The Lori Vallow Trial Vault: Day Number 15 Of Testimony (3/24/25)

​On the twenty-fourth day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the prosecution presented a detailed timeline of text messages exchanged among Lori, Chad Daybell, and Alex Cox, focusing on key dates surrounding the deaths of Tylee Ryan, J.J. Vallow, and Tammy Daybell. These communications provided insight into the trio's coordination and activities during critical periods. ​Additionally, Rexburg Police Detective Ray Hermosillo retook the stand to elaborate on the investigation's findings. He highlighted the significance of the text exchanges and their alignment with the movements and actions of Lori, Chad, and Alex during the times in question.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On the twenty-third day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the court delved into the circumstances surrounding the death of Tammy Daybell, Chad Daybell's first wife. Dr. Lily Marsden, Utah's Deputy Chief Medical Examiner, testified about the autopsy performed on Tammy's exhumed body. Dr. Marsden noted the presence of bruises on Tammy's arms and the discovery of pink foam in her airway, both indicative of asphyxia. She concluded that Tammy's death was a homicide resulting from asphyxiation.Additionally, FBI Special Agent Doug Hart presented evidence from Lori Vallow's iCloud account, revealing communications that shed light on the events leading up to the deaths of Tylee Ryan and J.J. Vallow. These messages provided insight into Lori's state of mind and her interactions with key individuals during that period.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

From the archives: 3-3-23The raid of Bryan Kohberger's family home in Pennsylvania unleashed a treasure trove of goods into the hands of the authorities. Those items included a knife, a gun, black face masks as well as several other pieces of evidence that could be damning for Bryan Kohberger.In this episode, we take a look at the full list of items seized and what signifigance they might play in the future trial of Bryan Kohberger.(commercial at 7:04)to contact me:[email protected]:Bryan Kohberger Search Reveals 'Most Incriminating' Items in Case Against Him (newsweek.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Forensically speaking, a latent footprint refers to an imprint left by a person's foot on a surface that is not immediately visible to the naked eye. These footprints are typically created when an individual transfers natural oils, dirt, or other substances from their feet onto a surface as they walk. These impressions are often faint and can only be revealed through specialized techniques like dusting, chemical treatments, or photography. Forensic experts use these methods to make latent footprints visible and then compare them to known footwear patterns to help identify or exclude potential suspects in criminal investigations.In the affidavit, investigators stated that they found a latent footprint at the scene of the crime that was consistent with the type of print you would find on a pair of Vans shoes. The problem with that? Just about everyone has Vans.In this episode, we take a look at the latent footprint as evidence and how it might be used by the prosecutors during the trial for Bryan Kohberger.to contact me:[email protected](commercial at 7:22)source:Clue in Idaho Murder Case Leaves Question About Bryan Kohberger Evidence (newsweek.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn and the estate of Jeffrey Epstein has been accused by the USVI AG of moving over 13 million dollars into accounts of their own. The battle between Denise George and the estate has been raging for several years now, but this is certainly an escalation. (commercial at 8:19)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/22/business/jeffrey-epstein-estate-assets.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense has filed an objection to the State's motion in limine concerning the admissibility of AT&T timing advance records. Timing advance records are utilized to estimate the distance between a mobile device and a cell tower, which can be pivotal in establishing a defendant's location at a specific time. The State seeks to introduce these records as evidence to place Kohberger near the crime scene during the time of the offense.The defense's objection challenges the reliability and accuracy of the AT&T timing advance data, arguing that such records are prone to significant errors and may not accurately reflect a device's precise location. They contend that admitting this evidence could mislead the jury and result in unfair prejudice against Kohberger. This objection aligns with broader concerns raised in the case regarding the use of cell phone data mapping, as defense experts have previously highlighted substantial inaccuracies in the FBI's cell data collection methods.to contact me:[email protected]:031725-Defendants-Obj-States-MiL-ATT-Timing-Advance-Records.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger (Case No. CR01-24-31665), the defense has objected to the State's notice of intent to introduce evidence under Idaho Rule of Evidence (I.R.E.) 404(b). This rule allows the admission of evidence regarding a defendant's prior bad acts for specific purposes, such as proving motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident. The State seeks to present evidence from an August 21, 2022, traffic stop involving Kohberger to establish his identity, address, phone number, and vehicle ownership. The defense argues that this evidence is not relevant to the current charges and that its introduction would be unfairly prejudicial.to contact me:[email protected]:Ty ABecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In a recent ruling, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed most claims in a lawsuit filed by six anonymous women against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several officials, alleging complicity in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The court determined it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants such as former Governors John de Jongh and Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and former Senators Celestino White and Carlton Dowe, leading to the dismissal of claims against them. Additionally, claims against former First Lady Cecile de Jongh were barred due to a prior settlement agreementHowever, the court allowed claims against Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett to proceed, citing sufficient ties to New York through alleged activities such as visiting Epstein's New York residence and soliciting campaign donations there. The court found plausible allegations under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and negligence claims, asserting that Plaskett's alleged receipt of financial and political support from Epstein in exchange for favorable political actions warranted further proceedings.to contact me:[email protected]:Judge Dismisses Jane Does’ Epstein Complaint Against All But Plaskett | St. Thomas SourceBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A New York judge has dismissed five out of nine claims in producer Rodney "Lil Rod" Jones' $30 million sexual assault and harassment lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs. Jones had alleged that Combs, along with his team, sexually harassed, drugged, and assaulted him during his work on Combs' "Love" album from September 2022 to November 2023. While Judge J. Paul Oetken dismissed several claims, including under the RICO and TVPA acts against Combs Global, he allowed some specific allegations of sexual assault and premises liability to move forward. The judge found Jones' allegations of being drugged and sexually assaulted plausible but dismissed the emotional distress and breach of contract claims due to lack of adequate pleading and non-written agreement. Jones' lawyer Tyrone Blackburn deemed the partial ruling a victory and looks forward to further proceedings. Combs is simultaneously detained on unrelated prostitution and trafficking charges, with a trial scheduled for May 5.The judge criticized Jones' attempt to frame the allegations as a racketeering case, writing that he had failed to properly argue the point and noting, “Jones fails to address any of these arguments in his opposition brief, and while the Court prefers to decide issues on the merits, it should not be necessary to root around a 402-paragraph complaint to contrive novel arguments on Jones’s behalf.” The court also took the unusual step of calling out Blackburn by name in a section titled “Warning to Counsel.” Judge Oetken slammed the attorney’s filings as “replete with inaccurate statements of law, conclusory accusations, and inappropriate ad hominem attacks on opposing counsel,” and called one legal claim “not just disturbing, but shocking.”to contact  me:[email protected]:Majority of Producer Rodney Jones' Claims Against Sean 'Diddy' Combs in Sexual Assault Lawsuit DismissedBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.