolved by early May. They also discuss market reactions, particularly energy prices, predicting oil volatility will calm as shipping lanes stabilize. The final major segment of Hour 1 turns to the Supreme Court and the birthright citizenship case, with intense criticism directed at Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson following her questions during oral arguments. Clay and Buck play and analyze a clip in which Jackson compares birthright citizenship to criminal jurisdiction while traveling abroad, calling the analogy legally incoherent and emblematic of deeper concerns about preparation, competence, and judicial philosophy. The hosts argue that Supreme Court justices should represent the very top of the legal profession, and they denounce what they describe as ideological appointment criteria under former President Joe Biden. Buck expands the critique into a broader examination of elite legal education, affirmative action, and merit, contrasting Jackson with Justice Clarence Thomas, whom they praise as a historically significant legal thinker. Both hosts stress that their objections are not personal but institutional, warning that lifetime appointments at the Supreme Court have consequences measured in decades. They argue that poorly reasoned questions and factual errors undermine public trust and diminish the gravity of the Court’s role as the final arbiter of constitutional law. Hour 1 concludes with listener calls previewed for later segments and teasers for upcoming data on births to non‑U.S. citizens, reinforcing the show’s throughline of citizenship, sovereignty, executive leadership, and institutional credibility. Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8   For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/   Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton:  X - https://x.com/clayandbuck FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/ IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/ YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuckFollow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hour 2 of The Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show centers on breaking political news, a major Department of Justice shake‑up, and an extensive interview with a Democratic congressional candidate—marking a rare, noteworthy moment on the program. The hour opens with confirmation that Attorney General Pam Bondi has officially been removed from her role by President Donald Trump, following a turbulent stretch marked by the mismanaged “Epstein Files” release and heightened criticism from inside the MAGA base. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton revisit why Bondi’s tenure drew frustration from Trump supporters rather than Democrats, pushing back on a listener claim that her removal was a “scalp” handed to the left. They argue that Bondi’s exit reflects Trump’s effort to tighten his administration ahead of Senate confirmation battles and the rapidly approaching midterms—framing the transition as strategic, not reactive. Clay and Buck detail the emerging shortlist of possible replacements, including EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, widely rumored as the frontrunner. They also explore alternative names that could instantly stabilize the DOJ and navigate Senate confirmation with ease, such as Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Harmeet Dhillon, and interim Deputy AG Todd Blanche. They analyze the political calculus required for each option—particularly red‑state Senate seats that governors could safely fill—and even speculate on whether the Attorney General role could be used as a power‑balancing move in internal Republican conflicts, such as the GOP civil war unfolding in Texas. Throughout the discussion, they emphasize that Trump is not “panicking” but rather strengthening his cabinet while timing and Senate control still allow significant personnel changes. Midway through Hour 2, the program features an extended interview with retired Brigadier General Shawn Harris, a Democrat running in the special election for Georgia’s 14th Congressional District. Harris, a 40‑year military veteran and former senior defense official in Israel, presents himself as a “moderate Democrat” heavily recruited by Republicans in his rural district. Buck presses him on why he is running as a Democrat given his policy alignment on major issues, including border security, ICE enforcement, gender in sports, and foreign policy. Harris repeatedly emphasizes that he supports Trump’s border policies, believes the southern border must remain closed, and insists men should compete only in men’s sports—a position at odds with mainstream Democratic leadership. He explains that his campaign is focused on “kitchen‑table” issues, job creation, and restoring representation for rural communities neglected by Washington. The conversation turns geopolitical as Clay and Buck ask Harris, given his national security background, whether he would support Trump’s military actions against Iran. Harris argues that Congress must be fully briefed at the top‑secret level before authorizing force, emphasizing lessons learned from past “forever wars.” He stresses the importance of having clear entry and exit strategies and warns that the United States could “win militarily but lose politically” if leaders fail to communicate objectives to the American public. The wide‑ranging interview also touches on internal Democratic politics, including whether Harris would vote for Hakeem Jeffries as Speaker. He declines to commit, insisting his allegiance is to rural Georgia rather than any party leader. Harris admits he voted for Kamala Harris in 2024 but says he will support Trump’s policies when they are correct—arguing that Marjorie Taylor Greene’s recent positions have moved closer to his, not the other way around. He closes with an ambitious vision for bringing “generational jobs” tied to aerospace and future moon‑to‑Mars projects into Northwest Georgia. After the interview, Clay and Buck react to Harris’ answers—calling him respectful, unusually moderate for a Democrat, and in some cases “a Republican running under a Democratic banner.” They note that, because of new FCC rules, more Democrats may appear on air, though most likely will not align with their audience the way Harris seemed to. Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8   For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/   Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton:  X - https://x.com/clayandbuck FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/ IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/ YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuckFollow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hour 3 of The Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show continues the Thursday broadcast with deep‑dive analysis into the Department of Justice shakeup, California politics, the collapse of Hollywood, and a marquee legal discussion on birthright citizenship featuring Anne Coulter. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton open the hour welcoming legal strategist Katie Zachariah, who weighs in on the removal of former Attorney General Pam Bondi and the question of who should be President Donald Trump’s next pick to lead the DOJ. Zachariah strongly backs Todd Blanche, praising his loyalty to Trump during the post‑presidency legal battles and arguing that his willingness to risk his career for the president proves he has the toughness and credibility required for the role. The discussion broadens into California Democratic politics, particularly speculation that the DOJ leadership change could expose renewed scrutiny of Congressman Eric Swalwell, including past allegations connected to a Chinese spy and questions about his residency. Zachariah argues that the Democratic Party lacks a deep bench in California, suggesting candidates like Swalwell and Katie Porter reflect broader party weakness as the state faces fiscal decline, population loss, and policy failure. Clay and Buck sharply criticize the idea of Swalwell as a potential governor, framing California as a case study in one‑party rule and systemic dysfunction. A major segment of Hour 3 focuses on the collapse of Hollywood and the film industry in Los Angeles, which Zachariah and the hosts attribute to tax policy, affordability, union costs, and ideological content mandates. They note that film and television production has moved en masse to states like Georgia or overseas to countries such as Ireland due to better incentives, devastating blue‑collar workers in the entertainment sector—many of whom are conservatives. Clay emphasizes that California’s decline is not cultural schadenfreude but an economic tragedy for tens of thousands of working families. The centerpiece of Hour 3 is an extended interview with Ann Coulter, who delivers a detailed legal history and constitutional argument against birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants. Coulter traces the 14th Amendment to its post‑Civil War intent—arguing it applied strictly to freed slaves—and criticizes modern interpretations that conflate legal residency with illegal entry. She explains that the Supreme Court case Wong Kim Ark dealt with a child of legal residents and should never have been expanded to create what she calls the “anchor baby” doctrine, which she says originated not in constitutional text but in a 1980s footnote by Justice William Brennan. Coulter praises the Trump administration’s legal strategy centering on domicile and allegiance, pointing out that illegal entry inherently violates U.S. law and cannot credibly establish allegiance to the country. She highlights statistics raised during Supreme Court arguments showing hundreds of organized birth‑tourism operations, particularly in China, and warns that allowing citizenship to be “gamed” threatens the meaning of national sovereignty. Coulter argues that mainstream media coverage falsely portrays birthright citizenship as ancient and indisputable when, in her view, it is neither. The conversation turns to the Supreme Court itself, where Clay presses Coulter on Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s performance during oral arguments. Coulter contrasts Jackson with Justice Clarence Thomas, noting Thomas’ pointed question tying the 14th Amendment back to Dred Scott and Reconstruction. While critical overall, Coulter acknowledges Jackson’s partial alignment with conservatives in past free‑speech cases involving government retaliation against political organizations. Hour 3 also addresses audience reaction to earlier Democratic guest interviews, with Clay and Buck defending their decision to host candidates from across the political spectrum as a function of FCC rules, audience growth across platforms, and good‑faith debate. They reject claims that featuring Democrats alienates listeners, emphasizing that respectful engagement does not equal endorsement.The hour closes with listener talkbacks, including reactions to the Georgia congressional race discussed earlier in the show and light‑hearted commentary from fans—ending the program on a mix of serious policy debate and community engagement. Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8   For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/   Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton:  X - https://x.com/clayandbuck FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/ IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/ YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuckFollow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Wellness Unmasked, Dr. Nicole Saphier breaks down the latest U.S. dietary guidelines—and why they’re sparking debate across the health world. While federal recommendations now emphasize eating real, whole foods and cutting back on ultra-processed products, they don’t fully align with the growing “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) movement. So what’s the real story? Dr. Saphier explores the key differences, including:🔹 The push for higher protein intake and what it means for your health🔹 The debate over red meat, full-fat dairy, and saturated fats🔹 Why ultra-processed foods and added sugars remain a major concern🔹 How traditional medical guidance compares to newer, holistic approaches🔹 Why personalized nutrition matters more than ever With chronic illness on the rise, what you eat has never been more important. This episode cuts through the noise to help you better understand how to make smarter, healthier choices for you and your family. 👉 Bottom line: Everyone agrees—eat real food. But what that looks like on your plate is still up for debate.Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Normally, Karol Markowicz is joined by guest host Bridget Phetasy for a wide-ranging and sharp discussion on the biggest stories shaping the moment. They kick things off with a major Supreme Court case on birthright citizenship—breaking down what’s at stake, why President Trump’s appearance at oral arguments is unprecedented, and how the ruling could reshape immigration policy in America. Then, the conversation shifts to culture and media—from the evolving role of political entertainment to the viral controversies dominating headlines. Karol and Bridget unpack the growing overlap between politics, celebrity culture, and digital media—and why “normal people” are increasingly tuning out the noise. Plus, a look at humanity’s next leap into space, why it still inspires awe, and a thoughtful discussion on influence, authenticity, and resisting the pressure to chase trends in today’s fractured media landscape.Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On this episode of The Karol Markowicz Show, Karol sits down with Washington Examiner and Magnolia Tribune opinion writer Kimberly Ross for a candid conversation about modern womanhood, media, and the pressures shaping today’s cultural landscape. Kimberly shares her journey into political writing—from blogging on Medium to becoming a nationally recognized voice—and dives into the issues she covers most: family, women’s roles, and life issues from a conservative perspective. The conversation tackles the growing divide between the “girl boss” and “tradwife” narratives, and why most women don’t actually fit into either box. Karol and Kimberly also explore the impact of online culture on relationships, rising loneliness in younger generations, and the challenges of building real-world connections in a digital-first society. Plus, Kimberly opens up about her personal experience with infertility, motherhood later in life, and why not caring what others think might be the ultimate superpower.Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Stealing American Citizenship Clay Travis and Buck Sexton open by setting the stage for a major address from President Donald Trump, scheduled for later that night, as the administration weighs the possibility of withdrawing from NATO amid escalating tensions surrounding the ongoing U.S.–Iran air conflict. The hosts frame the developments as a pivotal moment in global geopolitics, suggesting Trump is preparing to sharply confront European allies over burden‑sharing and their response to Iran. After briefly navigating an April Fools prank involving a fictional box of puppies—used to underscore how misinformation now spreads rapidly in an era of AI and social media—the tone of Hour 1 turns sharply serious with a deep dive into Supreme Court oral arguments on birthright citizenship. Clay and Buck analyze the case challenging President Trump’s executive order seeking to reinterpret the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, focusing on the modern phenomenon of birth tourism. They air excerpts from arguments by the U.S. Solicitor General detailing hundreds of foreign companies—particularly in China—whose sole business model is facilitating travel to the United States for the purpose of giving birth so children can obtain automatic U.S. citizenship. Clay's Birthright Citizenship Argument Clay Travis and Buck Sexton open the hour with lighter banter about space exploration and favorite space movies, using the imminent Artemis II mission as a springboard to discuss America’s renewed push for lunar exploration and eventual missions to Mars. They note the symbolic timing of reports that SpaceX is preparing for what could become the largest IPO in history, framing Elon Musk’s achievements as a stark contrast to government inefficiency. The core of Hour 2 returns to the Supreme Court oral arguments on birthright citizenship, with Clay and Buck expanding on the distinction between citizenship by parentage (jus sanguinis) and citizenship by soil (jus soli). They argue that while citizenship through American parents is universally accepted, automatic citizenship granted solely by birthplace is a global outlier and has become a magnet for abuse through birth tourism, particularly from countries such as China. Clay lays out two proposed policy frameworks he believes could constitutionally reduce the incentive structure without violating a likely Supreme Court ruling: first, a reciprocity standard, where foreign nationals would only receive birthright citizenship if Americans receive the same treatment abroad; and second, imposing minimum residency requirements for pregnant foreign nationals before a child could qualify for U.S. citizenship. Rep. Jim Jordan An interview with Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio about birthright citizenship, congressional gridlock, ICE funding, U.S.–Iran military operations, oil markets, NATO friction, midterm election dynamics, and global energy security.  Chairman Jordan argues that the strongest constitutional case lies in the “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” language of the 14th Amendment, contending that individuals who enter the United States illegally are not fully subject to U.S. jurisdiction and therefore should not automatically confer citizenship through childbirth. While acknowledging common‑sense concerns about large‑scale birth tourism—particularly involving Chinese nationals—Jordan expresses skepticism that legislation alone could survive Supreme Court review, reinforcing the need to secure the border, dismantle sanctuary jurisdictions, and fully fund ICE and Border Patrol enforcement instead. A significant portion of Hour 3 is devoted to the ongoing DHS and ICE funding standoff, with Jordan sharply criticizing Senate Democrats for attempting to fund most of DHS while excluding ICE. He explains that House Republicans rejected the Senate resolution to avoid establishing a precedent where immigration enforcement is selectively defunded, praising President Trump for reallocating resources to keep operations functioning while Congress remains deadlocked. The hosts and Jordan agree that this funding battle has become a flashpoint illustrating broader institutional dysfunction and partisan hostility toward immigration enforcement. The discussion then shifts to Iran, with Jordan strongly backing President Trump’s military campaign aimed at neutralizing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. He frames the action as consistent with Trump’s long‑standing promise to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, while acknowledging widespread concern over high gas prices and the desire for the conflict to end swiftly. Clay and Buck situate the Iran strikes within a larger geopolitical context, anticipating that Trump’s 9:00 p.m. national address will sharply criticize European allies for failing to help secure the Strait of Hormuz, despite their heavy dependence on Middle Eastern energy transit. Trump Addressing the Nation Clay introduces prediction market data showing Republicans as underdogs to retain control of both the House and Senate, warning that a Democratic takeover would effectively immobilize Trump’s legislative agenda through investigations, impeachments, and judicial blockades. This leads to a broader discussion about Supreme Court succession, with concern that aging conservative justices may risk repeating past strategic retirements that shifted the Court’s balance. The hosts turn to listener talkbacks, reinforcing themes from earlier hours. Callers share firsthand examples of how other countries handle citizenship strictly by bloodline, underscoring how rare U.S. birthright citizenship policies are globally. Other callers weigh in on the Supreme Court outcome, favorite space movies, cultural debates, and even comedic arguments about fashion norms such as ties and wool suits, providing comic relief to close the program. Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8   For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/   Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton:  X - https://x.com/clayandbuck FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/ IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/ YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuckFollow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuckSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.