The Epstein Rewind: Jeffrey Epstein And The Plot To Discredit The Investigation

Ghislaine Maxwell was able to get away with her activities for years according to authorities and now, when the bill comes due those who spent time with her are claiming ignorance.Join me as I dive in.(Commercial at 11:42)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.rt.com/op-ed/527798-epstein-shadow-ghislaine-maxwell/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of State v. Bryan Kohberger, the defense filed Motion in Limine #7, seeking to exclude witness identification based on the description of "bushy eyebrows." The defense argued that the surviving roommate's (identified as D.M.) description was unreliable due to her limited observation under distressing conditions, potential impairment from alcohol, and the generic nature of the "bushy eyebrows" characteristic, which could apply to many individuals. They contended that admitting this description could unfairly prejudice the jury against Kohberger.In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.to contact me:[email protected]:031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of State v. Bryan Kohberger, the defense filed Motion in Limine #7, seeking to exclude witness identification based on the description of "bushy eyebrows." The defense argued that the surviving roommate's (identified as D.M.) description was unreliable due to her limited observation under distressing conditions, potential impairment from alcohol, and the generic nature of the "bushy eyebrows" characteristic, which could apply to many individuals. They contended that admitting this description could unfairly prejudice the jury against Kohberger.In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.to contact me:[email protected]:031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

New developments in the case against Bryan Kohberger, the suspect in the University of Idaho student murders, suggest that he may have purchased a K-Bar-style knife—the same type of weapon believed to have been used in the killings—on Amazon prior to the attack. According to investigative sources, law enforcement uncovered Amazon purchase records tied to Kohberger’s account, which allegedly show he bought a combat knife matching the profile of the murder weapon. The K-Bar is a military-style fixed blade known for its lethality, and forensic analysts have long suspected such a weapon was used in the brutal stabbings.This new piece of evidence is considered damning by prosecutors because it may directly link Kohberger to the murder weapon, something previously lacking in the case. While no physical knife has yet been recovered, digital forensics revealing a purchase trail could help establish premeditation and intent, two key elements for a first-degree murder conviction. Kohberger’s defense team is expected to challenge the authenticity, ownership, and timing of the purchase, but if verified, this could significantly strengthen the prosecution's narrative that he meticulously planned the killings.to contact me:[email protected]:Bryan Kohberger's damning Amazon history revealed ahead of Idaho trial - as he points to multiple killers | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In response to Defendant Bryan Kohberger's Motion in Limine #1, which seeks to exclude potentially inflammatory evidence from the trial, the State argues that such evidence is both relevant and admissible. The prosecution contends that certain pieces of evidence, including Kohberger's Amazon purchase history and specific descriptions provided by eyewitnesses, are directly linked to the case and essential for establishing context and intent. They assert that this evidence demonstrates Kohberger's possession of items similar to those found at the crime scene and aligns with witness descriptions, thereby strengthening the prosecution's argument.​In response to Defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's Motion in Limine #3, which seeks to prohibit the use of the term "murder" during the trial, the State argues that such a restriction is unwarranted and impractical. The prosecution contends that the term "murder" is an accurate legal designation of the charges against Kohberger, who faces four counts of first-degree murder. They assert that the jury will be fully aware of the nature of the charges, and the use of the term aligns with legal standards and precedents.​In response to Defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's Motion in Limine #4, which seeks to prohibit the use of the terms "psychopath" and "sociopath" during the trial, the State has indicated that it currently has no plans to use these terms. However, the prosecution reserves the right to revisit this stance if the defense introduces evidence regarding Kohberger's mental health, particularly in light of recent motions referencing his diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).to contact me:[email protected]:031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-1-RE-Inflammatory-Evidence.pdf031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-3-Use-Term-Murder.pdf031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-4-Use-Terms-Psychopath-Sociopath.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiff Sara Rivers files this complaint in Case No. 1:25-cv-01726, bringing legal action against the defendant based on personal knowledge, information, and belief. Represented by legal counsel, Rivers outlines the specific allegations, detailing the defendant's alleged misconduct and the legal grounds supporting the claims. The complaint asserts that the defendant’s actions have caused harm and seeks accountability through the judicial system.This lawsuit requests appropriate legal remedies, including compensation and other relief deemed necessary by the court. The filing establishes jurisdiction, presents supporting facts, and sets forth claims that Rivers intends to prove. Through this action, the plaintiff seeks justice and redress for the alleged wrongdoing, holding the defendant legally responsible for the damages incurred.to contact me:[email protected]:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On the 9th day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the prosecution presented evidence highlighting Vallow's actions and communications leading up to the deaths of her children, Tylee Ryan and J.J. Vallow, as well as Tammy Daybell. FBI Special Agent Nicole Heideman testified about Vallow's online activities, revealing that in August 2019, Vallow attempted to purchase two glow-in-the-dark malachite rings from Etsy, though the order was not fulfilled. Later, in October 2019, she successfully ordered a malachite ring through Charles Vallow's Amazon account, initially in size 11.5, which was returned and reordered in size 11 on October 4. After Tammy Daybell's death on October 19, Vallow returned the size 11 ring and purchased a size 10, with no record of its return.Additionally, Heideman discussed documents found in Vallow's iCloud account titled "Seven Archangels" and "Presiding Council of Archangels," which referenced malachite, the names Raphael and James, the color green, and the significance of Tuesday—the day Vallow and Chad Daybell were married. Testimony also covered Vallow's multiple attempts to purchase rings and her communications with Chad Daybell during this period, providing insight into their relationship and shared beliefs.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​On the 8th day of Lori Vallow Daybell's trial, the court focused on the events surrounding the welfare check for her son, JJ Vallow, in November 2019. Rexburg Police Detective Chuck Kunsaitis testified about the initial welfare check, during which Lori claimed JJ was with a friend, Melanie Gibb, in Arizona. However, subsequent attempts to verify JJ's whereabouts with Gibb were unsuccessful, raising suspicions about Lori's statements.Additionally, body camera footage from the welfare check was presented, showing Lori's demeanor and responses to officers' inquiries about JJ's location. The footage revealed inconsistencies in Lori's account, as she mentioned JJ was with Gibb but could not provide verifiable details. This evidence highlighted the challenges law enforcement faced in locating JJ and underscored the urgency of the investigation.to contact me:[email protected] a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ecuador has long been a transit corridor for narco traffickers. Now though, those same narco traffickers have taken up residence in the country and they are driving a wave of violence and mayhem that has seen the country wracked by car bombs, beheadings and other violence that mimics what we have seen in Mexico. In this episode, we take a look.(commercial at 8:49)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ecuador-terrorized-by-mexican-led-drug-trafficking-explosion/ar-AA1056cv?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=37ebe9976dec44b09de93e44c40a536cBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.